Signing of The Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776
It appears that the charming and always delightful lesbian graduate student in psychology at Harvard University Medical School, has abandoned her premises, and her position as primary watcher and harasser. I say appears because I cannot be certain this is permanent. She has left for extended periods previously and returned to resume the criminal harassment and surveillance.
In the days leading up to Independence Day 2015, I experienced severe and intense harassment having my sleep disturbed and several attempts to provoke violence and crime, using young women as well as toddlers as bait from depraved minds of a new group of homosexual police employees. It is depressing to learn that all of the previous groups of police, crime families, FBI informants, Communists, Harvard University campus police, building superintendents and other assorted psychopaths all perform the exact same pattern of provocations and attempts at soliciting criminal behavior from me. For some of their bait it never entered my mind. But for the homosexual police criminals it is one of many ordinary thoughts they have. Toddlers? Young women? Not in my mind.
When I was 21, and a substitute high school teacher, teenage girls used to wait after class and rub up against me to express their interest. I shunned them knowing it was wrong for me to participate in any sexual interaction because I was their teacher. Even though it was as a substitute it never entered my mind. Today I read about the many teachers who have sex with multiple students. It is becoming common place. I am unable to understand that change. George Will wrote an essay about that.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will020515.php3
Defining failure down: We've made slow growth seem normal
By George Will
Published Feb. 5, 2015
Yet these obsessed police employees project onto me behavior I would never think of doing. It shows how misguided all of the harassment and surveillance I experience really is. It is beyond ludicrous. They do not know me at all. But they think they are omniscient.
That does not stop misguided police, FBI employees and their political associates in local and state government from abusing their power to censor my protected speech. Using psychiatry to silence criticism of wealthy and powerful police organizations, is intimidation of the first sort. It is a felony in Massachusetts to intimidate a person in the free exercise of a constitutionally protected right. Speech is one of those rights under the First Amendment and the Massachusetts constitution as well. There are currently two political activist members of the homosexual lobby associated with the FBI and local police who decided that my observations about criminal abuses of power by groups of homosexuals is an abomination.
Donald Trump's fact based opposition to the swarms of illegal aliens entering the United States with no screening has led to egregious abuses of the civil order. Murder, rape theft and injuries to law abiding American citizens is happening across the country. Cooperating useful idiot journalists refuse to report these abuses. It is only one of several misguided attempts to keep voters and taxpayers ignorant about dangers. Unlike Donald Trump I only have access to expression on my blog that Harvard University lawyers repeatedly tell me no one reads. So what is the problem? If I am speaking to the hand and the wind what does it matter?
One element infrequently discussed is that police, cooperating journalists, misguided attorneys, psychiatrists, even the drug-company-funded advocates for treatment and ordinary civilians, share an unfounded belief that being declared mentally ill makes the person a criminal. Those drug-company-funded advocates say they work to de-stigmatize mental illness. What they actually do is un-stigmatize drug treatment, which is what they are funded to do, promote more and more taxpayer funded drug treatment. All in the name of good.
Mental illness is a crime in the minds of many. One factor is that the psychiatric industry with substantial financial support from the pharmaceutical industry persuaded politicians that mental patients should be forced to take psychiatric drugs if they are in prisons. It is why the police, crime families and Communists try so desperately to have me arrested and jailed or put into a hospital. So they can drug me to control me. Police and psychiatrists are some of the most needy persons, desiring to control others. The conflation of crime and mental illness is mostly from the growing practice of jailing people who say or act in ways that police and psychiatrists do not like or do not understand. Their speech and behavior may be protected by the Constitution, but most psychiatrists and some policemen have little knowledge of the rights of ordinary civilians. There is no exception in the constitution for persons designated crazy. But if you ask psychiatrists and police they will tell you differently.
In recent days I wrote for the umteenth time on my blog, which Harvard University lawyers relentlessly remind me "No one reads your blog." about the obscenity of the 45 years of criminal abuses I survived. I noted again the $2 billion taxpayer funded human services industry stands by and watches. That industry whose mission is to protect vulnerable persons ignored my hundreds of complaints about criminal abuse. Their negligent attitude encouraged the criminals to continue and to increase the despicable acts they commit against me every day.
Once again (this happens every three of four years), someone takes the initiative to get a professional to speak to me as I seek assistance with an unrelated matter, to bring up the subject of speaking with "someone." As if I never spoke with anyone about this abuse. Hahaha.
Their objective is to get me to speak with a psychologist or a psychiatrist. Hehe. Well surprise to those who are omniscient. I did that. I explained the history of 45 years of abuse since I was a student at Columbia University when the FBI and the CIA had me under surveillance. This is usually news to them. I usually hear at this point or later, "I didn't know that." So what does it serve me or benefit me to take my time and tell someone who thinks they know it all, and tell them what they did not know (or worse what they "knew" that was not true). Will it make the abuse end? Will it compensate me for the 45 years of criminal abuse? Will it punish the wrongdoers? Will it restore my career and reputation? My social, economic and political supports? Not likely at all. So why waste my time?
This reminds me of George Bernard Shaw's comment, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." These homosexual political activists believe they are well intentioned, providing access to psychiatry for a misguided adult man who disagrees with their politics. It is how extremist leftists think. If you disagree with them you are wrong, stupid, a hater, evil and crazy. That is the face of Trotskyite, Leninist, Maoist and Stalinist intolerance in Cambridge, Massachusetts. If it was not a lawless city with exemptions under the Obama-Holder doctrine, which makes inconvenient laws optional, these criminal abusers of their political power would be jailed. Attacking a person using psychiatry is another felony. But since they control the police it is unlikely they will be stopped. Using psychiatry is a favorite method of misguided politicians who have been exposed as abusers of power while they promote an image as victims. That is what passes for political correctness in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Criticism is not tolerated.
It is also an example of pre-Homeric ancient Greek philosopher Cleobulous', observation, "The chief source of evil among men is excessive good." Much of the evil that exists is done in the name of good. In this case the homosexual moralists believe that psychiatry is a healing, loving discipline. In the name of love and healing they brutalize gentle troubled humans. That is another way of seeing the criminal abuse that these homosexual political activist police and FBI employees have unleashed on a elder white male who experienced 45 previous years of criminal abuses in the name of the same good.
These police employees who ignored me for 45 years, who think they know it all, believe they are going out of their way to extend me a "helping hand." How much help is it? The matter is a police matter. A civil and human rights matter. A matter of enjoying inalienable rights. A matter of preventing public officials from obliterating those god given rights. That is the purpose of the Bill of Rights. It has to do with the misguided ideas held by bystanders and human services professionals, politicians, police and the FBI.
They do not believe their job is to protect the freedom of vulnerable persons as their rights are protected, due to their wealthy and powerful connections. Instead, police act as if they do you a favor by stopping criminal acts when you are the victim. The FBI does the same. One agent said to me, "What have you done for us lately?" Another said about me, "He'll come around." They knew Communists and crime families were attacking me every day. They stood by and let it continue, waiting for me to plead with them for help and to reveal whatever information I had about crime.
J. Edgar Hoover, in 1961, known as The Arsonist and the Fire Chief.
Too bad I read several books about how the FBI operates and how many lives they destroyed. They would once again use me as bait for criminal activity that they are unable to see or learn about. Or is it they just allow it to continue? Hmmm. Then they will say, you are at risk of being harmed by the people we arrested. You must change your name and do what we say to keep you safe. You will join the "witless" security program and be a part of a larger group of criminals, who are protected by the FBI and the US Marshals. Then you will be safe. But you must do whatever we tell you to do. Huh? There goes my freedom. So you see, it is all about control. Not protecting inalienable rights. The FBI, police and US Marshals act more like organized crime than organized crime.
They push psychiatry as a way of helping, as a favor, giving access to treatment for them is how they help you. But what is it really? It is way to get control over a person. Not to empower them and to protect their freedom. It is a way to take control of the person to take his freedom from him. Psychiatry is an institutionalized program of blaming the victim. In former generations before the elitists discovered, or invented psychiatry, people had problems. If they were fortunate they had compassionate rational relatives and friends who helped them solve their problems. Today fortunate people with compassionate and rational relatives and friends, who encounter social, religious, economic, political, legal problems get help there too. But there is a large and growing segment of the population, which reacts to a person encountering problems with "Go see a psychiatrist." It is as if psychiatrists are experts at all kinds of problems. They actually believe they are.
One episode of Law and Order described a psychiatrist who led a group session of venture capitalists, their wives and friends. The psychiatrist manipulated the CEO, other executives, investors and their wives, to buy and sell commodities and stocks from which he benefitted. He was also able to have sex with the various wives. So it is a way to use others to raise one's position in life. Psychiatrists have as a primary pattern of relationship, control over the patient. People are no longer expected to help others. If others have problems they need to see a psychiatrist. Of course since the psychiatric control freaks demand substantial payment for exercising control, it is available only to wealthy persons or persons with good insurance. Poor people who use government insurance, or who have no insurance at all, do not get access to these experts at everything. So it is thought that providing access to psychiatry for poor persons is doing them a favor. Hehe.
That is how the massive human services industrial complex works. They withhold services until and unless the victim of abuse submits to the psychiatric control freaks. They do the same with homeless persons demanding that they take psychiatric drugs if they want to remain in housing. If they refuse they are thrown out of their residence. That is illegal but as mentioned above psychiatrists don't need no stinkin' laws.
Once a woman called me on a Saturday asking for help to get out a hospital. She went to an emergency room complaining about abuse. The psychiatrist placed her against her will in a psychiatric ward of a Boston hospital. It took me a few hours to find the psychiatrist who incarcerated the woman. I asked her why she put the woman in a hospital. The psychiatrist asked me."Have you ever spoken to her daughter? I said I did not. I asked if she threatened to harm the psychiatrist or made threats about violence to others or to property. The psychiatrist said no. I asked the psychiatrist if she knew the legal standards for placing a person in custody against their will. She did not. I explained it to her. She hung up the phone. I realized that she is not unique. That there are many psychiatrists with the backing of lawyers who believe it is in the best interest of a person to be forced to get treatment. The basic violation of due process is unknown to these morally superior people. Lawyers, psychiatrists and others who exercise their love and compassion for others. It is always in the name of good.
They do not tell their unwilling patients that whatever they say or do can be used against them in a court of law. Trusting a psychiatrist is like trusting a homicidal maniac. They have no concern for the law or the inalienable rights of their prey. They are just doing what is right, and they "know" what is right.
There is even a not for profit national organization which masquerades as a civll rights advocate for mental patients. But it is really a subsidiary of the drug companies, and promotes drug treatment. But image is all that matters. As Joseph P. Kennedy the elder reminded his sons, "It doesn't matter what you are. It matters what people think you are." Then there was the Kennedy cult homosexual employed by the FBI which led relentless character assassination against me for 45 years. He once said to me, "What do you care what people think about you?" Huh?
Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr. Image is all that matters.
Instead of investigating my 25 years of hundreds of complaints they simply say, "He has no evidence." Compare this with the way that complaints about rape are being treated in 2015. Taxpayers provide specially trained investigators, gatherers of evidence, in local police departments, hospitals and in prosecutors offices across the nation. But even that is not enough for the feminist interest groups. Now with the assistance of the White House and his billions in taxpayer funds, the mindless US Department of Education demands that colleges and universities set up parallel systems of criminal justice to address one crime, rape. The spineless administrator class at universities create additional bureaucracy at their institutions to comply with the mindless demands.
George Will reports in his essay,
"Existing law forbids federal officials from exercising "any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution. Existing practices ignore the law"
Fixing America's failing approach to schools
By George Will
Published Feb. 7, 2015
For 25-45 years in three states I complained about criminal abuses. The reaction of local, state and federal bureaucracy is to use psychiatry. They are lying, or at best have false ideas in their minds. Because I do not accept their false descriptions of me and my life they do not re-assess their beliefs. They simply declare that it is me, who needs psychiatry. Huh?
One extreme example of outrageous false beliefs is the relentless mantra of national journalists, professional millionaire athletes, university students, faculty and administrators, and celebrities across the nation. After the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, they promoted a false narrative that he was standing passive with his hands up surrendering to the policeman, when he was shot dead in cold blood. That was proven to be false. Yet there remains millions of people who believe that false version of events in Missouri. That is bad enough to have so many people walking the streets with a false belief.
New York City Police Department officers Rafael Ramos, left, and Wenjian Liu, right, were killed in the attack.
One extreme example of outrageous false beliefs is the relentless mantra of national journalists, professional millionaire athletes, university students, faculty and administrators, and celebrities across the nation. After the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, they promoted a false narrative that he was standing passive with his hands up surrendering to the policeman, when he was shot dead in cold blood. That was proven to be false. Yet there remains millions of people who believe that false version of events in Missouri. That is bad enough to have so many people walking the streets with a false belief.
