July 15, 2010

Diluting the First Amendment

[From article]
"measures ostensibly aimed at eliminating corruption or the "appearance" thereof illustrate the corruption inherent in incumbents writing laws that regulate political competition by rationing political speech.
[. . .]
When constitutional rights are treated as negotiable, the negotiations corrupt the negotiators.
[. . .]
The NRA's intellectual ludicrousness and moral disarmament is in arguing that the Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is absolute, but the First Amendment's protection of free speech is for favored groups to negotiate with . . . Congress.
[. . .]
Democrats are rushing to enact Disclose to control this November's elections and before the Supreme Court can adjudicate its dubious constitutionality. They are betting that Republicans won't get quick injunctive relief.
[. . .]
Beware when the political class preens about protecting us from "special interests." The most powerful, persistent and anti-constitutional interest is the political class. Bradley Smith, a former Federal Election Commission chairman, says Disclose should stand for "Democratic Incumbents Seeking to Contain Losses by Outlawing Speech in Elections." It is a reason for voters to multiply those losses."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/partisan_assault_on_free_speech_lwlsWUytn2V5cHwc8V4HNN

A partisan assault on free speech
George F. Will
New York Post

Last Updated: 4:54 AM, July 12, 2010

Posted: 1:16 AM, July 12, 2010

No comments: