September 21, 2014

Updated: Texas High Court: Upskirt Photography, Video Is Protected Expression


Posted September 19, 2014 8:11 PM ET; Last updated September 21, 2104 10:16 PM ET


Rejected: Texas's highest criminal court has thrown out a law banning 'upskirt' pictures - because it restricts photographers' right to free speech and is a 'paternalistic' intrusion of a person's right to be aroused

[From article]
Texas's top criminal court has thrown out a law banning 'upskirt' pictures - because it restricts photographers' right to freedom of expression.
The Court of Criminal Appeal struck down part of the anti-'creepshot' statute, which criminalised the taking of surreptitious images in public for the purposes of sexual gratification.
These included revealing photos of women - often called 'upskirting' or 'downblousing' - that were taken without their consent.
Rejecting the law on Wednesday, Judge Sharon Keller claimed it was a violation of federal free-speech rights and a 'paternalistic' intrusion of a person's right to be aroused.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2763645/Texas-court-throws-paternalistic-law-banning-upskirt-pictures-saying-restricts-photographers-right-free-speech.html

Texas court throws out 'paternalistic' law banning 'upskirt' pictures, saying it restricts photographers' right to free speech
Texas Court of Criminal Appeal struck down part of anti-'creepshot' law
Law banned taking surreptitious images in public for sexual gratification
These included revealing pictures of women, often dubbed 'upskirting'
Rejecting law, Judge Sharon Keller claimed it was violation of free speech
Added that it was a 'paternalistic' intrusion of person's right to be aroused
Appeal stemmed from 2011 case of man in his fifties charged with improper photography for taking underwater pictures of children aged 3-11
By SOPHIE JANE EVANS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 16:57 EST, 20 September 2014 | UPDATED: 17:00 EST, 20 September 2014

* * *



[From article]
The state's highest criminal court on Wednesday tossed out part of a Texas law banning "improper photography or visual recording" - surreptitious images acquired in public for sexual gratification, often called "upskirting" or "downblousing" - as a violation of federal free-speech rights and an improper restriction on a person's right to individual thoughts.
In an 8-1 ruling, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals said photos, like paintings, films and books, are "inherently expressive" and, therefore, are protected by the First Amendment. The opinion supported a previous decision by the San Antonio-based 4th Court of Appeals.
"The camera is essentially the photographer's pen and paintbrush," the opinion written by Presiding Judge Sharon Keller said. "A person's purposeful creation of photographs and visual recordings is entitled to the same First Amendment protection as the photographs and visual recordings themselves."
[. . .]
Peter Linzer, who teaches constitutional and First Amendment law at the University of Houston Law Center, said: "It's hard to see how you could make taking a picture a crime."

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/article/State-appeals-court-rules-upskirt-law-5763225.php?cmpid=twitter-premium&t=53c893b5408b7034ef

Texas court throws out 'upskirt' photo law
By Cindy George
September 17, 2014 | Updated: September 19, 2014 2:43pm

No comments: