Early Deaths For White Americans Are On Steep Increase

[From article]
During an era of headline-grabbing advances in medicine, the United States is experiencing a health cataclysm. The latest straw in the wind is last week’s report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showing that life expectancy for white women declined slightly from 2013 to 2014.
Other studies indicate rising death rates for a white working class that is in a slow-motion economic and social meltdown. Self-destructive behaviors are outpacing medical advances against killers like heart disease and cancer. Hopelessness may not be a condition studied by epidemiologists, but it is cutting a swath through a segment of white America.
A paper in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences late last year highlighted the bleak American exceptionalism of this crisis. It focused on middle-aged whites. In the 20 years prior to 1998, their mortality rate fell about 2 percent a year, in keeping with the trend toward lower mortality in other advanced countries. Then the rates diverged. Rates kept declining in countries like France and Britain. They began increasing for middle-aged whites in the United States.
The slide in the wrong direction was driven by drug and alcohol poisoning, chronic liver diseases, and suicide. In 1999, middle-aged blacks had higher rates of poisoning than whites; by 2013, rates were higher for whites. Overall, mortality rates for middle-aged blacks and Hispanics have declined since 1999, as they have increased for whites. The trend among whites breaks down neatly by levels of education. The mortality rate for middle-aged whites with a high-school degree or less has jumped since 1999; the rate for middle-aged whites with some college but not a degree stayed roughly flat; the rate for middle-aged whites with a college degree or more dropped. If there is such a thing as white privilege, no one has told less-educated whites.
The most direct indicator of rising distress is that the suicide rate in the United States is at a roughly 30-year high, according to new figures from the National Center for Health Statistics. The rate increased for white middle-aged women by 80 percent from 1999–2014. Although the data wasn’t analyzed by education level, researchers believe it tracks with other findings about increased working-class mortality.
[. . .]
The white working class is dying from the effects of a long-running alienation from the mainstream of American life. As one researcher told the Times, “they are not in stable relationships, they don’t have jobs, they have children they can’t feed and clothe, and they have no support network.” It is a formula for loneliness, stress, and despair.
[. . .]
The authors of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences paper say middle-aged whites may be a “lost generation.” That is depressing enough, but there is no guarantee only one generation will be lost.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434544/white-working-class-mortality-rates-are-increasing

The Working-Class Meltdown
by RICH LOWRY

April 26, 2016 12:00 AM

@RICHLOWRY

Violent Lawless Black Supremacists Attack Two Peaceful White Persons Rallies In Georgia

At least nine people were arrested after they allegedly fought with police in an attempt to attend the Rock Stone Mountain rally in the Yellow Daisy lot at the DeKalb County park.
[From article]
Not one, but two white supremacist rallies took place in north Georgia this Saturday.
Pro-white rights organizations including the National Socialist Movement, Aryan Nations and Ku Klu Klan groups in full garb participated in a 'free speech' rally in Rome, Georgia,
While 70 miles south of Rome, another 'white power' rally turned violent as counter-protesters clashed with police who attempted to block them at the popular Stone Mountain park.
Aiming to appear more mainstream, organizers of the Stone Mountain park rally say they will avoid Klan robes and other garb at the event.
Both rallies were timed to coincide with Confederate Memorial Day, which takes place on Monday.
Organizers say it is rare for two events to occur simultaneously in the same area and it is also rare for rallies to brazenly advertise their racial agenda, says the Atlanta Journal Constitution.
At least nine people were arrested after they allegedly fought with police in an attempt to attend the Rock Stone Mountain rally in the Yellow Daisy lot at the DeKalb County park, according to the AJC.
But a group of about 300 counter-protesters at Stone Mountain could be heard chanting, 'Hey hey, ho ho, the KKK has got to go' and 'Black Lives Matter' as they wanted to protest the group of about 30 'pro-white' rally participants.
Organizers for the event initially told park officials that members of the Ku Klux Klans, Aryan Nation sects and other white nationalist organizations would attend the event that was part of a 'push-back against the momentum for removing the Confederate Flag from state and city properties, the Atlanta Daily World reported.



To keep the groups apart, officers in riot gear encircled the Rock Stone Mountain rally participants.
Officials said that counter-protesters fought with police who were trying to prevent them from getting close to the 'pro-white' rally.
The AJC reported that some people who refused to take off their masks were also arrested.
WGCL reported that a man wearing a confederate hat was attacked by counter-protesters and appeared to suffer minor injuries.
Some of the hundreds of counter-protesters present at the park said hat they wanted it to be peaceful event.
Church member Scott Maddox, who decided to leave when the violence erupted, told the AJC: 'I came here for a peaceful rally. When you start throwing rocks… that is not what this is about. We are not gonna be a part of that.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555549/Nine-anti-KKK-protesters-arrested-violent-clash-police-pro-white-rally-Georgia.html

The KKK clashes with police and counter-protesters as marches to 'celebrate' Confederate Memorial Day turn violent
Not one, but two white supremacist rallies took place in north Georgia this Saturday
A group of about 30 'pro-white' rally participants were at Stone Mountain Park to attend the Rock Stone Mountain rally on Saturday
While a pro-right rally including National Socialist Movement and Ku Klux Klan took place 70 miles north in Rome
Both rallies were timed to coincide with Confederate Memorial Day, which takes place on Monday.
Roughly 300 counter-protesters showed up at Stone Mountain and chanted 'Hey hey, ho, ho the KKK has got to go' and 'Black Lives Matter'
Counter-protesters attempted to fight police who were trying to block them from reaching the white power group
The exchange erupted in violence as the counter-protesters threw rocks and fireworks toward the barricades and emptied trash cans
By ALEXANDRA GENOVA and REGINA F. GRAHAM FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 14:25 EST, 23 April 2016 | UPDATED: 11:21 EST, 24 April 2016

White People Will Be Minority in United States

[From article]
In late 2015, the Pew Research Center came out with a population projection that "non-Hispanic whites are projected to become less than half of the US population by 2055."
Similarly, during 2014, researchers working with U.S. Census Bureau data claimed that non-Hispanic whites would fall into minority status by 2045.
In fact, the U.S. Census Bureau data suggests that this event will almost assuredly happen far earlier than these estimates, likely by 2025 if current trends continue. The non-Hispanic white and Hispanic populations are expected to subsequently cross at about 35% each in the early 2040s.
The estimate of the rapidly falling non-Hispanic white percentage is probably conservative (i.e., the actual decline is much steeper than shown above), as the census data likely underestimates the large numbers of dominantly Hispanic illegal immigrants already in the country that would further lower the non-Hispanic white proportion.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/projection_nonhispanic_whites_will_be_minority_of_us_population_by_2025.html

March 25, 2016
Projection: Non-Hispanic whites will be minority of US population by 2025
By Sierra Rayne

White Votes Matter

[From article]
The only question for Republicans is: Which candidate can win states that Mitt Romney lost?
Start with the fact that, before any vote is cast on Election Day, the Democrats have already won between 90 and 98 percent of the black vote and 60 to 75 percent of the Hispanic and Asian vote. Unless Republicans run the table on the white vote, they lose.
If there’s still hope, it lies with Trump and only Trump. Donald Trump will do better with black and Hispanic voters than any other Republican. But it’s with white voters that he really opens up the electoral map.
A Republican Party that wasn’t intent on committing suicide would know that. But Stuart Stevens, the guy who lost a winnable presidential election in 2012, says it’s impossible for Republicans to get one more white vote — and the media are trying to convince the GOP that he’s right.
tevens says Romney tapped out every last white voter and still lost, so he says Republicans are looking for “the Lost Tribes of the Amazon” hoping to win more white votes: “In 1980, Ronald Reagan won 56 percent of white voters and won a landslide victory of 44 states. In 2012, Mitt Romney won 59 percent of whites and lost with 24 states.”
Apparently, no one’s told Stevens about the 50-state Electoral College. The national white vote is irrelevant. Presidential elections are won by winning states. (Only someone who got his ass kicked running an eminently electable candidate might not know this.)
[. . .]
If Trump wins only the same states as Romney, but adds Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Illinois — where Romney’s white vote was below his national average — Trump wins with 280 electoral votes. (Romney wasn’t an ideal candidate in the industrial Midwest.)
[. . .]
I haven’t even mentioned Florida, where Trump recently trounced Stuart Stevens’ dream candidate, Marco Rubio, a sitting senator — and a Cuban! — in a 20-point rout. Republican primary voters outnumbered Democratic primary voters in that election by more than half a million votes.
If Trump wins Florida, he needs to win only two or three of the 10 states where Romney either lost the white vote outright or won a smaller percentage of it than he did nationally.
Stevens’ analysis assumes that there will be no new voters — and, again, there isn’t a mammal on the North American landmass who knows less about winning presidential elections than Stuart Stevens.
It’s as if we’re only allowed to divvy up the pile of voters from 2012. Unless you voted in 2012, you can’t vote in 2016! Use it or lose it, buddy.
That’s not how it works.
Trump is saying he’ll bring in lots of new people, as he has throughout the primaries. In the Florida GOP primary, for example, Trump got nearly half a million more votes than Romney did in 2012 — about half a million new people voted. Trump may be wrong, but it’s insane to say that it’s impossible for him to bring out new voters.
[. . .]
Maybe 50 years of Third World immigration means it’s too late, and even Trump can’t win. But it’s an absolute certainty that any other Republican will lose.

http://humanevents.com/2016/03/30/its-only-trump/?utm_source=coulterdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

It’s Only Trump

Ann Coulter

Wednesday Mar 30, 2016 4:59 PM

Identity Politics Will Fail In 2016 Presidential Elections

Saying "Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line." is disjointed, applying an ancient paradigm to new patterns of voting. Democrats abandoned white workers favoring skin color based voters. Identity politics works in mindless conformist Massachusetts. It will fail in the rest of the country. Dangerous pattern unmentioned among liberal censors is billionaire George Soros and Google Corp. reportedly funding disruption of the political process using hired thugs. Their effort to bring banana republic government by brute force to the United States will fail.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20160312/NEWS/160319525

Column: Capitalizing on #NeverTrump
By Rick Holmes
Opinions/Mass. Political Editor
Posted Mar. 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

Blacks Over Represented in Oscar Wins; Whites Under Represented in Grammy Nominations

[From article]
Between 2000 and the present, the percentage of the U.S. general population that is black has ranged between 12.3% and 12.6%. Over this time, the proportion of black Oscar nominees for acting was 10% – a slight under-representation, but not egregious by any reasonable standards.
On the other hand, nearly 15.5% of Oscar wins for acting were by blacks, which not only balances out any perceived under-representation at the nomination stage, but likely over-compensates. Winning an Academy Award is far more prestigious than being nominated for one.
[. . .]
According to the research team, among all racial categories, "Black males were the most likely to be shown in a committed relationship (68.4%)." Surely this must be excellent news. Perhaps a question should be raised as to why the film industry portrays white males as far less likely (only 58.1%) to be in socially positive committed relationship roles.
White females are more likely to be sexually exploited in top films.
[. . .]
In fact, the USC team noted that "across the 100 top-grossing 2013 films ... [a] total of 3,932 speaking characters were evaluated for race/ethnicity ... 14.1% [were] Black ... Black speaking characters slightly over index (1.5%) in comparison to [the] 2010 U.S. Census."
In others words, blacks are over-represented in speaking roles within top-grossing films compared to their proportion of the general population, and blacks are over-represented within Oscar wins for acting since 2000.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/blacks_overrepresented_in_oscar_wins_since_2000.html

March 9, 2016
Blacks over-represented in Oscar wins since 2000
By Sierra Rayne

* * *



[From article]
Easily one of the most intellectually bankrupt social movements in recent times has been the absurd claim that blacks are under-represented in Grammy nominations and on popular music ranking systems, such as the Billboard Top 100.
[. . .]
Back during the 1980s, the racial demographics of the United States ranged from 80% to 83% white and 11.7% to 12.1% black. Thus, if Grammy nominations over this period were based on true equality – namely, each race receiving a number of nominations proportional to its share of the population – then whites should have received 7 times more nominations than blacks in any given year.
As a result, we must conclude that 1989 was a horrendously racist year for Grammy nominations – against whites. Among the 20 nominations discussed in the Vocativ article, 13 (65%) went to black artists, and just 7 (35%) were received by white artists. Had the nominations achieved racial equality, the number of black artist nominations should have been 2 or 3, with 17 or 18 of the nominations going to white artists.
Conveniently, Vocativ “crunched the numbers” on the number of Grammy nominations by race since 1959 and Billboard Top 100 artists by race since 1965. As shown in the figures below, the results are shocking for their discrimination against whites in favor of blacks.
During the 1960s and 1970s, on average there were about three times more Grammy nominations for white artists than for black artists. Based on American racial demographics at the time (83.1% to 88.6% whites vs. 10.5% to 11.7% blacks), there should have been 8 times more white artist nominations to reach racial equality.
The situation then got even worse for white artists. By 2000, the ratio of white to black artist nominations reached just 1.5, while at that time whites outnumbered blacks in the general population by 6:1. In other words, white artists were receiving severalfold fewer Grammy nominations than racial equality would dictate.
During the past few years, the ratio has increased in favor of white artists, back up to just over 3:1, but still constituting a gross under-representation of white artists as nominees and a corresponding over-representation of black artists.
For the entire history of the Grammy Awards, systematic racial bias is evident against whites and in favor of blacks.
[. . .]
On one aspect, the music industry race baiters are correct: if you accept the premise that any deviation from strict racial proportionality equals racism, there is substantial evidence of racism between whites and black artists. But the data strongly suggests that the racism is against whites, not blacks.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/whites__not_blacks__are_underrepresented_in_grammy_nominations_and_on_the_billboard_top_100.html

March 9, 2016
Whites, not blacks, under-represented in Grammy nominations and on the Billboard Top 100
By Sierra Rayne

White American Scapegoats, Privileged Lives

The two large American criminal political and economic organizations that were at war from about 1960 to 1974, who I call the Kennedy Cult and the California crime Syndicate designated me their scapegoat. Whatever each of them did to the other, and to other individuals and groups, they both blame me and punish me multiple times, for what they did. It is one more perspective on the 45 years of criminal abuses by them on me, which continue today in March 2016.

[From article]
Watching the Chicago street theater on Fox News as leftist groups shut down a Trump rally, I got to thinking that even Fox follows the liberal rules. They interviewed a lefty grandma outraged about fascism; they interviewed a middle-aged African American woman outraged about Trump coming into her neighborhood. We got to see African Americans disrupting the Trump event after the cancellation. But we never got to hear from a Trump supporter. And the next day Ted Cruz blamed Trump for the violence, and Hillary Clinton grated on about “divisive” rhetoric.
And then it occurred to me. There is one thing you are not allowed to do in America today, and that is cater to the tribalism of the white working class. You must cater to black racism; you must cater to feminist cant.
[. . .]
lawyer Michael A. Cooper, Jr., writing about “Trump's America, where working-class whites are dying from despair." He says the problem is that both parties have abandoned them:
As productivity climbed, working-class Americans wanted their wages to rise also. Instead, Republicans gave them tax cuts for the rich while liberal Democrats called them racists and bigots.
[. . .]
The reason for white working class despair is that they have been designated as the sacrificial victim for the racist, sexist, bigoted sins of America, and nobody has been allowed to speak up for them. Until Donald Trump.
But why the white working class? Its ancestors were starving on the land and working in sweatshops in Europe when all the sins of America were committed. How can they be to blame?
Let us turn to René Girard and his Violence and the Sacred. On his theory humans have learned to end escalating violence between factions by sacrificing a victim, a scapegoat. All of the hate and the rage of a divided community is diverted from hating each other and onto the newly selected victim. Somehow, at the civil rights revolution of the Sixties, the white working class got selected as sacrificial victim. Thus the necessity of Archie Bunker, racist, sexist, and bigot, that Norman Lear wanted to teach us all to hate.
But once the white working class had been selected as sacrificial victim to cleanse the nation of its racial sins, it is obvious that every so often a wooden stake would have to be driven through its corpse to make sure it could never be brought back to life. It could not be permitted for anyone to say that right-wing militias are embarrassing but marginal, or that the remnant of the KKK is anything less than a demonic threat that every Republican politician must condemn without equivocation. The sacrificial victim must stay dead and buried.
Then Donald Trump pulled the stake out of its heart.
[. . .]
why the Trump phenomenon is anathema not just to liberals, but to many conservatives. If working class white issues were admitted back into the public square, then the sacrificed victim would be brought back to life, and who knows where it might end?
Now you know what liberal activism is for, and race studies and gender studies and diversity and political correctness. They are there to apply muscle for the ruling class, to make sure that the Verdict of the Sixties is never reversed. Black Lives Matter and MoveOn.org and the Friday night lefty coalition are all rushing forward to drive the wooden stake back in.
[. . .]
The lefty protesters are fools. They don’t understand that they are not marginalized victims valiantly battling against the system, as Alinsky and Ayers have taught them. They are ordinary brownshirted government goons denying the American people the right to peaceably assemble and petition the ruling class for a redress of grievances. This ignorance in the protesters, and evil in their enablers, is not just a crime, it is a blunder.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/the_white_working_class_is_the_designated_scapegoat_of_the_ruling_elites.html

March 15, 2016
The White Working Class is the Designated Scapegoat of the Ruling Elites
By Christopher Chantrill

Black Activism Has Misguided Priorities

[From article]
As a black conservative, over the years I have written countless articles about how the Democratic Party has been duping my fellow black Americans. I have explained how America is the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for all who simply choose to go for it. I have dispelled the myth that white Americans are burning the midnight oil plotting ways to keep blacks down.
I have written endlessly about how blaming white America for issues plaguing blacks is wrong and fruitless. Real empowerment comes from taking personal responsibility for one’s life. Why sit around waiting for someone to do something to make your life better?
[. . .]
The new modern authentic blackness means hating and blaming America for every evil in the world. Black talking heads on TV from comedians to pundits preach a gospel of hate to black Americans: whitey is still out to get you – be angry and push back hard, because black lives matter.
Folks, it is all so evil, so divisive, and so frustrating. God help us.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/the_black_thing.html

March 4, 2016
The black thing
By Lloyd Marcus

Bernie Sanders Believes Only Black People Are Poor, All Whites Are Wealthy, Powerful

[From article]
Bernie Sanders, the senator representing the socialist paradise of Vermont, has apparently never seen a poor white person. This is understandable, since about 1% of the state's population is black.
But Sanders considers himself an expert on the racial divide in poverty. And at last night's debate with Hillary Clinton, the senator expounded on his theories of race and poverty
[. . .]
“When you’re white you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto, you don’t know what it’s like to be poor,” said Sanders. “You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street, or dragged out of a car.”
[. . .]
Clinton responded by saying, “being a white person in the United States of America I know that I’ve never had the experience that so many people in this audience have had.” Hillary went on to say, “I have spent a lot of time with the mother’s of African-American children who have lost them — Trayvon Martin’s mother.”
[. . .]
In short, Sanders doesn't know what he's talking about. In his effort to fully pander to black voters, he has made an ignorant statement based not on facts, but rather on urban myths. No doubt there are some blacks who are rousted, but is it racism or sensible policing?
And for Hillary to bring up Trayvon Martin's mother only feeds the false narrative that continues, despite the fact that the man who shot Martin was judged innocent and that the police had nothing to do with the shooting. Even Eric Holder's Justice Department couldn't find grounds to charge Mr. Zimmerman with violating the civil rights of Martin.
But why let the facts stand in the way of a good white-bashing narrative?
Neither Clinton nor Sanders has any shame.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/sanders_whites_dont_know_what_its_like_to_be_poor.html

March 7, 2016
Sanders: Whites don't know what it's like to be poor
By Rick Moran

Trump Courts Working Class White Citizens, Who Democrats Abandoned

[From article]
An interesting feature of this year’s presidential election is Hillary Clinton’s heavy dependence on blacks and, to a slightly lesser degree, Hispanics voters. Bernie Sanders has also been trolling for their votes.
If the 2016 Democrat candidate for the presidency has to depend on massive support in the black and Hispanic communities to carry the election, this would continue Democrats’ shift away from heavy dependence on white working-class voters. This historic transition was admitted by Obama’s advisor David Axelrod early in 2008, and was a feature of Obama’s quest for re-election in 2012. Only 36% of working-class whites voted for him in 2012.
That is a far smaller percentage than Franklin D. Roosevelt reaped in four presidential elections between 1932 and 1944. Indeed, the white working-class constituted the backbone of the New Deal coalition, which made the Democrat Party the majority party in America from the 1930s to the mid-1960s.Today’s alienation between the Democratic Party and working-class whites is not the first occasion on which large percentages of the group voted for a Republican presidential candidate. In the 1980s, for example, we heard much about the “Reagan Democrats,” who were mostly white blue collar workers outside the South who labored in so-called “rust belt” industries, jobs that would soon be gone with the wind. Those Reagan Democrats contributed to the Gipper’s landslide victories in 1980 and 1984, and enabled George H. W. Bush (#41) to win the presidency in 1988.
[. . .]
To a certain degree in 2000 and 2004, which became much more pronounced under Obama in 2008 and 2012, the Democratic Party visibly aligned itself with blacks and other minorities, in the process leaving working-class whites feeling deserted.
There are two odd, and initially, difficult to fathom, features of today’s political parties. One focuses on the Democrats, the other, on the GOP[. . .]
First, it is puzzling that a political party whose elites have harped on the issue of increased income inequality in America, and repeatedly promised to rein in Wall Street fat cats in particular and the one-percenters in general as well as advocating soak-the-rich tax policies, would be so dismissive of the white working-class that was once a major part of that party’s base. After all, are not white blue-collar workers also part of the ninety-nine percent whom Democrat elites claim to represent?
Yet Democrat elites have deserted working-class whites, and seek votes elsewhere.
The second puzzle surrounding the white working class is the -- so far -- apparent failure of the GOP to court their votes on a systematic basis. Although some demographers claim the white working-class is “a dying breed” -- largely because the kinds of jobs they’ve typically held are disappearing -- they still comprise between 30 and 35 percent of the country’s population. [. . .]
Decades later, even though Democrat elites seem willing -- eager, some would say -- to turn their backs on a sizable segment of the electorate that once had been key to the party’s majority status, the Republican establishment seems to be doing little, if anything, to attract those people’s votes.
[. . .]
The Republican Party has long been known as the party of business. Even at the height of the Great Depression, which had seriously tarnished businessmen’s reputation, the GOP clung to their (financial and ideological) coattails, and lost its majority party standing as one consequence.
By 2016, big business has long since abandoned the GOP. As big business learned how to work with, and even benefit from, big government, business types increasingly aligned with the party of big government, i.e., the Democrats. [. . .] Unlike labor unions, who donate almost entirely to Democrats’ campaigns, large corporations split their donations between the two major parties.
[. . .]
the GOP elites’ panting after the so-called donor class, [. . .] don’t seem to have heard that the Sanders campaign relies mostly on small money donations, or that lavishly-funded campaigns don’t always succeed. (Ask Jeb Bush.)
Harvesting millions of new votes from a previously untapped bloc of citizens will win more elections than soliciting a few big contributions that may be equaled, or even topped, by donations to the other party. In addition, don’t assume that big bucks are always spent wisely in a campaign. (Ask Jeb Bush.)
The Democrats are forfeiting millions of working-class whites’ votes. The Republican Party should appeal to them, reap the votes, and laugh all the way to the inauguration.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/the_gop_forgot_working_class_whites_votes_but_trump_didnt_.html

March 3, 2016
The GOP Forgot Working Class Whites’ Votes (But Trump Didn’t)
By Richard Winchester

Abused White Workers Support Trump

[From article]
The doing with the Negro was the worst, and still is, but the doing with the worker has come a close second. First the worker had to be exempted from the law against combinations, then protected from the exploitation of long work days. Then the worker had to be protected from want with government social insurance instead of his own mutual-aid society. The result was inevitable. The working class came to expect that the ruling class would look after it with good jobs and good wages forever.
But the labor unions exempted from laws against combination turned into parasites that killed their host manufacturing corporations and their good jobs at good wages, and government social insurance is not social and not insurance, but a way for the ruling class to pay off its supporters.
Then the ruling class tired of its working class supporters, decided they were racists and sexists, and went back to its old game of playing mischief with the Negro.
[. . .]
It planned to lead minorities, women, the educated, and young people to a new Promised Land of Hope and Change in which the white working class would only be a long withdrawing roar. Only Charles Murray, reviled for writing badthink about IQ in The Bell Curve, had the wit to write about the mess of the white lower class in his Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960-2010.
[. . .]
Life is good for the global educated elite, in the world designed, implemented, and ruled by the educated elite, even if you affect a rebellious conservatism like me.
But what about the rest of America?
The rest of America is looking right at the Gates of Hell. All because it believed the government when it promised good jobs at good wages.
[. . .]
The arc of history does not bend towards justice, as President Obama believes; it bends towards extinction for the defeated males, whether you are talking about the Rape of the Sabine Women by Rome, the Vikings sailing up the rivers of England in 1000 (men slaughtered, women and children enslaved), or the demoralized remnant of the Plains Indians with the highest male suicide rate in the U.S.
And the same goes for the farmers pushed off the land by the agricultural revolution, and the hand-loom workers by power looms, and the semi-skilled manufacturing workers buffeted by automation and low-wage Asians.
Life, the Universe, and Everything is about bucking the system and surviving to fight another round, and like the Jews, never, never give up. If you sell your birthright to the ruling class for a mess of pottage you will pretty soon be left without pottage.
There is only one sensible answer to the question of what the Trump voters want. If they want anything other than to demand that the government “do nothing with us,” then they are taking a fateful step towards oblivion.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/what_do_the_trump_voters_want.html

February 23, 2016
What Do the Trump Voters Want?
By Christopher Chantrill

White Privilege Extends To Protests For Black Activists

[From article]
Is this what they mean by “white privilege?”
A bunch of squirrelly hippies decide to block traffic into the city on an Interstate highway during rush hour — an act of domestic terrorism. And yesterday, a year after their irresponsible, heinous crimes, the smirking, spoiled art-history majors sauntered out of the courthouse in Quincy with “unsupervised probation,” which means zero punishment, as their leader, who lives in a mansion on Moss Hill in Jamaica Plain, refused to apologize.
[. . .]



The lesson is, if you’re a member of a PC-approved, politically protected class — in this case, rich white moonbats — the laws don’t apply to you. In the halls of justice, the only justice is in the halls.
What do you suppose would have happened to these fools if they’d claimed membership in the Tea Party instead of Black Lives Matter? Forget 90 days at the Dedham House of Correction, which the district attorney was looking for. They would have been politically profiled as “bitter clingers,” which would have meant a one-way ticket to some federal pen, maybe even a Supermax like in Florence, Colo. Interference in interstate commerce, conspiracy, violation of civil rights, etc. etc. Plus an IRS audit.
Outside the courthouse yesterday, they looked like a free-the-weed rally in search of a bong, an outtake from an ancient Cheech & Chong movie. With the addition of a single hand-lettered “Hands Off My Trust Fund” sign, it could have been a Bernie Sanders rally. Not a black life anywhere in sight — it could have been the stage at last night’s Democrat presidential debate in Durham.
[. . .]
Nor did the judge. Remember a guy from Concord named Henry David Thoreau? Before the Civil War, he was thrown into jail for non-payment of taxes. He committed the “crime,” so he was willing to do the time.
They’re not making hippies like Henry David Thoreau anymore.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/howie_carr/2016/02/carr_hippie_privilege_rules_in_quincy_courtroom

Carr: Hippie privilege rules in Quincy courtroom
Howie Carr

Friday, February 05, 2016

Updated: People United?

Posted November 10, 2015 10:06 PM ET; Last updated November 11, 2015 10:06 PM ET



One of the phrases used by leftist activists during protest marches is "The people united will never be defeated." It is an easy to remember way to recite a principle that the ultimate power in any society remains with the people. They hold the power to disrupt. There are not enough police to control people if they no longer obey and respect the rules of the society.



It is the reason why rulers throughout history always kept their people divided. "Divide and rule." is the phrase which describes what rulers do. The White House in 2015 a black man who speaks as if he cares about people, openly divides the citizens of the United States, by race, by class and by religion.

Over the past 50 years three major associations appeared in the United States which now have much of the population divided against each other allowing the ruling elite to control them. Black people and white people are divided. Women and men. Homosexuals and breeders. Dividing people works even if the arguments to divide them do not make sense.
Collectivism is an essential part of this method. All black people and all white people belong to one or another group. But any superficial analysis exposes the fallacies. Some people are wealthy. Some are poor. Some powerful. Some weak. But if you believe the collective arguments one is expected to believe that all white people are wealthy and powerful, and all black people are poor and weak. That is what allows black students at Harvard University, especially law students to see themselves as oppressed. It is also convenient to ignore the fact that more than 500,000 white Americans died in a war to end slavery.



Similarly homosexuals are collectively oppressed (they say), even though some of them are wealthy and powerful. Same with women, many of whom are born into wealth and power. Yet they object that their social class colleagues remain oppressors. And it is obvious that many black people are extremely wealthy. Professional athletes, celebrities, politicians and businessmen have privileged lives.

What makes the claims of these groups demanding special status offensive, is that foreign interests join them denouncing and dividing Americans. The Muslim Brotherhood's lobbyist in the United States is CAIR. They join black lobbyists who denounce all white people as racists. Exceptions include white women who have sex with black men and white men who have sex with black men. White men who have sex with black women are still racists exploiting black women. Recent Muslim immigrants to the United States also claim special status due to discrimination. My question about that pattern concerns Muslim dominated countries where there is little or no tolerance for Christians and Jews. America is referred to as the great satan. So why do so many Muslims want to come to this country to live? Instead of being grateful for the freedom to express displeasure they often try to kill Americans.

If they are so concerned with discrimination why don't they address it in their home countries? Why not teach and fight for the rights of Christians and Jews to live peacefully and to enjoy the same rights as Muslims in Muslim dominated countries? A similar problem exists with migrants from African nations, where white people are a minority, often a very small minority. Black African students come to the United States and speak out about fighting for equal treatment for minorities. But only in the United States. They remain unconcerned for the lack of rights of white minorities in their home countries.

Prevailing doctrine of the leftist media is that wealthy white people should give their wealth to poor black people. But wealthy black people are not expected to give their wealth to poor white people. They are not even expected to give their wealth to poor black people. It is only focused on diminishing the wealth and power of white people and giving it to black people. Same misguided principle applies to Muslim immigrants. Wealthy monarchies in the Middle East are not expected to open their borders to fellow Muslims. They fear terrorists may enter their countries. They are not expected to give money to poor Muslims to give them free housing, food, health care, legal services and college tuition. Only western Christians and Jews are expected to provide those benefits to Muslims whether they have money or not. They act as if all Christians and Jews are wealthy and powerful. They are driven by hateful, hostile propaganda directed at destroying Christians and Jews and Western Civilization. The horror is that dumbed down Americans are misled into hating their own country at their own individual expense, both financial and their personal freedoms.

* * *

Updated November 11, 2015

Tim Wolfe, was president of the University of Missouri, a public university. Missouri is a big football school. After reports of graffiti with racial epithets and a swastika made of feces black leftists with support of the football team and its coach demanded Wolfe resign. They were dissatisfied with his response to the graffiti. He was not accused of any official misconduct or illegal act.

He resigned. It was reported that if the football team did not play their scheduled game against Brigham Young University it would cost the University of Missouri one million dollars. It indicates that Mr. Wolfe was like many public officials, spineless with relaxed rectitude. He was unable or unwilling to stand up to the leftist domestic extremists.

At the same time there are hundreds if not thousands of foreign extremists working in the United States using the same propaganda tactics to discredit the United States and to destroy American culture. The White House and its administration work with domestic and foreign extremists. Many of them were indoctrinated by public schools and in colleges to hate America.

If American officials with the power of government are unable to stand up to misguided American information warriors they are also unable to withstand attacks by foreign interests who use the same tactics. That indicates few Americans are aware of what propaganda is, and who is using it for what purposes.

This event in Missouri at a prominent academic institution is troubling because it shows that a group of people are fighting to destroy the nation from within. It is not people who support the nation who are united. It is important to recognize that the country differs from the government. Extremists want to destroy the country. The United States is made up of citizens with strong individual rights. Extremists are people who believe in collectivism which is un-American.

Domestic and foreign extremists use the concepts of equality and fairness to avoid the constitution protections. They appeal to feelings of low and no information voters. That is how propaganda works. It does not have to make sense. It only has to make people feel good. In the Missouri case a university president resigned after propaganda attacks employed by a football team.

See also:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/the_left_eats_its_own_at_mu.html

November 11, 2015
The Left Eats Its Own at MU
By Jack Cashill

Another troubling incident was an assistant professor at the previously prestigious journalism school at the University of Missouri, tried to stop a student from video taping the activities on campus. That suggests even professors of journalism have been persuaded by propaganda to destroy constitutional protections. She did apologize afterwards but still, why attack a constitutionally protected activity as an official of the university. Shameless and clueless. And this is not an exceptional event. She reportedly resigned see this article.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/11/missouri-protesters-try-to-block-student-reporter-from-taking-photos/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fmost-popular+%28Internal+-+Most+Popular+Content%29

Missouri assistant professor resigns from courtesy appointment after confrontation with journalist
Published November 11, 2015
FoxNews.com

On Tuesday November 10, 2015 Harvey Silverglate, Boston attorney, appeared on the PBS local news show Greater Boston discussing the matter for ten minutes. About two and one half minutes per person.

link here
http://video.wgbh.org/video/2365604544/

He was joined by a black ACLU lawyer and a black psychologist from Lasell College in Auburndale, Newton MA outside of Boston. Silverglate was only one among the four, who recognized this is a pervasive problem silencing protected speech on college campuses. The psychologist said it was exceptional, not the rule. Is he clueless, or what? Silverglate said he disagreed strongly. That silencing speech is common on college campuses. Silverglate founded the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, FIRE, which litigates rights violations on college campuses.

The two black guests revealed they are clueless about the dangers of un-American extremist political activity. There was no time to discuss what the psychologist revealed about an unrelated issue, i.e., segregated housing in Boston. What did that have to do with free speech and the First Amendment on a college campus? The two black guests indicated a lack of comprehension of the purpose of the First Amendment, i.e., to protect unpopular speech. The psychologist was focused on not hurting people's feelings. Why was he on that show? The host is a known misguided extremist leftist from Cambridge, MA typical of mindless liberals in that city. The host and the two black guests revealed no understanding that protecting speech that hurts people's feelings is what the First Amendment is all about. Psychologists and psychiatrists try to avoid hurting feelings. Working against hurting people's feelings, destroys American culture. Psychologists and psychiatrists join the Muslim Brotherhood which promotes Sharia law. Both psychiatry and Sharia law share the notion of not offending others and silencing speech that does.

Harvard Foundation Intern From Gambia Supports Minorities In US But Not in Gambia

Nuha Saho ‘18 from Gambia, Presents Harvard T-Shirt to South Carolina Governor, Nikki R. Haley.
Harvard Foundation intern Nuha Saho ‘18 from Gambia, which has very few white people (toubabs), a small minority in that country. Saho says on his Foundation page, he "investigate[s] the systems of inequality facing young minorities in public school systems, Nuha intends [. . .] a specialization in the inequalities in race and ethnicity." And that will be focused on the United States but not Gambia? White people are a minority in the world (16 percent) for many years. Soon they will be a minority in the United States too. Will Saho work to help white Americans then?



http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/10/2/nikki-haley-honored-flag/

South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley Honored for Flag Removal
By SIDNI M. FREDERICK

Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
October 2, 2015

White Privilege Is Propaganda Promoted To Divide Americans and It Makes No Sense

[From article]
White privilege is a tactic rather than an idea, and to ask for a specific definition is to ask for something that has never been and cannot be.
But it does feature one basic element, not easily denied or cast aside, that, in fact, the concept cannot work at all without. That is the contention that benefits -- social, economic, academic, and historical -- are automatically conferred to an individual simply as a matter of being white (don’t ask for a definition of “white” either -- you won’t get one). Whites have always had it easy, have always gone to the head of the line, have always eaten high off the hog. White immigrants always arrived aboard the Queen Mary, were always ushered through immigration first, and were automatically assigned upper-class positions within the American system. And all of this was accomplished, without exception, on the backs of minorities, which, again without exception, means blacks.
[. . .]
The question that remains is: Where do we discover “white privilege” in all this? The answer is: We don’t. The Irish are the second largest “white” ethnic group in the U.S. If “white privilege” actually existed, it would be found among the Micks. But search as long as you like, and you will find none of it. The Irish made their way in this country along a hard, stony road, earning what they gained in the face of attempted genocide, prejudice, hatred, violence, and murder. White skin didn’t feed one single starving Irish infant.
[. . .]
The same can be said for most “whites.”
[. . .]
You’d have to search for quite some time to find an ethnicity that benefitted from “white privilege.” White skin never saved anyone from persecution, torment, slavery, starvation, or anything else.
The simple truth is, all peoples have suffered in ways that beggar the imagination. All peoples found refuge and a way up and out in America.
“White privilege” is simply another sick fantasy of the academic left, one that’s in the process of being transformed into a social myth.
Like all such myths, its true danger lies in its perniciousness -- the possibility that it will infect public consciousness the same way that gay marriage, immigrant “dreamers”, and victim hoodlums have done.
It needs to be fought ferociously and continuously. Otherwise, we’ll find ourselves, not too far down the line, with a choice between the Dem candidate who vows to end white privilege tomorrow and the GOP candidate who wants to wait a year.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/a_brief_history_of_white_privilege.html

September 4, 2015
A Brief History of White Privilege
By J.R. Dunn

Northeastern University Publishes Provocation on White Privilege. Denies It Is University Policy

[From article]
Jesse Watters visited Northeastern University to find out what students thought about a university publication on "White Privilege" and the "Umbrella of Oppression."
The university issued a statement that this policy "was intentionally provocative" and "does not represent the position of the university."



http://nation.foxnews.com/2015/08/31/jesse-watters-asks-college-students-why-white-males-cant-be-oppressed

Jesse Watters Asks College Students Why 'White Males Can't Be Oppressed'
Published August 31, 2015

Fox News

Offended At Bias in Media? Wait To You See How Biased I Am. Hehe.

Media Farm is an essay in the weekly allegedly alternative Boston newspaper, Dig Boston (formerly Weekly Dig). The newest senior journalist "wrangler" argues that white men accused of mass murder get better treatment by other journalists, than black or brown mass murderers. (Media Farm, "Estranged Fruit," Dig Boston, July 22, 2015, Page 9) Link here

https://digboston.com/estranged-fruit-how-the-media-bent-over-backward-for-a-white-terror-suspect/

What is perplexing is that it is often the opposite. Seldom do illegal aliens get identified as such. They are always "a man." Same with gangs of black youth after attacking individual white persons. They are called "youth" or "teenagers" by journalists, police and politicians. Same with Muslims who may be terrorists. They are usually called "Lone Wolfs" or "domestic terrorists." The latest incident in Tennessee continues to baffle the FBI and politicians who cannot figure out the killer's motive. He's called a Jordanian American who was born in the United States. His parents are both Palestinian.

But bias, like beauty, is usually in the eyes of the beholder. So what does this media critic cite as evidence? A letter which appeared in the Pittsfield, MA Eagle. He culled from it what he calls "gems." The penultimate sentence cited is, "Was this the beginning of ISIS in America, or a deeply troubled youth with a history of mental illness and no connection whatsoever to reality, let alone the Middle East."

Usually it is conservatives who blame mental illness for violence. But this is no right winger writing here. He joins the usual suspects in the mainstream media (not alternative) using the phrase "history of mental illness," to explain the accusation against a suspect. It is widely believed by young and old, left and right that there exists a causal connection between mental illness and violence, if not crime too.

It is also stereotyping of persons with disabilities, which makes this essayist an oppressor of vulnerable persons, even while he exhibits his bona fides among liberals as a defender of black persons and brown persons from racist white people.

Many writers, politicians, and activists speak loudly and clearly defending black people and brown people in alternative and mainstream media. There are few if any defenders of persons with disabilities. They remain easy targets for racists, and anti racists. White people and black people alike. Homosexuals and breeders. Police especially like to demonize people with disabilities. One MA state police officer explained to me that they do not pay attention to people they perceive as mentally ill when they complain about crimes against them. He said you cannot rely on what they say. That implies that "normal" people do not lie. Ahem!

The phrase "history of mental illness" can be heard each day in most courts when suspects are arraigned. It makes no sense other than to discredit a suspect at an arraignment when the prosecutor and police say, "He has a history of mental illness." There is no causal connection between mental illness and crime or violence. But that does not stop the police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges from slandering all persons accused of mental illness.

Massachusetts prosecutors defended their practice of revealing "a history of mental illness," because, they say, a defense attorney must notify the court if a mental illness defense will be used. That is correct. But it is not done at an arraignment. At that appearance the defendant is lucky if he even met with his attorney for more than five minutes. So how does the prosecutor and/or the police learn about this "history of mental illness?" It is a violation of state and federal law to reveal medical records. The only exception for police is if they do not know the identity of a suspect and need to use the medical records to identify the suspect. But at an arraignment the identity of the suspect is clear. So each time there is not only a violation of state and US laws, but it is also an unnecessary allegation, to discredit and to bias the judge.

Why is this not an issue of interest to the civil libertarians who denounce police, media, and court abuses of black and brown persons? Why no concern for persons with disabilities? Is there a cure for myopia?

Scottish Lady 14, Prevented From Boarding Arab Owned Airline in England

Grace Wain, 14, from Scotland

Is this the beginning of racial profiling of caucasians?

[From article]
“Grace was a bit tired and hot and bothered. She was cuddling into her mum in the line,” father Paul Wain told the UK Mirror.
“One of the Etihad check-in girls then made the decision that she wasn’t fit to fly based on the fact she was pale in color and was leaning against her mum.”
Wain had reportedly been saving up for the exotic vacation for years and the entire family became distraught at the prospect of missing their once-in-a-lifetime trip. After an airport paramedic performed a check-up and deemed Grace fit to fly, the Etihad staff still demanded that the Wains produce a doctor’s letter to confirm that Grace was well enough for the trip to Abu Dhabi.
[. . .]
“I told them, ‘We live in Scotland.’ She is a redhead and she has a pale complexion. That’s just the way she is,” Paul Wain said.
Just two hours before the Wains’ flight was scheduled to depart, they were able to obtain a letter from the family practitioner, at which point they were allowed to board.
Paul Wain suspects the holdup had nothing to do with whether his daughter was healthy enough to fly but believes Etihad was trying to ground certain passengers due to an oversold cabin.
But the family’s ordeal did not end when they arrived in the Maldives. Etihad lost both parents’ luggage — and couldn’t deliver it for three days.

http://nypost.com/2015/07/14/airline-stops-redhead-from-boarding-due-to-white-sickly-skin/

Airline stops redhead from boarding due to white ‘sickly’ skin
By Fox News
July 14, 2015 | 3:11pm

In California, Latinos Outnumber Whites

[From article]
The official confirmation had to wait until new population figures were released by the Census Bureau this summer. The new tally, released in late June, shows that as of July 1, 2014, about 14.99 million Latinos live in California, edging out the 14.92 million whites in the state.
[. . .]
California is now the first large state and the third overall — after Hawaii and New Mexico — without a white plurality, according to state officials.
[. . .]
The demographic shift has been a long time coming. In 1970, the 2.4 million Latinos in California accounted for 12% of the population, while the 15.5 million whites in the state made up more than three-quarters of residents, according to state figures. By 1990, the Latino population jumped to 7.7 million, or about 25% of the state's population.
The Latino population is relatively young, with a median age of about 29, while the aging white population has a median age of 45. State demographers project Latinos will account for about 49% of Californians by 2060.
"It is going to accelerate," Suro said. "This is really the beginning of a new phase that will play out over another generation."
[. . .]
"Where L.A. goes is where the rest of the state goes and where the rest of the country goes," he said. "We announce, demographically speaking, the future for the rest of the country."

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-census-latinos-20150708-story.html

It's official: Latinos now outnumber whites in California
By JAVIER PANZAR
Los Angeles Times

July 8, 2015, 2:00 AM

Utah Caucasians Not Permitted To Celebrate Their Heritage. Racists With White Privilege Can't Celebrate Anything

[From article]
An event called “Caucasian Heritage Night” to be put on by a Utah minor league baseball team, the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim-affiliated Orem Owlz, has been cancelled following severe social media backlash via #CaucasianHeritageNight, particularly in light of the recent admittedly racist shooting massacre in South Carolina.
The Orem Owlz baseball team in Utah scheduled Caucasian Heritage Night, or what some are calling a “white appreciation event,” long ago, before the racially-motivated South Carolina shootings, and that the Caucasian Heritage Night event was meant to be a “lighthearted” roast of Caucasian people, poking fun at white stereotypes, reports CNN,
But when the Orem Owlz put up a Caucasian Heritage Night post on Friday, promoting what they perceived to be an event mocking the behaviors and likes of white people, social media blew up, many, such as a woman calling herself Melanin Monroe, apparently offended and angered by the Caucasian Heritage Night event, thinking white people get enough attention as it is.
[. . .]
The blowback against Caucasian Heritage Night caught many in the Orem Owlz organization off guard, the team emphasizing in a statement that the event was meant to poke fun at whites, and had no intention of being disrespectful in the wake of the South Carolina tragedy

http://www.inquisitr.com/2190668/caucasian-heritage-night-cancelled-following-social-media-outrage/

Posted: June 21, 2015
‘Caucasian Heritage Night’ Cancelled Following Social Media Outrage