Showing posts with label Civility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civility. Show all posts

April 17, 2016

Censorship By Civility, Leads To Rage and Violence




[From article]
In a veiled reference to Trump at a recent lunch on Capitol Hill, President Obama declared he was “dismayed” at the “vulgar and divisive rhetoric” being heard on the campaign trail. “In America, there is no law that says we have to be nice to each other, or courteous, or treat each other with respect,” the president said. “But there are norms. There are customs.”
Are there? When I hear this sort of thing from Obama and his fellow leftists, what I wonder is: Have they not listened to themselves for the past 50 years? Do they really have no idea how vicious, how low, how cruel, and how dishonest their attacks on the Right have been?
No, they haven’t; and, no, they don’t. The Democrat-monopolized media, which explodes with rage at any minor unmannerliness on the right, falls so silent at the Left’s almost ceaseless acrimony that leftists are never forced to confront what despicable little Trumps they often are.
It begins with the Democratic leadership. Last August, principled Republicans opposed Obama’s foolish nuclear deal with Iran. Obama’s response? He compared them to terrorists. “Those hard-liners chanting ‘Death to America,’” he said. “They’re making common cause with the Republican caucus.” And yet “there are norms. There are customs.”
[. . .]



With the help of the media, leftists have even managed to bake their rudeness into the language itself, redefining standard behavior with offensive phrases. They use “objectification of women” to describe men’s normal sexual yearnings; “racial profiling” to describe street-smart police work that protects citizens of every color; and “climate deniers” (ala “Holocaust deniers,” for God’s sake) to describe those who call baloney on one of the great scams of our generation.
These off-handed insults have a purpose and a rationale. The mental tyranny that goes by the name of political correctness wrongly assumes that the human heart is infinitely malleable and that words can endlessly reshape the reality of its experience. Force people to declare that all cultures are morally equal, and morally equal those cultures will become; demand we pretend that gender differences are a myth, and gender differences will disappear; shame us out of noticing the color of a criminal’s skin, and crime statistics will lose their power.
[. . .]



It is in seeking these transformations that the Left has felt blithely justified in sneering at opposing opinions it deems racist, sexist, or otherwise hateful. But it just doesn’t work. The eyes see what they see; the heart knows what it knows. Bottle up the human experience in silence, and it will ultimately break forth in rage. Thus, the result of these last 50 years of ceaseless left-wing incivility has been not a rainbow-striped paradise of social justice, but the utter collapse of our civic dialogue as the Right now responds with vulgar cruelty of its own. “Those to whom evil is done,” as the poet Auden wrote, “do evil in return.”
You might say to me, as my mother used to say, “Two wrongs don’t make a right.” But I say to you, as I used to say to my mother, “They started it.”

http://city-journal.org/html/silent-nasty-14394.html

The Silent Nasty
Blame the Left for the deteriorating tone of our political discourse.
Andrew Klavan
April 14, 2016

March 21, 2016

Can Trump vs. Clinton Election Campaign Remain Civil?



Will they be polite to one another?

[From article]
I have long thought one of the more specious claims supporters of Donald Trump use is that he alone has the stomach to challenge the Clintons on their unsavory practices. In fact, Clinton and Donald Trump may be more likely to follow the campaign equivalent of MAD if they are the nominees because each is equally vulnerable to the same charges. If Hillary has been an incompetent administrator, Trump has presided over several bankruptcies. If Hillary helped cheat innocent vacation home buyers in Whitewater, Trump lent his name and did promotions for both the scam called Trump University and ACN, Inc, a multilevel marketing firm that many consumer watchdogs see as a pyramid scheme designed to separate gullible new members from their money. If Hillary has sold political influence, Trump has bought political influence. If Hillary is a creature of the big government far left, so is Trump, at least until recently. If Hillary lies, Trump lies just as often and as risible.
[. . .]
It is common knowledge that Bill Clinton is a horn dog. It is also common knowledge that before the Clintons and Monica Lewinsky came along there was the tabloid triangle of The Donald, first wife Ivana and concubine Marla Maples. Supporters of both the Clintons and Trump will carp that this is all old news and nobody cares. But there is one new twist. About the only sexual perversion that still has the power to offend our completely jaded culture is the sexual abuse of minors. And both candidates could end up locked in a MAD embrace on this issue because the equally rapacious Bill Clinton and Donald Trump have both socialized with reclusive financier and political donor Jeffery Epstein, a collector of expensive houses, including what is said to be the largest private residence in Manhattan, a Palm Beach estate and compound on a Caribbean island. Jeffrey Epstein also collected Nobel Laureates and the occasional member of royal families from the Windsor to the Ibn Saud. He is also a convicted sex offender who is the subject of ongoing litigation from at least a dozen of his then-underage victims, some of whom claim they were regularly offered as entertainment to prestigious guests at Epstein's residences.
[. . .]
This plays into the likelihood that Trump and the Clintons both wish to avoid the issue of the sleaze factor in a general election campaign. For while there isn't stronger evidence against Clinton than there is against Trump, both men did seem to have more than a passing acquaintance with Epstein, plus there are Trump's own words that the girls around Epstein were "on the younger side."
[. . .]
One question that has loomed large since Epstein was exposed as a pervert is whether he may have audio and visual evidence that could implicate his high placed friends in his crimes. All the incidents seemed to have happened on properties Epstein owns and he is said to be a control freak who loves secret cameras.
The presidential elections of 1828 and 1800 are often considered the two dirtiest in American History. Each was a rematch of the top two rivals in the election four years earlier, with the 1800 contest having the added twist of a devious vice presidential candidate's attempt to use the poorly drafted Electoral College clause in the Constitution to hijack the presidency for himself. Should Trump attempt to smear the Clintons, the 2016 election could well make those two campaigns look like brush fires.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/trump_and_clinton_mutual_assured_destruction.html

March 21, 2016
Trump and Clinton: Mutual Assured Destruction?
By Rosslyn Smith

February 13, 2016

Massachusetts Governor Objects To Uncivil Speech




Gov. Baker subscribes to the civility censorship argument, promoted by his alma mater, Harvard College. When former Mayor Galluccio told me at a Town Gown annual meeting "Be nice." he revealed he supports censorship if it is unpleasant. I asked, "How can you solve a problem if you cannot talk about it?" At that meeting the concern was the repeated deceptions by Harvard University PR flacks.

[From article]
Gov. Charlie Baker said Donald Trump’s vulgar remark about Ted Cruz is more evidence the Republican front-runner is unsuitable for office.
“Did he really? Did he really say that?” a visibly aghast Baker said when told by a reporter that Trump had called Cruz “a pussy.” “Look, I made very clear last week when I endorsed Gov. Christie that part of the reason that I endorsed him was I didn’t think that Donald Trump had the temperament and the seriousness of purpose to be president of the United States, and that comment would certainly fit quite well in that particular category.”

Tuesday, February 09, 2016

August 19, 2015

Boston Journalist Uses Civility Argument Trying To Silence Political Expression




Fitzgerald continues his campaign to censor Donald Trump using the civility argument. Harvard University officials use it to silence criticism of the university. Criticism you see is uncivil. He suggests that Trump speaks using words and phrases not fitting for a candidate for president. Has he heard the language used by the sitting president, the Vice President? They call critics stupid and terrorists. Congressmen utter the most frightening inanities of the elected criminal class (Noam Chomsky's phrase). They all owe me an apology for offending my sense of decorum for public speech. Funny how Fitzgerald does not mention the US Constitution. The First Amendment is specifically concerned with political speech. It does not mention civility which is the priority of Fitzgerald and the Harvard elitists. The purpose of the notion of free speech and the First Amendment is to protect speech that you hate. Fitzgerald opposes the First Amendment. He's a member of the but brigade. "I support the First Amendment but . . . " If what Fitzgerald believes is true why not let the people decide what they want to hear and who they want to be president. Don't you trust the voters and taxpayers Mr. Fitzgerald?

[From article]
this garrulous renegade whose speaking style is quite the opposite of predictable
[. . .]
By financing his own campaign, Trump is no one’s economic hostage, giving him freedom to say whatever he feels like saying.
But with it comes another freedom, a freedom to disregard decorum as if no one’s going to tell him what he can and cannot say.
So he tells us his opponents are stupid, are losers, which is what you might expect to hear in a schoolyard squabble, not in a race to become America’s next chief executive.
[. . .]
An old political axiom warns you can’t throw mud without getting dirty, and Trump has been slinging a lot of it lately.
Even Scripture calls the tongue “an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.”
So here’s some free advice to this loquacious billionaire.
Want to be the victor? Then it’s time to put a muzzle on the viper.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/joe_fitzgerald/2015/08/fitzgerald_mudslinging_may_get_donald_trump_dirty

Fitzgerald: Mudslinging may get Donald Trump dirty
Monday, August 17, 2015
By: Joe Fitzgerald
Boston Herald

August 11, 2015

Another Boston Journalist Wants To Deny Trump Free Speech Rights Under the U.S. Constitution In The Name of Civility



Donald Trump, New York Candidate For President 

Peter Gelzinis joins misguided journalists ignoring the Constitution which grants him and them priority in protected speech rights. Asking "How does he [Trump] get away with this stuff?" Gelzinis shows he is part of the PC crowd, who censors speech using civility to silence criticism. Referring to Trump's view of Mexicans as rapists and drug dealers, raises the question, "Does Gelzinis read any newspapers?" There are daily reports of illegal aliens from Mexico who are arrested for rape, convicted of rape and drug dealing. Concerning his opinion of what makes a hero, in his autobiography, Devil At My Heels, Louis Zamperini, who was held prisoner during World War II, and beaten for two years by Japanese military, describes his experiences. "I roamed from bar to bar accepting drinks on the house or from bighearted strangers. I told my stories and wallowed in the term 'war hero,' until I actually believed it myself. [. . .] I was just a guy who'd done nothing more heroic than live." Then Gelzinis uses his platform protected by the First Amendment to express personal attacks calling Trump "the latest slimeball," and saying he is "looking like George Washington." Really?  

[From article]
How does Donald Trump get away with this stuff?
Even after sliming Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly with insults that would draw groans in just about any barroom, The Donald still leads a platoon of befuddled Republicans who would like to be president.
He has flouted every law of political gravity, not to mention GOP politics, and it’s kept him way, way out in front.
Other than Mayor Marty Walsh, there was no one around here who’s taken umbrage at Trump’s view of Mexicans as rapists and drug dealers.
[. . .]
[Trump] said Arizona Sen. John McCain’s years of torture inside the Hanoi Hilton did not make him a hero.
[. . .]
this latest slimeball
[. . .]
looking like George Washington

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/peter_gelzinis/2015/08/gelzinis_mass_gop_women_silent_on_trump

Gelzinis: Mass. GOP women silent on Trump
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
By: Peter Gelzinis
Boston Herald

July 29, 2015

College Students Need Protection From College Administrators




[From article]
A more insulting and mindless exercise would be hard to imagine. But Napolitano’s seminar possesses a larger significance: it demolishes any remaining hope that college administrators possess a firmer grip on reality than the narcissistic students over whom they preside.
[. . .]
Well, you might ask any high school senior, steeped in his class’s SAT rankings, if it’s true that “people of color” are given “extra benefits” in college admissions. He will laugh at your naïveté. A 2004 study of three top-tier universities, published in Social Science Quarterly, found that blacks were favored over whites by a factor of 5.5 and that being black got students an extra 230 SAT points on a 1,600-point scale. Such massive preferences for URMs are found at every selective college and graduate school. Every student knows this, and yet diversity protocol requires pretending that preferences don’t exist.
[. . .]
The ultimate question raised by the seminar is: Are there any adults left on campus, at least in administrative offices? And the answer is: no. An adult administrator would realize that he is presiding over the most tolerant, well-meaning, and opportunity-filled community in human history. He would understand that the claim that females and minorities are the victims of discrimination on campuses is sheer fiction.
[. . .]
The most disturbing aspect of “Fostering Inclusive Excellence” is that it was initiated by the president’s office without outside provocation.
[. . .]
We have come to expect such ignorance from coddled, self-engrossed students. Now it turns out that those students may be the least of the university’s problems.

http://www.city-journal.org/2015/25_3_snd-bias.html

HEATHER MAC DONALD
Microaggression, Macro-Crazy
The University of California keeps upping the ante in its search for imaginary bias.
Summer 2015

July 21, 2015

Did New York City Mayor and City Councilman Violate First Amendment Rights of Many?




Threats by the NYC Mayor and the City Councilman may constitute a chilling effect, which is a First Amendment violation. Not only to Donald Trump but also to others who may be fearful of expressing constitutionally protected speech for fear of being denied access to the city government for making proposals and engaging in contracts for products or services. The right of others to hear Trump's constitutionally protected speech is another First Amendment violation. Here's one definition.





In constitutional law, the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of a a constitutional right, especially one protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, by the potential or threatened prosecution under, or application of, a law or sanction.
(Webster's New World Law Dictionary Copyright © 2010 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Used by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)


[From article]
New York City's mayor has had enough Trump, thank you.
During a press conference on Monday, Mayor Bill de Blasio said that while he's uncertain whether the city can break several existing contracts with the Republican presidential hopeful, one thing is clear: There will be no future deals between the Big Apple and Trump.
"My impression is that unless there has been some breaking of a contract or something that gives us a legal opportunity to act, I'm not sure we have a specific course of action," de Blasio told reporters.
"But we're certainly not looking to do any business with him going forward," the mayor added.
[. . .]



New York City Councilman Mark Levine also has begun circulating a petition calling on the city to sever its ties with Trump.
"Our parks are for everyone," the Manhattan Democrat said. "Trump's continued ownership of parks concessions runs directly contrary to that spirit."
[. . .]



"What Mr. Trump said about Senator McCain was unacceptable," the mayor said. "Senator McCain is a war hero by any measure, and [Trump] really should apologize for that. And I've said repeatedly, Donald Trump doesn't represent the views of the people of this city -- certainly not of the majority."
De Blasio added, "But this is an issue for folks in the other party to work through. I just think what he said in the last few days was reprehensible."

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/20/news/trump-de-blasio-new-york-city-contracts/index.html

Mayor de Blasio: No more Trump deals in NYC future
By Nicholas Yeap
@CNNMoney

July 20, 2015

Civility Is New Form Of Censoring Protected Speech




The focus by journalists on the comments by Trump shows the sorry state of American journalism, but also public discourse. Using the civility standard for public discourse silences and inhibits much speech which could explain where problems exist and how to fix them. Instead speaking about problems is discouraged because it might hurt someone's feelings. I encountered this same principle in public meetings in Cambridge, MA. One Washington DC dinner speaker, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States discussed this dangerous principle. Trump's comments are protected speech. If they are wrong or factually incorrect journalists should show how and why. Instead they use personal attacks which are a form of propaganda. 


Donald Trump

[From article]
"I will say what I want to say, and maybe that’s why I’m leading in the polls because people are tired of hearing politicians and pollsters telling the politicians exactly what to say," Trump told Raddatz.
The fact is that apologizing after a comment judged as ill-advised (at best) by most politicians is exact opposite of the Trump brand. The sort of people who misspeak and then try to clean up their messes are the very people that Trump derides -- and that he believes the public can't stand either.
Even as Trump was refusing to apologize, former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley was in the midst of the misspeak-apology cycle. In response to demonstrators at a liberal gathering in Phoenix demanding that O'Malley address police brutality and chanting "black lives matter, O'Malley said "Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter." He later apologized; "That was a mistake on my part and I meant no disrespect," he said. "I did not mean to be insensitive in any way or communicate that I did not understand the tremendous passion, commitment and feeling and depth of feeling that all of us should be attaching to this issue."


Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/19/donald-trump-didnt-apologize-to-john-mccain-because-of-course-not/

Donald Trump didn’t apologize to John McCain. Because, of course not.
By Chris Cillizza
July 19, 2015 at 11:10 AM

* * *

[From article]
John McCain has called his own constituents who want a secure border “crazies.” No one in the news media or the establishment, including the Republican National Committee, criticized the senator for those comments.
Now, as respected reporter Sharyl Attkisson has proved point by point, the news media are also distorting my words. But that is not my point. McCain the politician has failed the state of Arizona and the country.
[. . .]
Thanks to McCain and his Senate colleague Bernie Sanders, their legislation to cover up the VA scandal, in which 1,000+ veterans died waiting for medical care, made sure no one has been punished, charged, jailed, fined or held responsible. McCain has abandoned our veterans. I will fight for them.
[. . .]
He would rather protect the Iraqi border than Arizona’s. He even voted for the Iran Nuclear Review Act of 2015, which allows Obama, who McCain lost to in a record defeat, to push his dangerous Iran nuclear agreement through the Senate without a supermajority of votes.
A number of my competitors for the Republican nomination have no business running for president. I do not need to be lectured by any of them. Many are failed politicians or people who would be unable to succeed in the private sector.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/07/19/donald-trump-republican-party-presidential-candidate-editorials-debates/30389993/

Trump: I don't need to be lectured
Donald Trump
6:46 p.m. EDT July 19, 2015

November 15, 2013

Why Are Politicians Unable to Be Cordial?







The panelists all missed the elephant in the room, not the NJ Governor. Let me explain simply. You are all wrong, stupid, evil, extremist, tea baggers, and mentally ill. Only I know what is best because I have credentials, making me an expert. So stop talking, wasting people's time, and let me teach you what needs to be done.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/11/14/iop-gridlock-business-partisanship/?page=1

Panelists Discuss Business and Bipartisanship
By OLIVIA R. GOLDBERG, CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Harvard Crimson
November 13, 2013

March 11, 2011

WI Democratic Obama Inspired Civility in Action

[From artcile]
"The letter tells lawmakers to "make your peace with God as soon as possible and say goodbye to your loved ones," warning they will be killed "due to your actions in the last eight weeks."

The letter, which is signed, says the writer is working with a group of people and knows where the legislators live. It says legislators may be shot in their homes or killed with bombs placed at locations they frequent.

"We feel that you and the people that support the dictator have to die," the letter reads. "If you and your goonies feel that it's necessary to strip the rights of 300,000 people and ruin their lives, making them unable to feed, clothe, and provide the necessities to their families and themselves then We Will 'get rid of' (in which I mean kill) you."

http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20110311/WDH0101/303110067/Multimedia-18-GOP-senators-report-getting-death-threats?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE

8 Republican senators from Wisconsin report getting death threats after passing bill to end collective bargaining for most public workers
Written by Eric Litke
Wausau Daily herald
March 11, 2011

March 4, 2011

Civility For Thee But Not For Me

[From article]
"A widely circulated 2004 Guardian op-ed by Charles Brooker opined, "John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley, Jr. -- where are you now that we need you?"
[. . .]
I remember those eerie times well. There was Jonathan Chait's New Republic essay about why "I hate President George W. Bush." Garrison Keillor called Republicans "brownshirts in pinstripes." Then-NAACP Chairman Julian Bond said of Bush & Co., "Their idea of equal rights is the American flag and the Confederate swastika flying side by side."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/now_they_think_civility_must_VxCF0QzFpAMd60s7lnjzOI

Now they think civility's a must
Victor Davis Hanson
New York Post
Last Updated: 12:31 AM, February 16, 2011
Posted: 10:08 PM, February 15, 2011

February 19, 2011

Democrats Use Hitler Allegation Against WI Governor

http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/02/18/hows-that-new-civility-workin-fer-ya/

How’s That New Civility Workin’ Fer Ya?
Posted by Ron Futrell
BigJournalism.com
Feb 18th 2011 at 8:00 pm