Cambridge, MA, An Elitist Academic Enclave, Promotes "Affordable Housing"?

After 1995 demise of rent control developers in Cambridge work toward the goal of transforming Cambridge from a working class city to an elitist academic enclave. This is one more project in support of that goal. Remarkable how many limousine liberals chant "Affordable housing" but support elitist transformations. More feel good rhetoric? All comments are from property owners. Any renters left in Cambridge?

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20160209/NEWS/160206215

Cambridge developer hopes to transform historical building into boutique hotel
By Natalie Handy
nhandy (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Feb. 9, 2016 at 9:20 AM
Updated Feb 9, 2016 at 9:21 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

Liberal Journalists Show Lack Of Integrity, Distort Ben Carson's Words To Discredit Him

[From article]
First, it is nearly impossible without ignorance or ill will to misunderstand Dr. Carson’s clear and carefully chosen words. He did not say a Muslim could not be president, but only that he personally would not advocate for or support such a candidate due to issues of incompatibility. However, for those since who have relied upon the purposeful misstatement or reinvention of his words, we should be asking why they lie, and what they seek to achieve if they get away with it.
Many Americans are no longer religious, but cannot deny that our nation and our culture are direct products of Judeo-Christian history, experience, and law. The Ten Commandments are the bedrock of our legal system. There is the firmness of the Old Testament, with the temperance and forgiveness of the New Testament. Most of our ancestors were raised with the Bible. For the most part, those who emigrated to the United States through most of the 20th Century also came predominantly from Christian countries, bringing their faith with them. In America, one can accept religion or reject it, but Judeo-Christian history is woven into our culture.
[. . .]



the American tradition of separation of church and state is utterly unknown in Islam. The state and the church are effectively one and the same, because Sharia is the legal and social code of Islam. If you are a devout Muslim, you must adhere to Sharia. The state exists to enforce the religion and the code, and does so ruthlessly and cruelly.
[. . .]
We’ve already seen what can be done to us by “executive order”.
[. . .]
even more problematic when one with knowledge of Islam and Sharia admits that the believer is obligated to spread Islam and Sharia into all lands as commanded by his god, especially the lands of the infidels, and is encouraged to lie about his intentions to surreptitiously achieve that goal.
[. . .]
What chance would a Catholic have of being elected president of Egypt, or of ruling Saudi Arabia? None, of course.
[. . .]
They are who their history and culture made them, and they choose to remain so.
[. . .]
Our makeup these days includes a significant percentage of liberal social engineers who appear to hate other Americans, especially those who value and wish to preserve our unique culture, built upon individual rights and freedoms. They point to our rejection of other cultures, religions and laws being forced upon us as evidence of our insularity and alleged xenophobia, trying to shame us into accepting the chaos and inevitable social conflict that would overwhelm the Great American Experiment once and for all. Having failed to persuade us to surrender, they are now trying to drown us in other peoples and cultures, imported to make the outcome a certainty.
[. . .]
Just as white settlers came to this continent with their cultures and overwhelmed the native culture, so now is the left importing people of other countries, with their incompatible cultures, to smother the vestiges of the America they loathe. That the imported cultures are incompatible and will eventually compete for scarce funds and power, even to the point of violence, merely accelerates the outcome. They will be dependent and vote, and soon will make traditional Americans irrelevant. America is being “Indianed”, and the left can’t get it done quickly enough.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/the_culture_warriors_zero_in_on_ben_carson.html

September 24, 2015
The Culture Warriors Zero In On Ben Carson
By Jeffrey T. Brown

Boston Extremist Liberals Explain In Lockstep What South Carolina Should Do With the Confederate Flag

Monday June 22, 2015, Jim Braude, newest anchor of PBS, Greater Boston, Talking Heads Show, did one segment about the Confederate flag in South Carolina. He joins the lawless President making the tragic deaths of nine church goers in Charleston, SC a political issue. Not limited to one issue but a few. His guests that day were Scott Lehigh, a liberal Boston Globe columnist, and returning Tufts University history Professor and black supremacist activist Peniel Joseph. The Tufts supremacist was a guest on WGBH-TV Greater Boston on June 16, 2015, six days earlier discussing, drum roll please, the shooting in Charleston, SC.

Here's a link to that appearance

http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2015/06/taxpayer-funded-boston-public.html

Professor Joseph must be the Boston resident expert on that event. No one else's opinions must have sufficient gravitas for an appearance on WGBH to speak about the burning issue of the day, white racism. If there ever was an issue which can divert attention from the destruction of the United States it is racism played loudly and clearly by Communists and their useful idiot journalists, and in obedience to the chief PR flacks of the US, the president and his attorneys general.

The elder columnist repeated the misguided comments by Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker. Lehigh objected to his comments to allow states to decide what flags to fly and where. Lehigh and his liberal mobsters believe that Massachusetts journalists should decide what flags should fly in South Carolina. Makes sense since Massachusetts journalists are morally and  intellectually superior to all other humans who ever lived. I found Baker's apology for his comment exposed his spinelessness caving to the liberal censor majority in Massachusetts. Nothing is to be expected from Massachusetts politicians who fear every thought may not be acceptable to the extremists at Harvard University.

Peniel Joseph, who speaks for all black people, all Hispanic people, and all white supporters of black people, promotes the extremist black racist views on all subjects political or not. He cites democracy and the Constitution, when it suits his purpose. WGBH is a taxpayer funded broadcast corporation. He said "We will be talking about this on Basic Black later." That is a weekly talking head show on which only black liberal  intellectuals, journalists and academics are allowed to appear. They focus their discussions to how racist all white people are and what black people can do to get more power and money. They justify this unequal application of laws, (Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution) on taxpayer funded television because of the history of racism and Jim Crow laws. Ahem!

Professor Joseph agreed with the notion that Republican candidates for President who did not support removal of the Confederate flag in South Carolina are unqualified to be leader of the free world. But the current White House can be a great leader of the free world because he attacks all white Americans as racists. Hello?

Jim Braude decided the Confederate flag removal must be a national political issue along with gun control, or was it gum control? He talks funny. In any case Braude and his guests amped up the racial divide, assisting the White House by emphasizing political issues when the families of the nine dead are still mourning their losses. This is what passes for civilized taxpayer funded television in Massachusetts among the elite academics, journalists and intellectuals. Ah yes.  

Confederate Flag Debate
WGBH-TV
PBS Boston
Taxpayer Funded
Graeter Boston
Jim Braude, Host

Tufts University professor, Peniel Joseph (@PenielJoseph), and Boston Globe columnist Scot Lehigh (@GlobeScotLehigh), discuss the renewed focus on the confederate flag flying in the state capitol.

This segment begins at about 10:03 and goes to about 17:04.

Misguided Limousine Liberal Editorial in Cambridge, MA

This editorial by liberal censors suggests that John Lott's book, More Guns Less Crime, is fantasy. His research has not been refuted. The proposal to solve social problems i.e., violence by medicalizing it leads to totalitarianism. That is what the National Socialists did in Germany. Jews were declared to be vermin, a cause of illness. There is no appeal from a medical diagnosis. If Lott is wrong, demonstrate how. More people are killed by means other than guns each year. Pillows can be lethal. 90,000 to 100,000 people die each years due to medical negligence. Why should doctors be believed over criminal justice experts?

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150502/NEWS/150509468

Editorial: Break the research ban on gun violence
Posted May. 2, 2015 at 1:44 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

Harvard University Study Shows Faculty Extremely Liberal, Up to 98 Percent At Some Schools

[From article]
During the three years, the Harvard affiliates represented in analyzed public filings gave nearly $3 million to federal campaigns and candidates. Each of Harvard’s schools leaned to the left in the contributions made by their affiliates, many by wide margins. Ninety-six percent of donations in the data set from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, which includes Harvard College, supported Democratic efforts. That figure was even higher—nearly 98 percent—at Harvard Law School. Harvard Business School was the most Republican, with 37 percent of its contributions supporting Republicans and 62 percent going to Democrats.
[. . .]
The Crimson analyzed the federal donations of contributors who reported Harvard University as their employer and were listed in Harvard directories and websites as professors, lecturers, fellows, associates, researchers, and scientists, as well as visiting fellows and professors. The data set does not include people who only work as administrators.
[. . .]



The data does not include contributions made to independent expenditure, or super PACs, and nonprofits groups organized under section 501(c)(4) of the tax code that engage in electioneering communications. It does include contributions to candidate-linked PACs.
The data supports the commonly held belief that Harvard’s professoriate is largely liberal, raising questions about the ideological diversity of the faculty and what impact that may have on teaching and research.
[. . .]
The largest FAS donors in the data set include Chemistry professor emeritus and Nobel laureate Martin Karplus ’51, University professor and former University President Lawrence H. Summers, and Psychology professor Steven Pinker.
[. . .]
The third-largest donor in the data set was Martha L. Minow, who has been the Law School’s dean since 2009. Minow contributed $105,250, all to Democratic campaigns and organizations, including the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and campaigns for U.S. Senators Al Franken ’73 and Timothy Kaine, U.S. Representative Joseph P. Kennedy III, and the Obama Victory Fund.
[. . .]



“The only debate we get here is between the far-left...and the liberals,” Mansfield said. “It gives students a view that a very narrow spectrum of opinion is the only way to think.”
[. . .]
“I think that this is an institution that really chafes against simplistic adherence to one point of view or approach,” said Lawrence D. Bobo, chair of the African and African American Studies Department. “It is one of the great virtues of the University.”


http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/5/1/faculty-political-contributions-data-analysis/

Harvard Faculty Donate to Democrats by Wide Margin

Eighty-four percent of campaign contributions made by a group of 614 Harvard faculty, instructors, and researchers between 2011 and the third quarter of 2014 went to federal Democratic campaigns and political action committees.

STORY BY KARL M. ASPELUND AND MEG P. BERNHARD

DATA ANALYSIS BY DAVID FREED, IDREES M. KAHLOON, AND ALEXANDER H. PATEL

APRIL 30, 2015

Packing DC USCA May Hamper Reforms

U.S. Court of Appeals, Washington DC

[From article]

A shadowy network of wealthy liberal donors bankrolled an operation to pack one of America’s most powerful courts with progressive judges, according to documents reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.
Now the effort could prevent an Obamacare challenge from reaching the Supreme Court, legal experts say.
The strategy to fill the D.C. Court of Appeals with left-leaning judges was aided by the American Constitution Society, a non-profit group that “promotes a progressive vision of the law.” The ACS is funded in part by the Democracy Alliance, a liberal donor network that funnels millions to a web of 

dark-money member groups.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democracy-alliance-bankrolled-court-packing-scheme/

Democracy Alliance Bankrolled Court-Packing Scheme
Influx of progressive judges to D.C. Court of Appeals could lead to en banc reversal of Halbig decision
AP
BY: Alana Goodman
August 25, 2014 9:00 am

Liberal Economist Awarded $225 K at Public NY University

[From article]
So this publicly-funded university offered Paul Krugman $225k over nine months to essentially preside as a public face of its in-house institute that studies -- ahem -- income inequality. In exchange for the money, Krugman will provide his presence, play a "modest" role in CUNY public events, and "contribute to the build-up" of the initiative to combat -- ahem -- income inequality. Oh, and he'll host one solitary seminar. On top of his salary, the university will furnish the left-wing columnist and economist with $20,000 in fringe benefits, including travel expenses.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/16/income-inequality-institute-to-pay-infamous-class-warrior-25000-per-month-to-do-basically-nothing-n1825386?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Income Inequality Institute to Pay Infamous Class Warrior $25,000 per Month to Do Basically Nothing
Guy Benson

April 16, 2014

Misguided Liberals Believe They Can Spend Other People's Money Better

[From article]
Warren, a scourge of (other) economic royalists and especially of large financial institutions, is a William Jennings Bryan for our time: She has risen from among Harvard’s downtrodden to proclaim: “You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of derivatives.”
Before she sank to a senator’s salary, she was among the 1 percenters, whose annual incomes now begin at $394,000. Hillary Clinton recently made more than that from two speeches, five days apart, for Goldman Sachs, a prowling Wall Street carnivore that Warren presumably wants to domesticate. Between Warren, hot in pursuit of malefactors of great wealth, and Clinton, hot in pursuit of great wealth, which candidate would be more fun for the kind of people who compose the Democrats’ nominating electorate?
[Hillary Clinton] explained her health-care plan this way (a delicious quotation excavated by the Wall Street Journal’s Holman Jenkins):
“We just think people will be too focused on saving money and they won’t get the care for their children and themselves that they need. . . . The money has to go to the federal government because the federal government will spend that money better.”

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will111613.php3#.UoirFN00jDo
   
Jewish World Review
Excitement for 2016
By George Will
November 16, 2013

August to October 2013

Posted October 9, 2013 7:30 AM ET; Last updated October 13, 2103 9:25 AM ET



August through October 2013, all five crime families took turns trying to have me arrested using young women as bait. It is a repeating pattern for over 30 years. Criminal police officers in one Massachusetts city or another, take turns recruiting a lawyer who works for the criminal cops. He brings along a hired psychiatrist or psychologist, to use their omniscience and moral superiority to try to have me put into a hospital. 

There is an established pattern of what each group of criminals do. First they begin an intense project of sleep disturbances trying to provoke violence. It is also an attempt to recreate a police frame-up in 1990 in Cambridge MA. If that does not work they begin using young women as bait. If I do not go for their bait, they try young men. When that does not work they try using homeless men and homeless women who work for the police or the FBI. It is tiring and boring. For me. For them it is an exciting (and lucrative) time trying to recreate a fantasy.

It is a while since FBI criminals stole my personal journals in 1973 after the Harvard University-government psychiatrists drugged me for 80 days using hallucinogens. They sold copies of the journals to local police and to crime families who proceeded to use them to ridicule me and to humiliate me. Crime families working with (or for) the FBI culled all of the women I mentioned who I dated over the years. The women are now married to FBI informants, and members of crime families. I'm told that one more genius police-lawyer purchased a copy in October 2013, and that is what brought on the newest round of harassment.

This is one element of how government criminals working with crime families isolated me in order to permit the daily changing group of criminals who torment me. This has gone on for 43 years in mostly three states. Five crime families currently, take turns with Cambridge police, Harvard University campus police and FBI informants, also known as Communists. In order to prevent any of the above mentioned criminals from being held accountable for their criminal enterprises, and another element of keeping me isolated, they say "He's mentally ill." "He's crazy." "He's a space cadet." "He's retarded." Whatever it takes to scare people, and to cover up 43 years of criminal abuses by crime families, Communists, the FBI and police.

If that does not work they add other elements of relentless political and personal character assassination. "He's Homeless." "He's a retired drug dealer." "He's a racist." "He's a homosexual." "He's been married nine times." "He hates women." One gentle man took time from his busy schedule to call me at 2 AM in October 2013, to remind me he met me in 1994. "You made an impression on me," he said. How thrilling. "Is this a convenient time?" he asked. Well, I was waiting by the phone for his call, but did not want to tell him.

I suspect it was another maroon lawyer working for police criminals. He brought along the next day some unwashed women Marines with whom I was supposed to have sex? He did not specify. But the women Marines and the police psychologist followed me to a library. I tried very hard not to take her in my arms and ravish her right there in the library. Ugh! What an odor. Hadn't washed her in a week?

But that is how Harvard University and Cambridge compassionate, thoughtful, caring, and loving limousine liberals treat me after 43 years of criminal abuses. After destroying my career, my reputation, and eliminating my social, political and economic supports in 1973, they send unwashed women Marines as a reward. Who needs enemies when I have people like that around me each day?

One more regular element is shunning, by political subdivision, crime family or police agency. When I criticize a politician or public official who is supported or protected by a crime family, a city, state or federal agency, or a police agency all the members of that group shun me. One Cambridge City official actually said to me when I called, "I can talk to you." Huh? I researched the practice and found it is an actionable tort. But since I do not have access to courts, either to sue or to be protected from criminal abuses of power that is one more right that these government criminals denied to me for 43 years. 

So over the previous 6 weeks, five of the crime families (and their police associates) took turns conducting week-long operations trying to make my life more miserable. It increased my beliefs in the goodness of Americans. In the caring, gentleness and thoughtfulness of government. I am grateful they haven't shot me dead as police did in Washington DC, persons they declared mentally ill. It seems to be the latest police sport in the nation's Capitol. Shooting vulnerable people every few weeks. It keeps the population on their toes obeying the corrupt cesspool in Washington DC and on Beacon Hill.

At a Cambridge City Council candidate forum held at Lesley University on October 8, 2013 a man who sat one row behind me said to me, "I used to be a lawyer." He identified himself as a member of the Cambridge Historical Commission. I said "I met some decent lawyers." I did, and am grateful I met them. I also met the usual depraved lawyers who prey on others and exploit their licenses from the states. He said he saw me at the Commission meetings and asked me, "Are you going to write  a letter?" I guessed he read some of my letters I wrote which were published in Boston and Cambridge newspapers.  I wondered why he told me, "I used to be a lawyer." Did he mean himself? Most lawyers are lawyers until they die. The dictionary defines lawyer as a person familiar with the law. An attorney is a person licensed to practice law and to give legal advice. 

Did he mean me? I went to law school. That is when the US government began intense harassment and character assassination,  saying I was a Communist. I spent five years in a landlord tenant case from 1983 to 1988. I petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States. Many government criminals who slander me, deny I did it. They say I was homeless in Boston when I was litigating in the state and US courts in New Jersey. My case is, 

Bercaw v. Mandak, Judge, No. 86-5647, 479 U.S. 992, 93 L.Ed.2d 593, 107 S.Ct. 592 (Dec. 1, 1986); reh den, 480 U.S. 941, 94 L.Ed.2d  783, 107 S.Ct. 1594 (March 23, 1987).    

I am still a lawyer and will always be one. I am  not an attorney. Was he saying that to ridicule me and to humiliate me? For many years, first Communists then the Kennedy Cult told everyone wherever I went "He's a lawyer." The California syndicate, the Midwestern outfit and other crime families attacked me as a Kennedy Cult Communist lawyer. The Kennedy cult in Cambridge was still attacking me as a Communist in  2012, while Communists from Georgia, New York and New Jersey were harassing me at the same time. It is and was an interesting life. Not very happy or rewarding but interesting to learn how stupid public officials and ordinary Americans are. They can believe impossible lies. I saw it about myself and see it every day listening to the President, the Governor and the misguided lame elected criminal class speak every day. What is frightening is that journalists repeat what the politicians say without skepticism. That is where the system  breaks down. That and the demonization of religion and morality by liberals, socialists and Communists. The US Constitution was written for moral and religious people. If they are neither the government will not stand. 

Was this member of the Historical Commission mocking my writing letters too? Is he one more example of a Harvard Law School graduate ridiculing and humiliating a person he thinks is disabled like the police?

Best-selling Author Mark Levin Ignored By Liberal Media and Journalists

[From article]
Some of his ideas might command bipartisan support (now might be a particularly good time to renew the term-limits fight, with Congress polling at about the same approval rating as Lyme disease), but given that two-thirds -- of Congress and three-quarters of states would have to approve any constitutional updates, most of the Levin amendments stand almost no chance of being passed. Especially the wittiest one: moving tax day to the day before Election Day.



http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/vox_popular_zOYlSTdQ7TrnLupviVuhwL

Why are major media outlets ignoring bestselling writer Mark R. Levin?
Conservative host Mark Levin rules the radio and the bestseller charts because he speaks for people who feel left out of the debate. So, what does the media do? Ignore him.
New York Post
By KYLE SMITH
Last Updated: 11:32 AM, September 1, 2013
Posted: 10:52 PM, August 31, 2013

Intolerance In The Name of Tolerance

[From article]
Cambridge, it is clear, is a town full of communal narcissists. What's striking about this passage is that while the Cantabridgians quoted are quite articulate in describing their own professed virtues, when the subject turns to the cognitive dissonance caused by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's alleged crimes, they are reduced to blather: "That doesn't mean there aren't big gaps." "There may be more difficulty than people realize." What does any of that even mean?
One is tempted to chuckle at their naiveté and leave it at that. But it's important to understand the way these people think, because their way of thinking has wide cultural influence. And naiveté isn't the only problem with the ideologues of "diversity" or "multiculturalism." They're also quite frequently hypocritical, which is to say that they are selectively and sometimes harshly intolerant even as they extol tolerance. Anyone who's spent time on an American college campus in the past 30 years--and that includes a large proportion of Cambridge residents--is familiar with that phenomenon.
The naiveté and the hypocrisy both are the result of a parochialism that is at the heart of this supposedly cosmopolitan ideology.
[. . .]
A more abstract form of this parochialism is the multiculturalists' frequent insistence that "only white people can be racist." In this view, racism is perhaps the greatest moral failing of which human beings are capable--but nonwhites are absolved of moral responsibility for their racial prejudices.
But moral responsibility is the essence of humanity. It is what sets Homo sapiens apart from other animals. Assigning moral responsibility to whites while denying it to nonwhites is therefore a way of dehumanizing the latter. Multiculturalism
turns out to be a disguised form of white supremacy.

Taranto is aware of the abuses of limousine liberals especially in Cambridge. He does not quote anyone who knows about their hypocrisy and parochialism, who lives among these self proclaimed moralists. They abuse vulnerable citizens in the name of good.

Black racist Cambridge police harass white citizens who dare to criticize their abuses of power and the criminal acts of elected black officials. Harvard University joins in racial abuses of their privileged police powers attacking critics. Self proclaimed moralist black Harvard University Professors designate anyone who disagrees with them as mentally ill, and then use private Harvard University campus cops to harass the people they say have disabilities. It shows how depraved these hyper black elitists are in Cambridge. 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323844804578527412855526772.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email

June 5, 2013
Wall Street Journal
The Parochialism of 'Diversity'
Explaining the naiveté and hypocrisy of multiculturalism.
James Taranto

Liberals Stir Up Mob Mentality, Deny Reason and Science

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/08/15/why-liberals-behave-the-way-they-do/

WHY LIBERALS BEHAVE THE WAY THEY DO
By: Ann Coulter
8/15/2012 05:11 PM
Human Events

Campaign To Silence Rush Limbaugh

19 years ago an Episcopal Minister speaking in Cambridge MA said, "We've got to stop Rush Limbaugh." I didn't know who he was. The Minster was a vocal anti war activist so I wondered why he opposed Limbaugh's comments whatever they were. I began listening to Limbaugh and learned a lot I did not know. It didn't matter whether I agreed with him. He was speaking about issues that no one else did. I still wonder why anyone wants to censor speech. If Limbaugh is so wrong why not explain it in words rather than trying to censor him? Help ordinary citizens understand what the truth is. Another resident of Cambridge once began a conversation declaring that Glenn Back was terrible. I didn't know who he was either so I listened to him too. Sad that so many people have a misguided idea of what the First Amendment is all about. It is to protect speech that you hate. Everybody supports speech that they like. In ancient Athens there was no law or constitution that protected free speech. It was a 1200 year tradition.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/22/radio-campaign-next-step-against-rush-limbaugh/

Radio campaign next step against Rush Limbaugh
By David Baude
Associated Press
Thursday, March 22, 2012

Liberals Use Obama To Make Themselves Feel Good

[From article]
"Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin -- that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html

August 18, 2011
Obama: The Affirmative Action President
By Matt Patterson
American Thinker

Obama Liberal Limousines

[From article]
"Limousines, the very symbol of wealth and excess, are usually the domain of corporate executives and the rich. But the number of limos owned by Uncle Sam increased by 73 percent during the first two years of the Obama administration, according to an analysis of records by iWatch News."

http://www.iwatchnews.org/2011/05/31/4765/limousine-liberals-number-government-owned-limos-has-soared-under-obama

Limousine liberals? Number of government-owned limos has soared under Obama
By Joe Eaton
iwatchnews.org
May 31, 2011