March 14, 2007

New Cambridge Police Commissioner's Expertise

New Cambridge Police Commissioner's Expertise

Institutionalized discrimination toward persons with disabilities by police remains unaddressed. Is it unreasonable to expect the next police commissioner
will have some familiarity with the needs of persons with disabilities? Is it
unreasonable to demand that the next police commissioner know the requirements
of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of
1973?
The current city leadership is clueless regarding those laws. They say that
they do not discriminate based upon disability. But those are just words. The
reality is that PWD remain denied basic rights under the city government. The
leadership prevents achieving equality under law. The handicapped commission is
led by timid persons who do what they are told to do by the Manager.
A second area of essential expertise for the next Commissioner is high
technology, and protecting citizens from high tech crimes. That would include
identity theft by tampering with computer transmissions. That is a felony under
the U.S. Code. But local police remain untrained in how to identify, how to
investigate and how to address such crimes.
A related area is the use of electrical less lethal weapons. The current
police commissioner submitted a report on the proposed use of Electro Convulsive
Technology. That includes the family of stun guns. State law prohibits
possession of such illegal firearms (M.G.L. Chapter 140 Sec. 131J), but permits
the use of some forms of electrical firearms for corrections officers to control
prisoners. But as with all technology the new devices always fall into the hands
of private criminals who use them contrary to law for their own purposes.
Cambridge police claim they are unaware of the use of those firearms. They
say they have no way of investigating when the weapons are used. It is not clear
why the police are unable to investigate possession of such illegal firearms. It
is one of the few areas where the burden is placed on the victim to investigate
and to prove the crime.
Eliminating these forms of high tech criminal abuses of citizens requires
that the next police commissioner be familiar with computer crimes and the use
of electrical firearms contrary to law.
The next Commissioner must immediately end the practice of allowing
corporate lobbyists to train police how to treat persons with disabilities. The
state and US constitutions provide sufficient guidelines to define the rights of
persons with disabilities. Psychiatric and pharmaceutical corporations do not
protect rights and have no obligation to protect and to defend the Constitution.
The next police commissioner must end the use police powers to enforce
psychiatric diagnoses, which are often no more than personal opinions.
Psychiatry must be recognized for what it is -- an art form masquerading as
science. A dedicated observation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Mass General Laws Chapter 151 B will provide
many of the protections that are currently denied to citizens with disabilities.
The next police commissioner must have sufficient integrity and a strong
character to withstand any effort by the City Manager to permit Harvard
University and MIT special police to usurp the state police powers that the City
enjoys.


--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA