White House Denies Responsibility for Divided Nation

[From article]
It's hard to believe that the president actually thinks his toxic, sneering, sarcastic rhetoric directed against his political opponents hasn't contributed to the political divisions in the country.
As for policy differences, why should Republicans support policies they believe to be harmful to the country? This president construes opposition to his policies as racist, or worse. For more than seven years, he and his administration have played the race card for all it's worth, smearing his opponents so often that the epithet of "racist" has actually lost some of its bite.
The personal attacks on the president – the controversy over his birth certificate and charges that he hates America – are no worse than attacks by Democrats on Republicans over the last 20 years. This is politics in the age of the internet, and the fact that the president is oblivious to his own role in dividing the country shows why he was never qualified to be president in the first place.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/obama_claims_he_has_not_contributed_to_divisions_in_the_country.html

March 11, 2016
Obama claims he has 'not contributed' to divisions in the country
By Rick Moran

White House Refuses to Recognize Terrorism and Depravity of Muslim Extremists

[From article]
In Nigeria, violent killings of Christians are up 62 percent according to Open Doors which monitors religiously motivated violence and persecution. In 2015 there were 4,028 killings and 198 church attacks, nearly double those of the previous year. Since 2009, 11,500 Christians were killed, 13,000 churches were destroyed and 1.3 million Christians have fled to safer areas of Nigeria or have attempted to reach Europe.
According to Rose Gamble, "the persecution of Christians is carried out by three groups: Islamist terror group, Boko Haram, Muslim Fulani herdsmen; and the Muslim religious and political elite that dominate northern Nigeria. In fact, several areas of northern Nigeria have seen Christianity virtually wiped out."
The ongoing ISIS slaughter of Christians has resulted in the European Parliament unanimously passing a resolution referring to the Islamic State's (ISIS) killing of religious minorities under its control as "genocide" in the Middle East. But the Obama administration dithers and when asked, White House spokesman Josh Earnest claims that the word genocide "involves a very specific legal determination that has, at this point, not been reached." This should come as no surprise since the FBI has "released a new edition of its anti-terror video game, 'Don't Be a Puppet' that scrubs all references to Islamic terrorism" per the demands of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Thus, as Clare M. Lopez explains, "Islamic jihad is now excluded from a list of potential terror threats."
Additionally, in Canada "Conservative MP Cheryl Gallant has called out Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over his refusal to recognize as 'genocide' the sweeping targeting of Christians by ISIS in the Middle East." And so, “[t]housands of Yazidis have been summarily executed, killed, or, in the case of Yazidi women, kidnapped and sold into slavery by ISIS.
[. . .]
Nina Shea, Director, for the Center for Religious Freedom at Hudson Institute has repeatedly publicized the plight of these people and emphatically asserts that
[t]he Islamist genocide -- and there can be no doubt that it is genocide, despite world silence -- of the Christians, Yazidis, Mandeans, and other defenseless ethno-religious minorities of Syria and Iraq continues. The killing of these peoples is deliberate and brutal and is rooted in religious hatred of the 'infidel.' It is meted out in sudden violent executions, mass deportations, and the gradual, methodical destruction of their civilizations.
Washington is blind to this genocide that occurs alongside, but is separate from, a sectarian Muslim power struggle. It has failed to defend them militarily. Now it is failing to provide humanitarian help in the only manner left: resettling the survivors out of harm’s way, in countries where they will be able to rebuild their families and preserve their unique ancient cultures without fear.
[. . .]
But given that Obama invokes the Crusades and the Inquisition, as a means of ignoring Islamic terrorism, the antipathy against Christianity is not surprising.
[. . .]
In Germany the Father Superior of St. George the Victorious Monastery in Gotschendorf wrote that "Christian refugees from Syria, Eritrea, and other countries are exposed to humiliation, manhunts, and brutal harassment at the camps for refugees by their Muslim neighbors. This also relates to the Yazidi religious minority."
[. . .]
In fact, the Islamic Republic of Iran continues… to execute more individuals per capita than any other country in the world.
[. . .]
Those who insist that concerned Americans are either racist or exaggerating the danger would do well to ask themselves "[w]hat if Christian terrorists were blowing up Muslims" as liberal Saudi journalist Nadine Al-Budair posits. She asserts that Muslims consistently "absolve [themselves] of guilt

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/muslim_responsibility_and_western_inaction.html

March 7, 2016
Muslim Responsibility and Western Inaction
By Eileen F. Toplansky

Cambridge, MA City Council Condemns Published Article

Clever changing focus to First Amendment. Issue is whether a Cambridge City Councilor is linked to a terror group. No discussion of that by the Council. Is it true? Councilor Mazen does not deny he is so linked. The City Council ignores the issue, instead attacks a news venue. In 1993 R.W. Apple received an award from the Neiman Foundation at Harvard. I asked Mr Apple, at the event why the "irresponsible" media, his term, often turned out to be accurate in their reporting, while the "responsible" media, e.g., the New York Times was often wrong. The National Enquirer (designated irresponsible) revealed John Edwards impregnated his videographer, while running for President. Like Bill Clinton, Edwards denied it on television. The Cambridge City Council declared Breitbart to be an “illegitimate tabloid.” William Bulger blamed Boston tabloids for circulating rumors about him and his brother, serial killer James "Whitey" Bulger. After name calling is done, is CAIR terror linked or not? The FBI says it is. The British government says it is. Councilor Mazen is silent. Will name calling reveal the truth as it does on the Harvard University campus? Is the matter unacceptable for City Council deliberations?

[From article]
In a resolution passed last month, Cambridge’s City Council publicly denounced the right-wing media organization Breitbart.com for spreading what it called “anti-Muslim libel” after the outlet published an article asserting that a City councillor has ties to the Islamic militant group Hamas.
Breitbart’s November article, entitled “Hamas on the Charles,” claims that City Councillor Nadeem A. Mazen is connected to Hamas through his work as a founding director of the Massachusetts chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy organization.
The council’s December 7 resolution, proposed by Councillor Dennis J. Carlone, characterized Breitbart as an “illegitimate tabloid” that should be disregarded.
“Breitbart.com has a history of outrageous and sensationalized journalism designed for shock value but which has no proven basis in truth whatsoever,” the resolution reads.
[. . .]

Sam Westrop, one of the authors of the Breitbart article, said he does not believe his article is libelous.
“For it to be libel, something would have to be untrue and unfortunately everything we’ve written is true,” said Westrop, who is the research director of Americans for Peace and Tolerance, a group that frequently criticizes Islamist extremism. “This unprecedented attack on media criticism of a public official is highly unusual.”
In response to the December resolution, Breitbart published a second article written by another author titled “War: Cambridge, Massachusetts City Council Censures Breitbart News.” The article claims the resolution is an “affront to the First Amendment” and defends the site’s original story as factual.
Mark V. Tushnet ’67, a Harvard Law School professor specializing in constitutional law, wrote in an email that he “doubt[s] that the city council's resolution could be fairly called even an affront to First Amendment values.” Mazen also said he does not believe the resolution is a “free speech matter”; nor does Westrop, who said “no one has removed the article or stopped us from speaking.”

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/1/7/cambridge-city-council-breitbart/


Cambridge City Council Denounces Right-Wing Media Outlet
By JOSHUA J. FLORENCE and SAMUEL VASQUEZ

Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
January 6, 2016

Details of Muslim Migrants Sex Attacks in Germany, Spreading to Finland, Sweden

[From article]
Information continues to emerge on the war zone that erupted in Cologne, Germany on New Year’s Eve, when thousands of imports from Islamic lands threw bottles and fireworks into crowds and at the police, as well as molested, raped, attacked, robbed, knifed, spat, defecated, urinated, vomited, ranted, and raved as they turned an area of a beautiful city into a site of utter barbarism. (Other cities in Germany experienced similar violence on New Year’s Eve, which is only now beginning to be reported.)
One victim had a firecracker shoved into the hood of her jacket. When she tried to get it out, it fell into her jacket, causing serious burns across her shoulder.
Dozens, and most likely hundreds of women were subjected to all manner of physical, sexual, and verbal assault. Authorities now believe that many of the attacks were “coordinated” by men traveling in gangs of 30-40, surrounding women to make escape impossible, and then victimizing them. Frantic women were forced to run a gauntlet through the mass of thousands of men hunting them down (as one victim described it), groping their breasts and between their legs, stripping their clothes off, spitting on them, cursing at them, and raping every available orifice.
[. . .]
nitially it appears that the police hid the truth from the public when, on New Year’s Day, they announced that the festivities from the night before had been peaceful with a “jolly atmosphere.” But as victims came forward with reports of rape and robbery and as protesters took to the streets to register their anger at the alleged inaction by the authorities, the truth and the scope of what unfolded began to leak out. When the police chief was asked why the police department claimed that things on New Year’s eve were calm, he said: “That was wrong. For this we apologize.”
Meanwhile, The Daily Mail reports that the perpetrators taunted the police, claimed they were untouchable, and insisted that the police “be nice” to them. At least one New Year’s Eve jihadist told the police: “I am Syrian. I must be handled in a friendly manner. Mrs. Merkel invited me here!” Many tore up their temporary residency permits, threw them at the police, and announced they’d have new ones in the morning.
[. . .]
These people that we welcomed just three months ago with teddy bears and water bottles on the Munich main railway station started shooting at the police, which then had to come equipped with helmets onto the dome platform, to break that potential for violence. Well seasoned police officers then confessed to me that they never saw something like this in their entire life. They called it quote “a civil war like situation.” And no press coverage about that whatsoever.
The gentleman (who appears to be a bouncer at the hotel) described women coming up to him all evening, shivering, terrified, asking if they could just stand near him so he could look after them. (Eventually, he was attacked as well.)
[. . .]
One police officer said he hadn't seen anything like it in nearly 30 years and was struck by the high number of migrants and level of disrespect toward police officers. (Medical teams working that night confirmed that the mob comprised “asylum seekers,” and victims also corroborated that perpetrators were “migrants.”)

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/horrifying_details_emerge_of_cologne_attacks.html

January 8, 2016
Horrifying details emerge of Cologne attacks
By Carol Brown

* * *



[From article]
Three Iraqi asylum seekers have been arrested for committing sexual assaults during the celebrations in the city’s Senate Square, where some 20,000 had gathered.
Security personnel reported “widespead sexual harrassment” during the celebrations, police added, with women complaining that asylum seekers had groped their breasts and kissed them without permission.
“This phenomenon is new in Finnish sexual crime history,” Ilkka Koskimaki, the deputy chief of police in Helsinki, told the Telegraph. ”We have never before had this kind of sexual harrassment happening at New Year’s Eve.”

[. . .]

Mr Koskimaki said that sexual assults in parks and on the streets had been unknown in Finland before a record 32,000 asylum seekers arrived in 2015, making the 14 cases last year “big news in the city”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/finland/12088332/Unprecedented-sex-harassment-in-Helsinki-at-New-Year-Finnish-police-report.html

Unprecedented sex harassment in Helsinki at New Year, Finnish police report
Finnish police 'tipped off' about plans by groups of asylum seekers to sexually harass women
By Richard Orange, Malmo
3:48PM GMT 08 Jan 2016

* * *



[From article]
It's the latest in a spate of reported sex attacks in the country which has been rocked by awave of assaults in Cologne.
Two 14-year-old boys and a 21-year-old man have been held in Weil am Rhein, a small town near the Swiss and German borders, for the suspected rape of a 14 and 15-year-old girl.
The girls were allegedly held for several hours and gang-raped after going to a New Year's Eve party at the home of a 21-year-old man in the village of Friedlingen.
The arrests only emerged last night, despite the suspects being in custody for several days.Prosecutors say they kept tightlipped to protect the victims' identities.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/632735/Germany-sex-attacks-gang-rape-Cologne-New-Years-Eve

More horror sex attack claims: Teen girls gang-raped by four Syrian nationals in Germany
THREE Syrians have been arrested in southern Germany for the alleged gang rape of two teenage girls on New Year's Eve.
By REBECCA PERRING
08:24, Fri, Jan 8, 2016 | UPDATED: 09:37, Fri, Jan 8, 2016

* * *

[From article]

Swedish police say at least 15 young women have reported being groped by groups of men on New Year's Eve in the city of Kalmar.
[. . .]
Kalmar police spokesman Johan Bruun on Friday said groups of men encircled women on a crowded square and groped them. He said no one was physically injured but that many of those targeted were terrified.
He said two men, both asylum-seekers, were informed through interpreters that they're suspected of sexual assault and that police are trying to identify other suspects.
Asked about similarities to assaults in Germany, Bruun said "we are aware of what happened in Germany but we are focusing our investigation on what happened in Kalmar."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_SWEDEN_SEX_ASSAULTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-01-08-06-41-39

Jan 8, 6:41 AM EST
NEW YEAR SEX ASSAULTS REPORTED IN SWEDEN

AP

German Police Denying It Is Muslims Committing Sex Offenses, Imitates US Police Denying it is Black Racist Violence in The USA

This essay was published a day before a Muslim Gentleman shot a Philadelphia policeman. The detective who interviewed the suspect reported the suspect boasted he acted for Islam. But the new white mayor of Philadelphia said it had nothing to do with Islam. This is what passes for political leadership in America. 

[From article]
German officials want the world to know the 1000 African and Arab men who assaulted, robbed, rampaged and raped 100 or more German women had nothing to do with refugees.
And the Germans will not be talking about it any more, thank you, said German Justice Minister Heiko Maas.
[. . .]
The Mayor of Cologne issued a “code of conduct” for German women, suggesting they be more careful lest more refugees sexually abuse them.
There was no code of conduct issued for the abusers.
[. . .]
The BBC was happy to go along, saying that the attacks were just “boisterous” holiday frivolity.
That also goes for the 800 cars set on fire in France by the same kind of groups, whose race, ethnicity and religion shall not be named. Unless of course you want to provoke the ire of German and French reporters and public officials -- and Moslem clerics.
[. . .]
author Mona Eltahaway, who had written about being raped and beaten during the Arab Spring.
Harris-Perry and a Harvard professor also on the show in 2013 wondered if the author should have just kept her mouth shut because her story made Moslems look bad.
Which is also why black people in America do not report violent crime, especially rape, Harris-Perry said.
[. . .]



A recent story at mic.com reported that 60 percent of black women are raped before the age of 18 -- with 95 percent not reported.
The show continued as the MSNBC host brought in Harvard professor Leila Ahmed, who questioned whether Eltahawy should have written the article at all. Not because it was false, but because it was true and made Moslems look bad.
“You began, Melissa, by noting that some things in the African-American community are not publicized precisely because of the racism,” said Ahmed as Harris-Perry nodded in agreement on a split screen.
“Mona, I appreciate what you do,” continued Ahmed. “But if possible [you should not] give fuel, fodder to people who simply hate Arabs and Muslims in this climate of our day.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/german_muslim_crime_denial_looks_a_lot_like_american_black_crime_denial.html

January 8, 2016
German Muslim Crime Denial Looks a lot like American Black Crime Denial
By Willie Shields

Journalists, Police and Politicians Continue Denying Black Violence Toward Whites Happens

[From article]
Black mob violence and denial are getting easier to find – and harder to believe.
Let's start in Baltimore, an epicenter for practitioners of black violence and the public personalities who ignore, deny, condone, excuse, encourage, and even lie about it. Sometimes all at once.
In December, the BBC wanted to know why "so many young African-American men [were] being gunned down by the state."
So naturally, it asked the white conductor of the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, Marin Alsop. Her former mentor, the radical chic conductor Leonard Bernstein, could not have put it any sillier:
[. . .]
It's really just a listening problem, Alsop explained to the Sun. Black people had to resort to violence because white people were just not paying attention.
Alsop's comments echoed Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, who last year said black rioters needed "space to destroy." The next day she said she had not said it. Then she said she did not mean it. Then she said she did not want to talk about it anymore with white racists who were just trying to make her look bad.



[. . .]
Even with all this explaining from Alsop, a recipient of a MacArthur "genius grant," there is still so much left to understand. For example, why did a large group of black people beat Peter Marvit to death after he left a Baltimore symphony practice in 2012? Was that required?
He was just a dancer. Ironically enough, he was also a nationally recognized researcher on hearing.
And the night before the riots, a large group of black people in Baltimore beat almost to death some old white guy who did not want them fighting on his lawn and damaging his car. Was that required?
A year before the riots, Maryland state legislator Pat McDonough asked the governor to put a travel ban on downtown Baltimore because black people were "terrorizing" the Inner Harbor. City officials did not say it was required; they just denied it was happening.
[. . .]
Black writers in Baltimore say expectations of safety in public places are nothing more than "white privilege." That goes for patrons and police as well. Even those who pull down a million dollars a year for waving a stick in the air, as Alsop does. Now that is some white privilege.
[. . .]
In north Texas, a white college student was returning from a New Year's Eve party with her friends when an SUV with six black people pulled up next to them. Soon, Sara Wynette Mutschlechner was dead, with a bullet in her head.
In Ontario, California, a black man beat an old white woman during a home invasion robbery. Then he raped her. Maybe she was not listening. Nevertheless, police took a suspect into custody.
[. . .]
Also on video – also in the last few days – a large group of black people surrounded a pregnant white teenager and cheered as one of their number threatened her, beat her, and kicked her in the stomach.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/black_mob_violence_easier_to_find_harder_to_believe.html

January 4, 2016
Black Mob Violence: Easier to Find. Harder to Believe.
By Colin Flaherty

Homeland Security Secretary Denies Muslim Terrorists Exist

Actor Pretending To Be Homeland Security Secretary

[From article]
During an interview at the Aspen Security Forum, the interviewer asks if Johnson and DHS are missing the religious dimension of the terrorism we face by denying that it's inspired by Islam. "I couldn't disagree more," Johnson says.
Disagree with what?
Even if you buy Johnson's intellectually feeble claim that the Koran-quoting, Allah-praising, Halal-keeping members of Islamic State have "no connection to Islam," they certainly believe they do. Denying a connection between al Qaeda and Islam would be like denying any connection between the Christian Identity movement and Christianity. The typical Christian understands that, which is why they don’t object.
Even more disturbing (and once again, watch the video for yourself), Johnson says he can't call Islamic terror "Islamic terror" out of deference to American Muslims because they won't cooperate with homeland security efforts if he does. So the head of DHS believes American Muslims will stand by and watch their fellow Americans die in bomb blasts over a vocabulary dispute?

https://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dhs-chief-don-t-call-it-islamic-extremism-because-it-doesn-t-have-anything-do-islam_1002904.html#

DHS Chief: Don’t Call it 'Islamic Extremism' Because it Doesn’t Have Anything to Do With Islam
12:05 PM, AUG 2, 2015

BY MICHAEL GRAHAM

Texas Exposes Voter Fraud, Democrats Deny It Exists

Democrats in Texas like to claim that voter fraud is a non-existent issue. Hillary Clinton even had the nerve to come to Houston recently and lecture Republicans about the "phantom epidemic" of election fraud. Ironically, just in the last week, serious questions were raised about Gilberto Hinojosa, Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party, and whether he presided over institutional voter fraud for years during his time as an elected official in Cameron County.
The Republican Party of Texas has decided enough is enough. Today we answered Hillary and her liberal allies and have begun to shine a bright light on the scourge that is voter fraud.

Police Chief Blames White Victim for Black Mob Violence.

http://www.kltv.com/story/29025955/video-of-jacksonville-fight-spreading-viewers-outraged

Video of Jacksonville fight spreading, viewers outraged
Posted: May 10, 2015 3:51 PM EDTUpdated: May 10, 2015 7:02 PM EDT
By Summer Dashe
By Gabby Sims

Published on May 12, 2015
Police Chief Excuses Black Mob Violence.
That happens a lot too: local police say the victims were dumb to avoid it. Or somehow they deserved it.

Danish Editor Recognizes Americans In A Coma Denying Dangers of Sharia Law

[From article]
The Danish editor who commissioned the Muhammad cartoons that triggered deadly protests a decade ago said Monday the failed attack on a Texas cartoon exhibition won't change how "politically correct" Americans feel about the drawings.
"The lines have already been drawn in this debate in the US and I do not think events like these can change anything, because people will read their own opinions into it," Flemming Rose told Jyllands-Posten, where he is currently the foreign editor.



"Those who think you have a right to draw Muhammad if you want, and believe it is an important part of freedom of speech will say: 'There, you can see that freedom of speech is under threat.'"
"The other wing will say that it is an unnecessary provocation," he added.
Jyllands-Posten sparked lethal protests in some Muslim countries after its 2005 publication of 12 cartoons that included a picture of the Islamic prophet wearing a bomb in a turban.
In 2006, the US State Department reacted to the Danish cartoon controversy by saying it supported freedom of expression but that "anti-Muslim images are as unacceptable as anti-Semitic images."
"Americans have a belief that you shouldn't offend people's religious sensitivities," Rose said.

"Piss Christ," a piece of art by U.S. artist Andres Serrano, created in 1987, is a photography representing a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass of the artist's urine.
[Here is a liberal hypocrite employed by the US State Department. He did not mention when homosexuals promoted using taxpayer funds an image of Christ immersed in urine. The brutal relentless attacks on the Catholic church by homosexuals for decades are ignored. Attacks by Muslims on Jews and Christians not just words is ignored by these gentle flowers. Ahem!] 

http://www.globalpost.com/article/6537656/2015/05/04/danish-editor-slams-us-political-correctness-cartoons

Agence France-Presse
May 4, 2015 @ 12:45 PM
Danish editor slams US 'political correctness' on cartoons

Catholic Church Fires NJ Teacher, Denies It Did So

[From article]
Yesterday, Patricia Jannuzzi’s lawyer finally spoke to the press in response to this statement, and what he said is not pretty for the diocese: “At every point in our discussions the diocesan lawyers told us repeatedly there was no way that Patricia Jannuzzi would ever come back to the Immaculata classroom under any possible scenario,” Oakley told MyCentralJersey.com. “On Thursday by phone, the diocesan lawyers told me clearly and finally that Patricia Jannuzzi would be terminated as of the end of August, end of discussion.” “Something is baffling here, clearly, but not why the Jannuzzi family believed Patricia Jannuzzi had been fired,” Oakley added. It is not enough, apparently to fire a Catholic school teacher for defending the faith. The diocese has to sully her good name by pretending it has never done any of those things, and implying she’s a liar. This gets worse and worse.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/415897/diocese-metuchen-attacks-jannuzzi-family-maggie-gallagher

The Diocese of Metuchen Attacks the Jannuzzi Family 
by MAGGIE GALLAGHER
March 24, 2015 1:22 PM
National Review

Updated (2): Blind Man In White House, No Love For The Country, Rudy Giuliani Threatened

Posted February 19, 2015 8:46 PM ET; Last updated February 24, 2015 8:55 PM ET



[From article]
How does Obama get away with being “The Insulter-in-Chief”? Certainly the liberal media have been accomplices -- even Saturday Night Live mocked the media for their fawning approach towards Obama. But primarily, Obama and his Democratic allies consider most Americans to be stupid (see many examples here) and could not resist calling their own supporters “knuckleheads.”
The Republicans blew opportunities in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014 to tell Americans the truth about Barack Obama and his views towards them. The media abetted them and Obama. But now that Giuliani has raised the issue the media and Democratic flaks (but I repeat myself) have retaliated.
[. . .]
His “apology tour” overseas once he won election was an insult to America and an assault on truth. When a slew of foreign leaders of South and Central America unleashed torrents of abuse and insults towards Americans in 2009, Barack Obama was mute and did not try to defend America. Indeed, when Daniel Ortega, the Marxist dictator of Nicaragua, excoriated America for decades of abuse, all Barack Obama was able to say in defense was that he was “thankful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three years old,”
[. . .]
He has frequently snubbed our allies overseas while empowering our adversaries.
[. . .]
He dismisses Islamic terrorism and engages in rhetorical spin to absolve Muslims of responsibility for violence.
[. . .]
Don’t Republicans, elected in a magisterial red sweep in 2014, also have legitimate grievances regarding Obama’s flouting of the laws? These Americans -- including the ones who voted for Republicans -- do not seem to have legitimate grievances in Obama’s view. They don’t matter to him at all except as foils to insult and generate rage against.
Since Obama sees America as a force of evil in the world that has caused much pain to the oppressed, he has steadily done his best to weaken America and our capacity to defend ourselves in the future and seriously damaged.
[. . .]
So Rudy and Dinesh were right and if the besotted media had been fulfilling their responsibilities over the years America would not be saddled with a president who has contempt for millions and millions of Americans. Barack Obama agrees with Rudy Giuliani: he doesn’t love America.
So reporters should stop asking other politicians their opinions about Barack Obama’s love for America. The answer is obvious and has been for years.
[. . .]
As critical as Davis was to the formation of the fatherless Obama, Pulitzer Prize-winner David Maraniss managed to write a 10,000-word piece for the Washington Post on Obama’s early years in August 2008 without a single mention of Davis. In the runup to the election, when the Maraniss article was published, the many Obama enthusiasts in the Post audience no more wanted to read about Davis’s unseemly hobbies than Maraniss wanted to write about them. Win-win.
Obama and his admirers in the media understood that this was a relationship best kept under wraps. Davis never renounced his Communist past. As his FBI file reveals, the Hawaiian Communist Party simply went underground and infiltrated the Democratic Party.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/02/rudy_is_right.html

February 23, 2015
Rudy is Right
By Ed Lasky
* * *

[From article]
Rudy Giuliani doubled down on his claims that President Obama doesn’t “love America” in an interview with The Post Friday — claiming the commander-in-chief has been influenced by communists since his youth.
“From the time he was 9 years old, he was influenced by Frank Marshall Davis, who was a communist,” Giuliani said. The ex-mayor added that Obama’s grandfather introduced him to Davis, a writer and labor activist.
Giuliani also said another bad influence on Obama was Saul Alinsky, a community organizer whom the ex-mayor called a “socialist.”
The man once called “America’s mayor’’ also sharply criticized the president for having been a member of a church led by radical Chicago Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
“He spent 17 years in the church of Jeremiah Wright, and this is the guy who said ‘God damn America, not God bless America,’ ’’ Giuliani said.

[. . .]

“He was educated by people who were critics of the US. And he has not been able to overcome those influences.”
Giuliani also implied he was the only one with the chutzpah to call out Obama, saying: “Somebody has to raise these issues with the president. Somebody has to have the courage to stand up.”
Giuliani also bashed Obama for seeming to focus more attention on the police shooting in Missouri, which, he said, “turned out to be justified,” than the killings by Islamic fanatics. “How could you hold a press conference about Ferguson and not hold a press conference when Christians and Jews were slaughtered?” he asked.

http://nypost.com/2015/02/21/giuliani-obama-influenced-by-communists-since-youth/

Giuliani: Obama influenced by communists since youth
By Carl Campanile and Geoff Earle
New York Post
February 21, 2015 | 1:58am

* * *

[From article]
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said his office has received death threats since his controversial comments accusing President Barack Obama of not loving America.
"My secretary has received some death threats," Giuliani said in a brief interview by phone. But the former mayor emphasized the majority of the voice mails left at his office were supportive of his remarks. Giuliani did not say whether he alerted police to the threatening calls. CNN cannot confirm whether the threats were made.
[. . .]
"I don't regret making the statement. I believe it," Giuliani said. "I don't know if he loves America," he added.
"I don't feel the same enthusiasm from him for America," he continued during the interview.
[. . .]
Giuliani said he was disgusted with Obama's response to the executions of Egyptian Coptic Christians by ISIS and the attack on a Jewish market in Paris by radicals inspired by the terrorist group.
The President erred, Giuliani maintains, in not holding a press conference to immediately denounce those acts of terrorism.
"Islamic extremism is not an abstraction," he continued.
By contrast, Giuliani pointed out, the President did make comments to the press after the racial unrest in Ferguson, Missouri.
"There's something wrong with the rhetoric here," Giuliani said.
"I think the President is a very poor leader," Giuliani added, saying Obama doesn't measure up to past presidents Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton.
[. . .]
Giuliani said the White House owes him an apology after stating that he had made similar remarks about Obama during the 2008 campaign. Giuliani said that claim from White House spokesman Eric Schultz was not true.
"I think they should apologize to me," Giuliani said.



The White House should apologize to the nation, and to the people, who helped him get where he is. He has no shame. He has no love for the United States. He acts like he wants to destroy the country. His wife explained how she hated the country because of what it did to her husband. Huh? Columbia University degree, Harvard Law School degree, US Senator and President. This couple needs to do some self evaluation and show some humility. He acts more like a spy than the President.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/20/politics/giuliani-obama-love-america/index.html

Giuliani stands by Obama comments
By Jim Acosta,
CNN Senior White House Correspondent
Updated 12:36 PM ET, Sat February 21, 2015
* * *

[From article]
President Barack Obama has warned that Muslim community leaders are in danger of losing the propaganda war with the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Isil) and are often too “boring” to prevent their young people from getting radicalised.
Paying Isil a back-handed compliment for the effectiveness of its gruesome social media outreach campaign, Mr Obama said it was imperative to reach young Muslims and address their social, political and economic grievances in a way that they understood.
“By the way, [to] the older people here - as wise and respected as you may be - your stuff is often boring,” he told a White House summit on combatting the rise of extremism, “compared to what they're doing. You're not connected. And as a consequence, you are not connecting.”
Mr Obama it was time to be “honest” that slickly-produced Isil videos of fighting scenes, beheadings other atrocities were succeeding in brainwashing young Muslims.
[. . .]
His remarks came amid mounting criticism from some hawks in Washington that Mr Obama has refused to directly link Isil’s extremism with the religion of Islam.
However Mr Obama said that he rejected that linkage because it legitimised the Islamic State’s own propaganda that they are fighting a holy war against the West.
“We must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie,” Mr Obama said, “nor should we grant these terrorists the religious legitimacy that they seek. They are not religious leaders; they're terrorists. We are not at war with Islam.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/11421767/Barack-Obama-Muslim-elders-too-boring-to-win-Isil-propaganda-war.html

Barack Obama: Muslim elders too 'boring' to win Isil propaganda war
Islam is not to blame for rise of Islamic State says Barack Obama, arguing people not religion responsible for violence and terrorism
By Peter Foster, Washington
11:27PM GMT 18 Feb 2015
* * *

[From article]
Obama doesn’t love America — and Mitt’s not much better.
Those were the not-so-subtle views expressed by former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker at a Manhattan dinner party Wednesday night.
“I do not believe — and I know this is a horrible thing to say — but I do not believe that this President loves America,” Giuliani said of Obama.
“He doesn't love you. He doesn't love me. He wasn't brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up," Giuliani added. "To love this country. And with all our faults, we're the most exceptional country in the world."
The former mayor attempted to soften his comments Thursday, saying that he was "not questioning (Obama's) patriotism."
[. . .]
“You can be a patriotic American and be a critic," he added, "but then you're not expressing that kind of love that we're used to from a President."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/giuliani-slams-obama-wisc-gov-walker-fails-romney-article-1.2121037

Rudy Giuliani claims Obama 'doesn't love America' while Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker goes after Mitt Romney
The political figures expressed their disdain while attending a Manhattan dinner party Wednesday.
BY CELESTE KATZ , ADAM EDELMAN
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Published: Thursday, February 19, 2015, 1:52 AM Updated: Thursday, February 19, 2015, 4:16 PM

American Malls Already Under Attack By Black Teen Gangs

[From article]
Since the Christmas season, at least 25 malls around the country have experienced black mob violence, many connected to movie theaters. With much of the mayhem captured on video. With many of the malls turning into No Go Zones because of the regular racial violence and the muted response to it.
[. . .]
On February 9, police wanted to send a signal to the large black crowds that ran “wild and unsupervised” in the Circle Center Mall in downtown Indianapolis: They are not going to take it anymore. After 400 black people ran amok, 20 were banned from the mall, and five were arrested.
That did not make the black people happy: “Bra, don’t come near me or I swear I am going to go off,” said one “teenager” to a policeman, reported Fox 59 News. “If you touch my phone, or you are going to get hurt. And Bra, if you did not have a badge, it would be on.”
[. . .]
The second part of the story is this: Everyone involved in creating the violence was black. So say local police, local witnesses and some local residents who said ‘yes, everyone was black but it does not matter.’
On February 7, groups of black people rampaged through the Fashion Fair Mall, one of the nicer retail destinations in Fresno. “It was very violent and has really created a sensation,” said the ABC affiliate. What it did not create was any arrests.
[. . .]
News anchors at the TV station were incredulous at the “chaos” as they showed viewers one video after another of large-scale black mob violence breaking out all over the mall. Several commenters at the station’s web site said it was not fair to point out that all the rioters were black because white people do it too. The mall closed early. No one was arrested. No one posted videos of white rioters.
[. . .]
At least one reader did not like it that several others reported everyone involved in the Christmas 2014 violence was black: “The hateful, ignorant racist nonsense spewed here is disturbing, no wonder so many black people distrust whites.”
[. . .]
Just for the record, we cannot confirm the presence of large numbers of Amish people creating havoc and violence at Chicago’s most popular tourist destination. But there were lots of black people doing that in front of lots of witnesses.
[. . .]
This does not count large-scale black mob violence in lots of other places including schools, streets, an American Legion Hall, nightclubs, house parties, supermarkets, bus stops, downtowns, restaurants, Metro stations, Upper West Side neighborhoods, black history month celebrations and holiday events remembering the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/02/forget_the_terrorists_malls_already_under_attack_from_black_mob_violence.html

February 23, 2015
Forget The Terrorists: Malls Already Under Attack from Black Mob Violence
By Colin Flaherty

Updated: Teen Gang Invades Florida Theater Showing Fifty Shades . . .

Posted February 16, 2015 10:47 PM; Last updated February 20, 2015 4:02 PM ET



Do journalists, who fail to identify suspects, think it is helping their cause to eliminate racial animosity? It supports the beliefs that black people are getting privileges not enjoyed by white people, increasing animosity. If writers and editors are unable to identify suspects, readers have no such fears.

[From article]
West Oak Mall officials in the Orlando suburb of Ocoee said Monday that all teens must be accompanied by an adult after 9 p.m.
The policy was implemented after 100 teens rushed a movie theater Saturday night after they were denied tickets to see “Fifty Shades of Grey,” which is rated R and requires the viewer to be accompanied by a parent if they are under age 17.

http://nypost.com/2015/02/18/teens-bum-rush-theater-after-being-denied-entry-to-50-shades-of-grey/

Teens bum-rush theater after being denied entry to ‘50 Shades of Grey’
By Associated Press
New York Post

February 18, 2015 | 12:39pm

* * *

[From article]
There was a chaotic scene at an Ocoee movie theater, after deputies say hundreds of teens stormed the building, trying to get in for free.
[. . .]
Deputies say gunfire could be heard at one point and someone was robbed.

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/deputies-hundreds-of-teens-storm-ocoee-theater/31281974

Deputies: Hundreds of teens storm Ocoee theater
Middle, high school students try to get into theater free
Author: Cathleigh Winningham, Producer, cwinningham@wkmg.com
Published On: Feb 15 2015 07:14:27 AM EST Updated On: Feb 15 2015 01:04:53 PM EST

Muslim PR Flack Denies Growth of Muslim Terror

Here is a creative propaganda account of terrorist acts, using statistics. The system used to make his case is something like, "Let's count the number of terrorist acts by Muslim terrorists. How many of them were Muslim?" Um, all of them? He says none of them. In the years leading up to the National Socialist Party in Germany electing Adolf Hitler chancellor in 1933, the usual propaganda was they were only a few extremists. No need to worry about them. Here a Muslim propagandist denies that Muslims are Muslims, if they commit an act of terror in the name of Islam. Then they become non Islamist. That is his logic. Good for him. There are dumbed down Americans who will believe what he says.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/14/are-all-terrorists-muslims-it-s-not-even-close.html

Dean Obeidallah
01.14.15
Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close

Can't Solve A Problem Unless You Know What It Is

[From article]
The enemy, in case you need a scorecard, is Islamic expansionist jihad. The tactic is terrorism waged with shameless barbarity, and the goal is worldwide domination in the form of a Sharia-law-based caliphate.
That may seem like a ridiculous and overly ambitious aspiration, and one not worthy of response, but consider this: At the start of World War II, Germany had a population of 79 million compared to a world population of 2.3 billion people. If you want to, go ahead and throw in another 72 million to represent the population of Japan, and another 44 million for Italy. Those three Axis powers, in other words, had a combined population of 195 million to use to seek to impose their will (and their empire) over a world population of 2.3 billion people. That represents approximately a 1 to 12 ratio.
If that 1:12 threat was “credible” — and the deaths of 60 million people during World War II suggest it was — then how much more seriously should we take the threat of Islamic jihad? Muslims, after all, represent nearly one-fourth of the world’s population, and they zealously seek to expand the influence of their religion across the entire globe. This is not something new either. There have been repeated attempts by Muslim armies to conquer Europe in the last 1,300 years.
[. . .]
President Obama loves to defend Islam, and there’s no doubt that he is right about the fact that most Muslims have no interest in waging war. But by denying the self-evident truth that millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of Muslims want to crush Israel, the United States and our European allies, he has turned himself into the Charles Lindbergh of American presidents.
Lindbergh, who like Barack Obama, was an international hero and a role model for millions of children because of his youthful accomplishments, became an ardent apologist for Germany before World War II and toured America in a vainglorious quest to keep us from going to war against the Nazis.
[. . .]
Likewise, President Obama lacks the vision or the intestinal fortitude to comprehend just how dangerous the ideology of Islamic jihad is to the rest of the world. No matter how many good Muslims there are, they are not willing nor able to hold back the angry, vengeful “true believers” willing to die for their cause.
[. . .]
Those of us who recognize the evil of the Islamic State and are prepared to do anything necessary to stop it do now have a leader, but sadly it is not President Obama. It is King Abdullah II of Jordan, who — when just one of his citizens was killed in that fiery execution — declared eternal war against the jihadis and vowed never to give up.
If President Obama is today’s Lindbergh, then we can only hope that Abdullah will prove to be this generation’s Churchill, who told Britain’s wartime schoolchildren, “Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never — in nothing, great or small, large or petty — never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense.”

