June 22, 2014

Does Man Have Free Will?


In New York City, it was possible to have discussions about issues like this. People were not as obsessed with the cosmetic issues they focus on today. Is this too difficult for limousine liberals in Cambridge MA to contemplate? Too many control freaks in the psychology and psychiatric industries think of people as machines with no free will. If man lacks free will how can he be held accountable for his actions? 

[From article]
It has previously been suggested that our perceived ability to make autonomous choices is an illusion – and now scientists from the Center for Mind and Brain at the University of California, Davis, have found that free will may actually be the result of electrical activity in the brain.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/free-will-could-be-the-result-of-background-noise-in-the-brain-study-suggests-9553678.html

Free will could be the result of 'background noise' in the brain, study suggests
Scientists at the University of California, Davis, found that decisions could be predicted based on patterns of brain activity
ANTONIA MOLLOY 
Saturday 21 June 2014

* * *

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-mind-control-is-free-will-simply-a-myth-2177014.html

The uncomfortable truth about mind control: Is free will simply a myth?
In the Sixties, a groundbreaking series of experiments found that 65 per cent of us would kill if ordered to do so
MICHAEL MOSLEY
Thursday 06 January 2011

* * *

[From article]
More conventional genetics offers us genes not for such so-called universals but for differences - for violence, alcoholism and criminal behaviour, to say nothing of religiosity and tendency to mid-life divorce. In combination with neurophilosophers, these new breeds see our minds reduced to our brains, and our brains to computational devices. Soon every one of our thoughts and actions, they argue, will be explicable in terms of neural processes.
[. . .]
Let's be clear that we aren't that far away from such discussions. The legal status of "not guilty by reason of insanity" - the so called McNaghten rules - is based on a legal fiction which is a neuroscientific nonsense, that there is a clear-cut distinction to make between actions conducted through free will and those conducted involuntarily. I don't mean here the freedom we all have to dine at the Oxo Tower, constrained only by whether we have the money, but the freedom beloved of philosophers and the Judaeo-Christian tradition, in which God gave us all free will.
[. . .]
The tendency to turn social problems into medical conditions - which I call syndromitis - is alive and well, and growing fast.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/podium-genetic-programming-vs-free-will-1081294.html

Podium: Genetic programming vs free will
From a paper given to the Royal Society by the director of the Open University's brain and behaviour research group
STEVEN ROSE
Thursday 18 March 1999

No comments: