April 29, 2009

Ann Coulter is Funny (2 articles)


There are no more funny readers of columns than those who read Ann Coulter's and post comments. On her Human Events pages she gets over 2000 comments for one essay. I've seen no other humorous political writer get as many comments. She is hilarious and shows that liberals have no sense of humor and take themselves all too seriously.

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2009/04/23/case-coulter

April 23, 2009 - 8:47pm
The case for Coulter
by Will Prasifka
Columbia Spectator

* * *

Menckenlite April 29, 2009

College Republicans gain what anyone will if they attend her talk. Ann Coulter is funny and exposes hypocrisy by liberals. She uses logic and sarcasm. It is upsetting to the people who laugh at Jon Stewart to see her do the same to their icons. She uses words spoken by her targets just as Stewart does. What is the difference?

* * *

Ldubbs April 29, 2009

The difference is that people laugh AT Ann Coulter, whereas people laugh WITH Jon Stewart. For every rare valid point Ann Coulter makes, she drowns it out with 100 invalid points and thus completely discredits herself, much to the delight of liberals.

People will certainly be attending her speech for its entertainment value, but not for the reasons you give, menckenlite.

* * *

menckenlite April 29, 2009

We disagree. Coulter answers liberal extremist personal attacks, which they see as valid arguments. She points out obvious errors of their thinking, which enrages liberals who ridicule her as they did Gov. Palin. She makes rational arguments which liberals are unable to do. She admits that she enjoys upsetting liberals. Jon Stewart shows his hatred when he makes fun of conservatives.

Ldubbs April 30, 3009

Like Palin?
LOL. Reminder:

"COURIC: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?

PALIN: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land-- boundary that we have with-- Canada. It-- it's funny that a comment like that was-- kind of made to-- cari-- I don't know, you know? Reporters--

COURIC: Mock?

PALIN: Yeah, mocked, I guess that's the word, yeah.

COURIC: Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.

PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our-- our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They're in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia--"

Such OBVIOUS errors. Who would have thought that we should use basic grammar when speaking? I'm enlightened now. Thank you, Sarah Palin!

* * *

menckenlite April 30, 2009

Um, like you know, I totally disagree with, you know, like, Um, thinking that, Um, humans speak grammatically except, Uh, perfessers in collidge classrumes. Totally not all politicians can, Um, like, talk like Joe (Stand up Joe!) Biden, and like, Um, "57 states" Obama. I used to talk the way you talk. Until I learned the right way to talk. You know what I'm talkin' about?

* * *

[Original article at]

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2009/04/28/separating-right-wrong

Separating the right from wrong
April 28, 2009
by Eric Lukas
Columbia Spectator

No comments: