New York City Detectives Question Lack of Autopsy of Justice Scalia in Texas

US Marshals Bypassed The Medical Examiner To Declare a Non Suspicious Death of the Supreme Court Justice Scalia 

Could this case be a motive for the remarkable determination, contrary to law, by a US Marshal, that Scalia's death was not suspicious (See Washington Post), and thus did not require an autopsy? Texas law provides for a medical examiner to make the determination, and few marshals are trained as MEs. See also,
Detectives question lack of autopsy in Scalia death
By Jamie Schram and Bob Fredericks
New York Post
February 15, 2016 | 11:07pm
Then again since Justice Scalia was an unimportant man, his death did not create any benefit to anyone. And in any case the current administration is so strictly lawful that it is irrational to even think such a thought. Nothing to see here folks. Move along. This way. To your left.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/2/17/scalia-affirmative-action-harvard/

Scalia’s Death Could Affect Affirmative Action Lawsuits
By AIDAN F. LANGSTON

Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
February 17, 2016