[From article]
According
to the U.S. news media, Donald Trump is a dangerous extremist whose
rhetoric is inciting violence at his rallies. The protestors are
innocent as lambs, gentle people who are being violently assaulted by
Trump supporters. Trump's jack-booted white-trash constituency is
mercilessly punching and kicking anyone who dares to object to his
inhumane racist and xenophobic policies.
This moralistic
fairy tale is utter nonsense. It is the exact opposite of the truth. As
Trump himself has pointed out, these "protestors" are more aptly
described as "disruptors." Their intent is not to exercise their own
First Amendment rights but to silence people they disagree with.
Trump's
rallies across the U.S. have attracted tens of thousands of people.
Before they were intentionally disrupted, these gatherings were entirely
peaceful. Trump's supporters are not "white trash." On the contrary,
they're the very salt of the earth: the law-abiding and hard-working
people who pay their taxes and make this country work. These people want
nothing more than to be left alone and participate peacefully in the
democratic process of self-governance.
[. . .]
In
North Carolina last March 9, an elderly white Trump supporter struck a
young black man being escorted out of a Trump rally by law enforcement.
The video recording of this incident has been shown more times than the
Rodney King beating. One night, NBC news literally replayed it three
times within fifteen seconds. The implication is that Trump is guilty by
association. This is an absurd logical fallacy. A man is not guilty by
association. And if we are to judge Mr. Trump by the behavior of his
supporters, why choose the one person who became violent? Would it not
be more reasonable to base our assessment on the tens of thousands of
people who remained peaceful?
Who would have thought such a
bad man could win so many elections? Mr. Trump's detractors have run
through the entire English lexicon of insulting epithets. Perhaps they
implicate themselves by protesting too much. If Mr. Trump suffers from
any fault, it is a refusal to function as a punching bag. Some consider
this to be a sterling virtue in a Presidential candidate.
if
people want to oppose Donald Trump's candidacy they have a thousand ways
to do so. Instead of disrupting Trump's rallies, they could hold their
own rallies (would anyone attend?). They could write editorials, letters
to the editor, and make comments on the internet. They could march
up-and-down on the street holding up signs denouncing Trump. They might
even try (gasp) voting. Everyone in our society has a multitude of ways
of freely expressing themselves.
But the protestors do not
want to merely express themselves. They want to impose their political
views by force. If they don't like what you're saying, they're going to
shut you down and shut you up. In Phoenix last March 19, protestors
blocked a major highway leading to a Trump rally. This was not a
peaceful or lawful act. It was a forceful way of stopping people who
merely wanted to peacefully assemble and work for democratic change. Not
only were Trump's supporters affected, so was anyone who happened to be
traveling on that highway. This included people with medical
emergencies desperately trying to reach a hospital.
The
political season is just warming up. We have witnessed the beginning of
the violence, not the end. So let's be entirely clear about what is
happening here. The people who are disrupting Donald Trump's rallies are
not merely a threat to the Trump campaign. They are thugs and criminals
who are endangering everyone's right to free expression and democratic
governance.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/trump_protestors_are_thugs_and_criminals.html
March 30, 2016
Trump Protestors are Thugs and Criminals
By
David Deming