May 9, 2007

Selective Publishing

Selective Publishing

Letter to editor
Boston Phoenix

Michael Bronski cites seven Massachusetts statutes "on the books [which] do not
get enforced." ("You can't do that in Massachusetts," Boston Phoenix, April 7,
2006, page 7, News, This Just In)
The Massachusetts Constitution says matters of marriage are to be left to the
Governor and to the legislature. The Court does not have jurisdiction over
marriage. That did not stop the Marshal Court. The Constitution says that the
Senate President shall convene a Constitutional Convention to vote on a
citizen's ballot initiative. When Birmingham violated his constitutional duty I
heard silence from the limousine liberals.
In Massachusetts the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 are not enforced. Persons with disabilities are
denied basic rights including marriage.
Journalists remain silent about overt abuses of persons with disabilities. Why
are journalists so bigoted? Does the equal protection clause only protect
homosexuals? Are some people as in "Animal Farm" more equal than others?
Who decides which laws should be enforced, the homosexual lobby? Margaret
Marshal's Court? Laws are selectively enforced. Stories are selectively
published. What's the difference?

--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA

No comments: