Showing posts with label Chilling Effect. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chilling Effect. Show all posts

October 28, 2015

Cambridge Officials Show Lack Of Respect and Intolerance for Diverse Ideas




"Slate for Cambridge candidates didn’t know of his past beliefs and condemn them in the strongest terms,” the group wrote in a joint statement. Condemning the words shows a moralistic view denigrating the views expressed. It is one reason why it is nearly impossible to have rational discussions in Cambridge and at universities. A more appropriate phrase is "we disagree" with what the ex-candidate said. That would show respect for the person instead of saying this person said bad things implying he is a bad person. Too bad Cambridge city officials, voters, Harvard University students and professors are unable to show respect for those with whom they disagree. 

 

This is also a First Amendment issue denying a person protected speech, no matter how hateful. Some of the condemners are public officials, who took oaths to defend the state and US Constitutions. They are chilling speech. See Harvard Law School Prof. Archibald Cox's book, Freedom of Expression to see what is protected speech. Lively discussion on Cambridge Chronicle site.



http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/10/28/sanzone-drops-council-race/

Sanzone Exits Council Race After Racist Comments Revelations
By M. HANL PARK and SAMUEL VASQUEZ,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
October 28, 2015

September 29, 2015

Cambridge, MA City Councilor Wants Uncivil Speakers Chilled







In case you were not paying attention the First Amendment was itself amended by a single City Councilor, restricting speech that is not civil. The city joins Harvard University which objects to criticism as uncivil speech saying it is not protected by the Constitution. This is the latest change in the rules of law for public comment and for other councilors. We don't need no stinkin' speech. No need either for an Executive Order, a burden when the White House makes changes to laws.



[From article]
Councilor Marc McGovern [. . .] took exception to Mazen’s statement that the increase to $12 is not morally defensible.
“That’s a pretty heavy statement to make because somebody doesn’t feel you’re level of comfort with the risk,” McGovern said. “That’s [a] pretty divisive, nasty thing to say.”
McGovern also said he didn’t like hearing people in public comment say that the council was supporting developers over affordable housing by voting for the increase to $12 instead of $24.“That kind of rhetoric, we’ve got to stop,” McGovern said.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150929/NEWS/150925887

Cambridge votes to triple linkage fees in support of affordable housing
By Adam Sennott
Cambridge (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Sep. 29, 2015 at 3:33 PM
Updated at 3:46 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

July 21, 2015

Did New York City Mayor and City Councilman Violate First Amendment Rights of Many?




Threats by the NYC Mayor and the City Councilman may constitute a chilling effect, which is a First Amendment violation. Not only to Donald Trump but also to others who may be fearful of expressing constitutionally protected speech for fear of being denied access to the city government for making proposals and engaging in contracts for products or services. The right of others to hear Trump's constitutionally protected speech is another First Amendment violation. Here's one definition.





In constitutional law, the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of a a constitutional right, especially one protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, by the potential or threatened prosecution under, or application of, a law or sanction.
(Webster's New World Law Dictionary Copyright © 2010 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Used by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)


[From article]
New York City's mayor has had enough Trump, thank you.
During a press conference on Monday, Mayor Bill de Blasio said that while he's uncertain whether the city can break several existing contracts with the Republican presidential hopeful, one thing is clear: There will be no future deals between the Big Apple and Trump.
"My impression is that unless there has been some breaking of a contract or something that gives us a legal opportunity to act, I'm not sure we have a specific course of action," de Blasio told reporters.
"But we're certainly not looking to do any business with him going forward," the mayor added.
[. . .]



New York City Councilman Mark Levine also has begun circulating a petition calling on the city to sever its ties with Trump.
"Our parks are for everyone," the Manhattan Democrat said. "Trump's continued ownership of parks concessions runs directly contrary to that spirit."
[. . .]



"What Mr. Trump said about Senator McCain was unacceptable," the mayor said. "Senator McCain is a war hero by any measure, and [Trump] really should apologize for that. And I've said repeatedly, Donald Trump doesn't represent the views of the people of this city -- certainly not of the majority."
De Blasio added, "But this is an issue for folks in the other party to work through. I just think what he said in the last few days was reprehensible."

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/20/news/trump-de-blasio-new-york-city-contracts/index.html

