January 21, 2015
Protesting Brunch
Anti-omelet "Black Brunch" protesters in Oakland, Calif.
[From article]
the profoundly stupid “black brunch” protests, during which racial-grievance entrepreneurs disrupted meals at places that seemed to them offensively Caucasian (“white spaces”) are a different species of undertaking.
[. . .]
It’s the familiar Trotsky conundrum: You may not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in you.
[. . .]
They were targeted on racial grounds: These were detestable “white spaces,” and the people there were to be punished for being white — even if they were not, in fact, white, their presence in “white spaces” makes them guilty by association.
[. . .]
You don’t get paid leaning on brunchers; you get paid leaning on Google, a company in which whites are slightly underrepresented but Asian Americans are wildly overrepresented, constituting about 30 percent of its employees. When it comes to “people of color,” you can be sure that the Reverend Jackson has a favorite crayon in his diversity pack.
[. . .]
What’s hilarious is that the protesters themselves are getting a lesson in why private life matters. When an enterprising WBZ-TV reporter, Ken MacLeod, started tracking down the Boston protesters who shut down the freeway and found them at their homes — often their parents’ homes, mansions in Brookline — he was accused of “harassment,” told “I need you to leave our property immediately,” etc. Which is to say, the protesters, having inserted themselves into public affairs, wished to enjoy the courtesy that they refused to extend to those who hadn’t inserted themselves into public affairs.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/396798/abolition-private-life-kevin-d-williamson
JANUARY 21, 2015 4:00 AM
The Abolition of Private Life
They’re coming for your Denver omelet.
By Kevin D. Williamson
Labels:
Food Police,
New York City,
Oakland CA,
Privacy,
Private Party,
Protests
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment