[From article]
Assistant Attorney General Peter Sacks, representing Coakley before the SJC yesterday, argued casino companies responding to the 2011 Expanded Gaming Act spent millions applying for licenses and have an “implied contract” with the state to receive a decision from the Gaming Commission. Sacks said the proposed repeal ballot question, backed by 70,000 signatures, would stop the commission cold and not allow for those decisions to be made.
http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_politics/2014/05/ag_state_owes_applicants_ruling_before_repeal_vote_goes_ahead
AG: State owes applicants ruling before repeal vote goes ahead
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
By: Jack Encarnacao
Boston Herald
No comments:
Post a Comment