Showing posts with label Hotel Workers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hotel Workers. Show all posts

June 2, 2016

Wage Gap and Illegal Immigration




[From article]
There is a close long-term correlation between low-skill wages and illegal immigration. An influx of low-skilled labor drives down wages at the bottom of the income scale, aggravating the wage gap and social divisions, providing fodder for left wing demonization of the prosperous and successful.
The normal equilibrating capacity of a market economy is short circuited when the influx of low-skill illegal immigrants is nationwide. If American workers could easily escape to another country offering higher wages, then wages in the USA would quickly recover from a surge of immigrant workers, and employers would gain only a short-lived benefit. So, it might not be worth paying off politicians to import cheap labor from poor countries.
The Mariel Boatlift event provides a demonstration of this. Wages were hammered down in a local economy (Miami) by a flood of refugees and then recovered as workers scattered to surrounding areas with higher wages. The whole process took 10 years.
Miami Wages after the Mariel Boatlift
Harvard professor George J. Borjas has been called "America’s leading immigration economist" by BusinessWeek and The Wall Street Journal. The good professor recently surprised himself and outraged many of his pro-immigration colleagues with a study measuring the dive in wages for low-skill natives in Miami after the Mariel boatlift of 1980.
[. . .]



The Gap predictor works fairly well for the US as a whole because there is no foreign country where a low-skill worker can get enough of a pay raise to make it worth the move. So, the wages stay depressed for about 40 years, until the immigrant workers retire.
It is easy to say that immigrants can upgrade their schooling and training and thus reduce the surplus of low-skill labor. In practice, it is usually very difficult, especially while raising kids. For example, Senator Marco Rubio’s father spent his career mostly as a hotel bartender. He was also a street vendor, security guard, apartment building manager and crossing guard. Rubio’s mother worked as a maid and Kmart store clerk.
They stayed in low-skill jobs over their entire working careers. Their children did very well, however. If the children of immigrants do as well as the children of natives, then the depression of low-skill wages goes away unless more low-skill workers are brought into the country.
If the children and grandchildren of a large class of immigrants remain low-skill workers like their parents, then my simple Gap predictor no longer works and we are left with a persistent underclass of people who continue to cause a surplus of low-skill workers and thus continue to depress low-skill wages.
Unfortunately, this is the case for most of the illegal immigrants that are continuing to pour into the country.



Another Permanent Underclass?
If the illegals are allowed to stay, the effects will be dire, according to the findings of Gregory Clark, Professor of Economics at the University of California, Davis. “Immigration to the United States … rarely changes one’s social status,” he concludes after extensive study and many published works. His recent book is about the tendency of descendants within a family to stay in the same social class as their ancestors.
[. . .]
But if current immigration policy is continued, the “United States is likely to soon have the unprecedented situation of fostering a semi-permanent underclass.” This lack of social mobility from one generation to the next is a result that no government uplift program has been able to erase, according to Clark’s study of government efforts in Sweden, the US, and elsewhere.
[. . .]
A society over-loaded with low-skill workers will have lower wages in that category until the surplus disappears, which in this case might be generations away.
I estimate that enforcing the law and deporting all illegals would raise real low-skill wages by about 20% to 40% within 6 years, providing immediate relief to the oppressed low-skill citizens of our country.
[. . .]



A more skilled population would increase the historical trend of economic growth in this country. We might even become the richest per capita country in the world.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/06/illegal_immigration_and_the_wage_gap.html

June 2, 2016
Illegal Immigration and the Wage Gap
By David Lee

February 28, 2007

Cambridge Fired 150 Workers

Cambridge Fired 150 Workers

Passing the order directly to the Planning Board, the City Council may have violated a state law. (Erin Smith, "City vows to stick up for 150 fired hotel workers," Cambridge Chronicle, December 28, 2006)
Mass General laws Chapter 43, Section 107 states, "Except for the purpose of inquiry, the city council and its members shall deal [...] solely through the city manager, and neither the city council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any subordinate of the city manager either publicly or privately."
The penalties are severe -- fines, prison, removal from office and never being eligible for public office. [full statute below] The current City Councilors do not know Robert's Rules of Order and they do not know their legal limitations.
They appear to be out of control regularly violating their oaths of office. They imitate the legislative leadership at the state house.

--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA

Mass General Laws
CHAPTER 43. CITY CHARTERS
PLAN E.-GOVERNMENT BY A CITY COUNCIL INCLUDING A MAYOR ELECTED FROM ITS NUMBER, AND A CITY MANAGER, WITH ALL ELECTIVE BODIES ELECTED AT LARGE BY PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Chapter 43: Section 107. Interference with city manager by council forbidden; penalty Section 107.
Neither the city council nor any of its committees or members shall direct or request the appointment of any person to, or his removal from, office by the city manager or any of his subordinates, or in any manner take part in the appointment or removal of officers and employees in that portion of the service of said city for whose administration the city manager is responsible.
Except for the purpose of inquiry, the city council and its members shall deal with that portion of the service of the city as aforesaid solely through the city manager, and neither the city council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any subordinate of the city manager either publicly or privately. Any member of the city council who violates, or participates in the violation of, any provision of this section shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or both, and upon final conviction thereof his office in the city council shall thereby be vacated and he shall never again be eligible for any office or position, elective or otherwise, in the service of the city.

* * * * *
City vows to stick up for 150 fired hotel workers
By Erin Smith/
Cambridge Chronicle Staff
Thursday, December 28, 2006 - Updated: 05:31 AM EST
The Radisson Hotel closed last month for renovations, leaving about 150 hotel workers jobless and the City Council vowing for revenge. City councilors are hoping to stall condo construction plans at the hotel until the new owners agree to play nice with union workers. City councilors Anthony Galluccio and Marjorie Decker also asked the city’s law department to draft an ordinance that requires new hotel owners to rehire all workers after a hotel is sold. “The workers were told that the hotel was permanently closing down,” said Brian Lang, vice-president of Local 26, which represents the hotel workers.
[...]