Digboston, formerly called Weekly Dig, is a weekly print and online newspaper in Boston. The writers and editors are mostly young, idealistic and extremist leftist in nature. Often appearing are simplistic and factually wrong opinions about how the real world works. They have entertaining regular features which are often personal in nature. In the May 7-14, 2014 edition, the "Oh Cruel World" (unknown if this is written as a real experience or a fantasy. Unable to find a link. These are solicited as anonymous gripes.) feature [page 3], was addressed to "Dear White People." [There is a new film by the same name.] The anonymous writer gives permission to "white people" "to use the words 'black,' 'Asian,' and 'Latino' when describing people." We are grateful.
He laments having to ask callers to his restaurant, who "ask about something they might have left behind, [. . .] to distinguish [their server] along racial lines." He adds "you people need to grow the f**k up and get comfortable around new words. And when I say 'you people,' I mean white folks."
Isn't that gracious of this morally superior person who does not identify himself or herself along any "racial lines." Is it possible that he is not white? Gasp! So let's understand what "white folks" are supposed to do. If "white folks" express themselves freely identifying others as members of groups "along racial lines" as Mr. Donald Sterling, owner of the Los Angeles Clippers did, look what happened to him? He is over 80 years old. Was that an example of bullying an elder citizen? Is it elder abuse? Multi millionaire thug athletes and celebrities attack this elder citizen who paid scores of black men multi millions per year then call him a racist. And Digboston publishes ridicule of people who do not identify others as members of ethnic groups? Is "white" a race? Is "Latino" a race?
The police commissioner in a New Hampshire town, was forced to resign because he expressed a reference to the President "along racial lines." Is that approved by this columnist? Did someone did not get his memo?
Or the thousands of others who expressed their identifications of others "along racial lines." They were brutally and relentlessly attacked for what they said. Even though it is and was protected speech. The speech and thought police destroyed thousands of lives due to their superior knowledge of what is recommended acceptable speech. Cannot determine who shows less touch with reality. The writer of this column? Or the many FBI informants e.g., Al Sharpton, who attack "white people" on behalf of the FBI.
Ridiculing and humiliating "white people" for not expressing hate speech, for not identifying individuals as members of groups, wastes precious ink and paper for the sadistic enjoyment of a sacred victim, who enjoys immunity for expressing his racial animosity. He shows a lack of respect for "white people," who do not want to be attacked by black racists, the homosexual lobby, and man-hating feminists. In short he indicates a total lack of sensitivity toward people unlike himself.
The police commissioner in a New Hampshire town, was forced to resign because he expressed a reference to the President "along racial lines." Is that approved by this columnist? Did someone did not get his memo?
Or the thousands of others who expressed their identifications of others "along racial lines." They were brutally and relentlessly attacked for what they said. Even though it is and was protected speech. The speech and thought police destroyed thousands of lives due to their superior knowledge of what is recommended acceptable speech. Cannot determine who shows less touch with reality. The writer of this column? Or the many FBI informants e.g., Al Sharpton, who attack "white people" on behalf of the FBI.
Ridiculing and humiliating "white people" for not expressing hate speech, for not identifying individuals as members of groups, wastes precious ink and paper for the sadistic enjoyment of a sacred victim, who enjoys immunity for expressing his racial animosity. He shows a lack of respect for "white people," who do not want to be attacked by black racists, the homosexual lobby, and man-hating feminists. In short he indicates a total lack of sensitivity toward people unlike himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment