March 9, 2007

Good Journalism?

Good Journalism?

Great piece of investigative journalism about Cambridge! (Janice O'Leary, "City's great -- if you can afford it. So say residents in survey; study of seniors sought," Boston Globe, City Weekly, October 29, 2006) Who would have thought that politicians would agree that the city that pays their salaries is run well?
Getting quotes from officials is a mark of good journalism. Let's see five councilors and the City Manager. That seems like a cross-section of the population. If they all agree must not be any problems in that city. No news is good news and all that.
If the survey says so it must be true. That is why politicians use them, listen to them, vote for them and pay for them. It makes them look good.
So why not ask them what they think of the survey? In Cambridge who wants to hear any bad news which might lower property values? Not me. You?
There are no credible critics. The only credible voters in Cambridge praise the government. Ask any Harvard PR flack, or any MIT flack. Just doing my job.
--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA

CAMBRIDGE
City's great -- if you can afford it
So say residents in survey; study of seniors sought
By Janice O'Leary,
Boston Globe Correspondent
City Weekly
October 29, 2006

Cambridge residents increasingly consider their city a great place to retire -- that is, if you can afford housing, according to a recent survey by the city whose results were released last week. "It's useful and helpful to get a snapshot of what's going on in the city," said City Councilor Brian Murphy .
Twenty percent of Cambridge residents rate the city an excellent place to retire, up from 13 percent in 2000 . But 76 percent gave the city low marks for access to affordable housing. The perception of safety has declined; six years ago 83 percent polled rated Cambridge as a safe place to live, and this year 73 percent felt that way.
An overwhelming majority of residents, 85 percent , gave the city high marks for its recycling efforts and cultural offerings. None of this surprised city councilors. "The survey says what we all knew anyway," said Councilor Craig A. Kelley , a sentiment echoed by other councilors during Monday's presentation.
"We're not getting a whole lot of new information here," said City Councilor Henrietta Davis.
"It's too much good news, Bob," Mayor Kenneth E. Reeves joked to city manager Robert W. Healy. Most areas of inquiry remained stable or slightly improved, with 47 percent responding that they are totally satisfied with life in Cambridge and only 3 percent saying they are totally dissatisfied.
In addition to housing, issues topping the list of citizen concerns included education and property taxes. Davis, an advocate for public transportation, said she was happy to see the high number of respondents -- 51 percent -- who find driving in Cambridge difficult. The biennial survey cost the city $14,250 , according to Healy.
It first began in 2000 . Davis suggested alternating this survey in the future with another that could delve deeper into citizen responses. Councilor Michael A. Sullivan especially wanted a further study of seniors. Councilor Marjorie C. Decker said it would be useful to have comparative data available to see how survey responses change with demographics.

No comments: