Showing posts with label Jane Jacobs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jane Jacobs. Show all posts

July 18, 2014

Unsafe Cambridge Neighborhood


Posted July 17, 2014 10:18 AM ET; Last updated July 18, 2014 1:04 PM ET


Jane Jacobs

Jane Jacobs explained in her wonderful book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, that if you need police in your neighborhood it is not safe. Safe neighborhoods do not come from police presence. They are safe because of interested persons who live, work and pass through that neighborhood If persons do not watch who is in the neighborhood it becomes unsafe. Most crimes are committed by persons who do not live in the neighborhood. If only politicians read some books. 



Councilor Simmons admits that neighborhood residents sit on their front stoops. That is a major deterrent to crime. When they see a suspicious person they can speak up and/or call the police. 



But expecting civilians to "snitch" on criminals who brazenly commit murder is asking a lot. Read the awful story about 18-year-old Sarah Pearce who was convicted and served 12 years for a crime she did not commit.


Sarah Pearce

http://enoughroomvideo.blogspot.com/2014/07/idaho-woman-18-set-free-after-12-years.html An entire family knew she was innocent but refused to identify the guilty person because of fear. That is not only a local problem. Why do politicians expect young people to snitch on their colleagues when  police, politicians, doctors and lawyers do not snitch on their colleagues? To suggest that "a couple of dozen additional officers" should be assigned to one neighborhood is irrational.  On previous occasions Councilor Simmons lamented the presence of FBI and cameras in Cambridge, but suggested that there should be an officer on every corner. Her policy making needs re-evaluation.

[From article] A number of residents at the Pisani Center mentioned that they may spend hours on their front stoop and never see a uniformed officer.
[. . .]
I would like to see a couple of dozen additional officers walking the beat in Area Four,

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20140718/NEWS/140716740

Guest column: Preventing the ‘us versus them’ mentality towards police in Cambridge
By E. Denise Simmons
Posted Jul. 18, 2014 @ 10:04 am
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle


* * *

[From article]
"I don't want to be afraid in my neighborhood," Cambridge City Councilor E. Denise Simmons said Thursday, July 10, at the Area Four Neighborhood Coalition meeting. "I want to be able to walk on my street anytime I want to. I want to be able to walk in my neighborhood and feel safe."
According to Denise Phillips, an Area Four resident, police officers used to walk the neighborhood several years ago, but that is just no longer the case.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20140716/NEWS/140717327

Area Four asks for more police presence after shooting
By Sara Feijo
Posted Jul. 16, 2014 @ 2:06 pm
Updated Jul 16, 2014 at 3:29 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

February 4, 2013

Cambridge Police Commissioner Reports Low Crime Statistics



[Last updated Tuesday February 6, 2013 3:50 AM ET]
The evening after I posted this essay, Cambridge police conducted surveillance as I did errands. The usual women were present as bait. I did not pursue the bait. It is not clear if the source was the husband of the Attorney General or a psychiatrist on this occasion. Keep in mind that the police say "He's mentally ill." They stood by while crime families took turns harassing me for many years. The response to exercising a Constitutionally guaranteed right is a brutal campaign of harassment and provocation at my residence. One more felony that remains unaddressed, uninvestigated and unreported. More evidence of how unreliable the Commissioner's statistics are.

I'm told that there are man-hating women, feminists who are from New Hampshire that are participating in this abuse. I do not know of any connection to the post about the Commissioner's statistics. 

Mark Twain: "There are lies. Damn Lies. And then there are statistics."


Robert Haas, Cambridge
Police Commissioner

This report states, "Cambridge registered the lowest number of violent crime (sic) last year than has ever been recorded in the 44 years of collecting data," according to the Police Commissioner. He does not address non violent crime, or criminal statutes that are not enforced. Moreover does this "snapshot" include crimes committed and addressed on the Harvard University campus, the MIT campus and the Lesley University campus? Cambridge has a high population of college students, researchers and faculty. Do those groups have a high violent crime profile? 



Do these stats include reports of crime by CSX Special Police in Cambridge? Transit police? There is a pattern to police reporting crime. When it is time for contract negotiations low crime stats are the norm. When it is time for budget allocations the stats are of higher crime, necessitating more taxpayer funds. Police departments are able to reduce crime stats by not reporting crimes, or by making the report of lesser crime, e.g.,  making them into non violent crimes. An assault can be made into a verbal dispute. Police are clever at manipulating their reports, or by not making a report at all. It is one way that criminal acts can be ignored because there are no reports of them occurring. 

Low crime statistics are essential to keeping real estate values high. Real estate values are another incentive to lessen the reports of serious crime. People do not want to live in, or move to a city with a high violent crime rate. This way Cambridge real estate agents can say, "We are not Chicago. We are not Philadelphia. We are not Camden. See how few crimes we have? It is written in the Cambridge Chronicle reported by the Police Commissioner." 

Then there is the problem of my experiences. Just one ordinary civilian  living amongst the high and mighty students and faculty of this academic enclave. Each day at least two, maybe more state felony statutes and one US felony statute is violated against me alone. When they ask me "Why are you the only one?" I often ask them back, "Why am I the only one who gets harassed every day?" But I get no answer. So for the past 17 years three felonies against me  alone. Not reported. Not investigated. Not stopped. That is 365 times three which equals 1,095 felonies each year for 17 years. That is 18, 615 felonies which are not included in the statistics of the Commissioner. 




Some of the reduction of crime is due to having MIT, Lesley University and Harvard University patrol cars and shuttle buses patrolling the city. Harvard and Lesley Universities have private security guards (Securitas) also patrolling the area of their campuses. Jane Jacobs pointed out in her landmark book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities,  what makes neighborhoods safe. It is the number of eyes watching the area. People who live, work and pass through the neighborhood contribute to neighborhood safety.


Jane Jacobs

In addition if you look at the snapshot attached to this report, it shows that the average number of violent crimes remains about the same, if you count the past five years. This report is a clever example of spinning the facts to make the Commissioner look good. No doubt he uses the latest computer data analysis available which is used by many police departments. It is standard policing these days.



What remains troubling is that the Cambridge police do not enforce all laws equally. Some laws are enforced for some group members and not for others. It is an issue I raised with the City Council over 15 years. They ignored me. Two statutes which the Cambridge police do not enforce are the Massachusetts Civil Rights statute, MGL Chapter 265, Section 37, 

http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter265/Section37

and MGL Firearms statute, Chapter 140, Section 131J. 

http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXX/Chapter140/Section131j

Both are felonies. The Cambridge police do not enforce discrimination laws equally forcefully for persons with disabilities as they do for persons of color, women, homosexuals, illegal aliens and Muslims.




Police and public officials use intimidation to silence criticism of government, the dominant political paradigms, and politicians. The Cambridge police do not address abuses by Harvard University campus police or by Harvard University officials. Criminal abuses by public officials are immune from prosecution statewide in Democratic Massachusetts, with exceptions when the Boston Herald reports them. Criminal abuses by FBI informants are likewise above the laws, nationwide. The Cambridge police remain negligently trained when it comes to enforcing above-mentioned illegal firearms statute. Here's why.



With regard to rape, the City police have a taxpayer funded specially trained squad to investigate rape. The District Attorney has specially trained investigators to gather evidence of rape. The City Hospital has specially trained medical protocols and personnel to gather evidence of rape. In response to an allegation of rape there are substantial resources for the police to gather evidence of a crime against a individual.

But when it comes to violations of above-mentioned illegal firearms statute the Cambridge police demand that the victims provide evidence. One reason for this negligence is that the Commissioner says that the statute only applies to stun guns. The statute specifically includes weapons that emit "waves and beams." Stun guns emit neither. Stun guns use wires and battery powered electricity transmitted through wires shot from the stun guns or from the gun's connectors. In addition the Cambridge police demand evidence of use of the illegal firearms, when the statute only prohibits possession and sale.



The FBI acts the same way with regard to a US statute which makes it a felony to expose civilians to radiation. Violations include a fine of $2 million per incident. 

http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t17t20+1106+0++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2818%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%282332H%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20AND%20%28PART%20ADJ%20%28I%29%29%3AEXPCITE%20%20%20%20%20

The FBI does not enforce that statute due to negligent training. They are often too busy broadcasting character assassination about vulnerable elder persons in Cambridge and framing others on behalf of the Irish American crime elements in the state to eliminate any competition for the Bulger crime family.




It is not clear if the Commissioner is protecting the use of these high tech firearms in Cambridge by criminals, and by rogue police employees, or if he is clueless about them. I do not believe it is the latter. It is clear that campus police and city police know about these illegal firearms and use them contrary to law.

Finally if there is so little crime in Cambridge perhaps it is an auspicious time to reduce the police department's budget. It may enable the city to stop hiring new police officers and to eliminate or at least to reduce police overtime. That money can be used to help needy persons in the city who do not enjoy such high salaries and benefits as the police and the elected officials. Or it can be used to reduce taxes, a shocking idea in cities run by Democrats. One fact seldom reported in major media is that the Massachusetts Attorney General, and former District Attorney for Middlesex is married to a retired Cambridge Supervising police officer. That gives Cambridge police special access to the highest levels of law enforcement in the state. This report's validity depends on one's perspective. The report is made from the police Commissioner's perspective.

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x766858946/Police-Cambridge-hits-historic-low-in-crime#axzz2Jpf71Orp

Police: Cambridge hits historic low in crime
By Erin Baldassari/ebaldassari (at) wickedlocal.com
GateHouse News Service
Cambridge Chronicle
Posted Jan 31, 2013 @ 06:11 AM
Last update Jan 31, 2013 @ 09:55 AM

* * *

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/2/5/cambridge-crime-rate-2012/

Crime Rate in Cambridge Drops in 2012
By MATTHEW Q. CLARIDA, 
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
February 5, 2013

April 20, 2010

Harvard Segregates Housing

Destroying low income projects is the best idea. Jane Jacobs (Death and Life of Great American Cities) recognized that isolating people of low income eliminates hope of ever improving one's status. Young people grow up without hope or dreams. This is government segregation policy, which is shared to some extent by Harvard Real Estate policies. Harvard segregates the university population excluding non affiliated persons from living with students, staff and faculty. The few remaining unaffiliated residents on Harvard property are in place by Harvard's promise not to displace them when rent control was repealed in 1995. Harvard promotes diversity of skin color and ethnicity among their academic population. Harvard opposes diversity of economics and class in housing.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2010/4/20/sampson-mixedincome-study-community/

Sociology Professor Studies Housing Effects

February 25, 2009

Shut Down the Projects


Jane Jacobs (The Death and Life of Great American Cities) explained that housing projects make it almost impossible for residents to move up and out. It is cheaper to provide subsidies and allow all economic levels of families to live amongst one another. This conflicts with Harvard policy which is to segregate classes based upon their status in society. Nonetheless Jacobs makes the case for ending the cycle of poverty. Cambridge, run by elitists, subscribes to the traditional view of segregation.

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1464737270/Cambridge-Housing-Authority-director-hopeful-Obama-will-deregulate-housing-funding

Cambridge Housing Authority director hopeful Obama will deregulate housing funding
By Katrina Ballard/correspondent
Cambridge Chronicle
Tue Feb 24, 2009, 06:00 AM EST

June 30, 2008

New York City Policing

New York City Policing

[This letter was published in the New York Post on July 3, 2008.]

Community activist Aaron Biller laments that his neighborhood is down from 400 police officers to 100, and that "We're on our own." (Julia Vitullo-Martin, "1981 What went right could go wrong," NYPost, June 29, 2008, page 28) He says he needs the government to pay attention to the streetscape and to "give us back our cops." If police are needed the neighborhood is not safe. The people who live and work in the neighborhood make it safe or not. People make their streets safe by paying attention. When they leave safety to the police the streets cannot be safe. City guru Jane Jacobs wrote that in 1961 in "The Death and Life of Great American Cities." The needs of city streets have not changed since then. Safe neighborhoods require work and concern by ordinary people who use the neighborhood.

Roy Bercaw - Editor ENOUGH ROOM

Julia Vitullo-Martin
1981 What went right could go wrong
New York Post
June 29, 2008
page 28

http://www.nypost.com/seven/06282008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/revenge_of_the_bad_old_days_117615.htm?page=0

October 7, 2007

Cities Are the Answer

Cities Are the Answer

The Cambridge City Manager sees cities as collections of energy users.
(Douglas Foy and Robert Healy, "Cities are the answer," Boston Globe, April 4,
2007) It explains his destructive policies toward trees and wildlife. He favors
technology over nature. He minimized green public open spaces.
This essay indicates the Manager's anti-human policies. He digitizes people
dehumanizing them into a collective. He runs Cambridge like a for profit
business.
Vulnerable persons suffer under Healy, who shows little concern for their
quiet desperate struggle to enjoy life. The focus here is on an academic elite
exercise studying city life. All Robert Moses without any Jane Jacobs.

Roy Bercaw, Editor ENOUGH ROOM

Cities are the answer
By Douglas Foy and Robert Healy
Boston Globe
April 4, 2007

MANY OF the world's most difficult environmental challenges can be addressed and
solved by cities. This may come as a surprise to those who think of
environmental issues largely in the context of wild places and open spaces.
Cities, often congested, dense, and enormous consumers of resources, would not
be the place one might first turn for environmental solutions. But in fact,
cities are inherently
the "greenest" of all places. They are much more efficient in their use of
energy, water, and land than suburbs. They provide transportation services in a
remarkably equitable and democratic fashion. They may be the best of all places
for seniors to grow old. Development in cities helps to save natural areas and
open space by relieving growth pressures on the countryside. And cities will,
without question,
be the pivotal players in fashioning solutions to the growing problem of climate
change.

New York City, for example, turns out to be the most energy efficient place in
America. Yes, it houses 8.2 million citizens, and uses an enormous amount of
energy to do so. Its electrical load, more than 12,000 megawatts, is as large as
all of Massachusetts. Yet because the buildings are dense and thus more
efficiently heated and cooled, and because 85 percent of all trips in Manhattan
are on foot, bike, or transit, New York City uses dramatically less energy to
serve each of its citizens than does a state like Massachusetts. Indeed, it uses
less energy, on a per capita basis, than any other state in America. When one
considers that another 750,000 commuters also enter New York every day to work,
and use large amounts of energy in their daily business there but don't even
count in the per capita energy calculation, the city's efficiency performance is
even more remarkable.

Carbon dioxide, the dominant greenhouse gas and the primary cause of global
climate change, comes largely from the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal,
oil, gasoline, and natural gas. Nearly half of all the energy those fuels
produce is
used in buildings -- heating, cooling, and lighting our homes, factories, and
offices. Another third of all the energy is used for transportation, primarily
fueling automobiles, trucks, and transit fleets.
In order to address the challenge of climate change, it is imperative that we
make both buildings and transportation vastly more energy efficient. And cities
are the place to start. In a way, cities are the Saudi Arabia of energy
efficiency, vast mines of potential energy savings that dwarf most of the supply
options our country possesses.

It is with that efficiency goal in mind that the city of Cambridge and the
Kendall Foundation have developed for Cambridge the most aggressive energy
efficiency program ever deployed in a city in the United States. The outlines of
the program were announced on March 29. It will involve the investment of nearly
$100 million, largely raised from private capital sources, in buildings of all
types throughout the city. We will invest in energy efficiency measures in
homes, condos,
apartments, offices, hotels, institutions, hospitals, factories, and schools. We
will measure and verify the savings, and document the carbon dioxide reductions
and other environmental gains. And all of this will be done with the energy
savings paying for the cost of the program, without the need for any government
subsidies.

By mining Cambridge's efficiency opportunities, the city will become more
competitive, save money for its citizens and its businesses, add hundreds of
quality jobs, help build an efficiency industry that can be the pride of
Massachusetts, produce a model that can be replicated in cities all over the
state and the nation, and add its weight to a solution for global climate
change.

The old paradigm of the pollution-filled city as a blight on the landscape, and
the leafy-green suburbs with pristine lawns as the ideal, is outdated and does
not lead us to a future of energy independence, clean air, and a stable climate.
Cities are the best hope to realize our need for a bright, sustainable, and
promising future.

Douglas Foy, former secretary of the Office of Commonwealth Development, is
president of DIF Enterprises. Robert Healy is city manager of Cambridge.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/04/04/
cities_are_the_answer/

September 22, 2007

Blight is in the Eyes of the Beholder

Blight is in the Eyes of the Beholder

Jane Jacobs' explained blight in her book "The Death an Life of Great
American Cities." Government officials and professional planners declare
diverse,
thriving, exciting and safe neighborhoods blighted. Bankers refuse to grant
loans to residents of those neighborhoods.
If they are allowed to survive the "blighted" neighborhoods can unslum
themselves without outside help. But if the power of eminent domain is applied
to destroy a neighborhood there is no defense. Has Columbia adopted the
practices of Robert Moses?

--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA


EVICTIONS MADE (TOO) EASY
By TOM ELLIOTT
New York Post

September 19, 2007 -- TO realize its planned expansion in Manhattanville,
Columbia University will need the power of eminent domain - that is, the ability
to force property owners to sell at a "fair" price, below what they'd otherwise
hold out for. The prospect of such takings has probably caused more resentment
than any other part of the school's plan.

Technically, the power would be exercised by the state-run Empire State
Development Corp. (ESDC) - which must first reach a formal finding that the area
is "blighted."

But the ESDC has subcontracted the study that will make that determination to
the consulting firm of AKRF - which Columbia itself has already hired to help
sell its overall plan to city officials.

This arrangement inspired locals like Nick Sprayregen to sue - demanding the
ESDC produce its communications with AKRF to see if the consulting firm is truly
acting as an independent arbiter.

A judge agreed: "While acting for Columbia, AKRF has an interest of its own in
the outcome of [ESDC's] action, as AKRF, presumably, seeks to succeed in
securing an outcome that its client, Columbia, would favor." But ESDC's appeal
of that ruling won't be heard until December, so everything's going ahead for
now.

Complicating matters is the fact that AKRF, which specializes in
environmental-impact statements, has been the government's go-to consultant for
just about every major development over the last six years.
[...]