Showing posts with label Housing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Housing. Show all posts

April 19, 2016

More Emphasis Needed On Affordable Housing in Cambridge, MA




One percent of the world's population (including developers), has more wealth than the remaining 99 percent. Make the affordable housing requirement 99 percent. The useless eaters can interact with a member of the one percent developer class, or maybe a part of her. Alternatively the city council can and should eliminate rent in Cambridge. Mandating landlords to provide high quality of life property to parasites for free is a popular idea whose time has come. While Cambridge remains a sanctuary city, encouraging illegal aliens to live here, a shortage of free housing will grow larger. Eliminating rent will permit more illegal aliens and compassionate valedictorian refugees to live in the world class academic elitist Cambridge and enjoy its fruity fruits. Poor white Americans can find some other place to live. 

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/news/20160412/cambridge-looks-to-increase-affordable-unit-requirement-in-new-developments/?Start=1 

Cambridge looks to increase affordable unit requirement in new developments 
By Natalie Handy nhandy (at) wickedlocal.com 
Posted Apr. 12, 2016 at 5:27 PM 
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

April 12, 2016

Dallas, Texas Building Cottages For Homeless, Housing First Then Solving Problems



Tent City Dallas To Be Destroyed

[From article]
For rent: brand new one-bedroom apartments in the shadow of downtown Dallas, a short walk from one of the city’s trendiest areas. On-site concierge. Successful applicants will be homeless, mentally ill and possess criminal records.
These are strange-sounding tenant requirements, but The Cottages at Hickory Crossing is an unusual kind of project. It is a “housing first” strategy: find the homeless a permanent place of their own before trying to solve their problems, rather than the other way around.
The fifty 400sq ft units are set to open in April in north Texas. Despite its bucolic name, Hickory Crossing is wedged between freeways a mile from the city’s high-rises, with railroad tracks, warehouses and the nightlife of the Deep Ellum district close by. One of the nonprofits that has raised the funds for the multimillion dollar project, CitySquare, has an Opportunity Center across the road offering a variety of services for low-income Dallas residents.
“In order to live across the street you have to be chronically homeless, disabled, with some presenting mental health issue, typically drugs or alcohol, and you have to have a criminal background. If you haven’t been in jail you can’t stay in our houses,” says Larry James, CitySquare’s CEO.
The process of selecting tenants is under way. It began by identifying the 300 most expensive homeless people in the county, based on their cost to city services such as the health and prison systems.


The Cottages at Hickory Crossing 

“We will have 50 of the most expensive homeless persons. The average cost per person on this list of 300 to the county alone, not counting the city or nonprofit organisations, is over $40,000 a year to stay outside. We’re going to provide a gated community with security, seven day a week mental health services, really good housing – platinum LEED certified – every house has a bedroom scaled to queen-sized furniture, a living room, kitchen and a bath, a nice front porch. Less than $15,000 a year is what it costs to provide that kind of housing,” James says.
All for a rent of 30% of the tenant’s monthly income – whether it is $1,000 or $10. The only requirement? “Be a good tenant,” James says. That means no criminal or disruptive behaviour; but no pressure on residents to immediately go sober if they are addicted to alcohol, for example. Help will be on hand when they are ready.
“I’ve heard stories of people getting ‘housing first’ and sleeping with the door open because it’s such a massive shift, it took months or even a year for them to be able to shut and lock the door,” says Jonathan Grace, a pastor who works with the homeless in Dallas.
Other models for housing that focus on mental illness and alcoholism have been credited with reducing chronic homelessness in Utah by 91% and have been tried in cities including Seattle, Los Angeles and New York.
[. . .]
Some 40% of homeless adults in Dallas are severely mentally ill.
[. . .]
The sprawling homeless encampment beneath a freeway overpass grew to be so large that it encompassed hundreds of tents and distinct neighbourhoods: the alcoholics, the drug users, the young people, clustered on a dusty patch of wasteland close to the shimmering glass skyscrapers of downtown and a giant billboard advertising a banana-yellow Ford Mustang. Clothes hung on a metal fence, pigeons pecked at the ground and portable toilets stood in a corner near a truck providing medical services.
[. . .]
James believes the cottages could promote a more enlightened approach to homelessness in Texas, one that emphasizes trust, time and collaboration. “People given resources and opportunities typically work hard to solve their own problems. We just don’t respect that enough,” he says.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/20/tiny-home-dallas-homeless-housing-first-strategy

'Housing first': Dallas's new strategy for the city's most costly homeless people
Selection process for tenants is under way as project seeks to provide permanent place to live before solving issues such as mental health, drugs or alcohol
Tom Dart in Dallas, Texas
@Tom_Dart
Sunday 20 March 2016 08.00 EDT

April 3, 2016

Colorado Housing Not Open To Trump Supporters




In 1970s, in Cambridge and Boston, roommate ads often included prohibiting Republicans. Is this why Trump became a housing developer?

[From article]
A landlord in Grand Junction is not breaking the law by refusing to lease an apartment to anyone who supports Donald Trump for president.
According to The Daily Sentinel in Grand Junction, Mark Holmes is renting out a two-bedroom apartment on Main Street, but he refuses to rent to anyone who supports Trump.[. . .]
“That has nothing to do with the Fair Housing Act,” HUD spokesman Jerry Brown told The Daily Sentinel. “But that seems to be a first, and it’s original.”
“He’s preaching hate and he’s preaching … a lot of venom, spit and vinegar. And I live in the top part of the house,” Holmes said. “I don’t want anybody that even thinks that Donald Trump can be a good president to live in my home.”

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/03/20/grand-junction-apartment-donald-trump/

You Can’t Live Here If You Are Voting For Donald Trump
March 20, 2016 5:07 PM
CBS News Denver CO

February 13, 2016

Cambridge, MA, An Elitist Academic Enclave, Promotes "Affordable Housing"?




After 1995 demise of rent control developers in Cambridge work toward the goal of transforming Cambridge from a working class city to an elitist academic enclave. This is one more project in support of that goal. Remarkable how many limousine liberals chant "Affordable housing" but support elitist transformations. More feel good rhetoric? All comments are from property owners. Any renters left in Cambridge?

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20160209/NEWS/160206215

Cambridge developer hopes to transform historical building into boutique hotel
By Natalie Handy
nhandy (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Feb. 9, 2016 at 9:20 AM
Updated Feb 9, 2016 at 9:21 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

February 7, 2016

Donald Trump Helped Save New York City



Wollman Rink, Central Park, New York City

[From article]
Whatever you think about his political views or crazy campaign, Trump doesn’t get enough credit for being a transformative planner who is in love with the city.
No matter how many times they watch “Taxi Driver,” younger New Yorkers and older ones who arrived recently have no idea of what the city was actually like in the mid-1970s through the mid-’90s. Notwithstanding Studio 54 and a short-lived Wall Street boom, the metropolis was reeling. Rampant street crime, AIDS, corporate flight and physical decay brought confidence to an all-time low.
Trump waded into a landscape of empty Fifth Avenue storefronts, the dust-bowl mugging ground that was Central Park and a Wall Street area seemingly on its last legs as companies moved out.
[. . .]
Trump himself is largely to blame for being a prophet without honor in his home city. He grew weary of the risky, time-consuming development grind and started selling his name to just about any developer willing to sign a check. The result was horrible projects like the Trump Soho Hotel which he neither built nor owns.
His disastrous foray into Atlantic City casinos — Why, Donald? — his tacky promotion of China-made shirts and ties among other goofy ventures further cheapened his name.

http://nypost.com/2016/02/07/how-donald-trump-helped-save-new-york-city/

How Donald Trump helped save New York City
By Steve Cuozzo
New York Post
February 7, 2016 | 6:00am

January 13, 2016

Cambridge, MA City Council Approves Basement Apartments With Lower Ceilings



Cambridge, MA City Council January 2016

Curious arguments by omniscient politicians. Earlier the argument was Inspectional Services could not enforce current laws, but new laws would be enforced. Now the issue is flooding? Harvard University took three residential units off the market contrary to their promise due to frequent flooding. Last week my kitchen sink drain backed up with dirt blocking the drain. This is another example of lack of critical thinking by Cambridge Councilors. Increased population density does not improve quality of life. What are they thinking?

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20160113/NEWS/160118155/?Start=1

Cambridge zoning petition allows homeowners to create basement units
By Natalie Handy
nhandy (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Jan. 13, 2016 at 1:50 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

November 2, 2015

Cambridge, MA Advocates Affordable Housing For Black Activists





Evict white tenants from Cambridge. Make room for Better Black Lives.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/11/2/black-lives-matter-march/

Black Lives Matter March Calls for Reforms
By JONAH S. LEFKOE, CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Harvard Crimson
November 1, 2015

October 10, 2015

The Dakota, New York's Most Exclusive Building, New Book



New York City's Most Exclusive Building, 1 West 72nd Street

During my brief period as a celebrity in New York City I went to a party there once. The elevator was luxurious. If rumors are true my current building is the first one which had an elevator in Cambridge, MA.  

[From article]
the iconic structure, built in 1884 and designed by architect Henry Hardenbergh, the man behind the Plaza and the original Waldorf-Astoria.
[. . .]
Celebrities from Lauren Bacall to Leonard Bernstein have called it home. It was immortalized in the seminal horror movie “Rosemary’s Baby,” and, of course, John Lennon’s assassination at its gates 35 years ago has made the building a tourist Mecca to this day. (His widow, Yoko Ono, still lives on the seventh floor.)
[. . .]


A crafted Native American sculpture on the facade of the Dakota.
Photo: Ken Grant
The most expensive unit ever sold went for a whopping $27.5 million. In 2014, art collector Ydessa Hendeles bought the three-bedroom pad — with 100 feet of Central Park frontage — from hedge funder Bruce Barnes.Modal Trigger
The very same apartment likely went for around $150,000 in 1971,
[. . .]
Among the celebrities who’ve lived in the Dakota: John Madden, “Grey Gardens” filmmaker Albert Maysles, Connie Chung and Maury Povich, Boris Karloff, and Judy Garland. (Among those reportedly turned down by the co-op board: Cher, Billy Joel, Madonna and Judd Apatow.)
[. . .]
For its debut in 1884, developer Clark and architect Hardenbergh kitted out the Dakota with technology that was cutting-edge for the area, including electricity. It was one of the first residential building to have elevators

http://nypost.com/2015/10/10/secrets-of-new-yorks-most-notorious-apartment-building/

Secrets of New York’s most notorious apartment building
By Hana R. Alberts
New York Post
October 10, 2015 | 5:12pm

September 29, 2015

Wife of Columbia University Graduate Student Jumps to Death




[From article]
A new Manhattan mom jumped to her death from a sixth-floor window early Monday despite a desperate attempt by her Columbia University grad-student husband to stop her, police sources told The Post.
Jiyunu Kim, 33, who gave birth just four months ago, broke free from her husband’s grasp and jumped out the window of their apartment at 414 W. 120th St. in Morningside Heights at about 5 a.m., the sources said.
She landed in a small courtyard, with the window screen falling nearby.
“I woke up at about 5 a.m. and heard a crash. Then I heard a door slamming and someone taking off running. I heard screaming in Mandarin or Cantonese,” said a resident who refused to provide her name.
A police source said Kim lived in the apartment with her husband, Donghan Kim, 27, who attends Columbia’s Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Keeping Cambridge MA Affordable?





Not discussed in this report is the concept of eminent domain, where the city takes possession of land for public purposes. Declare a housing emergency, noting thousands of migrants arriving from the Middle East (the geographic area, not the restaurant), Africa, Mexico and China. Take Harvard University's law school quadrangle and renovate for housing. Build 20 stories of affordable housing on what Harvard calls, the science center plaza (city owned land), and then twin 50 story housing edifices on Cambridge Common. Voila. Ipso facto builto.



http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150929/NEWS/150926026



Guest Column: How to keep Cambridge affordable
By Jesse Kanson-Benanav
Posted Sep. 29, 2015 at 10:15 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

August 29, 2015

Cambridge MA Politicians and Journalists Speak For Others




In this interview, media darling (regularly cited in local papers and on public television), and City Councilor Nadeem Mazem, indicates he suffers from a common syndrome of Cambridge politicians. He says, " everyone knows it [minimum wage] should be $15 an hour." Really? Everyone? How does he know that? He adds, "everyone [in the Boston area] secretly feels in their gut that this just isn’t going to happen," Again. How does he know what people feel? Especially if it is a secret? He's not the only one who speaks for others, with or without their permission. In a recent interview published in the Cambridge Chronicle, City Councilor Carlone does the same thing. See at this link.

http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2015/08/cambridge-ma-city-councilor-speaks-for.html

They are not the only ones. Former City Councilor Jim Braude used to do the same thing when he was a councilor. He also did it on his radio show. I asked in a phone call why he did that. It did not stop him. He continues to speak for others. Now he does a local PBS television show and continues the tradition. He added an upgrade. He has three guests for a seven minute segment. That allows for the four of them including the host less than two minutes each to discuss complex issues. In order to extend the time he asks a question of his guests and then cuts them off saying, "I got it." Meaning he is so smart he knows what the guest is going to say. Can he read minds? Is that why he speaks for others? Can the other city councilors also read minds?

Returning to this interview, Councilor Mazem refers to "high value construction that buoys our economy and empowers our local government to do incredible things for education." If that's true why are the educational results of all that money so disappointing? He adds, "we have academic powerhouses, we have everything we need to empower the upper middle class and above." He does not mention teachers unions and other government unions. Public policy is hindered by these unions and none of the politicians speak about them except to boast that they negotiated with the unions for the city. Why is that? Do politicians fear criticizing unions?

Those academic powerhouses are focused properly on educating their students and doing research. What does public school education have to do with that? Is academic excellence of the universities supposed to rub off on the city's students?  He suggests a problem without discussing it when he says, "we also have 45 percent of our public school kids on free and reduced lunch, which means that their parents are living around the poverty line." Oh? Cambridge has a large high income population. Why are so many of their children attending private schools? Is there a problem unmentioned with the city's public schools?

Showing off his knowledge of economics Mazem makes a remarkable comment. "if you financially benefit the wealthy, they will save it, but if you put dollars in the pockets of people who are working or middle class, they will spend it at local businesses. It happens right away." How does he know that? Wealthy people invest their money. Poor people have access to the internet and purchase items online anywhere in the world. The Council provided access to the internet for all Cambridge citizens defeating their campaign to buy local. Indeed they hire out of town consultants to make their decisions. What is up with that? Once the Council bought a book as a present for the City Manager. At a public meeting Mayor Reeves boasted that was purchased at Barnes and Nobles.

The final perplexing comment has to do with a proposed experiment of councilors living on $10 a day. Homeless people live on less. Free food is served at venues seven days a week in and around Cambridge. Free clothing, furniture and more. One can get free mental health services too. Some homeless persons abuse the system and pretend to be ill and call emergency services, which provides free rides to hospitals with a free overnight stay with meals. Why not address some solvable problems  instead of reinventing the wheel, grandstanding for journalists. The more things change, the more they stay the same imitating Washington DC.

[From article]
I watched, and I think everyone knows it should be $15 an hour, but I also think that everyone [in the Boston area] secretly feels in their gut that this just isn’t going to happen,
[. . .]
We have 105,000 people in this city [Cambridge], but we have an unbelievable amount of extremely high value construction that buoys our economy and empowers our local government to do incredible things for education. But how could we not take care of a very basic wage right? We have commercial development, we have academic powerhouses, we have everything we need to empower the upper middle class and above.
[. . .]
We want to house as many people as possible who need it, housing is a human right, but we also have 45 percent of our public school kids on free and reduced lunch, which means that their parents are living around the poverty line.
[. . .]
the fact is that if you financially benefit the wealthy, they will save it, but if you put dollars in the pockets of people who are working or middle class, they will spend it at local businesses. It happens right away.
[. . .]
We’re also going to do a challenge where councilors and others try to live on the current minimum wage. At the end of the day, the lesson will be that none of us really can live on $10 a day.

https://digboston.com/labor-revolt-in-the-peoples-republik/

LABOR REVOLT IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIK
August 24, 2015
By CHRIS FARAONE

July 27, 2015

Plenty of Affordable Housing In New York City and London. If You Can Afford It



A look inside Donald Trump’s penthouse at Trump Park Avenue, which just sold for $21 million.
Evan Joseph Images

[From article]
Located on the 24th floor of the 32-story 502 Park Ave., this floor-through unit — which Trump never lived in — has five bedrooms and 7½ bathrooms.
Sweet features include 10-foot ceilings, floor-to-ceiling windows, three exposures in the great room, a windowed chef’s kitchen with butler’s pantry, and two walk-in closets in the master suite. Want more? The unit also boasts custom moldings, marbled bathrooms with Watermark fixtures, a library and a media room.
http://nypost.com/2015/07/27/donald-trump-sells-park-avenue-penthouse-for-21m/

Donald Trump sells Park Avenue penthouse for $21M
By Zachary Kussin
July 27, 2015 | 5:27pm
New York Post

A sprawling oasis in Manhattan's premier prewar condominium! This exceptional 6,192-square-foot penthouse residence with a private elevator is an incredible light-filled space with 5 bedrooms, 7 and a half baths, floor-to-ceiling windows that showcase wonderful views and impeccable attention to detail at every turn. Among the wealth of luxurious highlights are solid oak quarter sawn floors, handcrafted Italian brass doorknobs, custom moldings, stylish spa-like Fior de Pesco marble baths with bowed white wood cabinetry and Watermark chrome nickel fixtures, 12-month individually-operated climate control, and a sleek gourmet windowed chef's kitchen with a butler's pantry, white marble floors, stainless steel GE Profile appliances, fluted glass-paneled white wood cabinetry, marble countertops, mirrored backsplash and an undermount cast iron sink. Host formal gatherings in the breathtaking great room with triple exposures that is privately located opposite from the bedroom wing of the home. Relax with a good book or favorite movie in the separate library and den/media room. Retire to the large master suite with a separate study, his and hers baths and 2 walk-in closets located at the far end of this incredible home.A landmarked architectural wonder on Manhattan's Upper East Side, Trump Park Avenue is idyllically situated near Central Park, Manhattan's best cultural destinations and premier dining and schools. Residents enjoy a level of service that exceeds every expectation, with your daily needs tended to by an attentive professional staff. World-class amenities includes a 24-hour doorman, concierge, daily maid and laundry service, hotel and valet services, hotel and valet services, live-in resident manager and state-of-the-art fitness center.



* * *


The exclusive property in Chelsea boasts seven bedrooms and looks out over the River Thames and Battersea Park opposite.

[From article]
He once joked about doing a 'job swap' with Boris Johnson and has referred to London as his 'second home'.
Now Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former mayor of New York, has purchased an historic riverside mansion once owned by George Eliot.
Mr Bloomberg splashed out £17million on the seven-bedroom property in the exclusive Cheyne Walk in Chelsea.[. . .]
As well as its rich artistic heritage, the 5,000 sq ft property boats an impressive literary history. The novelist Mary Ann Evans - better known as George Eliot - lived in the house until her death in 1880.
The seven-bedroom mansion also includes a large garden, vaults, a lift, original parquet floors, panelling and intricate cornice work, murals and marble fireplaces.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3175937/Former-New-York-mayor-Michael-Bloomberg-buys-17m-seven-bed-Thames-mansion-owned-George-Eliot.html

Former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg buys £17m seven-bed Thames-side mansion once owned by 'George Eliot'
Michael Bloomberg, billionaire ex-mayor of New York, bought historic riverside mansion in Cheyne Walk, Chelsea
He purchased the Grade-II listed building dating back from 1715 and once owned by George Eliot for £17million
He beat off three other bidders to land the mansion, which overlooks the Thames, for £1m more than its asking price
By THOMAS BURROWS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 06:04 EST, 27 July 2015 | UPDATED: 07:58 EST, 27 July 2015

July 20, 2015

Updated: White House Collects Personal Data To Racially Change The Nation


Posted July 18, 2015 8:09 PM ET; Last updated July 20, 2015 8:14 PM ET



Considering how secure data bases are this will also make it extremely easy to fake data. As for statistics as if it wasn't bad enough. In the words of Mark Twain, "There are lies. Damn lies. And then there are statistics." Place these numbers in the hands of spin doctors, lawyers and politicians and it will be more deception, more lies and more abuses of white people. Why not just ban white people?

[From article]
If you happened to be a born white conservative, you were always a natural “racist” to the race-obsessed Obama. The only difference now is that he’s managed to make it official.
[. . .]
The Obama administration is profiling the entire population in a rigid new world where people will be catalogued as racists—not because they really are but all because their government tagged them that way.
It’s a system where innocence of the charge doesn’t count.

http://canadafreepress.com/article/73861

Obama’s secret database forces ‘racist’ smear on innocent citizens
By Judi McLeod
July 19, 2015

* * *

[From article]
A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”
Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.
This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.
[. . .]
The granddaddy of them all is the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing database, which the Department of Housing and Urban Development rolled out earlier this month to racially balance the nation, ZIP code by ZIP code. It will map every US neighborhood by four racial groups — white, Asian, black or African-American, and Hispanic/Latino — and publish “geospatial data” pinpointing racial imbalances.
The agency proposes using nonwhite populations of 50% or higher as the threshold for classifying segregated areas.
[. . .]
Through its mandatory Civil Rights Data Collection project, the Education Department is gathering information on student suspensions and expulsions, by race, from every public school district in the country. Districts that show disparities in discipline will be targeted for reform.
Those that don’t comply will be punished. Several already have been forced to revise their discipline policies, which has led to violent disruptions in classrooms.
[. . .]
Even if no one has complained about discrimination, even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair.

http://nypost.com/2015/07/18/obama-has-been-collecting-personal-data-for-a-secret-race-database/

Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database
By Paul Sperry
July 18, 2015 | 4:00pm

July 15, 2015

Cambridge, MA City Council Promotes Affordable Housing



Cambridge, MA City Council July 2015

Does it matter that this consulting organization resides on the MIT campus? Is this another instance of for profit endeavors on tax exempt property? Who said the money is on Wall Street? Here's one more "consultant" giving city officials expensive advice. What do the politicians provide to taxpayers for the salaries (about $100,000 per year now) they get? Are they in the business of middle men hiring organizations to make decisions for them? If taxpayer funds spent on consultants were instead used to house persons without homes, or to create affordable housing would the quality of life improve in the city? What role does the Massachusetts legislature play in establishing guidelines for increasing affordable housing? Has the City Council ever defined what they mean when they use the word "diversity?" 

[From article]
Linkage Fees are the amount of money corporate developers pay the city to help preserve and create affordable housing. For over a decade, the fee has remained close to $4.80 per square foot. Following our recommendations, the fee will be raised to $12, with a $1 increase over the next three years, ultimately tripling the amount of money developers must pay the city toward affordable housing.
[. . .]
These recommendations were reached following a study completed by Karl F. Seidman Consulting Services, who recommended that fees be increased to $10-$12 per square foot.
[. . .]
Cambridge’s diversity is its strength. If we are going to maintain that diversity, we must do everything we can to create and protect as much affordable housing as possible.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150715/NEWS/150718147

Guest column: Significant victory for affordable housing in Cambridge
By Denise Simmons, Dennis Benzan and Marc McGovern
Posted Jul. 15, 2015 at 9:54 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

July 2, 2015

More Studies Of Persons Without Homes Planned, Housing Them Will Have To Wait Some More




Enthusiasm is good, how about some focus? Advocates suggest "bringing in experts and the public." What makes an expert? People employed at non profits who provide services to people without homes? Another says, “We need finely-tuned data.” which is collected frequently. Re-inventing the wheel is fun, but wastes time. Another wants to know "which types of homelessness are the most prevalent." Is diversity the issue? Still another asks, what "barriers prohibit the homeless from getting housing." Where are the experts? US Congressional and state legislative committees studied this issue, wrote legislation and provided funding. Every couple of years the Cambridge City Council (and many other city councils) assembles an army to write the ten year plan to end homelessness. University researchers study the issue and write articles and books about it. There are enough plans and studies wasting time, money and good will. Use the money and resources to put people into homes. Put fugitives into their proper places too. Stop stalling. Oh, is the open border contributing to the unending supply of homeless persons?

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150701/NEWS/150709650

Cambridge takes holistic approach in helping the homeless
By Amy Saltzman
asaltzman (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Jul. 1, 2015 at 7:57 AM
Updated at 12:16 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

June 24, 2015

Cambridge City Council Deliberates Housing Abuses, Snow Removal




Concerns about landlords displacing tenants for renovations belongs with the state legislature. Maybe a home rule petition from the City Council, or protesters at landlord homes paid by George Soros, would solve problem. Property owners who fail to clear sidewalks after snow storms often find it is cheaper to pay fines than to clear the snow. It is usually the same property owners each year who do not clear paths for pedestrians.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/6/17/cambridge-city-council-snow-removal/

City Council Talks Rental Properties and Snow Removal
By JALIN P. CUNNINGHAM
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
June 17, 2015

June 2, 2015

Older Americans Face Threats To Their Housing





[From article]
Of all the financial threats facing Americans of retirement age — outliving savings, falling for scams, paying for long-term care — housing isn't supposed to be one. But after a home-price collapse, the worst recession since the 1930s and some calamitous decisions to turn homes into cash machines, millions of them are straining to make house payments.
The consequences can be severe. Retirees who use retirement money to pay housing costs can face disaster if their health deteriorates or their savings run short. They're more likely to need help from the government, charities or their children. Or they must keep working deep into retirement.
[. . .]
They say they shouldn't have qualified for a loan that big. They alleged in an unsuccessful lawsuit against two mortgage firms and a title company that "someone" without their knowledge had inflated Lowe's income on the loan application to get the mortgage approved. (A court ruled in 2013 that "a reasonably prudent person" should have spotted "the alleged wrongdoing" in the application in 2005.)

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/39c19ef44eaa46888423ae1072226596/more-older-americans-are-being-buried-housing-debt

More older Americans are being buried by housing debt
By PAUL WISEMAN
Jun. 2, 2015 3:37 AM EDT

May 21, 2015

Changing Skyline of Kendall Square




It is perplexing in extremely progressive Cambridge, loud voices oppose change. No longer a working class factory and college town, the people's republic is now an academic enclave. Like New York City rich people want to live here. They do not like having too many poor people nearby. Does Harvard University have any influence on what the city government does? With a Planning Board that approves projects, the city needs an approval board to make city-wide development plans. What role does state law play in restricting affordable housing?

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150518/NEWS/150516650

LETTER: Kendall Square sprawl is taking over with Mass+Main
Posted May. 18, 2015 at 3:54 PM
Updated May 18, 2015 at 3:56 PM
To the editor:
Marilee Meyer, Dana Street
Editor’s note: This is an open letter to the Cambridge City Council.

May 19, 2015

Cambridge, MA Housing and Movers, Not Shakers




This article fails to recognize the effect of Newton's first two laws of motion, on people moving. First law: a body at rest will remain at rest unless an external force acts on it. Second law: a body in motion will continue in motion in a straight line unless an external force acts on it. How many people who do not move have not had any external forces on them? How many with external forces moved? That would provide facts to explain the market and allow for planning and investment.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150424/NEWS/150428087

Moving companies reflect changes in Cambridge housing market
By Danielle McLean
dmclean (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Apr. 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

May 5, 2015

Cambridge, MA Architect Laments Permit Process For Building Housing



MIT Dormitory, Cambridge, MA

Mr. Boyes-Watson laments difficulty with permit process for new housing. Is it the need to get permits at all, that is a problem, or only some of the process? He does not explain. He does not suggest that any part of the process is corrupt, or can be ignored with due consideration. He does not mention why developers want to build in Cambridge with all of the problems getting permits. Do the high prices of real estate have anything to do with it? Is building in Cambridge a good investment? Is blaming "we in the community" for "loading up housing construction with more and more obligations and fighting each project that is proposed" misguided blame? How much influence do "we in the community" have over decisions by the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals? 
 
Are official requirements too high for low income housing? Shoddy construction, no heat and hot water would lower costs and allow more poor people to live in the city. Allowing flop houses for single room occupancy would get rid of, or at least mitigate the homeless problem. Standards are too high. Look at places like the Sudan, Jordanian and Syrian refugee camps, Gaza, asylum seekers in Italy, for low cost housing of millions who are refugees. The same standards could be used in Cambridge to increase housing and to reduce the homeless problem. Look at the large tent Harvard University erected on city owned land on the overpass near the Fire Department headquarters, which Harvard calls Science Plaza. A great place for low cost housing near a major transit hub. 20 stories of low income housing would go well there. Then there is Cambridge Common where a fifty story building could easily be built, even closer to major transportation and shopping.


[From article]
I can categorically state that it is hard, very hard, to obtain permits to build housing. In my opinion is far too hard, in fact so hard that despite the strong desire of developers to invest in housing in the city not enough new housing is being permitted and built here. This throttling of new housing supply means that well-to-do, moderate-income and low-income folks are all competing for what is a too limited, too static resource.
[. . .]
This is a problem of not permitting enough housing, period. Every unit is very expensive to get permitted and built, so the new housing is, inevitably expensive.
[. . .]
It is disingenuous to suggest we are powerless to slow the rise of housing costs in Cambridge. Those who have control can and should address the rise in housing costs by permitting more housing to be built. We in the community cannot behave like Marie Antoinette and bemoan rising housing costs while loading up housing construction with more and more obligations and fighting each project that is proposed. It is hypocrisy.
Guest column: Permit more housing in Cambridge to slow rising costs
By Mark Boyes-Watson
Posted May. 5, 2015 at 10:49 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle