White House Promotes Globalism, One World Conformist Government Over United States Nationalism, Individual Rights

[From article]
It used to be only tinfoil hat types who raved about a conspiracy to establish a new world order. Such nutcases generally did not include the secretary of state of America, a country once known for common sense and pragmatism.
But the days of Harry Truman's Missourian levelheadedness and his visionary but realistic secretaries of state Dean Acheson and George Marshall appear to be long gone. That tinfoil-hat globalists are currently in charge of U.S. policy, such as it is, is now evident in Secretary of State John Kerry's proclamation to graduates of Northeastern University that they should get used to a world without walls and without borders – indeed, without nations (italics mine):
[. . .]



In a couple of paragraphs, Kerry basically advocated the elimination of nation-states while advising the young that he is not particularly concerned about the safety of the land in which they live. It is, he basically announced, impossible to protect you. Get used to terrorism.
Kerry appears to be channeling Germany's Angela Merkel and Brussels's leadership, whose experiments with a borderless Germany and a nationless Europe dominated by the European Union apparently are not working out perfectly.
[. . .]



But the dream of world government by supranational entities such as the EU and the U.N. is persistent and strong. Kerry has, along with president Obama, apparently embraced that dream, and both are fostering it in a number of ways, the most important of which is urging the United States to provide an example for national hara-kiri by permitting open borders, especially to the south of the United States. Another step in the process is to ensure that the individual states are rendered powerless. The federal government essentially is turning the states into satrapies that do the bidding of the U.S. government and which are to follow the ideological insanities of our current elite in the White House and beyond to the letter. Elimination of state identities means that only one entity is in charge.



This brings us to the other important component essential to the success of the one-worlders – namely, the elimination of distinct identities among humans. Ultimately, their goal is to see that men and women (pardon the politically incorrect terminology) are without a country and without identity, including any differentiation between the sexes.
The above is ultimately what the push for a genderless society is all about. There is a reason for the fight for transgender "rights" that goes far, far beyond the stated goal of civil "rights." The goal is to destroy the ancient historical, religious, and scientific reality of the human being as male or female – and with that destruction, collapse all the institutions of civilization that have existed since the dawn of history and have provided identity for human beings – namely, the family, the tribe, the town, the city, the country, and the Church.
The idea is to keep humans in a state of constant indeterminacy, as indeterminacy concerning identity renders people malleable. Indeterminacy allows almighty global institutions to determine what a human being is, what humans are to be loyal to, where humans are to live, and what value humans have. Indeterminacy allows the idea of a "citizen of the world" to take root and grow. No one is male or female, Hungarian or Chinese, English or French, Catholic or Protestant or anything in between. The human being is merely an undifferentiated unit subject to global entities who can decree, "This is who you are."



In sum, the entire globe is to become a tabula rasa on which elite powers can write the outlines of a new world order.
Huxley's dystopian fantasy of a "Brave New World" is coming to fruition. He saw in 1933 where matters were heading. In chapter 3 of Huxley's work, Mustapha Mond, the leader of the World State, gives a long speech about its history. He blames the formerly sacred institutions of family, love, motherhood, and marriage for the chaos found in the old world order. These personal institutions were causes of instability, and individuals were always capable of divided allegiances that led to conflict. Therefore, the World State destroyed all allegiances except to the world government. Peace would reign when uniformity of life and thought was achieved. Everyone is happy because everyone thinks alike, just as they do at Harvard and Princeton. The struggle for Truth is eliminated, and all is calm.



Huxley presciently foresaw the day when globalist President Obama would issue a Mothers' Day Proclamation that essentially eliminated the concept of motherhood, and thus the differentiation of the sexes. The president stated, "Regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status, mothers have always moved our Nation forward and remained steadfast in their pursuit of a better and brighter future for their children."
So there we have stage two of Brave New World as articulated by our president, with stage one having been articulated by our secretary of state.



The only thing that stands between the new chimerical global order and its accompanying ideological insanity is the blessed resistance of sane realists. Thank God there are people who see the tinfoil hats. Thank God there are people who still realize that the human race is divided into male and female and that nations have a right to insist on their autonomy as validated and valued because of history, tradition, and faith.
Thank God they will give up neither their identities as men or women nor the identities of the countries they love.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/welcoming_the_brave_new_world_order.html

May 12, 2016
Welcoming the Brave New World Order
By Fay Voshell

Brief History Treaty of Westphalia, Connection to Collapsing States in Middle East

[From article]
The Westphalian System is a doctrine in international law that has been the generally accepted norm for the world order in the past couple of centuries. The basis of this doctrine is the Peace of Westphalia that put an end to the Thirty Years’ War in Europe in 1648.



The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) proved to be one of the most devastating wars in Europe’s history, one that left around eight million casualties. The war initially started over post-Reformation religious disputes between the Protestant and the Catholic states in the Holy Roman Empire. However, it later grew into an ongoing continental power struggle between the Habsburg Empire and the Bourbon Empire for the fate of Europe, where the Habsburgs and their Catholic allies closed ranks against an alliance of the Protestant anti-Habsburgians and the Catholic Bourbon Empire. That bloody war was concluded by the Peace of Westphalia.
In order to prevent the re-forming of such formidable “blocs of power” that had made the disaster of the Thirty Years’ War possible in the first place, the Westphalian System stipulated a set of specific codes according to which all European states became bound by the principle of “non-interference” in the domestic affairs of other European states; each state’s right to exercise sovereignty over her territory was recognized and emphasized; and each country, regardless of its size, was accorded equal rights with others in international affairs.



The apex of the Westphalian System came in 19th-Century Europe, where it was infused with and strengthened by the emerging trend of “nationalism” that would consider the “state” and the “nation” one and the same. As time went by, with the spread of European imperial influence in the world, the Westphalian System and European-style nationalism were also taken to the four corners of the globe, in effect making the Westphalian System the basis of modern international law and thus the prototype of the new world order.
But if the Westphalian System had been theoretically designed to ward off war and to make peace permanent, it proved far from successful in practice. By making “separation” of states the most salient principle of international relations, the Westphalian System rendered “confrontation,” although of another kind, inevitable. In that regard, perhaps Javier Solana, the former NATO Secretary-General, has delivered the most cogent argument against the Westphalian System so far. In 1998, during a Symposium on the Continuing Political Relevance of the Peace of Westphalia, Solana said that



[T]he Westphalian system had its limits. For one, the principle of sovereignty it relied on also produced the basis for rivalry, not community of states; exclusion, not integration. Further, the idea of a strong, sovereign state was later draped with nationalistic fervour that degenerated into a destructive political force… In the end, it was a system that could not guarantee peace. Nor did it prevent war, as the history of the last three centuries has so tragically demonstrated.
[. . .]
Except for Iran and somewhat Turkey that had historical continuity as political entities, almost all the states in the modern Middle East are the product of the Westphalian System.
[. . .]
the Islamic Republic has been forging a wide-ranging and far-reaching league of Shiite extremists in the Middle East with zealous followers in the form of Hezb’allah in Lebanon, the Alawites and Druze in Syria, Houthis in Yemen, Twelvers in Iraq and Bahrain, Afghan Shiites, and even Zaydis in Saudi Arabia.
[. . .]
The key concepts here are “Islamism,” “Export of Revolution” and “terrorism,” the first continuously implemented via the second and the third. As such, the Islamic Republic has managed to create an ideological bloc of power that supersedes and threatens to subvert the Westphalian System, first in the Middle East and then all over the world.



And it is that bloc of power that today more than anything else threatens Western values and interests, not only in the Middle East but also around the world. It can be said that while the non-centralized Sunni forms of Islamism such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Qaeda and ISIS only individually, sporadically and inconsistently threaten the West, the Iran-centered Shiite bloc of power has been collectively, systematically and consistently targeting the West and polarizing the region and the world to the detriment of the West.
Given that, believing that leaving the Iran-centered Islamist bloc to its own devices and granting it leverage in the region in hopes that it will behave itself and stick to its own business is only an illusion; as can be most apparently seen in the case of the ill-going Nuclear Deal with the regime of the mullahs. Indeed, leaving the Middle East’s fate to the mullahs will eventually lead to more unwanted cost and intervention on the part of the West as they will by no means cease to threaten the West: the Iranian brand of Islamism proves to be in a state of perpetual offensive against the West.
That is why if the Middle East is meant to be left to its own devices, whether as a result of a calculated, peaceful American withdrawal or in conclusion of any unavoidable confrontation, it is not only wise but also to the best interest of the West that whatever “order” is left behind shares the fundamental values of democracy, secularism, liberalism, human rights, and a predisposition to free market with the West. And the next occupant of the Oval Office will be well advised to heed that.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/the_collapsing_state_system_and_the_western_stake_in_the_middle_east.html

May 1, 2016
The Collapsing State System and the Western Stake in the Middle East
By Reza Parchizadeh

UN Commissioner Broadcasts Propaganda At Harvard University, Participates in Domestic Politics, Ignores History

This high commissioner on human  rights speaks about fantasy land, and enters into domestic politics. Isn't that a part of the globalist agenda to destroy nation states? The international business community demolished the United States' manufacturing industry moving plants to third world countries. The same global interests including but not limited to George Soros and the current White House, work to destroy national cultures in the name of globalism. The European Union  was one effort to destroy national boundaries.  Another was the proposal to eliminate borders between the United States, Canada and Mexico. Former Massachusetts Governor and Harvard University graduate William Weld was a co-author. The open southern border of the United States is one method of implementing that proposal without any knowledge or consent from taxpayers, voters or even their representatives who stand by and let it continue. Feckless journalists lament the growing abuse of overdose deaths  by heroin. It flows freely into the country across the southern border with no controls. The same business interests are stealing taxpayer funds billing for treatment of addicts who have not yet died from heroin. It is a good business model almost as self perpetuating as the psychiatric industry. To suggest that countries are not overrun by invading cultures indicates he has no knowledge of history, or ignores history of the exact abuses he denies. 

[From article]
At the Institute of Politics, Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein, the United Nations’ high commissioner for human rights, called for more accountability for UN peacekeepers, a number of whom face accusations of sexual exploitation and assault, and emphasized the enormous threat that such behavior poses to the organization’s reputation.
The John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum event, co-sponsored Friday by the Kennedy School’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, comes a month after the UN Security Council adopted a resolution expressing “deep concern” about allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse by UN peacekeepers.
[. . .]



Al-Hussein lamented that legislation reforming the disciplinary process for peacekeepers has been stalled for the last decade. One proposed measure he supported was mandatory DNA testing of all peacekeepers to both deter illicit conduct and investigate allegations of sexual misconduct.
He also emphasized that only individual governments—not the United Nations—could subject peacekeepers to criminal investigation and punishment.
[. . .]
“The UN can dismiss them from service, in violation of some administrative regulation, but if you can engage in sexual abuse of the worst kind—and we’ve seen this over many years—it’s simply not good enough that the UN can send you back home,” Al-Hussein said. “It’s so frustrating, of course, for us to continuously receive the most appalling accusations.”
Al-Hussein also decried the extremist and nationalist rhetoric of the political right in Europe and United States at Friday’s event, pointing especially to the “incendiary” speech in the ongoing U.S. presidential race.
[. . .]



He also called on Americans to resist “disgraceful” rhetoric that places blame on immigrant communities, and asked Europeans to adopt a more “humane” attitude when discussing the refugee crisis.
“Humanity has a way of self-adjusting and you don’t have to fear that you’re going to all be swamped by people from other countries and lose your identity, it doesn’t really work like that,” Al-Hussein said.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/4/24/un-human-rights-commissioner/

UN Human Rights Chief Calls for Peacekeeper Accountability
By NATHANIEL J. HIATT and LUCA F. SCHROEDER

Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
April 24, 2016

Collapse of Early Civilization, Book Review

Review of
Eric H. Cline
1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed
Princeton University Press
Princeton NJ 2014

[From review]
But very few people will have the faintest idea that anything of interest happened in 1177 B.C. It wasn't one of the 5,000 “essential names, phrases, dates, and concepts” constituting the “shared knowledge of literate American culture” that E.D Hirsch identified in his best-seller Cultural Literacy (1988), nor did it make it onto the revised edition Hirsch issued in 2002. Just over 3,000 years ago, a series of catastrophic events demolished whole cities, destroying the commercial and diplomatic connections among distinct societies that had linked up to form an emerging world order.
[. . .]
Well, if the account attributed to Ramses III is reliable, that was the date of a final, juggernaut-like offensive by what he called the Sea Peoples. By then, skirmishes between Egypt and the seafaring barbarians had been under way, off and on, for some 30 years. But 1177 was the climactic year when, in the pharaoh’s words, “They laid their hands upon the lands as far as the circuit of the earth, their hearts confident…. ”
[. . .]
They attacked cities throughout the Mediterranean, in places now called Syria, Turkey, and Lebanon, among others. About one metropolis Ramses says the Sea Peoples “desolated” the population, Ramses says, “and its land was like that which has never come into being.”
Cline reproduces an inscription that shows the Sea Peoples invading Egypt by boat.
[. . .]
Given that the Egyptians ultimately prevailed over the Sea Peoples, it seems plausible: they would have had reason to record and celebrate such a maneuver. Ramses himself boasts of leading combat so effectively that the Sea Peoples who weren't killed or enslaved went home wishing they’d never even heard of Egypt:
[. . .]
Other societies were not so fortunate. One of them, the Hittite empire, at its peak covered much of Turkey and Syria. (If the name seems mildly familiar, that may be because the Hittites, like the Philistines, make a number of appearances in the Bible.) One zone under Hittite control was the harbor city of Ugariot, a mercantile center for the entire region. You name it, Ugarit had it, or at least someone there could order it for you: linen garments, alabaster jars, wine, wheat, olive oil, anything in metal…. In exchange for paying tribute, a vassal city like Ugarit enjoyed the protection of the Hittite armed forces. Four hundred years before the Sea Peoples came on the scene, the king of the Hittites could march troops into Mesopotamia, burn down the city, then march them back home — a thousand miles each way — without bothering to occupy the country,
[. . .]
But by the early 12th century, Ugarit had fallen. Archeologists have found, in Cline’s words, "that the city was burned, with a destruction level reaching two meters high in some places.” Buried in the ruins are “a number of hoards … [that] contained precious gold and bronze items, [. . .] They "appear to have been hidden just before the destruction took place,” but "their owners never returned to retrieve them.” Nor was Ugarit ever rebuilt, which raises the distinct possibility that there were no survivors.
Other Hittite populations survived the ordeal but declined in power, wealth, and security. One of the maps in The Year Civilization Collapsed marks the cities around the Mediterranean that were destroyed during the early decades of the 12th century B.C. — about 40 of them in all.
[. . .]
The Sea Peoples storm the beaches, one city after another collapses, but Ramses III survives to tell the tale…. One value of making a serious study of history, as somebody once said, is that you learn how things don’t happen.
Exactly what did becomes a serious challenge to determine, after a millennium or three. Cline’s book is a detailed but accessible synthesis of the findings and hypotheses of researchers concerned with the societies that developed around the Mediterranean throughout the second millennium B.C.,
[. . .]
The Sea Peoples storm the beaches, one city after another collapses, but Ramses III survives to tell the tale…. One value of making a serious study of history, as somebody once said, is that you learn how things don’t happen.
Exactly what did becomes a serious challenge to determine, after a millennium or three. Cline’s book is a detailed but accessible synthesis of the findings and hypotheses of researchers concerned with the societies that developed around the Mediterranean throughout the second millennium B.C.,
[. . .]
But evidence from the digs also shows two other developments during this period: a number of devastating earthquakes and droughts. Some of the cities that collapsed circa 1177 may have been destroyed by natural disaster, or so weakened that they succumbed far more quickly to the marauding Sea Peoples than they would have otherwise. For that matter, it is entirely possible that the Sea Peoples themselves were fleeing from such catastrophes. “In my opinion,” writes Cline, “… none of these individual factors would have been cataclysmic enough on their own to bring down even one of these civilizations, let alone all of them. However, they could have combined to produce a scenario in which the repercussions of each factor were magnified, in what some scholars have called a ‘multiplier effect.’ … The ensuing ‘systems collapse’ could have led to the disintegration of one society after another, in part because of the fragmentation of the global economy and the breakdown of the interconnections upon which each civilization was dependent."

https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/04/23/review-eric-h-cline-1177-bc-year-civilization-collapsed

Before the Fall
1177 B.C. was the kind of year people try to forget. Scott McLemee reports on a book that takes us all the way back.
April 23, 2014
By Scott McLemee

Too Late To Stop Trump. Elite Cannot Risk The Alternatives

[From article]
Should the Donald fall short of the delegates needed to win on the first ballot, 1,237, there is growing certitude that he will be stopped. First by Ted Cruz; then, perhaps, by someone acceptable to the establishment, which always likes to have two of its own in the race.
But this city of self-delusion should realize there is no going back for America. For, whatever his stumbles of the last two weeks, Trump has helped to unleash the mightiest force of the 21st century: nationalism.
Transnationalism and globalism are moribund.
[. . .]
Republican candidates who failed to parrot Trump on illegal immigration were among the first casualties.
For that is where America is, and that is where the West is.
Consider Europe. Four months ago, Angela Merkel was Time’s Person of the Year for throwing open the gates to the “huddled masses” of the Middle and Near East.
Merkel’s Germany is now leading the EU in amassing a huge bribe to the Turks to please take them back, and keep them away from the Greek islands that are now Islam’s Ellis Island into Europe.
[. . .]
If immigration is the first issue where Trump connected with the people, the second is trade.
Republicans are at last learning that trade deficits do matter, that free trade is not free. The cost comes in dead factories, lost jobs, dying towns and the rising rage of an abandoned Middle America whose country this is and whose wages have stagnated for decades.
[. . .]
Production comes before consumption. Who owns the orchard is more essential than who eats the apples. We have exported the economic independence that Hamilton taught was indispensable to our political independence. We have forgotten what made us great.
China, Japan, Germany — the second, third and fourth largest economies on earth — all owe their prosperity to trade surpluses run for decades at the expense of the Americans.
A third casualty of Trumpism is the post-Cold War foreign policy consensus among liberal interventionists and neoconservatives.
Trump subjects U.S. commitments to a cost-benefit analysis, as seen from the standpoint of cold national interest.
[. . .]
American hawks talk of facing down Beijing in the South and East China Seas while U.S. companies import so much in Chinese-made goods they are fully subsidizing Beijing’s military budget.
Does this make sense?
[. . .]
If, through rules changes, subterfuge and faithless delegates, party elites swindle him out of the nomination, do they think that the millions who came out to vote for Trump will go home and say: We lost it fair and square?
[. . .]
Whatever happens to Trump, the country has spoken. And if the establishment refuses to heed its voice, and returns to the policies the people have repudiated, it should take heed of John F. Kennedy’s warning:
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.”

http://buchanan.org/blog/what-trump-has-wrought-125088

What Trump Has Wrought
Monday - April 4, 2016 at 10:45 pm
Patrick J. Buchanan

Call To Action

[From article]

Teddy bears, tears, candles, cartoons, murals, mosaics, flowers, flags, projections, hashtags, balloons, wreaths, lights, vigils, scarves, and more. These are the best solutions the Western world seems to come up with every few months when we are slammed by another Islamist terrorist attack. We are our own sickness.
Since the world learned of the dozens dead, hundreds injured, and hundreds of thousands affected by Monday’s attack on the NATO and European Union capital, we have seen an outpouring of what is commonly known as “solidarity”.
This word – most commonly associated with hard-left politics, trades union activism, socialism, and poseur indie rock bands – has come to mean very little in reality. In effect, “standing in solidarity” with someone now means that you have observed the situation, changed your Facebook profile picture accordingly, and patted yourself on the back.
[. . .]
Because nowadays, teddy bears are the new resolve. They symbolise everything we have become in response to our way of life being threatened, and our people being slaughtered on our streets: inanimate, squishy, and full of crap.
Our security services and our police, hamstrung by political correctness, are just as interested (or more?) in rounding up Twitter “hate speech” offenders than criminal, rapist, or terrorist migrants. Our borders are as porous as our brains. We refuse to realise that there are now literally millions of people amongst us who hate us. Who hate our way of life, and who will, one day, dominate our public life.
[. . .]
But of course, such statements are dismissed as fear-mongering, alarmist, or “out of touch with reality”. As if the data doesn’t exist, or the demographics aren’t shifting quickly enough to notice.
As if vast parts of our towns and cities haven’t become ghettos, or no-go zones, or hubs of child grooming activity, or terrorism.
As if mosques, schools, prisons, and universities aren’t used as recruiting grounds for radicals.
As if the blood of our countrymen hasn’t even been spilled at all.
[. . .]



Instead, we will now think deeply about how we can “reach out” to these populations. How we can “co-exist” and “be tolerant” of one another. As if toleration – which is actually the permittance of what is not actually approved or desired – is a healthy aspiration for a society.
It is as if we model our countries on the practice of bending over and “taking one for the team”, chastising those who fail to “tolerate” the most barbaric traditions of alien cultures.
[. . .]
We must be fearless in electing leaders who we feel will best keep us safe. It is one of the few areas of our lives in which we should be able to feel comfortable. We pay our taxes, you keep us safe.
If not, then we must arm ourselves. If our governments refuse to protect us, or even begin to use the tools with which we empower them against us: surveillance, counter-terror laws, detention, then we will need to take the law back into our own hands. We cannot be afraid of doing so. It is where our societies all sprung from.
The defence of ourselves as individuals. The defence of our families, our properties, our means of production, our communities, and our neighbours.
[. . .]
It is why arms sales to individuals has shot up since the migrant crisis in Europe. Many Germans are losing their faith in their elected leaders to protect them. The same applies in Sweden, and in Austria. Some people refuse to take being wiped out laying down. How quaint.
[. . .]
It is also time to start to make serious, wide-reaching demands of our politicians on the subject of immigration and Islamism.
When U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump said what he said about a temporary ban on Muslim immigration, the tolerance lobby went into overdrive: full condemnations across the board from politicians – including presidents and prime ministers, across the media sphere, and you will recall the House of Commons debating a petition to ban the man from the country.
Now even the most politically correct of Hollywood luvvies is asking: is he really that wrong on this?
Because Mr. Trump has thought in a cycle longer than his potential presidency: what does the Western world look like in 20, 30, 50 years? What kind of societies do we leave to our children?
[. . .]
Do we leave cities with soldiers on patrol. With “peace” signs scrawled onto bomb-struck buildings? Or do we leave them safe places, with real promise for the future. Like our parents, or at least our parents’ parents, left us.
In order to confront this question, we have to get to the root cause of the problem. There is too much immigration, or at least, not enough hand-picked immigration, into the Western world today.
People of my age had no choice that our post-war leaders felt the heavy hand of post-colonial guilt on their shoulders, and decided to open up our countries, and flood us with “diversity”.
But we do have a choice to not make the same mistakes again. And we have a duty to correct the ones that were made.
[. . .]
And yes, that does mean exactly what you think it means. It means ending mass migration. It means smashing apart ghettos and no go zones. It means repealing laws that allow for Sharia councils. It means asserting what it means to be British, or European, or American, without fearing a backlash from the political left, or the media classes who scarcely see a face my colour let alone darker.
Let them riot. Let them cry.
I would far rather be subjected to ceaseless “direct action” by the scourges of my own society than import others.
At least if my fellow countrymen are deplorable, I won’t get called a racist for pointing it out.
So put down the teddy bears, burst the balloons, and let’s start demanding again that our countries are safe and civilised. And if we can’t find people who’ll make that happen for us… let’s do it ourselves.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/23/tears-teddy-bears-but-no-resolve-to-deal-with-islamist-threat-in-europe/

Enough With The Teddy Bears And Tears: It’s Time To Take Our Civilization Back
by RAHEEM KASSAM

23 Mar 2016

National Suicide To Avoid Hurting Feelings of Middle East Migrants

[From article]
Today, Angela Merkel's Germany is making another suicidal gesture by opening the borders to tens of thousands of predatory, war-indoctrinated jihadis – young men of military age, who have been taught to despise, hate, and beat up anybody outside their own Muslim sect. They are indoctrinated in war theology – the last major war theology on Earth. Merkel and the EU have drifted into this suicidal fiasco by mistake – but they still refuse to admit it.
[. . .]
Sweden and Germany (especially Prussia) have a long folk reputation for getting completely stuck in whatever the current absolutist ideology happens to be. This kind of fanatical belief led to centuries of bloody warfare between German-speaking Lutherans and Catholics.
[. . .]
Only the slogans changed.
Today Angela Merkel and the EU preach peace, peace, but they stupidly let in 50 million easily indoctrinated Muslims – so there will be no peace.
[. . .]
After Hitler and the Holocaust, West Germany had a long period of stability, under American defense guarantees, and many West Germans repented of the most disastrous mass regression in European history, the Nazi period. At the same time, East Germany under Soviet control refused to take any responsibility for the Nazi past, including the ex-Nazis themselves. It is difficult for human beings to confess to overwhelming guilt. People who lived under Stalin had their own Holodomor and Siberian concentration camps, and humankind cannot bear much reality.
[. . .]
Rational adult responsibility for Hitler turned into compulsive self-loathing, which was as insane in its own way as all the other absolutist beliefs of the past. Multiculturalism took over as an irrational overcompensation for the sins of the fathers, who were long dead by the time the multicult took hold.
The biblical wisdom is that children cannot be blamed for the sins of the fathers. Public guilt-tripping for the Holocaust was mighty convenient for the hard left, which never repented of 100 million victims of Marxist regimes in the 20th century (still growing in North Korea today).
Freud thought that mental illnesses were irrational exaggerations of normal emotions. Paranoids suffer from intolerable suspicion about hidden forces, but there is such a thing as reasonable suspicion. Severe depression is the extreme of normal sadness, driven by irrational perfectionism. Anxiety disorders involve dysfunctional fears, but sane fear is a very healthy thing when a big truck is bearing down on you. Islamophobia is a fantasy disease manufactured by the Organs of Propaganda, but legitimate fear of jihad is completely sane.
German-Swedish-French perfectionism and self-loathing are national manifestations of the same disorders we see in individuals. If you're haunted by deeply irrational self-loathing, insane fear, or suspicion, the answer is not to swing to the opposite extreme.
[. . .]
Still – Angela Merkel overcompensated to an insane extreme when she opened Europe's borders to the closest thing to the Nazis since Hitler. This is a madness of Europe's political elites.
ISIS is not at all different from the sadistic mass murders committed by the Nazis and by Stalin. War ideologies are pretty much the same; only the uniforms, the hats, and the flags change. What we see on ISIS murder videos is a bunch of adolescent males wearing Halloween outfits while they boast about murdering and abusing children and other innocents, who happen to believe in the wrong things. The Hitler Jugend was an earlier manifestation of ISIS, with different hats and flags.
[. . .]
Murder cults are amazingly stereotypical.
The biggest mistake Europe's ruling classes made was "multiculturalism": glorifying dysfunctional tribal cultures and spreading hatred against the successful West and Christianity. The multicult has now been denounced by Merkel, by Britain's David Cameron, Tony Blair, and other big politicians, but you can't wipe out decades of heavy indoctrination in one day.
The European and U.S. left wing hammered multi-cultism into millions of human heads, 24 hours a day, shoving it down in the schools and insisting on perverse glorification of violent tribal groups, like Muslim Somalis in Minneapolis.
The Multi Cult forbade rational thinking about importing violent Muslims and their hate-preaching imams.
The current wave of holy war began with the rise of OPEC in the 1970s, as per Mohammed's specs from the Arabian desert 1,400 years ago. Saudi super-billionaire Walid bin Talal has just promised another 35 million dollars for Muslim expansion in the West. Holy struggle doesn't have to be violent; if you kowtow to them completely, they are happy to accept your surrender.
[. . .]



Jihad adapts its tactics to the enemy, but it never drops the goal of global conquest. This is not a secret; our ruling classes and media are not as stupid as they pretend to be.
They know.
The European Union never has to face an election. Eurosocialist politicians have lifetime tenure, and when they make ruinous mistakes, they always escape any blame. The euro currency has been a catastrophe for the weaker economies of Europe – all except Germany and France. Importing 50 million easily radicalized Muslims was a history-making suicidal blunder, but nobody is allowed to say so, even today. Cannibalizing their defenses to feed the welfare state was yet another mind-boggling mistake. In the real world, suicidal mistakes are punished by reality, or by other people. Socialism evades any consequences.
When Obama withdrew U.S. protection, Europe suddenly became vulnerable to Putin and jihad. Even so-called "conservative" (i.e., sane) newspapers over there can't bring themselves to tell the truth. The EU and its national elites own the media. Not all Europeans are blind to these gross, delusional mistakes. Millions of people see it happening, and they are afraid. But this bunch of Eurosocialist rulers are just as deaf and dumb as the Soviet apparatchiks were. They can see their delusions crumbling, but they can't stop it.
The EU has a perfect formula for endemic corruption and betrayal, and Muslim regimes have always practiced political baksheesh. All the Saudis had to do was to import their own ancient political culture along with the mosques they built all over the place. Under Multi-Cult Jacques Chirac, Dominique de Villepin and Kofi Annan took big money from Saddam Hussein, money that was intended to feed Iraqi children. Nicolas Sarkozy took 50 million dollars from Moammar Gaddafi. Helmuth Kohl sold out to Putin's Gazprom, the Russian energy giant. The media shut their eyes.
Today the London Daily Telegraph claims that 261 British politicians are directly implicated in child sexual abuse rings in the U.K., but they are never exposed. The BBC covered up their own child sex abuse scandal for decades. Every writer about Islam has known that underage sexual abuse is endemic in the Muslim world, following the example of the perfect man, Mohammed. Occasionally another "Asian" (Muslim) child abuse gang is arrested in the U.K., but the cops can never catch up. They can't even go into no-go zones in London. Nobody can purge the rot, because everybody is either on the take or open to blackmail.
The Cambridge Spy Ring of the 1930s were gay college students who were easily suborned by the KGB. Today gay sex is legal, but child abuse is not, and to hostile regimes it's an obvious blackmail trick. In the U.S., Bill Clinton was caught going to Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Island off the Florida coast, and yes, Mr. Epstein did have videocams recording what was going on.
Nobody has ever told the U.S. public all the blackmail possibilities, but we know that unidentified hackers have stolen hundreds of personal identities of many federal officials. Hillary and Huma's email scam was a wide open invitation for predatory hackers from Russia, Iran, China, Israel, the EU, and all the rest. Once you can read hundreds of Hillary's SecState emails, it's a lot easier to break into more secure systems.
Any sentient person now knows that Obama and Hillary are Eurosocialists. Chicago is a sort of Eurosocialist political machine. Obama's mentor is Emil Jones, the "godfather" of the Illinois Machine, and Michelle's father was a Chicago ward boss. Chicago is also a baksheesh culture. It makes Chicago Muslims feel right at home.
The West has cooked up this devil's brew with the active help of hostile regimes. Angela Merkel will never admit to being wrong about the jihad invasion, because German politicians can't admit mistakes. The Euroclass keep committing lethal blunders, but they're afraid that public exposure will bring Dr. Guillotin to their door, just as with Marie Antoinette. Muslim infiltration by money, blackmail, and jihad immigration is still out of control.
[. . .]
Europe is still the second richest economy per capita, with more than 300 million productive people. It still has no serious defensive capacity, because Uncle Sam took care of all that – until Obama pulled out the rug.
[. . .]
Europe has been emasculated by two generations of anti-male, anti-realist, fantasy propaganda.
[. . .]
When Obama gave his first "Look at me, citizens of the world!" speech in Berlin in 2008, he first wanted to talk at the Brandenburg Gate. Instead, the Germans proposed the Siegesaule Platz, the center of the gay scene in Berlin.
[. . .]
Everybody over there understood the joke, but nobody told Americans. The Victory Column celebrates Prussia's victory over France in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. Otto von Bismarck ruled Prussia at the time, and the war was part of his campaign to unite all the German-speaking provinces under Berlin's control in a single Reich. Bismarck's unification of Germany led directly to World War I, which led directly to World War II and the Cold War.
[. . .]
Eurosocialism has now managed to swing Europe away from its bloody past, which seems like a good idea. But under Angela Merkel the Germans have also managed to emasculate themselves, in another one of those pathological swings from one extreme to the other. The EU proclaims its peaceful intentions at the top of its voice, just like Stalin's Soviet Union.
But Merkel's ground-kissing bow to the rapefugees tells us that Europe still hasn't found a sane political balance.
Europe has only switched one political pathology for another one.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/suicidal_overcompensation_in_germany.html

February 19, 2016
Suicidal Overcompensation in Germany
By James Lewis

What Is The Role Of Nation Of Islam In Police Shootings By Black Men?

[From article]
Edward Archer, a follower of Farrakhan's teachings, received international attention for gunning down a cop in Philadelphia in the name of Allah.
But Farrakhan got no props. Nothing.
Farrakhan has worked as hard as anyone to preach racial hostility and resentment against white people and cops in America. Just a few months ago, Farrakhan told a gathering at a packed Baptist Church about how he wanted to find 10,000 black men to "rise up and kill those who kill us."
[. . .]
Like the Philly gunman, Farrakhan is down with ISIS. He even brags about it: ISIS wants "America to send some troops back so they can send them back in body bags," Farrakhan said in October in a speech that Breitbart, but few others, followed.
[. . .]



Then Philadelphia happened: A black man, a devout Moslem, was wearing Moslem garb when he ambushed a white cop in a black neighborhood and shot at him 13 times. Hitting him thrice.
Soon after, Archer told the police he did it for Islam, in the name of ISIS. He did not mention Farrakhan, but he did not have to,
[. . .]
Archer's brother said he was angry at how white police treated black people. Apparently, they were picking on them all the time for no reason whatsoever.
That's Farrakhan talking. Not ISIS.
[. . .]
reporters ignored Black Lives Matter when they chanted, "What do want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now" or "Pigs in a blanket. Fry 'em like bacon."
First in line to ignore Farrakhan was the new mayor of Philadelphia, who denied that the killer had anything to do with the religion of peace. "It is abhorrent," said Mayor Jim Kenney. "It does not represent the religion in any shape or form or any of the teachings."
[. . .]
But acknowledging everything Farrakhan did and said to encourage a shooter like Archer? Not a word.
Instead, one outlet after another trotted out its experts on ISIS to discuss whether this was some kind of new front in the international war on terror.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/farrakhan_and_the_philly_police_shooting_why_hide_his_light_beneath_a_basket.html

January 11, 2016
Farrakhan and the Philly Police Shooting: Why Hide His Light Beneath a Basket?
By Colin Flaherty

Washington DC Directs Assisted Suicide of the United States

Communist Party took over the Democratic Party. Unable to defeat the U.S. economically and militarily, they infiltrated and continue to do so. Notice any weak Republicans? Surprise! Voters elected Communists. Journalists are their useful idiots. US taxpayers and voters need to learn propaganda to survive.

[From article]
President Obama’s legacy to America: a Middle East in chaos, radical Islam ascendant, a nuclear Iran with a $150 billion dollar terror fund, Israel demonized as a warmonger, Europe flooded with Muslims. This Iran Deal is so bad, so dangerous, so traitorous, it is hard to believe. That is one reason the Democrats can get away with it. Their loyal voters assume their party leaders and beloved first black President would not do something this traitorous.
[. . .]
Have no doubt this “deal” is a national security disaster. In an unprecedented move, motived by alarm and a sense of their responsibility, 245 (and the number is growing daily) retired generals and admirals, including the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Clinton and the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the Gulf War, have written a stiff letter that was hand delivered to every member of Congress.
Their message to Congress: kill the Iran Deal.
[. . .]



Democrats in Congress are willing to betray their country rather than stand up to a rogue President. What is more important to the liberal politicians? The favors and threats that we know have been emanating from the White House, or decades of bi-partisan support for our national security? Easy answer for these career politicians: first their careers, then their perks, then their Democratic Party. American national interest is no longer on the list.
[. . .]
Our President has a lifelong affection and affinity for Islam, the religion of his father and his step-father, and of the country where he was raised as a child.
Obama also has his own version of American history, in which we are not a Judeo-Christian nation, not exceptional, have many reasons for remorse and few for pride. These are the values that led him to his dream of a Middle East where Iran, not America and not Israel, is the dominant military power.
[. . .]



Because of his Moslem father and stepfather and where he grew up, Obama has an emotional affinity for Islam that few Americans share. The sound of the Islamic call to prayers is the “one of the prettiest sounds on earth” our President told the New York Times. He then recited the Moslem call to prayer in a “first-rate accent.”
Nicolas Kristof, the Time’s reporter, was too lazy to look up the Muslim call to prayer, or its significance. Recite it aloud in front of a witness three times, and you are a Muslim for life. Leaving the religion is punishable by death.
[. . .]
In his twisted moral universe, the mullahs are on the side of the right and America and Israel are the bad guys.
That’s our President. What is Congress’s excuse? What is the excuse of all those Democrat voters who like to swallow easy lies, even at the cost of betraying our country?

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/why_are_democrats_willing_to_strengthen_iran_and_hurt_israel.html

September 6, 2015
Why are Democrats Willing to Strengthen Iran and Hurt Israel?
By Karin McQuillan

Dangerous Secret White House Trade Deal Would End Supremacy of US Constitution

[From article]

On Friday, Congress disrupted President Obama’s plan for a sweeping transfer of U.S. sovereignty to an unaccountable group of foreign busybodies. Hurray for the stalwart Americans who resisted the demands of Obama, the Republican leadership and the big-donor claque – but Speaker Boehner plans to give Congress another chance this week to make this dangerous mistake.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would turn over to globalists the power to issue regulations about U.S. trade, immigration, the environment, labor and commerce. It’s called a “living agreement,” which means the globalists can amend and change the text of the so-called agreement after it has gone into effect.
That reminds me of our supremacist judges who invented the term a ‘living” Constitution, which they can rewrite to comport with their own updated ideology. The globalists claim that this “living” document (TPP), now called Obamatrade, has all the powers of a treaty to commit the U.S. to new foreign obligations, although it certainly did not comply with any U.S. constitutional provisions for treaty ratification.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., has frankly warned about this giveaway of U.S. sovereignty. Not only would Congress give up its powers to negotiate and write the terms of a treaty, but Congress also gives up its power to debate and amend the deal, to apply a cloture vote in the Senate, and to require a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
The secrecy wrapped around TPP is appallingly un-American. Whatever happened to Obama’s promise of “transparency”? TPP was negotiated and agreed to by Obama’s trade representative and a bunch of foreigners in a secret room, and the American people are not allowed to know the details until after it’s a done deal.

[. . .]

TPP is separating us from the U.S. Constitution and from national sovereignty and replacing both with a global governance superstructure. TPP has wrapped its audacious global governance plan in the mantle called “free trade,” which is a misnomer if there ever were one.

[. . .]

Sen. Sessions says TPP will give Obama a backdoor to increase immigration, and the same lobbyists who are pushing for Obamatrade are demanding open borders.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/no-wonder-obama-wont-let-us-read-tpp/

NO WONDER OBAMA WON'T LET US READ TPP
Phyllis Schlafly: Deal would separate us from Constitution and national sovereignty
Phyllios Schlafly
June 15, 2015

Lee Kwan Yew, Founder of Singapore, Dies at 91, Obituary

Lee Kwan Yew (1923–2015)

[From obituary]
Lee Kwan Yew had no problems with elitism, provided it brought about an elite of intelligence and ability (not always quite the same thing); the fashionable theories of liberal educationists had no attraction for him. No politician has ever defended more fiercely than Lee Kwan Yew the importance for a society of fostering high intelligence.
[. . .]
Observing that it was difficult to look either kindly or intelligent while chewing gum, and that gum-chewers more often than not disposed of their gum on the pavement of the streets, he simply turned the chewing of gum into a crime. He gave even shorter shrift to drug-traffickers.
[. . .]
The achievements of Singapore under Lee Kwan Yew are incontestable. Almost alone of all the countries in the word, it has developed a first-rate medical system that it can actually afford. The Singaporeans are among the healthiest people in the world. It has economic reserves that would be enviable for countries many times its size. All this is largely thanks to Lee Kwan Yew, who knew how to harness the energies of his people for their own good.

http://www.city-journal.org/2015/eon0323td.html

THEODORE DALRYMPLE
The Man Who Made Singapore
Lee Kwan Yew willed a well-ordered and disciplined society into existence.
March 23, 2015

Son of Suriname President Dési Bouterse, Sentenced To 16 Years For Terrorism, Father Convicted Of Drug Trafficking

President Desi Bouterse and son Dino, head of the country’s anti-terrorist unit 

(Pic Reuter)
[From article]

The son of Suriname President Dési Bouterse got a big break from a sympathetic judge Tuesday when he was sentenced to 16 ¼ years in prison for attempting to assist the terrorist group Hezbollah in planning attacks on the US and conspiring to import cocaine.
With the government seeking at least 30 years to life in prison for Dino Bouterse — whose father Desi Bouterse is the drug-trafficking president of Suriname – Manhattan federal Judge Shira Scheindlin decided to go light on the defendant. The judge – who’s best known for infuriating the NYPD by ordering an overhaul of its stop-and-frisks procedures — agreed with Bouterse’s lawyers that there is no proof a threat to the US was imminent despite their client getting caught in an undercover federal sting operation agreeing to help Hezbollah set up terror training camps in his
country in exchange for $2 million.
[. . .]
Bouterse was recorded in Europe telling confidential sources and undercover DEA agents that he wanted to host 30 to 60 Hezbollah members in Suriname for training and operations, the indictment says. He also said he wanted a Hezbollah cell there — in part to serve as his personal armed forces.
In one conversation, a confidential source told Bouterse, “from what I heard, … there is not much love between you and the Americans.”
Bouterse responded, “We have a problem with the Dutch. And Americans.”
His father, President Dési Bouterse, was convicted in absentia by a Netherlands court in 1999 of smuggling over 1,000 pounds of cocaine into the country — but never served any prison time.
The elder Bouterse is a former military dictator accused of human-rights violations, including the killings of 15 political opponents in December 1982. He ruled the tiny country from 1980 to 1987 and regained power in 2010.

http://nypost.com/2015/03/10/son-of-drug-trafficking-president-gets-16-years-in-terror-case/

Son of drug-trafficking president gets 16 years in terror case
By Rich Calder
New York Post
March 10, 2015 | 7:14pm

Benghazi Declared Emirate of New Caliphate

[From article]
“Benghazi has now become an Islamic emirate,” said Mohammed al-Zahawi, the spokesman, to Radio Tawhid.

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2014/07/31/Libya-s-Ansar-al-Sharia-declares-Islamic-state-in-Benghazi.html

Benghazi declared ‘Islamic emirate’ by militants
By Staff writer | Al Arabiya News
Thursday, 31 July 2014

EU and US Government In Power Grab

[From article]
So the democratically elected government of a sovereign state was to be summoned, in effect, before the unelected, unaccountable European Commission to prove its case for a change in its own country’s welfare policy. Yes, indeed — the growing power of centralised government over local populations is going to be the big fight of the age. And it’s coming to an arena near you.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10389356/The-power-of-the-people-is-being-stolen.html

The power of the people is being stolen
How strong should central government be, and how much of our money should it spend?
By Janet Daley
6:10PM BST 19 Oct 2013

UK Refuses Iroquois Passport

[From article]
"The British government is refusing to allow an American Indian lacrosse team to travel to England using passports issued by the Iroquois Confederacy."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/brits_nix_iroquois_rS4wkxocrxvf7IKdZ8qq3L

Brits nix Iroquois

By SAMANTHA GROSS

AP

Last Updated: 12:50 PM, July 15, 2010

Posted: 2:02 AM, July 15, 2010

Border Crossings

    IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO
    POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.
   
    IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET :
   
    * A JOB,
    * A DRIVERS LICENSE,
    * SOCIAL SECURITY CARD,
    * WELFARE,
    * FOOD STAMPS,
    * CREDIT CARDS,
    * SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,
    * FREE EDUCATION,
    * FREE HEALTH CARE,
    * A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON
    * BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR
    LANGUAGE
    * THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY’S FLAG WHILE YOU PROTEST THAT YOU
    DON’T GET ENOUGH RESPECT
   
   
    I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE HAD A FIRM GRASP ON THE SITUATION….