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/islam-history-and-the-failure-to-recognize-a-world-threat/article_9a9119dc-af2f-11e4-8549-fbb4f2c8a2f7.html

Islam, history and the failure to recognize a world threat
Posted: Saturday, February 7, 2015 7:00 pm
FRANK MIELE/Daily Inter Lake

White House And Acolytes Deny One Problem Is Islamist Terrorists

[From article]
President Obama and his commissars fit the longstanding pattern of behavior (insistence, denial, castigation) that the hard left has embraced for generations. In the mid-20th century, leftists, bereft of God and desperate for a new faith, insisted for decade after decade that Comrade Stalin was a paragon of political virtues and that the Soviet Union was Utopia. All reports of purges, terror, man-made famines and the Gulag were fabrications of capitalists and their servants.
[. . .]
But leftists need a utopia, a fantasy heaven on earth, to comfort them and to give their lives purpose. Robbed of the Soviet dream, the forlorn left was in need of a new redeemer.
Welcome, Comrade Usama! The left—and young Barack Obama -- already saw Islam as an oppressed religion, the noble faith of the wretched of the earth, while casting Christianity and Judaism in the role once occupied by capitalist imperialists: that of oppressors. Bin Laden gave the left a new torch to carry. While it remained necessary to condemn terrorism in public, the left simultaneously justified it in a globalized version of the Marxist construct of a class struggle.
[. . .]
From the comfort of Cambridge or the splendor of California’s coast, they can rationalize radical Islam, a creed that would, if imported here, exterminate them as surely as Comrade Stalin would have purged the old American left.
[. . .]
So President Obama’s just playing by the time-honored rules, substituting Muhammad for Josef Stalin or Mao: Never criticize the Party. Ignore the facts. If the facts can’t be ignored, deny or twist them. No matter what, stick to the script (let them laugh for now, they’ll see soon enough...). And anyone who strays one inch must be neutralized, whether as a Trotskyist yesteryear or slandered as an Islamophobe today.
[. . .]
Truth is malleable. Facts are nuisances to be exterminated, along with troublesome people. Middle-class notions of freedom must be shouted down. The rule of the intellectuals must be imposed. Never, ever criticize the cause. Deny everything. Never forget that Islam’s a religion of peace.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/01/23/stalin-muhammad-and-obama/

Stalin, Muhammad and Obama
By Lt. Col. Ralph Peters (ret.
Published January 23, 2015
FoxNews.com

UN Secretary General: French Terror Not Religious War

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
Yelling Allahu Akbar while shooting writers, saying Prophet was vindicated? Shooting civilians in a Kosher Market? Not religious? Huh?

[From article]
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told reporters on Friday in New York that the terror attacks in Paris, in which radical Muslims targeted a Jewish supermarket and a newspaper that had mocked Muhammad, were “criminality” that had nothing to do with religion.
[. . .]
Similarly, on Thursday, Ban told reporters at the UN that the terror attacks “should never be seen as a war of religion … for religion … or on religion.” He noted, as evidence, that one of the police killed outside the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris had himself been a Muslim.
French President François Hollande expressed similar sentiments on Friday, telling the nation: “Those who committed these acts have nothing to do with the Muslim religion.”
Ban appealed Friday for tolerance and for people to resolve differences through dialogue.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/09/un-secretary-general-french-terror-not-religious-war-just-criminality/

UN SECRETARY-GENERAL: FRENCH TERROR NOT ‘RELIGIOUS WAR’–JUST ‘CRIMINALITY'
by JOEL B. POLLAK
9 Jan 2015

Murdoch: Denying Jihadist Muslims Must End

Rupert Murdoch
Getty Images

[From article]
The 21st Century Fox Chairman and CEO tweeted that "Maybe most Moslems peaceful, but until they recognize and destroy their growing jihadist cancer they must be held responsible," going on to tweet "Big jihadist danger looming everywhere from Philippines to Africa to Europe to US. Political correctness makes for denial and hypocrisy."

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rupert-murdoch-tweets-jihadist-cancer-762397

Rupert Murdoch Tweets About "Jihadist Cancer" Following Paris Attack
The mogul tweeted "Political correctness makes for denial and hypocrisy"
By Aaron Couch
January 9, 2015 6:20 PM PDT

Denying Terrorism Will Not Make It Go Away

[From article]
The president of the United States, now into his sixth year of denying of reality, refused to use the terms “Islamic terrorism,” “Islamic extremism” or Islamic-anything-that-isn’t-nice.” “Our thoughts and prayers” are with the French people, Obama said. He “strongly condemns the horrific shooting.”
At least he didn’t call it workplace violence (the designation for the Ft. Hood massacre) or attribute the murders to an obscure Internet video, as he did the Benghazi butchery.
[. . .]
In 2012, maintaining the fiction that an anti-Islam video sparked the murders of our ambassador to Libya and three others, the president bravely proclaimed before the representatives of 49 Moslem countries, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” – as if this was an imminent danger. It’s more likely that Harvard will be taken over by creationists and global warming skeptics.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/01/the_paris_attack_and_western_elites.html

January 9, 2015
The Paris Attack and Western Elites
By Don Feder