March 5, 2012

Forced Treatment OK If Person Is Disabled?

It is amazing the difference in how courts treat women owning their bodies and persons with disabilities. In an opinion piece by a Lesley College student she says,

http://digboston.com/think/2012/03/yes-virginia-there-is-a-fourteenth-amendment/

YES, VIRGINIA, THERE IS A FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT
Posted on March 1, 2012
by KELLY BROLIN

"We have rights that allow us to have control over our bodies, our words and our actions.
[. . .]
Does the government have a place between a woman and her doctor?
[. . .]
How can you promote individual lives and curb individual rights simultaneously?"

But the government may impose its will on persons with disabilities obliterating the legal notion of consent. Why do women own their bodies regarding abortion, but persons with disabilities lose ownership rights. Under what constitutional provision does disability deny a person any rights?


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2012/03/05/loughner_loses_appeal_over_forced_medication/

Loughner loses appeal over forced medication
By Jacques Billeaud
Associated Press
Boston Globe
March 5, 2012

No comments: