February 29, 2012
Scapegoat - Diversity of Police Criminals
Tuesday February 28, 2012 one day after posting comment about black racist police harassment since Christmas 2011. Without missing a beat police changed the ethnicity of the primary assailants from black racist homosexuals to Chinese, Chinese American Communists and Asian crime family associates. As the black racists did, these Asian racists attack a white male 69-year-old (that they say is disabled) trying to provoke him to permit an arrest or hospitalization. Here is proof that there is no difference between races. They are all capable of depravity as a group attacking over many days, weeks, years, an older white male, to retaliate for past abuses of white supremacists. Black racists exposed my position as Grand Kleagle of Cambridge. Cambridge will have to hold a new special election costing the taxpayer extra money, typical of Cambridge voters. Now Asian criminals have exposed my leadership role of the anti Chinese and Asian Society. Good thing we have a hierarchy of leaders to take charge.
The Chinese and Asian criminals use the same high tech weapons used by their black racist predecessors. They conduct the same tactics using young women as bait. Was it Albert Einstein the man who flunked math, who observed that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome is the definition of insanity? Does this principle apply to these criminal police employees? What is their obsession with me after 42 years of FBI, police, crime family, and Communist abuses in mostly three states? Are these brave young men and women who target me in my superior powerful position after 42 years of character assassination? With my thousands of soldiers to fight back against the police power of Massachusetts crime families and their police, FBI, public officials and university associates, no wonder they fear me. It is why they deploy hundreds of their employees each day to harass me, to ridicule me, to humiliate me, to provoke me and to threaten me. They repeated two days ago an old threat, "They (landlord Harvard) are going to throw you out of here."
Massachusetts state law prohibits possession of electrical weapons used to alarm, to harm, to inflict pain, and to kill. It is a felony. The penalties were increased after my bill submitted to the state legislature in 2001. My bill was tossed. But within two years someone else passed an amendment which increased penalties. But that does not stop Harvard and Cambridge police who protect their use. Local police and campus police pretend they do not know what they are. In that case they are negligently trained. Police say people who complain about their use are mentally ill. That allows police and their criminal informants to use these illegal firearms to harass, to inflict pain, to harass, and to try to kill their targets like a 69-year-old white male that they say has a disability. Everyone in Cambridge knows that all white males are criminals. That is why homosexuals, women and black people attack them, unless they submit. That is what Islam means "to submit to God." And that is what these three special interest groups believe they are. White men must be eliminated from the gene pools, now.
The US Code prohibits exposing humans to radiation. That is what electrical weapons emit, electromagnetic radiation. The penalties under US law are $2 million fines and prison for each exposure. But again like the state statutes, laws are optional in Massachusetts. Only the little people must obey them. Harvard and government officials (is there a difference?) may or may not obey them. If the laws are inconvenient as the homicide laws were for the Boston FBI for 20 years they may be ignored at the discretion of the investigating officer or agent.
The abuse at my residence is coordinated by a high ranking Harvard administrator. I know this because I've been complaining to the General Counsel's office at Harvard since before Margaret Marshal was General Counsel. Then to Anne Taylor and recently to Robert Iuliano. They ignore my complaints, obviously because they know who is behind them. Initially it was an illegal experiment using humans subjects. If this was exposed formally Harvard would lose hundreds of millions in US taxpayer grants over many years. But again see above about law enforcement in Cambridge. On Thursday February 23, 2012 Harvard announced (see Harvard Crimson article, link below) via Mr. Iuliano that they would submit a brief in support of continuing to allow the university to employ Affirmative Action programs to legally discriminate against white people.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/2/23/supreme-court-affirmative-action/
Harvard Likely To Support Affirmative Action in Supreme Court Case
By JUSTIN C. WORLAND,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
Published: Thursday, February 23, 2012
That explains why Harvard will not enforce any laws against black people when the victim is white. That would admit that all people were entitled to protection under the laws equally. That is not allowed at Harvard, where race based law enforcement is the rule.
The esteemed US Attorney General makes that official US law enforcement policy now. No prosecutions of black violators when the victim is white. (See J. Christian Adams, new book Injustice) It is only fair! Harvard supports the notion voiced by their prominent graduate John Kennedy, "Life is not fair." If you want fairness go to Russia. There everyone is put in jail not just white people. Harvard will continue to discriminate against white males not only in admissions, but also in how they address criminal abuses on their property.
This is all simply explained in historical context. For 15 years the FBI used me to fight organized crime with no compensation. Then they abandoned me and encouraged the same crime families to retaliate for the next 25 years. That is ongoing now with the assistance of Harvard campus police. One FBI agent said to me in or about 2002, "What have you done for us lately?" Another said, "He'll come around." The FBI knows what goes on and explained, "We are not in the protection business." Huh? Is this because the crime families run the FBI? Or because the FBI runs the crime families? Character assassination increases every day when I post comments about what they do. The reason the FBI did not pay me as they did others e.g., hitmen in Boston and New York, is that I did not kill anyone. They do not fear me. Sammy Gravano admitted killing 19 people. John Martarano confessed in court to killing 20 people in Boston. He served about 7 months for each murder. When he was released from prison the US Attorney made sure he got $20,000 to start his new life. Gravano got a new identity, home and money. In Arizona he started a drug cartel for him and his son. I just wanted to go to law school and the FBI destroyed my life using informants and crime families. From 1973 to 1979 the FBI's profile of me was a black, homosexual, Jew from New York. In 1979 it changed to being a white supremacist, racist, homosexual, Italian Communist. I cannot explain it. Ask the FBI. What has not changed is allowing local police and crime families to harass me and to provoke me trying to have me arrested as they did in 1990.
Police priorities changed since they were innocent officials who tried to help people. Now their mission is to control people and to make money. Government mechanisms are used by criminals to steal taxpayer money. They change laws when necessary and exploit loopholes they create to steal not millions but billions and trillions at a time (see e.g., repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act). Obama administration does not even try to hide what they do. They know there is no law enforcement apparatus that can hold them accountable. Obama openly states that he will ignore Congress and do what he wants to do no matter what the constitution says.
Local police and the FBI make agreements with public officials. We do not scrutinize each other. You have your area of earning, and we have ours. If a public official or a private person wants someone arrested they pay for the service. There are all kinds of specialists today. In 1990 local police provided deluxe arrest services for me. It paid for local criminals working for police to conduct constant harassment disturbing my sleep every day and provoking violence. It included paying seven assigned defense lawyers to not put on a defense. It arranged for judges who threatened me if I testified they would stop the trial and call psychiatrists to have me put in a hospital. It paid to have the arrest kept on the public police files for 22 years instead of it being deleted after a year, as per the agreement at a third trial when I represented myself because the judge refused to appoint another attorney. There were extra services as well. Watch for future article about more details of the arrest.
Few citizens are aware of how abusive the police and the courts are. "Most men lead lives of quiet desperation." (Henry David Thoreau) Others fear speaking or doing anything to attract attention. Still others just want to get in on the action.
The Chinese and Asian criminals use the same high tech weapons used by their black racist predecessors. They conduct the same tactics using young women as bait. Was it Albert Einstein the man who flunked math, who observed that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome is the definition of insanity? Does this principle apply to these criminal police employees? What is their obsession with me after 42 years of FBI, police, crime family, and Communist abuses in mostly three states? Are these brave young men and women who target me in my superior powerful position after 42 years of character assassination? With my thousands of soldiers to fight back against the police power of Massachusetts crime families and their police, FBI, public officials and university associates, no wonder they fear me. It is why they deploy hundreds of their employees each day to harass me, to ridicule me, to humiliate me, to provoke me and to threaten me. They repeated two days ago an old threat, "They (landlord Harvard) are going to throw you out of here."
Massachusetts state law prohibits possession of electrical weapons used to alarm, to harm, to inflict pain, and to kill. It is a felony. The penalties were increased after my bill submitted to the state legislature in 2001. My bill was tossed. But within two years someone else passed an amendment which increased penalties. But that does not stop Harvard and Cambridge police who protect their use. Local police and campus police pretend they do not know what they are. In that case they are negligently trained. Police say people who complain about their use are mentally ill. That allows police and their criminal informants to use these illegal firearms to harass, to inflict pain, to harass, and to try to kill their targets like a 69-year-old white male that they say has a disability. Everyone in Cambridge knows that all white males are criminals. That is why homosexuals, women and black people attack them, unless they submit. That is what Islam means "to submit to God." And that is what these three special interest groups believe they are. White men must be eliminated from the gene pools, now.
The US Code prohibits exposing humans to radiation. That is what electrical weapons emit, electromagnetic radiation. The penalties under US law are $2 million fines and prison for each exposure. But again like the state statutes, laws are optional in Massachusetts. Only the little people must obey them. Harvard and government officials (is there a difference?) may or may not obey them. If the laws are inconvenient as the homicide laws were for the Boston FBI for 20 years they may be ignored at the discretion of the investigating officer or agent.
The abuse at my residence is coordinated by a high ranking Harvard administrator. I know this because I've been complaining to the General Counsel's office at Harvard since before Margaret Marshal was General Counsel. Then to Anne Taylor and recently to Robert Iuliano. They ignore my complaints, obviously because they know who is behind them. Initially it was an illegal experiment using humans subjects. If this was exposed formally Harvard would lose hundreds of millions in US taxpayer grants over many years. But again see above about law enforcement in Cambridge. On Thursday February 23, 2012 Harvard announced (see Harvard Crimson article, link below) via Mr. Iuliano that they would submit a brief in support of continuing to allow the university to employ Affirmative Action programs to legally discriminate against white people.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/2/23/supreme-court-affirmative-action/
Harvard Likely To Support Affirmative Action in Supreme Court Case
By JUSTIN C. WORLAND,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
Published: Thursday, February 23, 2012
That explains why Harvard will not enforce any laws against black people when the victim is white. That would admit that all people were entitled to protection under the laws equally. That is not allowed at Harvard, where race based law enforcement is the rule.
The esteemed US Attorney General makes that official US law enforcement policy now. No prosecutions of black violators when the victim is white. (See J. Christian Adams, new book Injustice) It is only fair! Harvard supports the notion voiced by their prominent graduate John Kennedy, "Life is not fair." If you want fairness go to Russia. There everyone is put in jail not just white people. Harvard will continue to discriminate against white males not only in admissions, but also in how they address criminal abuses on their property.
This is all simply explained in historical context. For 15 years the FBI used me to fight organized crime with no compensation. Then they abandoned me and encouraged the same crime families to retaliate for the next 25 years. That is ongoing now with the assistance of Harvard campus police. One FBI agent said to me in or about 2002, "What have you done for us lately?" Another said, "He'll come around." The FBI knows what goes on and explained, "We are not in the protection business." Huh? Is this because the crime families run the FBI? Or because the FBI runs the crime families? Character assassination increases every day when I post comments about what they do. The reason the FBI did not pay me as they did others e.g., hitmen in Boston and New York, is that I did not kill anyone. They do not fear me. Sammy Gravano admitted killing 19 people. John Martarano confessed in court to killing 20 people in Boston. He served about 7 months for each murder. When he was released from prison the US Attorney made sure he got $20,000 to start his new life. Gravano got a new identity, home and money. In Arizona he started a drug cartel for him and his son. I just wanted to go to law school and the FBI destroyed my life using informants and crime families. From 1973 to 1979 the FBI's profile of me was a black, homosexual, Jew from New York. In 1979 it changed to being a white supremacist, racist, homosexual, Italian Communist. I cannot explain it. Ask the FBI. What has not changed is allowing local police and crime families to harass me and to provoke me trying to have me arrested as they did in 1990.
Police priorities changed since they were innocent officials who tried to help people. Now their mission is to control people and to make money. Government mechanisms are used by criminals to steal taxpayer money. They change laws when necessary and exploit loopholes they create to steal not millions but billions and trillions at a time (see e.g., repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act). Obama administration does not even try to hide what they do. They know there is no law enforcement apparatus that can hold them accountable. Obama openly states that he will ignore Congress and do what he wants to do no matter what the constitution says.
Local police and the FBI make agreements with public officials. We do not scrutinize each other. You have your area of earning, and we have ours. If a public official or a private person wants someone arrested they pay for the service. There are all kinds of specialists today. In 1990 local police provided deluxe arrest services for me. It paid for local criminals working for police to conduct constant harassment disturbing my sleep every day and provoking violence. It included paying seven assigned defense lawyers to not put on a defense. It arranged for judges who threatened me if I testified they would stop the trial and call psychiatrists to have me put in a hospital. It paid to have the arrest kept on the public police files for 22 years instead of it being deleted after a year, as per the agreement at a third trial when I represented myself because the judge refused to appoint another attorney. There were extra services as well. Watch for future article about more details of the arrest.
Few citizens are aware of how abusive the police and the courts are. "Most men lead lives of quiet desperation." (Henry David Thoreau) Others fear speaking or doing anything to attract attention. Still others just want to get in on the action.
Labels:
Boston FBI,
Disability,
Elder Abuse,
FBI Informants,
Police Abuse,
Scapegoat
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment