Cambridge police employees joined Harvard University campus police employees in a brutal 43-year campaign harassing a 70-year-old white male who they all say is "crazy." For 17 years I've lived in a building owned and operated by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Campus police employed graduate students in psychology at Harvard University Medical School to conduct an unlawful behavior conditioning project trying to make me into a homosexual. After many years of complaints the graduate student vacated her premises adjacent to mine. She yielded to another just-as-depraved criminal police psychologist.
Harvard University employs psychologists for evaluations contrary to law. It is a violation of state and U.S. privacy statutes to perform an evaluation without consent. The problem is that (1) in Cambridge and at Harvard University inconvenient laws can be ignored. You can see how well the Harvard Law School trained Obama, who practices this principle at every chance. And (2) psychologists like psychiatrists believe they are above the laws and have no need to obey or even know laws which regulate their behavior. They believe they are omniscient and morally superior to ordinary humans. They believe their genes have been cleansed of greed, mendacity and sadism. Like their police admirers control freak psychologists are out of control with their abuse of power, self love, trying to control anyone and testing those they do not like or do not understand. It is what these narcissistic deluded people do. They believe they are the smartest man in the room even at Harvard University where everyone is the smartest man in the room. Cambridge police refuse to enter onto Harvard University property unless I provided evidence to them, unlike complaints by other crime victims e.g., rape victims for whom police gather evidence.
On February 15, 2014 a suspect unknown to police allegedly punched several local pedestrians without provocation as they walked along Massachusetts Avenue in Cambridge. The police spokesman, a Deputy Superintendent, said the man was mentally ill, crazy, or he was on "substances" and that caused the crimes. He said that without knowing who the suspect is. It is a pervasive pattern among police and prosecutors who attribute criminal conduct to mental illness, without any rational basis. It is an example of how police and prosecutors think of persons with disabilities. It is illegal to discriminate based on disability, violating city, state and US laws.
The problem in Cambridge is that discrimination laws are only enforced for homosexuals, women and black persons. Recently the city added Muslims and illegal aliens. The latter two groups are especially of interest to Cambridge police even when they do not have jurisdiction. Nonetheless city officials and Harvard University officials openly insult and abuse persons with disabilities while they vigorously protect the other groups.
City officials refuse to address criminal conduct on Harvard University property without evidence. It is surprising that after my message to city officials including but not limited to the police commissioner, elected leaders and concerned civilians, city police employees did not refuse to enter onto Harvard University property to conduct harassment and try to provoke violence.
[link to updated and edited message]
http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2014/02/knockout-comes-to-cambridge-ma.html
They disturb my sleep every one or two hours. Prior to this unusual visit by city police employees it was exclusively Harvard University campus police employees with an occasional visit by city police employees. There is no reluctance to cross the property line when it suits Cambridge police employees for criminal conduct. They attack speech protected by the First Amendment seeking relief from unlawful police activity. They refuse to stop unlawful conduct especially when victims have legal disabilities, contrary to city, state and U.S. laws. It is one more example verifying my many years of complaints to city, state and U.S. officials about this pervasive unlawful conduct. One of the few groups, for which Massachusetts officials tolerate harassment and abuse, is persons with disabilities.
In typical misguided policy Cambridge officials ignore violations by Harvard University of city ordinances, state and U.S. laws. But when this fact is published reluctant officials become enraged and focus on silencing the messenger. Not that civilians in Cambridge or elsewhere in the U.S. are concerned about criminal conduct by government officials. In Cambridge as elsewhere when a politician or a taxpayer or voter expresses concern about malfeasance they are met with insults, "You're a racist." or "You're mentally ill." relentless personal attacks. Spinelessness is preferred to addressing lawlessness by government officials. Now Cambridge police employees add to the abuse by visiting your home and disturbing your sleep every hour or two.
Peggy Noonan observed this pattern in her essay:
[From article]
And it is all about the behavior of our elites, our upper classes, which we define now in a practical sense as those who are successful, affluent and powerful. This group not only includes but is almost limited to our political class, Wall Street, and the media, from Hollywood to the news divisions.
They’re all kind of running America.
They all seem increasingly decadent.
What are the implications of this, do you think?
http://blogs.wsj.com/peggynoonan/2014/02/18/our-decadent-elites/
February 18, 2014, 7:58 PM
Our Decadent Elites
Peggy Noonan
It is troubling that the Obama FCC initiative plans to place monitors in newsrooms around the country.
[From article]
An FCC commissioner is warning people about an agency study that would bring government monitors into newsrooms and inspect issues like the amount of time spent on the “critical information needs” of Americans in news content.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/fcc-commissioner-warns-of-agency’s-plan-to-monitor-newsrooms/
FCC Commissioner Warns of Agency’s Plan to Monitor Newsrooms
by Josh Feldman
8:44 pm, February 19th, 2014
Two gentlemen told me in Cambridge: "There is no such thing as Free Speech." One long term black Cambridge politician told me in February 2014, "I have to watch you so that you do not cause trouble." Huh? Is that what he thinks is the mission of government? Not to protect freedom but to curb it? The answer in Cambridge is yes. There is no need to place monitors in the newsroom of the New York Times, the Washington Post or NPR. They self censor and do not criticize the misguided government miscreants. It is the same in Cambridge where residents in the nine local home owners associations obey what Harvard University and city officials promote unless it affects the value of their homes.
Cass Sunstein a darling of Harvard Law School, and the Obama White House openly advocates limiting free speech and eliminating the First Amendment. Wendy Kaminer in her courageous book,
Worst Instincts, provides details of how the ACLU went off the tracks and no longer focuses on the Bill of Rights. It has become a fund raising operation to promote leftist causes.
The United States fell to 46th on the Reporters Without Borders Freedom Index.
http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php#
World press freedom index 2014
Biggest rises and falls in the 2014 World Press Freedom Index
