Posted September 3, 2014 9:11 PM ET; Last updated September 8, 2014 9:16 PM ET
Goes to show that bureaucrats in the human services industry are the same in the UK and the USA. No longer likely to stop severe criminal abuse of vulnerable persons. They protect their behinds first and foremost.
[From article]
Jay’s report proved that virtually everyone in any position of authority from the late ’90s until today must have known the scale of the sexual exploitation. Internal documents show that they heard reports on the situation several times, most notably in 2005. Town councillors have been accused of having business interests in the taxi companies — one of the companies that was accused of rounding up and grooming girls also had a contract with the city to ferry children between social services locations.
[. . .]
From 1997 to 2013 it was imprudent to say anything like this, or even to mention the ethnicity and religion of the perpetrators: A Home Office researcher who tried to tell police and superiors what was going on was sent on a diversity training course instead. (The influential 1999 Macpherson Report said any policeman who has not been given formal diversity training must be assumed to be racist.)
[. . .]
1,400 victims neglected, mistreated, and betrayed. Every agency contributed to silencing the whistleblowers and abandoning the girls. Parents who acted to protect their daughters were ignored, harassed, even fined and arrested. Rotherham Council ignored their pleas and continued to give contracts to the taxi firms whose owners and drivers were the perpetrators, and in whose cars no teenager in town would ever willingly travel.
[. . .]
In reality, the number of victims grew every year, and the number of arrests was vanishingly low. But the inspectors continued to praise Rotherham’s “commitment to safeguarding young people”; continued to measure commitment by the quality of collaborativeness itself. In 2003, the SSI praised “examples of innovation, moves towards integrated services and new preventive strategies.”
[. . .]
the only failure that really matters was that of the South Yorkshire Police, who could, by aggressive policing, have pursued and arrested the relatively small group of men, whose identities were well known, who started the ring in 1997-98. Why didn’t they? The leading theory is a culture of political correctness: Crudely stated, the police refused to arrest the perpetrators because they were Muslims.
[. . .]
the truth is that these men are aware that the police do not want to be accused of racism in today’s climate.”
[. . .]
The police may have been reluctant to arrest Muslim suspects accused by white Christians, but the police in Britain are comparatively reluctant to arrest anyone at all.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/rotherham-s-collaborators_804406.html?nopager=1#
Rotherham’s Collaborators
The helping professionals didn’t help; the caring professionals didn’t care
SEP 15, 2014, VOL. 20, NO. 01
* * *
[From article]
An independent report has found that at least 1,400 children were sexually exploited in Rotherham by gangs of men who were predominantly of Pakistani origin between 1997 and 2013.
Report author Professor Alexis Jay said that girls as young as 11 were raped by "large numbers of male perpetrators".
It spoke of the "collective failures" of political, police and social care leadership over the first 12 years the inquiry covered.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28955170
Rotherham abuse scandal: Key dates
27 August 2014 Last updated at 12:52 ET





No comments:
Post a Comment