White House Promotes Globalism, One World Conformist Government Over United States Nationalism, Individual Rights

[From article]
It used to be only tinfoil hat types who raved about a conspiracy to establish a new world order. Such nutcases generally did not include the secretary of state of America, a country once known for common sense and pragmatism.
But the days of Harry Truman's Missourian levelheadedness and his visionary but realistic secretaries of state Dean Acheson and George Marshall appear to be long gone. That tinfoil-hat globalists are currently in charge of U.S. policy, such as it is, is now evident in Secretary of State John Kerry's proclamation to graduates of Northeastern University that they should get used to a world without walls and without borders – indeed, without nations (italics mine):
[. . .]



In a couple of paragraphs, Kerry basically advocated the elimination of nation-states while advising the young that he is not particularly concerned about the safety of the land in which they live. It is, he basically announced, impossible to protect you. Get used to terrorism.
Kerry appears to be channeling Germany's Angela Merkel and Brussels's leadership, whose experiments with a borderless Germany and a nationless Europe dominated by the European Union apparently are not working out perfectly.
[. . .]



But the dream of world government by supranational entities such as the EU and the U.N. is persistent and strong. Kerry has, along with president Obama, apparently embraced that dream, and both are fostering it in a number of ways, the most important of which is urging the United States to provide an example for national hara-kiri by permitting open borders, especially to the south of the United States. Another step in the process is to ensure that the individual states are rendered powerless. The federal government essentially is turning the states into satrapies that do the bidding of the U.S. government and which are to follow the ideological insanities of our current elite in the White House and beyond to the letter. Elimination of state identities means that only one entity is in charge.



This brings us to the other important component essential to the success of the one-worlders – namely, the elimination of distinct identities among humans. Ultimately, their goal is to see that men and women (pardon the politically incorrect terminology) are without a country and without identity, including any differentiation between the sexes.
The above is ultimately what the push for a genderless society is all about. There is a reason for the fight for transgender "rights" that goes far, far beyond the stated goal of civil "rights." The goal is to destroy the ancient historical, religious, and scientific reality of the human being as male or female – and with that destruction, collapse all the institutions of civilization that have existed since the dawn of history and have provided identity for human beings – namely, the family, the tribe, the town, the city, the country, and the Church.
The idea is to keep humans in a state of constant indeterminacy, as indeterminacy concerning identity renders people malleable. Indeterminacy allows almighty global institutions to determine what a human being is, what humans are to be loyal to, where humans are to live, and what value humans have. Indeterminacy allows the idea of a "citizen of the world" to take root and grow. No one is male or female, Hungarian or Chinese, English or French, Catholic or Protestant or anything in between. The human being is merely an undifferentiated unit subject to global entities who can decree, "This is who you are."



In sum, the entire globe is to become a tabula rasa on which elite powers can write the outlines of a new world order.
Huxley's dystopian fantasy of a "Brave New World" is coming to fruition. He saw in 1933 where matters were heading. In chapter 3 of Huxley's work, Mustapha Mond, the leader of the World State, gives a long speech about its history. He blames the formerly sacred institutions of family, love, motherhood, and marriage for the chaos found in the old world order. These personal institutions were causes of instability, and individuals were always capable of divided allegiances that led to conflict. Therefore, the World State destroyed all allegiances except to the world government. Peace would reign when uniformity of life and thought was achieved. Everyone is happy because everyone thinks alike, just as they do at Harvard and Princeton. The struggle for Truth is eliminated, and all is calm.



Huxley presciently foresaw the day when globalist President Obama would issue a Mothers' Day Proclamation that essentially eliminated the concept of motherhood, and thus the differentiation of the sexes. The president stated, "Regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status, mothers have always moved our Nation forward and remained steadfast in their pursuit of a better and brighter future for their children."
So there we have stage two of Brave New World as articulated by our president, with stage one having been articulated by our secretary of state.



The only thing that stands between the new chimerical global order and its accompanying ideological insanity is the blessed resistance of sane realists. Thank God there are people who see the tinfoil hats. Thank God there are people who still realize that the human race is divided into male and female and that nations have a right to insist on their autonomy as validated and valued because of history, tradition, and faith.
Thank God they will give up neither their identities as men or women nor the identities of the countries they love.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/welcoming_the_brave_new_world_order.html

May 12, 2016
Welcoming the Brave New World Order
By Fay Voshell

UN Commissioner Broadcasts Propaganda At Harvard University, Participates in Domestic Politics, Ignores History

This high commissioner on human  rights speaks about fantasy land, and enters into domestic politics. Isn't that a part of the globalist agenda to destroy nation states? The international business community demolished the United States' manufacturing industry moving plants to third world countries. The same global interests including but not limited to George Soros and the current White House, work to destroy national cultures in the name of globalism. The European Union  was one effort to destroy national boundaries.  Another was the proposal to eliminate borders between the United States, Canada and Mexico. Former Massachusetts Governor and Harvard University graduate William Weld was a co-author. The open southern border of the United States is one method of implementing that proposal without any knowledge or consent from taxpayers, voters or even their representatives who stand by and let it continue. Feckless journalists lament the growing abuse of overdose deaths  by heroin. It flows freely into the country across the southern border with no controls. The same business interests are stealing taxpayer funds billing for treatment of addicts who have not yet died from heroin. It is a good business model almost as self perpetuating as the psychiatric industry. To suggest that countries are not overrun by invading cultures indicates he has no knowledge of history, or ignores history of the exact abuses he denies. 

[From article]
At the Institute of Politics, Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein, the United Nations’ high commissioner for human rights, called for more accountability for UN peacekeepers, a number of whom face accusations of sexual exploitation and assault, and emphasized the enormous threat that such behavior poses to the organization’s reputation.
The John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum event, co-sponsored Friday by the Kennedy School’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, comes a month after the UN Security Council adopted a resolution expressing “deep concern” about allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse by UN peacekeepers.
[. . .]



Al-Hussein lamented that legislation reforming the disciplinary process for peacekeepers has been stalled for the last decade. One proposed measure he supported was mandatory DNA testing of all peacekeepers to both deter illicit conduct and investigate allegations of sexual misconduct.
He also emphasized that only individual governments—not the United Nations—could subject peacekeepers to criminal investigation and punishment.
[. . .]
“The UN can dismiss them from service, in violation of some administrative regulation, but if you can engage in sexual abuse of the worst kind—and we’ve seen this over many years—it’s simply not good enough that the UN can send you back home,” Al-Hussein said. “It’s so frustrating, of course, for us to continuously receive the most appalling accusations.”
Al-Hussein also decried the extremist and nationalist rhetoric of the political right in Europe and United States at Friday’s event, pointing especially to the “incendiary” speech in the ongoing U.S. presidential race.
[. . .]



He also called on Americans to resist “disgraceful” rhetoric that places blame on immigrant communities, and asked Europeans to adopt a more “humane” attitude when discussing the refugee crisis.
“Humanity has a way of self-adjusting and you don’t have to fear that you’re going to all be swamped by people from other countries and lose your identity, it doesn’t really work like that,” Al-Hussein said.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/4/24/un-human-rights-commissioner/

UN Human Rights Chief Calls for Peacekeeper Accountability
By NATHANIEL J. HIATT and LUCA F. SCHROEDER

Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
April 24, 2016

Science Seldom Remains Settled

Seldom mentioned about the earth and its climate is the shape of entire continents has changed over time. So what is now desert was once mountain and vice versa. The entire fantasy about global warming nee climate change is pure nonsense when viewed through the prism of history. Difficulty is so many bright omniscient young people have no idea what history is. Another element is that political propaganda called climate change is one method of pushing one world government, called globalism on the human population in order to eliminate individual freedom as enjoyed in the United States and Israel.



[From article]

The favorite cudgel of leftist climate change fear mongers is the appeal to authority, as in that there is “a scientific consensus” that the earth is warming and that changes over the last century are due to human activity. The problem with appeals to authority on extremely broad scientific topics is that they are not subject to easy proof by experimentation, and are quite often wrong. Here’s a list of ten popular theories ultimately proven false, and it omits some major howlers, like therapeutically bleeding people or the geocentric theory of the solar system. Now we can add to that list the “scientific consensus” that diets rich in processed foods and fats lead to heart disease.

[link to list]

http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-most-famous-scientific-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-wrong.php



[. . .]

New studies of pre-modern humans, dating back many millennia, demonstrate that arteriosclerosis (the hardening of the arterial blood vessels that causes blockages and heart attacks) afflicted people who (by necessity and not choice) followed that most rigid of diet and exercise regimens -- hunting and gathering. The mummified remains of Neolithic era humans from around the globe demonstrate that arterial disease was about as commonplace in those ancient populations as it is today. Despite the fact that these people had diets low on saturated fats, high in proteins, vegetables and fruits, and engaged in regular and strenuous exercise, they still suffered from heart disease as they aged at about the same rates as modern humans.
[. . .]
one thing that is certain is that the earth’s climate has obviously undergone dramatic change in both historic and prehistoric time frames. In historic time (that is in the last 5000 years or so) there has been massive desiccation in northern Africa and the Middle East (probably due to long term warming) interspersed with mini-ice ages (countervailing periods of cooling especially in northern latitudes.) On balance, at least for people in the northern hemisphere (which is where most of the human population resides) warming has been a good thing, while cooling (with associated famines) a bad thing.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/another_scientific_consensus_bites_the_dust.html

January 3, 2016
Another 'Scientific Consensus' Bites the Dust
By Jonathan F. Keiler

Discussion of Globalism and Nationalism,

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/707a1500-a415-11e5-873f-68411a84f346.html#axzz3vqpfXWTb

December 30, 2015 5:24 pm
Why globalisers still retain the upper hand
Debate often boils down to a war between nationalists and globalists

Explanation for Misguided White House Actions, Priorities of Democrats and Republicans

This essay is extremely helpful explaining the actions of the White House over the past seven years but also a well funded political effort of more than 50 years in American history. The goal is a one world government, globalism. There are conflicting narratives raised by the many politicians and useful idiots funded by George Soros and others who promote the destruction of national boundaries.

Global warming, climate change is the venue through which the basis for one world government is being promoted. The appearance that the White House supports Islam over Judeo-Christian values is related. Islam is a supremacist religions with the goal of dominating the world and eliminating other religions.



Stirring up racial divisions through funding of black nationalist organizations helps keep Americans divided. George Soros and his foundations support the creation of one world government. A few years ago the former Republican Governor of Massachusetts co-authored an essay in Foreign Affairs the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations. It advocated the elimination of the borders between the United States and Mexico and between the United States and Canada. The authors alleged the goal was security. Similarly the creation of the European Union destroyed barriers between free travel between European countries.

Globalism explains the remarkable policy of Angela Merkel in Germany to allow up to one million migrants from the Middle East. There are many actions of governments and corporations alike which appeared curious until scrutinized through the prism of globalism.

The transfer of millions of jobs by moving factories to China, India, Mexico, and other countries after Bill Clinton supported NAFTA shows that business interests, drive the move toward globalism. Weak elected officials act on behalf of corporate interests to break down national boundaries.



Destroying stable autocratic governments assisted this effort toward globalism. Ridding the Middle East of Saddam Hussein, Hosni Mubarak, Anwar Sadat, Muammar Gaddafi and Bashir al-Assad makes it easier to eliminate national boundaries. This essay may not provide solutions to this problem. But it does illuminate the problem and make it clear what is going on without any open discussions. The last trillion dollar Congressional Budget passed contrary to numerous promises by Republicans shows that even the new US House Speaker is also a globalist.

The many Republican candidates who attack Donald Trump also show their fear of being exposed at promoting the destruction of the national sovereignty of the nation. It is a long essay (these are only excerpts) but well worth the time.



[From article]
The regulatory bureaucracy depersonalizes tyranny, diluting its real meaning with legalistic paperwork and soporific incrementalism. The bureaucratic labyrinth, with its officious, abstract, uncommunicative language, is the perfect guardian for the craven greed and power lust that occupy the offices on the top floor but dare not show their true faces in a "democratic" society.
[. . .]
The Paris Agreement is repetitive, dull, and full of provisos and addenda tacked on to appease various factions.
[. . .]



The entire Agreement is predicated on the assumptions that (a) the global mean temperature definitely will rise by more than 2 °C over the next century, despite the awkward absence of recent warming commensurate with rapidly increasing GHG levels, and (b) that the only means of preventing this calamity is fascistic economic intervention. Almost two hundred national governments, including those of the entire developed world, signed on to this wildly speculative but politically transformative proposition.
[. . .]
But the true heart of the Agreement, and its clearest concrete achievement, appears in Article 2, paragraph 2:
2. This Agreement will be implemented to reflect equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.
This statement, parsed carefully, is just a clunky, bureaucratic rendition of the principle Karl Marx borrowed from French socialist Louis Blanc: "From each ['common but differentiated responsibilities'] according to his ability ['respective capabilities'], to each according to his needs ['different national circumstances']." This sentence, in nearly identical phrasing, is repeated throughout the document to reinforce the point that this Marxist collectivist ideal, applied at the global level, is the guiding principle of the entire Agreement.



[. . .]
In other words, the commitment to economic control is total, though the implementation of that control will of necessity be gradual.
[. . .]
Establishing ever-greater bureaucratic regulation of private citizens' lives, and an ever-tighter interweaving of industry and government, is the point. In other words, the real problem the globalists are trying to solve is not excessive CO2, but excessive freedom, which is an intrinsic threat to the only kind of sustainability a ruling establishment cares about, namely the sustainability of its privilege.
[. . .]
we are talking about the development "beyond previous efforts" of crony capitalist industry, along with increased taxation to be used, not for the benefit of the overtaxed citizenry and unfairly restricted private businesses, but rather "taking into account the needs and priorities of developing country Parties" -- in short, redistributive justice.
[. . .]



It does, however, firmly entrench man-made global warming as a scientific truth with the official endorsement of all the world's governments, now including the U.S., Russia and China. Furthermore, it gives official approval on behalf of all the world's governments to the principles of Marxist interdependency and redistribution, government-corporate alliances aimed at restricting private action and free markets, and the aggressive use of state propaganda to promote a tyrannical agenda.
[. . .]
The globalists are elated because they know they have taken their greatest leap forward, with the world's most powerful government, having access to the world's biggest cookie jar, now officially on board and fully committed to the goals of supra-national government and global redistribution. This really is historic. It symbolically ends progressivism's long struggle against all national resistance to its twin goals of global rule by an unelected elite and the gradual dissolution of national sovereignty. This is the breakthrough progressives of every stripe have been yearning for. Climate change may finally fulfill its promise as the vehicle whereby traditional nationhood -- the ultimate bulwark against the universalist dreams of tyrannical souls -- is weakened beyond repair.
[. . .]



They will use fear tactics and the machinations of an administrative apparatus answerable to no one to weaken national sovereignty worldwide, with the aim of establishing unlimited global politico-economic authority.
When progressives say they desire equality, they mean power and wealth. When they say they want to save the planet, they mean they want to protect their power and wealth. When they say "people over profits," they mean all people other than themselves should live without profits. When they talk of peace, they mean universal submission. When they speak of sustainability, they mean coercively restricted growth and development for "the masses." And when they speak of "global governance," well, they mean global governance

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/global_tyranny_just_getting_warmed_up.html

December 18, 2015
Global Tyranny Just Getting Warmed Up
By Daren Jonescu

Hidden Cameras Record Sex at African Resorts

Some benefits of globalism. New businesses, jobs, and exotic films. No films were available after repeated requests to film makers.

[From article]
The lodge owners, managers and/or staff are allegedly working with Nigerian men who pay as much as US$1000 for a week’s recordings
"The idea is being engineered by Nigerian business people who install the equipment in the rooms and capture unsuspecting clients in the act," said the man.
In some cases the owners of the lodges are not aware of the existence of the cameras as the Nigerians work with unscrupulous managers and staff at the lodges.
Most of the low class city lodges offer rest rooms for $5 per hour during the day and about $15 for a night. These lodges are targeted by the Nigerians as most clients using them will be in the company of sex workers.

http://www.timeslive.co.za/africa/2015/07/07/Resorts-secretly-records-and-sells-unsuspecting-couples-sex-tapes

Resorts secretly records and sells unsuspecting couples' sex tapes
Times LIVE

07 July, 2015 08:03

White House Promotes Globalism and Increased Business For Lawyers

White House is well aware of misguided rape policy it promotes. Administration moves to place all police under federal jurisdiction. No more state and local police departments is the goal. Part of the effort toward globalism, breaking down borders and nations. It is why so many Republicans support the secret trade deal. Globalists are in both parties. Immigration abuses are part of this also. Useful idiot journalists divert attention with fake race and rape statistics most of which are made up by PR flacks. What is shocking is the silence of police agencies and lawyers about this destruction of the legal system. Police, prosecutors and hospitals all have taxpayer funded specially trained investigators of rape. Colleges have none of these. But it does increase potential for more lawsuits by men falsely convicted without Due Process protections. The White House encourages the rule of lawyers replacing the constitution.

[From article]
I have a problem with any organization judging what is clearly a criminal matter and being the judge and jury of someone's guilt or innocence. We are supposed to be a nation of laws, where anyone accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty. We have all seen, at some point, videos or pictures of someone clearly committing a crime. The MSM is always very careful to refer to the person committing the crime as the "alleged" criminal or perpetrator. Why should institutions of learning be an exception and be able to follow their own arbitrary rules or the rules of any administration in matters of sexual assault, or any other criminal matter? Why should the alleged perpetrator be considered guilty until proven innocent? If there were a shooting on a campus, wouldn't the police be called immediately and the matter be turned over to the judicial system?
[. . .]
After we rode around for a while, he said he had some records at his room we could listen to in order to kill time. Once we were in his room, he attacked me viciously. I fought and fought, and screamed to the point where I subsequently lost my voice for several days. It was to no avail, as he was considerably stronger than me. When I finally blacked out due to a pillow being pressed on my face, he raped me.
I won't go into all the details of the rape or how I got away, but get away I did, and I ran to my friends, who were waiting for me with the police. When I hadn't turned up at the appointed time, they knew something was wrong and started to search for me. When the police went to his motel room looking for him, they found pieces of the clothes he had ripped off me and chunks of my hair he had torn out.
I was then terrorized for days by phone calls made by him to the motel where I worked, to the point where my employer got someone else to take over my switchboard duties. I also had Ocean City police officers voluntarily driving me each day to work and then back to where I was staying. I was perfectly willing to press charges, but my rapist escaped and returned to his home in Canada, which didn't have extradition for rape.
Sandra Jones appears to be one of a growing number of young women trivializing true rape by crying rape when they get drunk and do something they later regret. By doing so, they ruin young men's lives. These young women should be educated about what sexual assault truly is. Maybe the Obama administration should be educated as well.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/rape_on_campus_guilty_until_proven_innocent.html

June 22, 2015
Rape on Campus: Guilty until Proven Innocent
By Claire Hawks

Dangerous Secret White House Trade Deal Would End Supremacy of US Constitution

[From article]

On Friday, Congress disrupted President Obama’s plan for a sweeping transfer of U.S. sovereignty to an unaccountable group of foreign busybodies. Hurray for the stalwart Americans who resisted the demands of Obama, the Republican leadership and the big-donor claque – but Speaker Boehner plans to give Congress another chance this week to make this dangerous mistake.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would turn over to globalists the power to issue regulations about U.S. trade, immigration, the environment, labor and commerce. It’s called a “living agreement,” which means the globalists can amend and change the text of the so-called agreement after it has gone into effect.
That reminds me of our supremacist judges who invented the term a ‘living” Constitution, which they can rewrite to comport with their own updated ideology. The globalists claim that this “living” document (TPP), now called Obamatrade, has all the powers of a treaty to commit the U.S. to new foreign obligations, although it certainly did not comply with any U.S. constitutional provisions for treaty ratification.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., has frankly warned about this giveaway of U.S. sovereignty. Not only would Congress give up its powers to negotiate and write the terms of a treaty, but Congress also gives up its power to debate and amend the deal, to apply a cloture vote in the Senate, and to require a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
The secrecy wrapped around TPP is appallingly un-American. Whatever happened to Obama’s promise of “transparency”? TPP was negotiated and agreed to by Obama’s trade representative and a bunch of foreigners in a secret room, and the American people are not allowed to know the details until after it’s a done deal.

[. . .]

TPP is separating us from the U.S. Constitution and from national sovereignty and replacing both with a global governance superstructure. TPP has wrapped its audacious global governance plan in the mantle called “free trade,” which is a misnomer if there ever were one.

[. . .]

Sen. Sessions says TPP will give Obama a backdoor to increase immigration, and the same lobbyists who are pushing for Obamatrade are demanding open borders.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/no-wonder-obama-wont-let-us-read-tpp/

NO WONDER OBAMA WON'T LET US READ TPP
Phyllis Schlafly: Deal would separate us from Constitution and national sovereignty
Phyllios Schlafly
June 15, 2015

US Sen. Jeff Sessions Warns of Deception By US Rep. Paul Ryan on New Secret Trade Deal. Another Attempt To Diminish Sovereignty of US

U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), right, says U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, left, (R-WI), is deceiving Americans About Secret Trade Legislation

[From article]
Sessions’ final “critical alert,” one of several he’s issued throughout the Obamatrade process, shows House Ways and Means Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has been engaged in deception as he attempts to guide Obamatrade’s passage through the House.
“Promoters of fast-track executive authority have relied on semantic obfuscation in an effort to deny the obvious: the President’s top priority is obtaining fast-track authority because he knows it will expand his powers and allow him to cement his legacy through the formation of a new political and economic union,” Sessions said.
[. . ]
If, as promoters amazingly suggest, the President had more powers without fast-track, he would veto it. The authority granted in “Trade Promotion Authority” is authority transferred from Congress to the Executive and, ultimately, to international bureaucrats. The entire purpose of fast-track is for Congress to surrender its power to the Executive for six years. Legislative concessions include: control over the content of legislation, the power to fully consider that legislation on the floor, the power to keep debate open until Senate cloture is invoked, and the constitutional requirement that treaties receive a two-thirds vote. Legislation cannot even be amended.
[. . .]
Without granting Obama fast-track authority, Sessions notes that Congress remains in charge of trade policy and negotiations. Congress would keep the ability to amend trade deals and the Senate would still have power to filibuster against them—but that’s only if the House shoots down TPA on Friday. If the House passes TPA, there’s no telling what President Obama might do with the new power Congress would be ceding to him.
[. . .]
In other words, Ways and Means is intimating that this new secret Pacific Union would function like a third house of Congress, with legislative primacy, sending changes to the House and Senate under fast-track procedures (receiving less legislative procedure than, for instance, Post Office reform). Moreover, this legislative fast-track, Ways and Means implies, is limited to that which requires a ‘change in U.S. law’—meaning if this President (or the next) argues it is simply an executive action, not a legal action, the Executive could have a free hand to implement the Commission’s decrees without Congress. This is not merely a loophole; this is purposeful delegation of congressional authority to the Executive and to an international body. The fast-tracked implementing legislation would have the ability to make these delegations binding as a matter of law.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/11/jeff-sessions-issues-final-critical-alert-obamatrade-just-like-amnesty-obamacare/

JEFF SESSIONS ISSUES FINAL ‘CRITICAL ALERT’: OBAMATRADE JUST LIKE AMNESTY, OBAMACARE
by MATTHEW BOYLE

11 Jun 2015

Washington, DC

Federal Government Power Grab Continues Encouraging Globalism, Destroying State and Individual Rights

Would it be simpler to ban idiots and incompetents from running for office? Same courts can determine who is or isn't.

[From article]
The Obama Justice Department has quietly launched an effort to erode traditional state powers over elections.
In the first instance, Attorney General Loretta Lynch has drafted and sent a bill to Congress which would force state election officials to turn over power to tribal governments to determine the location and number of polling places on Indian reservations in state-run elections.
In the second instance, the DOJ is seeking to erode the power of states to prohibit the mentally incompetent from voting, as long as they express a desire to vote to their caregiver, often a unionized government worker.
In both instances, the Justice Department is acting at the behest of activist groups and undermining powers the Constitution gives to the states.
Given the election results of the last twenty years, it might be surprising to learn that the California constitution says that “no idiot or insane” person shall be entitled to vote. Understand that “idiot” is a legal term used to denote someone who is literally incompetent or incoherent. Other states use the term “imbecile” or the more modern, ‘incompetent.”
While the terms may be anachronisms, the reasons behind the prohibition on voting are as valid today as they were in 1849. Allowing someone who is not competent or aware to vote corrupts elections — and invites the patient to be victimized by someone effectively stealing that patient’s vote.
[. . .]
Justice Department, however, has launched an effort against California to erode powers under the Qualifications Clause, claiming that practices disqualifying the incompetent might violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Civil Rights Division has told California it is opening an investigation into how it decides who is incompetent and thus disqualified to vote. The focus of the investigation is on the Los Angeles Superior Court, the entity which decrees incompetence and then often appoints public guardians to oversee the care of those deemed incompetent to take care of themselves and to vote.

http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2015/06/04/indians-and-idiots-doj-attacks-state-power-over-elections/

Indians and ‘Idiots’: DOJ Attacks State Power Over Elections
Loretta Lynch's DOJ looks to further federal control of elections in ways that benefit the Democrats.
by J. Christian Adams
June 4, 2015 - 8:52 am

Sneak Peak At Ann Coulter's New Book, Adios America

Sign supporting globalism, held by elitist "rule of law" skeptic.

Does misguided abuse (non enforcement) of immigration laws and other White House clever tricks help to implement globalism, breaking down of international borders? Is that why Republicans do not oppose the destruction of the US economy and culture? Are international lobbyists funded by elite business interests trying to create one world government and allow business elitists to run the world? Is their goal eliminating nations, laws, state's rights and individual rights? Will elimination of the middle class improve the quality of life of third world countries?

[From article]
Mexican immigrants send $20 billion back to Mexico every year — more than the U.S. sends to that country in direct foreign aid.
– The New York Times was saved from bankruptcy by one of the richest men in the world, Mexican Carlos Slim, whose fortune comes from illegal aliens’ sending money — most of it from the U.S. taxpayer — back to Mexico.
– Anything the Times says on immigration ought to be treated like a press release from a tobacco company about the low risk of disease from smoking.[. . .]
– Fully half of the fires on federal or tribal land investigated by the Government Accountability Office, where a cause could be determined, were set by illegal immigrants. (For suggesting as much, Sen. John McCain was denounced as a racist on MSNBC and in The Washington Post.)
– Illegal immigrants from Mexico planted a huge pot farm right in the middle of Sequoia National Forest, dumping pesticides and refuse within a few miles of the world’s tallest tree.
– The Sierra Club, which took a $100 million donation from hedge fund billionaire David Gelbaum to be pro-illegal immigration, never said a word about it. Consequently, nothing the Sierra Club says about immigration — or the environment — can be believed.

http://humanevents.com/2015/06/03/immigration-advocates-frightened-by-99-pound-blonde/?utm_source=coulterdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Immigration Advocates Frightened By 99-Pound Blonde

Ann Coulter

Wednesday Jun 3, 2015 3:19 PM

White House Remains Focused On Globalism At Expense of US Taxpayers

[From article]
The most important thing that happened last week was that the country dodged a bullet. Had the Democrats retained control of the Senate, President Obama could have spent his last two years in office loading the federal judiciary with judges who share his contempt for the Constitution of the United States.
[. . .]

The very idea of Congress rushing a bill into law in less than two months, on a subject as complex, and with such irreversible long-run consequences as immigration, is staggering. But there is already a precedent for such hasty action, without Congressional hearings to bring out facts or air different views. That is how ObamaCare was passed. And we see how that has turned out.
[. . .]
When Obama made a brief public statement about Americans being beheaded by terrorists, and then went on out to play golf, that was seen as a sign of political ineptness, rather than a stark revelation of what kind of man he is, underneath the smooth image and lofty rhetoric.
[. . .]

The president's refusal to protect the American people by quarantining people coming from Ebola-infected areas — as was done by Britain and a number of African nations — is by no means a sign of incompetence. It is a sacrifice of Americans' interests for the sake of other people's interests, as is an assisted invasion of illegal immigrants across our southern borders.
[. . .]
The big question is whether the other branches of government — Congress and the Supreme Court — can stop him from doing irreparable damage to America in his last two years.

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell111114.php3

What Happened?

By Thomas Sowell
Published Nov. 11, 2014

Elite Exploits Poor Stirring Up Animosity, In Support of Globalism

[From article]
That there is an agenda is not in question. Presidents, attorneys general, sports and entertainment celebrities, and the media sphere as a whole do not get involved in small local disturbances for no reason. Stepping back, we can see a consistent thread of deliberately aggravated racial incidents throughout the Obama presidency, from the Gates incident through the Trayvon Martin controversy on to Ferguson. All featured intervention from Obama, and most from Eric Holder as well. You can search all you like among previous presidencies for comparable actions, but you will do so in vain.
[. . .]
To understand what’s happening here, we need to go back to the collapse of the civil rights movement in the late 60s. In exchange for control of the newly-ratified black vote, Democrats dramatically expanded government welfare both through ADC and Lyndon B. Johnson’s “Great Society” programs. As has often been pointed out, this led to the deterioration of the urban black family, with young single black women with children “marrying” Uncle Sam in preference to their hapless male opposite numbers, unwilling to complete their educations and unable to obtain decent employment. The result was generations of young black men deprived of any sexual or social purpose. These lost generations comprised a kind of bonus to the left, with black male drifters viewed as an urban proletariat that could be exploited for revolutionary purposes.
[. . .]
But instead of diligently studying their Lenin and Gramsci and doing what community activists told them, young blacks preferred loafing, dressing in outré styles, involving themselves in petty crime and sexual escapades, and boasting about both.
[. . .]
This new class of gangsters was a large factor in the crime explosion that racked the country from 1965 to 1995.
[. . .]
Measures taken to control crime are presented as ipso facto evidence of “systemic” or “institutional” racism. Both Obama and Holder, along with the vast majority of their contemporaries in both government and media, are true believers in this ideological construct.
[. . .]
leftists in government are not concerned with the welfare of urban blacks in general, but one particular class of blacks, distinct and separate from all others -- black criminals.
Activists, both in government and media, desire to decriminalize black lawlessness. They wish to put black criminals beyond the reach of the law. They seek gangbangers unbound.
[. . .]
the culture is expressed in times of emergency by the committee of vigilance. When law enforcement becomes corrupt or incapable, leading citizens and businessmen band together to form their own law enforcement organizations comprised of law-abiding citizen volunteers. The justice meted out by these groups is usually swifter and harsher than that of the conventional criminal justice establishment. They invariably step aside when a working legal structure is re-established. This pattern can be found in San Francisco in 1856 and 1877, in Montana in 1864, in New Orleans in 1901, and in Athens, Tennessee as recently as 1946.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/gangbangers_unbound.html

December 22, 2014
Gangbangers Unbound
By J.R. Dunn

No Poverty In America, Depending Upon What Poverty Means

Appalachia U.S.

[From article]
The end result of all of this is that if we measure poverty in the US the same way that the World Bank does for the world then there’s actually no poor people at all inside the United States. That War on Poverty has been fought and we who would aid the poor won. It should be said though that the definitions of poverty used are not quite the same as those used in the domestic political debate even though they are how we describe poverty in other parts of the world.
[. . .]


Appalachia U.S.

So that US number doesn’t include many of the things that we do to try to reduce poverty (things like SNAP, Section 8 vouchers and so on). Our measurements of foreign poverty are after all of the things that their governments do to try to reduce poverty.
[. . .]
Something must be wrong with our figures then and the answer is again that the US numbers are looking at incomes: the foreign numbers are looking at consumption. When we look at the consumption numbers for the American poor we find something very different indeed:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/08/27/by-global-standards-there-are-no-american-poor-all-in-the-us-are-middle-class-or-better/

8/27/2014 @ 12:43PM
By Global Standards There Are No American Poor; All In The US Are Middle Class Or Better

Tim Worstall Contributor

Global Anti Semitism Fanned By Hamas, Palestinian Supporters

[From article]
There are many takeaways from the Gaza war, including the diversion of cement and other supplies to the Hamas tunnel and rocket effort, and the use of civilian populations as a military shield.
The civilian casualties, though almost certainly overstated to include Hamas fighters in civilian clothes, are tragic. The death of so many children is heartbreaking.
But there is another important phenomenon on which we should reflect now, even before the conflict is over: The widespread global eruption of openly anti-Semitic rhetoric and violence in the name of anti-Zionism.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/civil-rights/214344-anti-semitism-flares-up-with-gaza-crisis

August 06, 2014, 09:00 am
Anti-Semitism flares up with Gaza crisis
By William A. Jacobson

Are Boehner and McConnell Working With Obama For Global Masters?

[From article]
Could it be that Boehner and McConnell have sold their souls, and our rights and freedoms, to partner with other entrenched establishment elites atop both major political parties, to protect our puppet dictator? Could Boehner and McConnell have been clandestinely and strategically placed into their positions of leadership, to advance the global elite puppeteers’ agenda against the United States of America, and freedom throughout the world?
[. . .]
We have, what appears to be, a gutless GOP leadership that has become increasingly docile towards a renegade regime that has grown increasingly hostile against the U. S. citizen/taxpayer, our rights and freedoms, and our constitutional republic. From a political perspective, this does not make sense, so don’t we need to think outside of the boxes in which the puppeteer-controlled media have confined our thinking?
[. . .]
Our puppet dictator could not have been as successful as he has been in destroying our culture, economy and republic without hidden assistance from unlikely sources.
[. . .]
What is motivating either of them to cede our rights and freedoms, and participate in the controlled destruction of our constitutional republic, with impunity? Is it just about the wealth and power they accrue, or is it more sinister than that?
[. . .]
The puppeteer-controlled media control the narrative, accusing patriotic citizens of being anti-Hispanic and anti-Latino. The reality is that patriotic citizens are placing all legal citizens of, and visitors to the United States above those here illegally, without regard to race, creed, color, or country/countries of origin. Additionally, there is a valid concern about criminals and those who may seek to do harm to our republic from within, with origins from China, North Korea, and Russia. Considering the challenges Muslims continue to create throughout Europe, and the incremental push for Sharia Law within the United States, our borders must be secured, prior to any discussion of legitimate immigration reform.
[. . .]
don’t we need to be asking why Boehner and McConnell are acting distressingly akin to Pelosi and Reid? Doesn’t this expose the myth that we have a true, two-party political system?

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/61028

Obama’s Praetorian Guards!

By A.J. Cameron  Saturday, February 8, 2014

Obama Gives It All Away For Globalism

Obama supports globalism giving US sovereignty away. But he ignores the minority status of white people, who constitute 16 percent of the world population. Whites are a minority and it is long past due for reparations from the non white anti white nations who kept white people from enjoying equal opportunity and equal outcomes in those nations. Show me the money.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/obama-quietly-seeking-to-cede-u-s-oceans-to-u-n-law/?cat_orig=world 

WND EXCLUSIVE
OBAMA QUIETLY SEEKING TO CEDE U.S. OCEANS TO U.N. LAW
Shock recommendation buried in White House report
April 19, 2012
Aaron Klein

Harvard Focuses On Assisting Poor Black People Only. Whites Need Not Apply

Obama leads the US into globalism. It is time to recognize that white people are 16 percent of the world population. Whites are a global minority. Will they be granted special access to admissions to universities and jobs as other minorities have been for 60 years? Or will this idea of minority be limited only to black persons? Is the notion of greed ever applied to non whites? Why are upper class black persons omitted from the discussions when there are many more poor white people in this nation than there are poor blacks? What is the issue of limiting assistance to only non whites? Are all white persons racists and evil? Or just white men?

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/3/8/minority-politics-activism-panel/

Panel Says Minorities Should Unite
Professors and reverend praise Obama’s success on charter schools
Harvard Crimson
By JOE B. LERER, CONTRIBUTING WRITER

Do What You Lament (Song Title?)

Griffin laments the ignorance of ordinary citizens regarding foreign policy. He and
Zbigniew Brzezinski are correct that "the American public’s understanding of world affairs as 'abysmal.' We are probably the least informed country in the world, he says." Americans are as ignorant of domestic affairs as well. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings former Democratic US Senator from South Carolina wrote a book, Making Government Work. In it he laments the failure of journalists to keep citizens informed. Many journalists are propagandists, advocates as the New York Times admits. In this essay Griffin tells us about Brzezinski's biography and the book but does not explain any issue about the world that would help us understand what policies are needed and are being implemented. How often do public officials reveal to ordinary citizens what and why they do things?

Much of foreign policy is done in secret. It is a conspiracy of public officials and media companies that keeps us ignorant. How can citizens force the bozos to share what they know? Currently Obama and the elitists, as Harvard Law Professor Duncan Kennedy calls them, are remaking the United States into a subservient nation to global government. They are erasing the borders between the US and Mexico and between the US and Canada. None of this is done with the consent of the governed. Even when citizens are aware of what they do officials lie, deceive others and use psychiatry to discredit the few citizens who are aware. Noam Chomsky calls it "Bewildering the Herd."

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1353889296/Griffin-Americans-ignorance-of-foreign-politics-hurts-U-S-foreign-policy?zc_p=0#axzz1nCCnnmwW

Griffin: Americans ignorance of foreign politics hurts U.S. foreign policy
By Richard Griffin/Growing Older
Cambridge Chronicle
Posted Feb 25, 2012 @ 06:39 AM

Department of Justice Promotes Globalism

U.S. Department of Justice
W E B S I T E C H A N G E !

Little by little the subtle changes come until one day we will wake up and be the United Socialist States of America . 2012 is just around the corner so get and stay engaged as if our nation depended on it because it does!!!!!

U.S. Department of Justice
ditches red, white, and blue stars and stripes.

Well, how interesting! It seems the U.S. Department of Justice has changed its web site.
Gone are the colorful red, white, and blue U.S. Flag decorations on the page,



Replaced by stark black and white.



And at the top of the page, is a rather interesting quote:
"The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."

Catchy, huh? Just one tiny little (too small to be relevant obviously) point --the quote is from C. Wilfred Jenks, who in the 1930's was a leading proponent of the "international law" movement, which had as its goal to impose a global common law and which backed 'global workers' rights.'

Call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, call it Socialism -- under any of those names, it definitely makes the DOJ look corrupt in their new website with Marxist accessories to match.

See for yourself: http://www.justice.gov/ < http://www.justice.gov/>

How very interesting that 'they' couldn't find a nice quote from one of our Founders. People, we have lost our Republic. This is an example of the slow, methodical misuse of power our current government is doing as they lead us to socialism, and destroying our republic as we have known it.

Get ready for 2012-
*******************************************************
Bring back the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA------

Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak.
Courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.
Winston Churchill In God We Trust!