New York City Police Department officers Rafael Ramos, left, and Wenjian Liu, right, were killed in the attack.
Photo: New York Police Department
But one charming gentleman visited his girlfriend in Baltimore. Borrowed her pistol and took a bus to New York City. He walked up to two NYPD officers and shot them dead as a retaliation for the brutal (in his mind) police shooting of Michael Brown. I saw a few reports about how distorted this was. But very few journalists noted how outrageous this event was. Based on a lie about facts, in a narrative promoted by politicians, journalists and Communist propagandists, who are given open access to media outlets, two NYPD officers are dead. Their wives and children have no husband and father. Is there any suggestion that journalists, athletes, politicians who promoted these lies be held accountable? Any apology from those who added to the false narratives?
Atheists, Muslims do not believe in God as a source of inalienable rights, and the constitution. Yet they appeal to it in courts and in media arguments, i.e, propaganda. Humans are given inalienable rights by God. The founders of the United States wrote the constitution to prevent the government from violating those god given rights. But atheists do not believe in god. So how do they argue for their rights? If they do not believe in god they do not have those rights. Muslims claim Allah's word in the Koran is the only law, Sharia law. So how do they argue that they are being denied equal rights under law, a right protected by the constitution but given from god? It appears to me that these non believers in god and the constitution, should be barred from filing lawsuits in US and state courts. They are ineligible because they do not believe in god given rights.
Immediately upon realization that I did not intend to submit to homosexual police and FBI controllers, they abandoned me once again. There was 15 previous years of the FBI using me as bait for organized crime. They did not pay me one cent. They joined the abuses and coordinated the up to nine crime families who took turns harassing me. Within hours homosexual police employees from the California Syndicate replaced them conducting the same kind of criminal harassment, surveillance. Disturbing my sleep every one or two hours, and tampering with my computer. That is the problem. The California criminals and their supporters in the state of Washington conduct a brutal 25-45 year campaign of criminal harassment, abuse, character assassination, ridicule, humiliation, insults, provocation, abuse of power. Police agencies stood by for 25-45 years and allowed the crime families and Communists, to freely do what they wanted to do. Now the police expect me to ask for their help after they allowed the California criminals to brutalize me for so many years. They really think of me as a fool.
But one charming gentleman visited his girlfriend in Baltimore. Borrowed her pistol and took a bus to New York City. He walked up to two NYPD officers and shot them dead as a retaliation for the brutal (in his mind) police shooting of Michael Brown. I saw a few reports about how distorted this was. But very few journalists noted how outrageous this event was. Based on a lie about facts, in a narrative promoted by politicians, journalists and Communist propagandists, who are given open access to media outlets, two NYPD officers are dead. Their wives and children have no husband and father. Is there any suggestion that journalists, athletes, politicians who promoted these lies be held accountable? Any apology from those who added to the false narratives?
Atheists, Muslims do not believe in God as a source of inalienable rights, and the constitution. Yet they appeal to it in courts and in media arguments, i.e, propaganda. Humans are given inalienable rights by God. The founders of the United States wrote the constitution to prevent the government from violating those god given rights. But atheists do not believe in god. So how do they argue for their rights? If they do not believe in god they do not have those rights. Muslims claim Allah's word in the Koran is the only law, Sharia law. So how do they argue that they are being denied equal rights under law, a right protected by the constitution but given from god? It appears to me that these non believers in god and the constitution, should be barred from filing lawsuits in US and state courts. They are ineligible because they do not believe in god given rights.
Immediately upon realization that I did not intend to submit to homosexual police and FBI controllers, they abandoned me once again. There was 15 previous years of the FBI using me as bait for organized crime. They did not pay me one cent. They joined the abuses and coordinated the up to nine crime families who took turns harassing me. Within hours homosexual police employees from the California Syndicate replaced them conducting the same kind of criminal harassment, surveillance. Disturbing my sleep every one or two hours, and tampering with my computer. That is the problem. The California criminals and their supporters in the state of Washington conduct a brutal 25-45 year campaign of criminal harassment, abuse, character assassination, ridicule, humiliation, insults, provocation, abuse of power. Police agencies stood by for 25-45 years and allowed the crime families and Communists, to freely do what they wanted to do. Now the police expect me to ask for their help after they allowed the California criminals to brutalize me for so many years. They really think of me as a fool.
No comments:
Post a Comment