Mayor de Blasio: No more Trump deals in NYC future
By Nicholas Yeap
@CNNMoney

July 6, 2015

Ignore Terrorist Apologists, Stay Alert




[From article]
If you see something, say something — even if it means CAIR will threaten to sue you.
Multiple federal agencies and the Department of Defense are on high alert for a possible Islamic terrorist attack on U.S. soil this Independence Day weekend. They’ve increased security at military bases and sent bulletins to law enforcement officials across the country.
The heightened stance comes in the wake of a bloodthirsty ISIS call to arms for Ramadan; multiple jihad outbreaks in Kuwait, France and Tunisia; and the arrest of at least 30 terror plotters in our country radicalized by ISIS over the past year.
[. . .]
Unfortunately, too much of the nation remains in permanent post-9/11 snooze-button mode. Compounding this collective apathy is political correctness run amok. It’s the ever-present handmaiden of terrorism: reluctance to risk offending, unwillingness to stick out one’s neck, and feckless aversion of the eyes in the face of existential threats.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, which was designated by the Justice Department as an unindicted terror co-conspirator in 2007 in the federal prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation and others for providing support to Hamas, has gleefully exploited this cultural weakness — filing intimidation and obstructionist lawsuits left and right against those who have dared to look out and speak up.
CAIR subjected a private citizen, Zaba Davis, to harassing and invasive subpoenas over her opposition to a planned construction project by the Muslim Community Association and Michigan Islamic Academy. A federal judge called CAIR’s anti-free speech witch-hunt “chilling.” The group has refused to pay sanctions ordered by the court.
[. . .]
it was CAIR that advised six publicity-seeking imams who filed a federal discrimination lawsuit against U.S. Airways and the Metropolitan Airports Commission in Minneapolis-St. Paul several years ago. The Muslim clerics were removed from their flight and questioned for several hours after their suspicious behavior alarmed both passengers and crewmembers. CAIR and the instigating imams targeted “John Does” — innocent bystanders who alerted the authorities about their security concerns.
After a national backlash and passage of a congressional amendment protecting heroic John Does from frivolous p.c. lawsuits, CAIR quietly dropped its complaint. But their incessant cries of “Islamophobia” remain a potent deterrent to alert whistleblowers and witnesses who risk the manufactured wrath of jihad apologists, funders, enablers and front groups.
[. . .]
Remember Brian Morgenstern, the teenage Circuit City worker who fearlessly contacted authorities when suspicious Middle Easterners brought in tapes of themselves shooting off guns and shouting “Allahu Akbar.” The men were convicted of plotting to kill American soldiers at Fort Dix.
[. . .]
remember the words of one of the brilliant men who secured America’s independence, Patrick Henry: “The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.”
http://michellemalkin.com/2015/07/03/vigilance-is-patriotic/

Vigilance is patriotic
By Michelle Malkin
July 3, 2015 08:19 AM
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2015

June 13, 2015

Texas Teacher Fired For Protected Speech About Texas Policeman's Actions During Arrest


See related story at this link
http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2015/06/miami-school-principal-removed-for.html


Fired: Teacher Karen Fitzgibbons was fired for saying online that she was 'almost to the point' of supporting racial segregation after watching video of a white officer wrestling a black teenager to the ground in Mckinney.

More spineless school board politicians, intimidating others for free thought and free expression. They show their ignorance saying "We find these statements to be extremely offensive, insensitive, and disrespectful to our Frenship community and citizens everywhere. These comments in no way represent the educational environment we have created for our students." Protecting offensive and insensitive speech is the purpose of the First Amendment. But also these misguided officials admit creating an educational environment where free speech is not celebrated, protected or defended. They appear to violate their oaths of office by their actions. They are more examples of the weak anti Americans who hold public office in the United States today. 

[From article]
A West Texas school district has fired a teacher who said online that she was 'almost to the point' of supporting racial segregation after watching video of a white officer wrestling a black bikini-clad teenager to the ground in Mckinney.
'I'm just going to just go ahead and say it...the blacks are the ones causing the problems and this "racial tension," fourth-grade teacher Karen Fitzgibbons wrote in the since-deleted Facebook post on Wednesday.
'I guess that's what happens when you flunk out of school and have no education. I'm sure their parents are just as guilty for not knowing what their kids were doing; or knew and didn't care.'
[. . .]
The Frenship school district, near Lubbock, said in a statement on Thursday that it was disappointed by the 'thoughtlessness' of fourth-grade teacher Karen Fitzgibbons' charged comments.
'Frenship ISD is deeply disappointed in the thoughtlessness conveyed by this employee's post,' the release said.
'We find these statements to be extremely offensive, insensitive, and disrespectful to our Frenship community and citizens everywhere. These comments in no way represent the educational environment we have created for our students.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3120756/Blacks-segregated-Texas-elementary-school-teacher-fired-comments-McKinney-video.html

'Blacks should be segregated': Texas elementary school teacher fired for post about pool party video showing cop wrestling black girl to the ground
'I'm just going to just go ahead and say it...the blacks are the ones causing the problems ' fourth-grade teacher Karen Fitzgibbons wrote
Fitzgibbons was fired for her comments on Facebook after watching video of a white officer wrestling a black teenager to the ground in Mckinney
'I'm almost to the point of wanting them all segregated on one side of town so they can hurt each other,' she continued in her racist rant
By ALEXANDRA KLAUSNER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and ASSOCIATED PRESS
PUBLISHED: 17:24 EST, 11 June 2015 | UPDATED: 01:51 EST, 12 June 2015


June 12, 2015

Miami School Principal Removed For Expressing Support of Police in Texas. Florida Thought Crime


See related story at this link
http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2015/06/texas-teacher-fired-for-protected.html



[From article]
The principal of North Miami Senior High School has lost his job over his Facebook comment defending the Texas police officer caught on video pushing a teen girl to the ground in an incident at a community pool.
[. . .]
"If you're running a majority black school and you say a remark such as that people will not respect you," student Price Testinobles said.
"Of course teachers and parents and students they're gonna see it (the post) it's not his job to go comment on with the police were doing," added another student.

http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/North-Miami-Senior-High-School-Principal-Alberto-Iber-Loses-Job-Over-Post-on-Police-Incident-in-McKinney-Texas-306816711.html

North Miami Senior High School Principal Alberto Iber Loses Job Over Post on Police Incident in McKinney, Texas
Updated at 11:38 PM EDT on Wednesday, Jun 10, 2015
By Jamie Guirola and Brian Hamache

* * *

This is the Chilling Effect in action. What happened to the ACLU? People are being intimidated by thugs who threaten free thought and free speech. It is the road to totalitarianism. Few young people are taught the purpose of the Constitution and especially the First Amendment. It is to protect speech that you hate. Hating speech is no reason to shut it down. Emotions do not make for rational thought or public policies. It does encourage mob rule. The current White House thrives in the misguided atmosphere of emotional manipulation. The intimidation extends to the spineless Chief of Police in  McKinney, Texas who did not support Officer Casebolt, as well as to the school board in North Miami made up of similarly spineless officials. 

[From article]
In a public post on a story about the Texas incident on the Miami Herald's website, Iber wrote that Officer David Eric Casebolt, who has since resigned, did nothing wrong and was afraid for his life.
In the comment section, believing he would be anonymous Iber posted,'He did nothing wrong. He was afraid for his life. I commend him for his actions.'
But the post included Iber's Facebook picture, name, school and title.
The comment was later deleted, but not before it had been screenshotted and passed around social media.
Iber told the Herald that he supports law enforcement and was sorry if his opinion upset people.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3119346/Principal-reassigned-Internet-post-Texas-officer.html

High school principal reassigned after public post supporting pool party cop
Alberto Iber removed as principal of North Miami Senior High School
Posted a comment online about the Texas pool party cop from viral video
Wrote: 'He did nothing wrong. He was afraid for his life. I commend him for his actions.'
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
PUBLISHED: 20:43 EST, 10 June 2015 | UPDATED: 11:42 EST, 12 June 2015


November 14, 2013

Gov't Surveillance Creates Fear Among Writers, Artists




[From article]
A new report from the PEN Center and the FDR Group entitled “Chilling Effects: NSA Surveillance Drives U.S. Writers to Self-Censor” finds that 85 percent of surveyed writers are worried about government surveillance of Americans, and nearly three-quarters (73 percent) “have never been as worried about privacy rights and freedom of the press as they are today.”
[. . .]
Writer comments included statements such as, “I assume everything I do electronically is subject to monitoring.”

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/11/12/report-government-spying-causing-self-censorship-privacy-fears-among-us-writers/

Report: Government Spying Causing Self-Censorship, Privacy Fears Among US Writers
Benjamin Fearnow
November 12, 2013 9:49 AM
CBS News Washington DC

October 28, 2009

Retaliation for Hate Speech?


This essay was rational until the last paragraph asking, "How, then, are we supposed to react to people like Wilders? The first step is giving them a taste of their own medicine." John Stuart Mill supported free expression so that in case we are wrong about a belief we can correct our misconception. If we are correct we can affirm what we believe. Responding to unpopular speech with more unpopular speech "to give them a taste of their own medicine" is childish. Censoring speech restricts freedom. Repeatedly in the name of religion violence was used to silence speech critical of Islam. There is the concurrent harm of the chilling effect. How many people now fear speaking out because of fear of being killed? The notion of free speech is to protect speech that you hate. If it is wrong show how. If hate speech is correct it needs to be adopted no matter how hateful. But if it is censored how can it be evaluated?

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2009/10/26/why-hate-speech

Why hate speech?
Banning hate speech ultimately prevents us from supporting the principle of free speech.
By Derek Turner
Columbia Spectator
Published Monday 26 October 2009 07:24pm EST.

May 27, 2009

Presidential Chilling Effect?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/23016.html

[Video embedded]
W.H. to Sotomayor critics: Be 'careful'
By ALEXANDER BURNS
Politico.com
May 27, 2009 4:27 PM EDT

* * *

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124338457658756731.html

REVIEW & OUTLOOK
MAY 27, 2009
The 'Empathy' Nominee
Is Sonia Sotomayor judically superior to 'a white male'?
Wall Street Journal

* * *

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98EO9DO0&show_article=1

or

http://tinyurl.com/rx7lmn


Napolitano addresses Sept. 11 Canada controversy
May 27 01:21 PM US/Eastern
By ROB GILLIES
Breitbart.com
Associated Press Writer

* * *

http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0509/gibbs_vs_uk_press_6f2649ca-3a2a-41fa-ae25-b3fe063046e4.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/l986fp


POLITICO.com
Gibbs vs. UK press
Lashes out at British media
May 28, 2009

* * *

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gibbs_should_apologise_to_the_british_press_for_his_sneering_rant

or

http://tinyurl.com/mqscdf

Robert Gibbs should apologise to the British press for his sneering rant
Posted By: Nile Gardiner
Telegraph (UK)
May 29, 2009