John Roberts' Vote On Obamacare, Plus No Abilities Act

Some people say that Obama used NSA information to intimidate Roberts into his vote for Obamacare because of his illegal adoption of Irish babies.

[comments]
VRAJAVALA says: January 10, 2013 at 10:02 pm
I basically wanted to know why the Roberts had focused on adopting 2 Irish babies. I would have to say that this article explains that completely.

EOWYN says: March 27, 2013 at 7:07 pm
Irish law prohibits the adoption of children to non-residents. If the Roberts indeed had adopted their two children from Ireland, the adoptions are illegal.

http://irishamerica.com/2009/08/jane-sullivan-roberts-rules-for-success/

Jane Sullivan Robert’s Rules for Success
By Niall O'Dowd, Founding Publisher
August / September 2009

* * *

[comment]
Rich says: January 9, 2014 at 6:06 pm
I shed a tear in memory of what once was the greatest nation on earth. Brought to it’s knees by a media that has no honesty, a government with no morality and a population without ambition. The theory of a Supreme Court justice being blackmailed isn’t new. If not for the interstate commerce clause most federal regulations wouldn’t exist. Look that one up for an eye opener. Civil war is upon us. But in the sense that first comes to mind. The founders of this nation anticipated a man like Obama. They kept a final tactic in reserve. It is called nullification. And it can be done by the states. If the states like South Carolina and Georgia are joined by others and outlaw Obamacare it will be a dead issue. The feds need the states to comply if the states refuse to do so there is nothing the feds can do. The federal government is not sovereign. We the people rule ourselves. So while it is far more difficult, we have the legal means to stop Obamacare and it’s redistribution of wealth produced by those who earn it given to those who do not.

[comment]
Orland says: January 9, 2014 at 8:22 pm
The Americans With No Abilities Act (ANAA)
President Barack Obama and the Democratic Senate are considering sweeping legislation that will provide new benefits for many more Americans. The Americans With No Abilities Act is being hailed as a major legislative goal by advocates of the millions of Americans who lack any real skills or ambition.
“Roughly 50 percent of Americans do not possess the competence and drive necessary to carve out a meaningful role for themselves in society,” said California Sen. Barbara Boxer. “We can no longer stand by and allow People of Inability (POI) to be ridiculed and passed over. With this legislation, employers will no longer be able to grant special favors to a small group of workers, simply because they have some idea of what they are doing.”
In a Capitol Hill press conference, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid pointed to the success of the U.S. Postal Service, which has a long-standing policy of providing opportunity without regard to performance. At the state government level, the Department of Motor Vehicles also has an excellent record of hiring Persons with No Ability (63 percent).
Under the Americans With No Abilities Act, more than 25 million mid-level positions will be created, with important-sounding titles but little real responsibility, thus providing an illusory sense of purpose and performance.
Mandatory non-performance-based raises and promotions will be given to guarantee upward mobility for even the most unremarkable employees. The legislation provides substantial tax breaks to corporations that promote a significant number of Persons of Inability (POI) into middle-management positions, and give a tax credit to small and medium-sized businesses that agree to hire one clueless worker for every two talented hires.
Finally, the Americans With No Abilities Act contains tough new measures to make it more difficult to discriminate against the non-abled, banning, for example, discriminatory interview questions such as, “Do you have any skills or experience that relate to this job?”
“As a non-abled person, I can’t be expected to keep up with people who have something going for them,” said Mary Lou Gertz, who lost her position as a lug-nut twister at the GM plant in Flint, Mich., due to her inability to remember righty tighty, lefty loosey. “This new law should be real good for people like me. I’ll finally have job security.” With the passage of this bill, Gertz and millions of other lazy untalented citizens will finally see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Said Sen. Dick Durbin, IL: “As a senator with no abilities, I believe the same privileges that elected officials enjoy ought to be extended to every American with no abilities. It is our duty as lawmakers to provide each and every American citizen, regardless of his or her inadequacy, with some sort of space to take up in this great nation and a great salary for doing so.”
This message was approved by Jesse Jackson, Kathleen Sebelius, Al Sharpton, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Barack Obama.

[comment]
Henry says: January 12, 2014 at 2:36 pm
Glad you reported this. Ireland has strict adoption laws. Only an Irish citizen can adopt Irish children. Everything else is called kidnapping.

[From article]
In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions.
Apparently, when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes, the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to “ break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents’ “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/john-roberts-likely-protecting-obamacare/

Why John Roberts (Likely) Is Protecting Obamacare…
JANUARY 9, 2014
BY DR. KEVIN "COACH" COLLINS

* * *

[see comments for more links]

http://twitchy.com/2014/01/06/chief-justice-john-roberts-denies-stay-on-obamacare-scotus-alternate-universe-noted/

Chief Justice John Roberts denies stay on Obamacare; SCOTUS ‘alternate universe’ noted
Posted at 5:39 pm on January 6, 2014
by Twitchy Staff


Shannon Bream
@ShannonBream