Showing posts with label Stop and Frisk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stop and Frisk. Show all posts

August 31, 2015

Ex-NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly's New Book Criticizes Mayor DeBlasio



Ex-Police Commissioner Ray Kelly says Mayor Bill de Blasio "ran against the police" during his mayoral campaign.
Photo: David McGlynn (left), AP

[From article]
De Blasio swept away stop-and-frisk — a policy police brass instituted in 1990 to let cops search and detain anyone they suspected of committing a crime — as a sop to his core supporters as soon as he took over in City Hall, Kelly says in a scathing critique of the mayor’s law-enforcement policies.
“And who benefited most from our successes?” Kelly writes. “The very people the de Blasio campaign were reportedly speaking for, young minority males especially.”
Kelly chided Manhattan federal Judge Shira Scheindlin for helping de Blasio win the primary thanks to her “disturbing, highly offensive” decision describing stop-and-frisk as unconstitutional and calling for reforms.
“What really burned me up though, one of many things, from a tiny number of incidents, cherry-picked from millions, Judge Scheindlin had pinned the whole police department as a racist institution,” he writes.
He calls the decision “bad science, bad judgement, bad policy, and on a human level personally wrong.”
“This was a product of a transparently cynical collaboration among an agenda-driven academic, a crafty plaintiff’s attorney and a judge who already made up her mind.”
Kelly saved his harshest criticism for de Blasio’s campaign rhetoric.
He excoriated de Blasio for treating cops as “cartoonish villains” and using that rhetoric to eke out a victory with a “narrow slice” of voters.
“I personally resent the implications of de Blasio’s false narrative,” he writes. “I knew the truth — that our policies targeted reported crimes. We didn’t target people based on their skin color.”
“Bill de Blasio didn’t only run against the only candidates in the race to replace Mike Bloomberg,” Kelly adds. “He also ran against the police.”
[. . .]



The ex-commissioner’s book calls for police departments across the country to recruit more officers of color and wean themselves off surplus military weapons.
And he chastised the Ferguson, Mo., police department for mishandling its investigation into Officer Darren Wilson’s shooting of Michael Brown, even though Wilson was cleared of any misconduct.
“They failed to release information in a timely fashion, they had far too many talking to the media, delivering confusing, conflicting reports,” he writes.
And when cops left Brown’s body in the street for hours, they “contributed to the rush to judgment against Darren Wilson,” Kelly says.
But he blasted pols who tolerate lax enforcement of the law.
“If we ease up on the things that made us successful, if we bow too much to the political pressures of the day, we are going to see more young people die and more young lives lost before they have had a chance to live,” Kelly writes.

http://nypost.com/2015/08/30/ray-kelly-blasts-de-blasios-false-narrative-in-new-memoir/

Kelly’s rage: De Blasio’s false narrative about cops endangers NYC
By Aaron Short
New York Post
August 30, 2015 | 6:00am

June 5, 2015

Stop And Frisk Controversy Continues in New York City




[From article]
A dramatic drop in stop-and-frisk encounters has emboldened criminals and made cops more reluctant to take proactive police action, even as murders and shootings are on the rise in the city.
The frightening message — echoed by police supervisors and union leaders — comes as stop-and-frisk encounters are on pace to plunge by 42% this year, with 20,000 fewer street stops.
There were 11,652 stops across the city through June 3 — projecting to roughly 28,000 for the year, records obtained by the Daily News show. As the number of stops fell, the number of murders spiked 19.5% during the first five months of the year, the number of people shot is up 9.2% and the number of shooting incidents jumped 9%.
[. . .]
“Everyone is afraid to make stops,” said one Brooklyn police supervisor. “No one wants to get jammed up. They’re telling us the stops have to be quality stops. But if you make a stop, and you think it’s a good one, and the guy has nothing on him, is that a good stop?”
[. . .]
Christopher Dunn, assistant legal director for the New York Civil Liberties Union, said history showed stop-and-frisks had no effect on crime data.
[. . .]
“The vast majority of the time, it’s a way to harass young men of color,” said the Bronx resident. “The shootings are unfortunate, but there should be more police in the community, working with the community and not just showing up when there is trouble.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/exclusive-big-fall-stop-and-frisk-criminals-bolder-article-1.2247406

EXCLUSIVE: Huge drop in stop-and-frisk as NYC crime increases raises fear that cops are reluctant to confront criminals
BY ROCCO PARASCANDOLA , KERRY BURKE , LARRY MCSHANE
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Friday, June 5, 2015, 2:30 AM

February 27, 2015

New York City Council A Situation Comedy




Among my ideas was to write a television comedy called City Council using video tape from councils throughout the country. But I could never have made up some of the real actions taken by New York City Councilors described in this article. Cambridge City Council is sane compared to this. 

[From article]
de Blasio came into office with an advantage that his recent predecessors lacked: overwhelming support in the city council, whose members, as one lawmaker put it, are like a “cult of true believers,” eager to follow their leader. In New York, the mayor makes most of the news, and it’s easy to ignore the city council. That would be a mistake. Not only did de Blasio himself come from its ranks, where he spent years building alliances; New York’s next mayor may well be a sitting council member today—and, if so, judging by the views of some of the council’s leading figures, the de Blasio years might be ironically remembered for how moderate they were.
[. . .]
Insiders had considered Mark-Viverito a long shot for the speakership. She grew up in privilege in Puerto Rico, where her ophthalmologist father, who owned his own dual-engine Cessna, founded a hospital that, after his death, sold for $165 million. She and her family own properties in San Juan and along the coast that provide them with a stream of rental income. Under the auspices of a program aimed at middle-income, first-time home buyers, Mark-Viverito purchased her current home, a three-family structure on East 111th Street, for $350,000, and paid off the mortgage after only ten years. The property is now estimated to be worth $1.2 million. Despite appearing at Zuccotti Park during the Occupy Wall Street sit-in and announcing on camera that she belongs to the “99 percent,” Mark-Viverito has the real-estate portfolio of a 1 percenter.
[. . .]
Melissa Mark added her mother’s maiden name, Viverito, after graduating from Columbia University.
[. . .]
Including Mark-Viverito as speaker, the caucus, with 18 seats, now makes up more than one-third of the 51-member council and dominates the council politically, holding all leadership posts and most key committee chairmanships. Its members are unremittingly left-wing.
[. . .]
As a council member, Chin lifted the protective-landmark designation on an early-nineteenth-century wood-framed building on the Bowery, one of the few such historic structures remaining in Manhattan. The 1817 building, owned by a Chinese-American bank that contributed generously to Chin’s campaign, was quickly torn down to allow for the development of a generic, eight-story brick-and-glass structure. Chin defended the erasure of a remnant of New York’s Federal-era past, saying that the new building would offer below-market “affordable office space.” “Affordability” in reference to housing is a legal term pertaining to residents’ income. There is no equivalent term for commercial real estate, so Chin concocted the phrase to give cover to her donors.
[. . .]
Rather than condemn the violence, [Letitia] James instead chided the restaurant’s owners for “irresponsible” management in holding their promotion on the eve of a school holiday, when the teenagers would be more likely to go out for the evening. “I want this Tuesday restaurant promotion stopped, or the lease of this business revoked,” she demanded.
[. . .]
Council Member Jumaane Williams of Brooklyn [. . .] sponsored a resolution calling on police to “stop arresting people for committing minor infractions in the transit system.” According to the text of the resolution, being arrested for littering, gambling, or urinating in the subway can be “very disruptive” to the arrestee. Moreover, being arrested is “overly punitive and unfair” and can even cause “financial hardship.” Clearly, Williams’s policy priorities don’t include protecting subway riders from disorderly or violent behavior.
The only reason that Council Member Inez Barron isn’t a Progressive Caucus member is because the group’s politics aren’t radical enough. In January 2014, Barron, a former state assembly member, assumed the seat formerly held by her husband, Charles Barron; he, in turn, will succeed her in Albany this year. A former Black Panther, Charles Barron was known during his time on the council for never standing during the Pledge of Allegiance, for inviting Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe to City Hall, and for saying that he wanted to go up to the next white person and “slap him, just for my mental health.”
[. . .]
Few council members have much experience of professional life outside politics. Many worked as staffers to council members before becoming council members themselves. One, Progressive Caucus member Richie Torres of the Bronx, said in an interview with The Nation, “Do I look like a politician to you? I’m a 25-year-old college dropout who grew up in public housing. I’m gay. I’m Afro-Latino. I hardly have the characteristics people associate with a politician, but here I am.” Council Member Torres had previously served on the staff of a council member from an adjoining district. He was essentially selected by the local machine to fill a vacancy. So when he asks, “Do I look like a politician to you?” the answer, more or less, is yes.
[. . .]
The quirky personalities and often zany ideas of New York’s progressive council members can make for amusing reading, but the job of governing a city of 8 million people is no joke.
[. . .]
In short, the city faces serious challenges and needs serious leaders to meet them. Based on the quality of its political bench, New York could be in real trouble soon.

http://www.city-journal.org/2015/25_1_new-yorks-progressive-council.html

SETH BARRON
Council of Crackpots
New York City’s far-left lawmakers are out of touch with reality.
Winter 2015

October 9, 2014

Misguided Priorities of Abusive Government



These young men complain about being stopped by police. It reminds me of Obama, Holder and multiple black Harvard University Law School students complaining that racism hindered their careers. Poor little wealthy and powerful boys. In this case the non white youth are stopped by police when they are outside, on the street, in public. I am white, 70 years old. For the past 44 years I've been (and continue to be) under 24/7 surveillance, and harassment by police, Communists, and crime families. The ACLU repeatedly told me, "We cannot help you." But they issue reports about these young men, whose sleep is not disturbed, and who use computers without surveillance and tampering. The police do not broadcast relentless character assassination about them as the FBI and their army of informants did and do to me. One executive director of the ACLU told me in 1983, "You don't need a lawyer. You need a law firm." That was 30 years ago. So why is this such a big deal?

[From article]
“I wouldn’t be able to count, honestly. At one point I was getting stopped multiple times a day,” said Ponte-Capellan, who noted being stopped and questioned by police hit a peak in high school.
“I feel powerless, like I have no rights,” said the 23-year-old from Roxbury.
“Like a second-class citizen almost,” Richiez said. “You’re treated based on their perceptions only.”
According to the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, blacks are disproportionately stopped by police in Boston when compared to the white population.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2014/10/stopped_by_cops_too_many_times_to_count

Stopped by cops too many times to count
Thursday, October 9, 2014
By: Erica Moura
Boston Herald

* * *

This ACLU report cites a Rutgers-Harvard researcher. In my case Harvard University campus police now lead the harassment after 40 previous years. I call them the bottom feeders, abusing the carcass of a old man.
[From article]
“I can’t explain why these racial patterns exist ... but it’s clear there are problematic patterns,” said Anthony Braga, the Rutgers criminologist and Harvard fellow whose analysis of more than 204,000 so-called “civilian-police encounters” in Boston between 2007 and 2010 was the basis of yesterday’s American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts report that accused the Boston Police Department of “racially biased policing.”
[. . .]
The police department said the findings show that cops are targeting gang members in “high-crime areas.”
Cops are also repeatedly stopping those with criminal records or “gang membership,” according to police, who say just 5 percent of the individuals stopped accounted for 40 percent of the total reports.
Police Commissioner William B. Evans said that the use of the type of police report the ACLU studied has dropped 42 percent between 2008 and last year, though officials said they did not have a racial breakdown of who was stopped during that period.
“We aren’t out there stopping every African-American child for no reason at all,” Evans said. “We put most of our officers, like we did this summer ... into the areas where we see the gun violence. And unfortunately that is where most of that is populated by African-American young males. It’s only reasonable to believe that we’re going to stop and talk to more black males than any other part of the city.”

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2014/10/aclu_accuses_boston_police_of_racial_profiling

ACLU accuses Boston police of racial profiling
Thursday, October 9, 2014
By: Matt Stout, Antonio Planas
Boston Herald

August 3, 2014

Why Attacks on Police Are Increasing




[From article]
“The biggest thing is that you’re going to see more cops get hurt, and that’s the sad part,” said one Manhattan cop, blaming it on the decreased use of “stop, question and frisk” — a cutback championed by the de Blasio administration.
“I think cops are more hesitant to take police actions, and that’s when you see cops getting hurt more, cops getting shot, and cops saying, ‘F- -k that. Why am I going to do something that’s going to cause me to get hurt or suspended? Why am I going to be that person?’
“The streets are absolutely more dangerous for other people, too,” said the officer, adding the rise of cellphone videography is also problematic, since suspects “want to put on a show for the camera.”

http://nypost.com/2014/08/03/officers-making-arrests-face-more-fighters-than-last-year/

Why assaults on the NYPD are on the rise
By Stephanie Pagones and Gary Buiso
New York Post
August 3, 2014 | 7:33am

December 12, 2013

New NYPD Commissioner Supports Stop and Frisk




[From article]
Bratton emphatically endorsed stop-and-frisk as a police tactic. “First off, stop-question-and-frisk has been around forever,” he told me. “It is known by stop-and-frisk in New York, but other cities describe it other ways, like stop-question-and-frisk or Terry stops. It’s based on a Supreme Court case from 1968, Terry v. Ohio, which focused very significantly on it. Stop-and-frisk is such a basic tool of policing. It’s one of the most fundamental practices in American policing. If cops are not doing stop-and-frisk, they are not doing their jobs. It is a basic, fundamental tool of police work in the whole country. If you do away with stop-and-frisk, this city will go down the chute as fast as anything you can imagine.”

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/12/brattons-endorsement-of-stop-and-frisk.html

DECEMBER 5, 2013
BRATTON’S ENDORSEMENT OF STOP-AND-FRISK
POSTED BY JEFFREY TOOBIN
New Yorker

August 20, 2013

Stop And Frisk NY Judge Knows Nothing About Policing; Furtive Movements




http://www.city-journal.org/2013/eon0819hm.html

HEATHER MAC DONALD
The NYPD’s Hanging Judge
As her ruling showed, Shira Scheindlin is patently ignorant about the realities of policing.
19 August 2013

* * *

http://www.city-journal.org/2013/eon0819cw.html

CLARK WHELTON
Stop-and-Frisk and American Freedom
Recognizing “furtive movements” is part of basic self-preservation.
19 August 2013



July 24, 2012

NYPD Stop and Frisk Law Gets Support

[From article]
Had the ordinary means of social control—above all, the family—not broken down in those neighborhoods, the police would not need to look out for and intervene in suspicious behavior. If communities don’t control their teenagers, however, the police will have to. And until mothers and fathers start socializing their children so that shooting someone no longer seems a normal response to a dispute, the choice will remain stark: put up with a higher level of stops (which, of course, should be conducted lawfully and respectfully) or with a higher level of shootings. There is, to date, no middle ground.
Unless the politicians and editorialists pressing so hard for a radical reduction of stops can offer a crime-fighting strategy to rival the NYPD’s record, they are implicitly calling for a rise in violence.

http://www.city-journal.org/2012/eon0723hm.html

HEATHER MAC DONALD
Stop the Killing, Keep “Stop-and-Frisk”
A senseless child shooting changes one New York politician’s mind.
23 July 2012
City Journal

March 28, 2010

NYPD Stop and Frisk



http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/saving_minority_lives_dY8EnrXHowq05kvy1upiRN

Saving minority lives
The real truth about NYPD stops & frisks
By HEATHER MAC DONALD
New York Post
Last Updated: 10:51 AM, March 25, 2010
Posted: 12:34 AM, March 25, 2010