Showing posts with label Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hypocrisy. Show all posts

May 25, 2016

Privileged University of Missouri Student Protester Accused of Theft, Drugs, Misogyny



Jonathan Butler made news with a hunger strike at Mizzou last year, but some of his online rants are eyebrow-raising. (Heat Street)


[From article]
“Butler did it,” gushed Southern Christian Leadership Conference president Vernon Howard, introducing the graduate student as he made the keynote speech at the Martin Luther King Jr. celebration in January. Since November, Butler has made half-a-dozen speeches, including addresses at the law schools of Harvard and Duke.
Perhaps these institutions should have done their research before portraying Butler as a social-justice hero. Heat Street’s review of Butler’s online presence, as well as video reviewed exclusively by the publication, reveals he’s chronically stolen items, denigrated low-income workers, and made troubling comments about women and drugs.
ost of the coverage of the events of last fall focused on claims of pervasive racism at the university, as well as administrators’ struggle to address the demands of student organization #ConcernedStudent1950. But our investigation has uncovered not only past controversial statements by Butler but also other dimensions to the unrest, including pervasive fears about safety on campus, as well as massive backlash from donors, sports fans and alumni.
Last fall, other student activists and social-justice warriors on campus began looking into Butler’s background because he hadn’t been involved in activism at the University of Missouri previously, and they had concerns about his speaking for everyone. Now that things on the campus have settled down, they’ve provided the information they found to Heat Street.
In a blog post from August 2011, titled “My Summer Breakfast Experience,” Butler describes how, for 61 days, he swung by a hotel before work and “decided to indulge myself with ‘free’ breakfast items.”
Butler describes trying to get caught stealing food, making goofy faces in the camera and making sure staff got a good look at his face.
[. . .]



His disdain for low-income Americans is also apparent in another blog post, from July 2011, that was written about his visit to a Subway sandwich shop. Butler describes how he “stormed up to the counter inpatient [sic] and indecisive,” further detailing rude behavior to the worker. He describes watching the worker, “a grumpy older gentleman, about 70-75 years old,” making his sandwich.”
Butler, who grew up in Omaha, Nebraska, is the son of an railroad executive whose compensation in 2014 was $8.4 million, according to regulatory filings.
Some videos published by Butler, also in 2011, are equally controversial.
In one, nearly 15 minutes long that was published to YouTube in March 2011, Butler says he wants to “address the issue—a very important issue—of XX versus XY. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, male and female: which is better.”
Butler and a guest continue to discuss the problem of “ratchet women,” who flirt and generally are not well-behaved, by their reckoning.
“So you’re saying, she jumps from male to male,” Butler says, continuing: “So this would be like in the kingdom, the wild kingdom, where they’re trying to get their prey.”
At one point, Butler asks his guest: “So what he’s saying is that us as men, we don’t have issues, it’s all women, obviously, because what do we do? We just eat, sleep, work, we’re the backbone. Is that what you’re saying? … You’re saying all women are trash, is that what you’re saying?”
Another 9-minute video, posted to YouTube in July 2011, features Butler singing about cooking crack cocaine with his love interest.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/09/crack-misogyny-and-stealing-from-hotels-meet-mizzous-rich-kid-civil-rights-hero.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fmost-popular+%28Internal+-+Most+Popular+Content%29

Crack, misogyny and stealing from hotels: Meet Mizzou's rich-kid civil rights hero
By Jillian Kay Melchior
Heat Street
Published May 09, 2016

May 4, 2016

Privileged Harvard Law School Students End Civil Rights Action, Resume Pursuit of Corporate Positions




How many of these dedicated, altruistic, morally superior civil rights activists will reject those high paying corporate associate positions, when they leave Belinda Hall and the racist, oppressive, sexist, homophobic and Islamophobic law school community behind? 

After posting the above comment on the Harvard Crimson site, one of the many thoughtful young people who harass me warned, "You better stop doing that. They want to kill you." Really? A group of privileged black students at Harvard Law School whine non stop about white oppression. They demand punishing white people who did them no harm, and demand special privileges, more money and more power as payment for harms they did not suffer. They want to kill a citizen for exercising a constitutionally guaranteed right, i.e. criticizing  misguided young lawyers. Does this indicate how flawed the current higher education system is? Do they really believe that all white people are wealthy and powerful? Do they really believe that all black people are poor and weak? Do they really believe they are the only group chosen to express their demands for better living? Do they believe they are granted special privileges to silence any differing opinions, by disrupting law abiding professors at their own law school who want to speak? Like the Republican Party, they probably do not understand why Donald Trump is so popular and will be the next President. 

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/5/4/reclaim-hls-holds-informal-commencement/

Closing a Year of Activism, Law Students Hold Informal Commencement
By CLAIRE E. PARKER
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
May 4, 2016

March 16, 2016

Black Lives Don't Matter To BlackLIvesMatter




[From article]
It appears that for leftists, black lives don’t really matter. Supposedly concerned about racism, Soros-funded groups in Chicago that ginned up protesters to shut down a Trump rally Friday are utterly silent about black lives that apparently don’t matter. It is only Sunday morning, and the Windy City weekend is already a bloodbath for young men of the African-American demo.



The Chicago Tribune reports:
Four men were killed and at least 12 other people have been wounded since late Friday morning in shootings across the city.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/what_blacklivesmatter_and_moveon_are_not_demonstrating_about_in_chicago.html

March 13, 2016
What #BlackLivesMatter and MoveOn are not demonstrating about in Chicago
By Thomas Lifson

It's Not What I Say, It's What You Say




[From article]
Sanctimonious voices in the media, and among Democrats and some Republicans (shame on you: Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio) declare that Donald Trump fostered a climate of violence that justifies left wing groups organizing, printing up signs, and violently disrupting his rallies.
This is shameful, and leads to a political state where the forcible suppression of a political candidate by mob violence is justified by a political establishment afraid of the policies he advocates.
If inflammatory rhetoric justifies organizing a mob to shut down a political speech, how about Obama?
[. . .]



“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”
The comment drew some laughs and applause. But it also struck a chord with his Republican rival. John McCain’s campaign immediately accused the Democratic candidate of playing the politics of fear. They also mentioned that Obama said he would use a gun that would be illegal under Obama’s plans to cut down on illegal firearms.
“Barack Obama’s call for ‘new politics’ is officially over. In just 24 hours, Barack Obama attacked one of America’s pioneering women CEOs, rejected a series of joint bipartisan town halls, and said that if there’s a political knife fight, he’d bring a gun,” McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said in a statement.
[. . .]



As I mentioned yesterday, violent imagery is no stranger to the Obama faction:
…doesn’t President Obama’s rhetoric about “get in their face” and White House advice to “punch back twice as hard” justify disrupting Obama’s public events?

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/lets_apply_the_trump_standard_of_rhetoric_fostering_violence_to_obama.html

March 13, 2016
Let’s apply the Trump Standard of rhetoric fostering violence to Obama
By Thomas Lifson

January 19, 2016

Multi Millionaire Black Celebrity Laments Few Black Nominees For Academy Awards. Disabled? No So Much



Multi Millionaire Movie Mogul Celebrity

Lee says, "it doesn’t matter what color they are." But complains there are not enough black actors. Huh? Well, which is it? Does skin color matter or not? So how many persons with disabilities appear in, produce, direct movies,  and get nominated? How many are in that magic room with those who decide? If there are enough black persons will that make it fair? Equitable? Who decides how many black actors must get awards? Spike Lee? When will the multi millionaire Lee complain as loudly that there are no persons with disabilities getting awards?

[From article]
I’m personally tired of seeing movies in which all the actors are white when it doesn’t matter what color they are.
[. . .]
Dr. King Said “There Comes A Time When One Must Take A Position That Is Neither Safe, Nor Politic, Nor Popular But He Must Take It Because Conscience Tells Him It’s Right”.
[. . .]
As I See It, The Academy Awards Is Not Where The “Real” Battle Is. It’s In The Executive Office Of The Hollywood Studios And TV And Cable Networks. This Is Where The Gate Keepers Decide What Gets Made And What Gets Jettisoned To “Turnaround” Or Scrap Heap. This Is What’s Important. The Gate Keepers. Those With “The Green Light” Vote.

http://www.showbiz411.com/2016/01/18/spike-lee-winner-of-lifetime-achievement-oscar-this-year-wont-attend-february-ceremony-in-protest

Spike Lee, Winner of Lifetime Achievement Oscar this Year, Won’t Attend February Ceremony
by Roger Friedman
January 18, 2016 8:52 am

January 8, 2016

Facebook Joins Journalists Slanting Publishing Standards




[From article]
On December 28, the ILC opened two inciting Facebook pages that mirrored each other in sentiment with just one difference between them. One page was against Palestinians, and the other page was against Israelis/Jews. The next day, the ILC started to simultaneously upload inciting posts, with the only difference between them being the target of the incitement.
After several posts, the ILC increased the level of incitement, calling for death to Jews on one page and death to Arabs on the other. They continued to upload incendiary posts simultaneously on each page, with identical verbiage except for the targets.
Then ILC reported both pages to Facebook.
[. . .]



The result?
Facebook closed the anti-Palestinian page, writing: “We reviewed the page you reported for containing credible threat of violence and found it violates our Community Standards.” The page inciting violence against Jews was not closed by Facebook, who stated that it was not in violation of their rules.



Same content. Two dramatically different results.
Apparently Facebook’s “community standards” support incitement to murder Jews.
Good to know

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/facebooks_double_standards.html

January 8, 2016
Facebook's double standards
By Carol Brown

December 31, 2015

Battle of the Bills, Clinton vs Cosby




[From Article]
Subbing for Rush Limbaugh on The Rush Limbaugh Show Tuesday, conservative commentator Mark Steyn wondered why Bill Cosby is “finished” while Bill Clinton remains “beloved.”
“I mean that as a serious question, incidentally,” Steyn said. “Why is Bill Cosby finished? He was the most beloved guy.



http://nation.foxnews.com/2015/12/30/mark-steyn-why-bill-cosby-finished-while-bill-clinton-beloved?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fmost-popular+%28Internal+-+Most+Popular+Content%29

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?
Published December 30, 2015
Fox News
By Elizabeth Preza
Mediaite

* * *

[From article]
In Cosby’s case, the answer has to do with the lovable image he projected and the powerful financial interests in keeping him in the public’s fond regard.
The very same analysis applies directly to Bill Clinton. The list of women believed to have been his sexual prey may not run to 52, but it includes:
Paula Jones
Monica Lewinsky (his subordinate)
Elizabeth Ward Gracen
Gennifer Flowers
Kathleen Willey
Juanita Broaddrick
Dolly Kyle Browning
And who knows how many underage girl on Orgy Island.
Making certain these women were not believed was Hillary Clinton’s job, and she did a capable job of it.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/a_tale_of_two_bills_cosby_and_clinton.html

December 31, 2015
A tale of two Bills: Cosby and Clinton
By Thomas Lifson

December 11, 2015

Privileged Hatred On US Campuses, OK To Hate and To Harass Jewish and Pro-Israel Students



Dear Friends;

We are completing a new documentary about the campus titled “Privileged Hatred.” The film exposes the nation-wide campaign to demonize Israel and its supporters, and the failure of university officials to protect Jewish students.

Here is a link to a 9 minute preview.


https://youtu.be/rool4bFqg9o




We plan to release the film this spring and we need your help to create a national campaign to pressure universities to grant Jewish and pro-Israel students the protection from harassment and intimidation that is afforded every other group.

There is a crisis on campus, enabled by a failure of leadership in our universities dominated by radical academics, Saudi funding and now organized mobs. The increasing ideological assaults against Israel and its supporters on campus must not be tolerated. We need to educate the public about these growing threats which too many prefer to ignore.

For the sake of America, the Jewish community and for our children and grandchildren, we must do everything we can to stop this growing fascist movement.

In Freedom,

Charles Jacobs, President
Americans for Peace and Tolerance

December 10, 2015

Margot Elisabeth Wallström, Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs, Indicates Anti Israel Animus



Sweden's Foreign Affairs Minister, Margot Wahlstrom

[From article]
Now that we understand that was just discussing matters of law in general, there is something that is not clear to me. As I understand the law, if someone tries to murder you, you have the right to use lethal force to defend your life. In addition, if you witness someone attempting to murder someone else, you may intervene with lethal force to prevent the murder. To be clear: in either case, whether self-defense or defense of other, you may kill the person attempting to commit murder.
Furthermore, if two people are attempting to murder one person, you may take the lives of both of them to spare the life of the intended victim. One who sets out to murder forfeits his own right to life. The same rule applies no matter how many attackers there are. Numbers are irrelevant. I believe that to be the rule in all Common Law jurisdictions and it is my impression that it is the law everywhere. If Swedish law is different, please set me straight. I suspect it is not.
[. . .]
In a case where one side of a conflict employs as a strategy the incitement of ordinary citizens to carry out terrorist murders and they are killed in the course of such attempts, what force was excessive? How many random civilians have to be killed in order to justify killing others who attempt to kill? Where is this rule embodied? Is it a rule of general application? If so, it should be codified or embodied in precedent somewhere. Or is it something that everyone “just knows”? If it applies only to Israel, then this has a name. The Swedish government knows what it is. So do the Israelis. Perhaps Madam Wallstrom should explain the laws she referred to.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/sweden_israel_and_the_law.html

December 10, 2015
Sweden, Israel, and the Law
By Jack Golbert

December 3, 2015

Facebook Billionaire Avoided Taxes, Morphs Into Philanthropist Explaining What Is Good For The Rest Of Us



Mark Zuckerberg, Billionaire Creator of Facebook

[From article]
Yet there is a dark side to this trend. For behind it lies the sanctimonious hypocrisy of billionaires who build vast fortunes with firms that avoid the taxes paid by the rest of society, then arrogantly think they are best placed to solve the planet’s problems.
Zuckerberg talked in his letter of creating stronger communities. Yet Facebook, like too many technology behemoths, is a serial tax avoider undermining government through its stubborn refusal to pay its fair share to society.
Last year, this all-conquering social media firm handed over just £4,327 in corporation tax in this country: less than the annual sum paid in tax by the average worker.
Yet its staff in Britain took home an average £210,000 each in pay and bonuses, safe in the security of a society that relies on public servants to protect them from terror, provide health care in hospitals and repair the roads on which they travel to work.
The Facebook founder has hailed Bill Gates as his hero — the world’s richest man, who has been revered as something close to a secular saint after promising to give away the bulk of his £57 billion fortune.
[. . .]
Microsoft was accused of avoiding paying £3 billion annually in tax by shifting earnings around between low-tax nations. In Britain alone, it reported £1.7 billion revenues in one year for online sales of software, on which it paid no corporation tax. Zilch.
Gates even has the gall to tour the world telling governments to take more and more money from taxpayers for his beloved foreign aid programmes, once even branding those who oppose such policies as ‘evil’.
[. . .]
In one radio interview, Gates spoke of how philanthropists of the past such as the oil giant John D. Rockefeller offered a model for him and his generation of billionaires.
It was an interesting comparison, since Rockefeller, a ruthless monopolist, became the world’s richest man by using controversial practices such as collusion with railroad companies to crush his oil industry rivals — and then gave away $500 million to good causes.
[. . .]
are among the most notorious examples of cut-throat capitalists who stop at nothing to build their fortunes, then seek in later life to improve their public image with good deeds.
[. . .]
It is laudable to see the super-rich devote themselves to good works and give away big sums for the betterment of others.
Many of these people are technological visionaries, creating fortunes though their energetic entrepreneurship.
Yet too many of them seem to think it is acceptable for their companies to avoid paying taxes, in part because they see themselves as wonderful benefactors engaged in personal crusades to solve the world’s problems.
In effect, they are saying the super-rich have the right to ‘self-tax’ themselves by giving away money to pet causes, rather than the companies with which they made their fortunes paying their fair share of tax to governments, like the rest of us.
However much good they achieve, this is not just breathtakingly arrogant, but profoundly undemocratic. And for all their skills and smartness, they are often no better than governments at tackling problems in public services.
Zuckerberg went on Oprah Winfrey’s TV show five years ago to proclaim a $100 million gift to turn schools in the New Jersey town of Newark ‘into a symbol of educational excellence for the whole nation’.
The donation was doubled with matching funds from others. Yet his controversial scheme failed to meet its goals after blowing $20 million on consultants, and running into opposition from parents, teachers and community leaders.
[. . .]
The harsh truth is that the likes of Zuckerberg and Gates may be philanthropists, but they built those fortunes off the back of companies engaged in massive tax avoidance.
Such corporate strategy weakens society while placing heavier burdens on the rest of us.
It is all too easy in our globalised age for corporate giants to exploit tax loopholes and outwit inadequate politicians by paying the best advisers to shuffle paper profits around the planet.
So by all means praise a plutocrat such as Mr Zuckerberg for promising to give away extraordinary wealth. We must hope the money is put to good use to transform lives.
But at the same time, do not be deluded by the self- proclaimed altruism promoted so publicly by these titans of the technology revolution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3343771/The-tax-avoiding-Facebook-mogul-act-charity-reeks-hypocrisy.html
The tax-avoiding Facebook mogul and an act of charity that reeks of hypocrisy
By IAN BIRRELL FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 20:18 EST, 2 December 2015 | UPDATED: 03:44 EST, 3 December 2015

November 28, 2015

In Terror War Muslims Permitted To Use Religious Tests. White House Prohibits Christians From Using Them





[From article]
[White House] recently scolded those who don’t want to admit “Syrian refugees” to the United States, saying there should not be a religious test. He had the temerity to suggest it was “un-American,” as if being American means abandoning national security to exchange our lives and future for the lives of some other group of folks, many of whom hate us.
In any case, for all of [The White House’s] faux passion and outrage about religious tests, he had nary a word to say about the religious test that is the core of Islam – the test put forth to non-Muslims before terror strikes, sparing those who can recite passages from the Quran before massacring those who cannot. The dead did not pass the religious test.
[White House] does not speak about the religious test put forth to Yazidis and Christians and other non-Muslim minorities in the Middle East when jihadists show up in their town and at their door and in their homes and demand they convert to Islam. Or die. Because they failed the religious test.
[White House] does not speak about the religious test when “Palestinians” take to the streets of Israel and knife, or run over, or shoot Jews because they are Jews, with 23 murdered and 192 wounded in the most recent wave of attacks. It’s a war against Jews because they fail the test.
[. . .]
How dare he raise the idea of a religious test in the face of genocide sweeping across the Middle East, as individuals and families are wiped out because the religious test was put to them? How dare this man stand upon the world stage and utter a single word on a single matter with a fake air of authority when he is, among so many things (and none of them good), a hypocrite of epic proportions?
[. . .]
Islamic scripture is a doctrine of war, and anyone who is talking about other matters while circumventing this is a dangerous fool and has no business being in a position of power or having access to the bull horn.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/11/the_religious_test_hypocrisy.html

November 28, 2015
The 'religious test' hypocrisy
By Carol Brown

September 30, 2015

Washington Post Owner Lectures About Income Inequality, While Earning $16 billion in One Year



Billionaire Jeff Bezos


[From article]
The Washington, D.C., paper of record has spent the past year filling bird cages and landfills with stories about income inequality – 156 in print alone and another 404 in blogs or 560 total. Subtract one of those (listed twice in LexisNexis) that included the name of billionaire Post owner Jeffrey Bezos. And that was a column by conservative George Will declaring: “Income inequality is good.”
The remaining 155 print and 403 blog mentions didn’t have any discussion of the newspaper’s fat cat owner. Yet, Bezos is now the fourth-richest American with a fortune of $47 billion, according to Forbes. He purchased the Post for $250 million, wrote the Post.
According to the Sept. 29, Daily Mail “But it was Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos who has emerged as the biggest overall gainer, adding a whopping $16.5 billion to his war chest in a single year after his company posted a quarterly profit in July.”
Whopping indeed. Bezos made 899,521 times the median household income in the United States -- $52,250. Were Bezos a nation, the $16.5 billion would give him a GDP rank of 150, just below Kosovo and above 81 nations including Guinea and Iceland.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/business/dan-gainor/2015/09/30/post-owner-makes-165b-while-paper-whines-558-times-about-income

Washington Post Owner Makes $16.5B While Paper Whines 558 Times About ‘Income Inequality’ By Dan Gainor
September 30, 2015
12:13 AM EDT

July 30, 2015

Typical Upper Class Politically Powerful Elitists Whining About Racism



Here's the young fellow who knows what it is like to not be liked because of how he looks. George P. Bush, 38, son of Presidential Candidate and former Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush. He's a Texas Land Commissioner.  

What an awful life with a grand-father who was CIA director and President, and an uncle who was President. He must suffer a lot of deprivation and denial of access to schools, jobs, and social life. Poor baby.
[From article]
Bush: It was important. I remember there was a time when my son went to Ocala to play baseball, a game on a team. And the team was a Miami team, the majority were Hispanics. My son George, he's dark-skinned. And they spoke horrible things about those from Miami. And naturally I had to explain or describe that people who hate are not the majority, and we just accept them and move forward. Because he was quite upset. Because he and his friends never -- since we live in Miami, we don't have a problem. But in other parts of the country, it exists. It's a good lesson to learn, to always remember that we still don't have a country that's full justice for all. We can see this in the African-American communities also, there's discrimination still. And in my life it's important to acknowledge this and to act about that -- yes.

http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/jeb-bush-recalls-dark-skinned-sons-experience-with-discrimination/2238998

Jeb Bush recalls 'dark-skinned' son's experience with discrimination
Patricia Mazzei, Miami Herald
Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:21am
From the staff of the Tampa Bay Times

May 30, 2015

Brigitte Gabriel Speaks To UN About Muslim Slave Trade, White House Has No Comment



Brigitte Gabriel

[From article]
Ms. Gabriel is a Lebanese Christian describing the systematic persecution, murder, rape, and slave-taking against Christians in the Middle East -- Christians who have lived there since the time of Jesus.
If we ever manage to make Americans face the reality of Jihad, it will be due to men and women like Brigitte Gabriel. Like Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Geert de Wilder[s], they are risking their lives to save civilized society, constantly opposed by the malicious liberal media and death threats from Muslim fascists.


Geert de Wilder

As always, the Left’s silence about Islamofascist massacres means consent. The Left is utterly cold-hearted.
[. . .]
I don’t know if Obama is a secret Muslim, but it doesn’t really matter -- because his silence means consent. Whatever he believes, he stands convicted by his silence.
Every week ISIS uploads videos celebrating sadistic murders of innocents. But Obama says nothing.
This collusive silence of the Left is nothing new. The Left was just as silent about Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and all the other Marxist murderers, including North Korea’s Kim dynasty.[. . .]
The genocide against Christians and native cultures in the Sudan has been public knowledge for two decades. But Americans still do not know where their president stands on the African slave trade. His silence gives the answer.
[. . .]


Pamela Geller

Today, black children and women are sold on slaves markets in Africa and the Middle East, just like the public markets used to sell the ancestors of today’s African-Americans. But Muslim slave raiders have no color prejudice. In the Middle East they kill and kidnap Christians of Arab descent, Yazidis, and any “apostate Muslims,” like the civilians of Ramadi who were just murdered on the public streets.
 In centuries past Muslim slave raiders in Africa brought their victims to coastal ports for the Atlantic trade.
[. . .]
African-Americans are whipped up to rage against living white folks for the Muslim slave trade. That is either woefully ignorant, or it is a political lie, meant to squeeze the race racket for money and power, like Mr. Obama’s good friend [and FBI informant] Al Sharpton.
The genocide against Christians and native cultures in the Sudan has been public knowledge for two decades. But Americans still do not know where their president stands on the African slave trade. His silence gives the answer.


Robert Spencer

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/05/silence_about_muslim_horrors_means_consent.html

May 30, 2015
Silence about Muslim horrors means consent
By James Lewis


http://youtu.be/1ZPBCJwdA74
video

May 13, 2015

White House Admits Not Knowing Anyone Who Can't Pay His Bills




Like the Clintons, the White House Pleads Poverty While Living Among the Upper Class Elite

[From article]
“I mean, there’s some communities where I don’t know — not only do I not know poor people, I don’t even know people who have trouble paying the bills at the end of the month,” Obama said during the Tuesday morning event. “I just don’t know those people.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/12/cnns-acosta-to-earnest-do-obamas-poverty-comments-show-hes-out-of-touch-video/

CNN’s Acosta To Earnest: Do Obama’s Poverty Comments Show He’s ‘Out Of Touch?’ [VIDEO]
AL WEAVERReporter
3:38 PM 05/12/2015

April 25, 2015

Harvard University Honors Black Nobel Laureate, Who Freely Expresses Her Hatred of Whites. Can It Be Racism?




Here's another false premise, more false facts, more propaganda believed by many including this celebrated black poetess honored by Harvard University. How many innocent white people will be killed by this celebrity encouraging murders of white people? Harvard University shows it has no shame exploiting racial animosity and encouraging violence and murder.  See how far this formerly great university has fallen. Founded as a training school for ministers, it now produces politicians who work to destroy the American political system and encourages its destruction.

[From article]
“This is the conversation. I want to see a cop shoot a white unarmed teenager in the back,” Morrison said. “And I want to see a white man convicted for raping a black woman. Then when you ask me, ‘Is it over?’, I will say yes.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/20/toni-morrison-i-want-to-see-a-cop-shoot-a-white-unarmed-teenager/

Toni Morrison: ‘I Want To See A Cop Shoot A White Unarmed Teenager’
10:36 PM 04/20/2015
CHUCK ROSS

* **

[From article]
A winner of a Nobel Prize for Literature, a Presidential Medal of Freedom, and a Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, Morrison is one of the most decorated living authors. She is the author of more than ten novels, including Beloved, for which she won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 1988 and the 1987 National American Book Award.
It will not be Morrison’s first appearance at Harvard. The octogenarian writer has given multiple previous talks on campus spanning a wide range of topics from advice on writing to good and evil in literature. Notably, Morrison delivered the Massey Lectures in 1992 which gave rise, in part, to her book of literary criticism, “Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination.”

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/4/21/toni-morrison-norton-lectures/

Nobel Laureate Toni Morrison To Deliver Six Campus Lectures
By C. RAMSEY FAHS, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
April 21, 2015

* * *

[From article]
Nobel Prize-winning novelist Toni Morrison says she wants to see an officer shoot an unarmed white teenager in the back before agreeing that the “conversation about race” is over, but she almost certainly already has received her wish.
An analysis released last week shows that more white people died at the hands of law enforcement than those of any other race in the last two years, even as the Justice Department, social-justice groups and media coverage focus on black victims of police force.
[. . .]
Meanwhile, the deaths of whites at the hands of law enforcement typically receive less attention, even when the case is shrouded in controversy. For example, Gilbert Collar, an 18-year-old white student at the University of South Alabama, was shot and killed while naked, unarmed and under the influence of drugs by a black police officer.
[. . .]
As researchers are quick to point out, FBI data on police shootings by race is notoriously incomplete, which may explain why Peter Moskos, assistant professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice at the City University of New York, decided to use figures from the website Killed by Based on that data, Mr. Moskos reported that roughly 49 percent of those killed by officers from May 2013 to April 2015 were white, while 30 percent were black. He also found that 19 percent were Hispanic and 2 percent were Asian and other races.
[. . .]
The fact-checking website PolitiFact concluded in August 2014 that police kill more whites than blacks after the claim was made by conservative commentator Michael Medved. PolitiFact cited data from the Centers for Disease Control on fatal injuries by “legal intervention” from 1999 to 2011.
“Over the span of more than a decade, 2,151 whites died by being shot by police compared to 1,130 blacks. In that respect, Medved is correct,” said PolitiFact.
But PolitiFact gave his assertion a “half true” rating because whites make up 63 percent of the population, while blacks make up just 12 percent.
“Yes, more whites than blacks die as a result of an encounter with police, but whites also represent a much bigger chunk of the total population,” PolitiFact said in its Aug. 21 post.
But PolitiFact did not take into account the percentage of those by race involved in violent crime or shootings of police, as Mr. Moskos did.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/21/police-kill-more-whites-than-blacks-but-minority-d/

Police kill more whites than blacks, but minority deaths generate more outrage
Analysis contradicts widespread views about racial targets

April 23, 2015

MSNBC Hosts Owe Taxes, Want Others To Pay, But Not Them




[From article]
And he’s just one of the network’s four tax scofflaws Touré Neblett, co-host of MSNBC’s The Cycle, owes more than $59,000 in taxes, according to public records reviewed by National Review. In September 2013, New York issued a state tax warrant to Neblett and his wife, Rita Nakouzi, for $46,862.68. Six months later, the state issued an additional warrant to the couple for $12,849.87. In January 2014, Neblett tweeted, “Regressive taxation & tax-avoidance & union crushing & the financial corruption of legislation has fueled inequality more than hard work.” In 2012, he also criticized Republican politicians, saying they were “all afraid to vote for a modest tax increase of people who can totally afford it.”
MSNBC’s hosts and guests regularly call for higher taxes on the rich, condemning wealthy individuals and corporations who don’t pay their taxes or make use of loopholes. But recent reports, as well as records reviewed by National Review, show that at least four high-profile MSNBC on-air personalities have tax liens or warrants filed against them.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/417275/msnbcs-tour-has-taxman-his-case-jillian-kay-melchior

MSNBC’s Touré Has the Taxman on His Case
by JILLIAN KAY MELCHIOR
April 22, 2015 4:00 AM

March 31, 2015

Hypocrisy Among Homosexuals Rears Its Ugly Head





The extremist alarmists about religious beliefs, demanding that homosexuals and lesbians be treated equally, ignore the disgusting way they obliterate the rights of people to believe as they choose. Religious beliefs are guaranteed by the US Constitution. The same document does not guarantee homosexuals a right to practice homosexual sex. One more example of common sense being a punishment, not a gift. You have to live with people who do not have it.  

[From article]
Like Shariah Law, liberalism imposes its values upon nonbelievers and punishes noncompliance.
Says Mayor Edwin Lee, who has banned city-funded trips to Indiana, “We stand united as San Franciscans to condemn Indiana’s new discriminatory law, and will work together to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”
[. . .]
The mayor may not like how people exercise their freedom. Does his dislike justify depriving them of that freedom?
The gay rights community seems to have advanced from asking for tolerance of their lifestyles — to demanding punishment for those who refuse to accept its moral equality.
[. . .]
What the Indiana issue is really all about is the replacement of Christian values with secular values as the operating premises of society.
And the hallmark of our new society is intolerance of those who reject the revolution. It is ever so with revolutions.
[. . .]
As the Jack Nicholson character George Hanson said in “Easy Rider,”
“You know, this used to be a helluva good country.” It surely was.

http://buchanan.org/blog/stand-up-for-indiana-15798

Stand Up for Indiana!
Tuesday - March 31, 2015 at 12:41 am
By Patrick J. Buchanan

March 29, 2015

Pharrell Williams, Appropriate Successor To Al Gore



Parrell Williams arrives on his private jet

[From article]
CBSNews refers to Pharrell as “the new climate change czar,” but Al Gore needn’t worry at the moment, because global warming hasn’t yet caused a shortage of private jets. It has, unfortunately, created a shortage of self-awareness on the part of jet-set celebs and apparently parents and teachers capable of instructing kids on how to spot hypocritical BS:


Pharrell Williams' Yacht

http://michellemalkin.com/2015/03/22/heir-apparent-to-al-gore-proves-hes-totally-up-to-the-challenge/


Pharrell Williams alone on his private jet


Heir apparent to Al Gore proves he’s totally up to the challenge
By Doug Powers
March 22, 2015 09:32 AM