HUPD (Harvard University Police Department) is out of control. They have little or no oversight. Thugs with guns and badges. If you criticize them they appear at your door with threats and harassment. When I posted comments on the Harvard University student newspaper, The Crimson, web pages under a story about police action responding to noise and misconduct, open container laws and nuisance violations, two of the "readers" attacked me personally calling me names.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/10/11/ellison-response-final-clubs/#
Ellison Clarifies Administrative Role in Police Response to Final Clubs
By MICHELLE DENISE L. FERREOL and JARED T. LUCKY,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
October 11, 2013
It is a common event when discussing public issues online. I recently read an article which shows that it is the people who use personal attacks who are usually wrong. You can read it here.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/are-conspiracy-theorists-really-the-sane-ones/
ARE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS REALLY THE SANE ONES?
University study shows they are more well-grounded than others
Gina Loudon
October 6, 2013
I say that when people begin using personal attacks it shows they have no rational arguments, which is the same thing but without the psychological research and mumbo jumbo in the article.
There is another element of when personal attacks appear. It is the first rule of propaganda, which demands discrediting people by using character assassination, another term for personal attacks. It is what was done to Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, US Senator Joseph McCarthy, President George W. Bush, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and me among many others. If you read journalism as much as I do you may notice the absence of character assassination of the current president and his misguided appointees. Journalists now use character assassination when they have no rational arguments. The main problem is that few ordinary Americans have experience noticing, and lack the means to understand how to respond to propaganda. I was lucky. When I was 18 or 19 I was very upset with what I read in the papers and went to my college dean and complained about "propaganda" as if there was something he could do about it.
One of the Crimson readers, used "wacko" as his great contribution of hate speech of the day. Another said of me "He's all over the place." with no explanation of what that means. A third said that "He won't respond to the question" about why I thought HUPD was negligently trained. They demanded I teach them in the comments section of a college newspaper. On previous occasions HUPD stopped me after I was taking pictures, in the rear of a Harvard University residential building, of trash, which attracts rodents. It is an ongoing issue discussed for many hours at Cambridge (MA) City Council meetings and committee meetings. The only way to prevent attracting rodents in cities is to keep trash off the streets. Because there are so many visitors to Cambridge there is a lot of food left in the streets. That is what attracts rodents. But also the sloppiness of residents who fail to place trash in containers for collection. In Harvard University residential buildings there are many students who have never lived alone and had to be responsible for their household trash. They leave it in the basement, alongside the receptacles and in general fail to keep the area clean.
I used to take pictures and send them to the building managers at Harvard and to the City inspectional services department. One night two HUPD officers stopped me and a third joined them. They asked me if I was taking pictures behind the buildings. I said I was. They asked why. I explained. They asked me why I did not call them. I explained that it is not a police matter. And even if it was the HUPD did not have jurisdiction. They told me they did have jurisdiction. I told them they were negligently trained, that they did not have the legal authority to enforce city ordinances which is what the inspectional services department does. They were arrogant wise asses as most cops are and said to me "Are you going to teach us?" I said "The University is not paying me to teach you." Same with the response of the readers in October 2013 asking why HUPD is negligently trained still many years after the above incident.
That should have been the end of it. But I declined the opportunity to explain the details in the comments section of the student newspaper. I suggested that the readers who expressed hate speech look up the state statutes which gave HUPD their police powers. That they learn where the property lines are of Harvard University, and then they should apply thought to the information. Well that was apparently a direct threat to the mindless manhood of at least one if not all of the hate-speech-uttering readers one of whom may be a City police employee.
That night as I slept one of the HUPD officers, the worst kind of officer who abuses his authority, arrived at my building which is owned and operated by the President and Fellows of Harvard College, the legal name of the Harvard University corporation. He attacked me severely trying to cause me to have a heart attack or stroke, with electrical weapons possession of which is a felony in Massachusetts. Attempted murder is a felony too. That also is one of many laws which the police refuse to enforce claiming they do not know how. That is another example of negligent training, for another time, in the host city of Harvard University, Lesley University and MIT.
Retaliation for free speech, protected speech under the First Amendment is another felony. Intimidating a person in the free exercise of a constitutionally protected right is a felony in Massachusetts under state law whether or not the offender is a public official. But that law too is ignored in Cambridge and at Harvard University where the campus cops are negligently trained and where laws are optional. Does that explain the relaxed rectitude of Harvard University groomed and educated Governor of Massachusetts and the President of the United States?
Earlier and every day another HUPD employee causes my computer to crash trying to stop my free expression online. That is a federal felony. Each day for the past 17 years while I lived on property owned and operated by the President and Fellows of Harvard College the same criminals committed 4 to 40 felonies a day. My complaints to city, to state and to US officials were consistently ignored. The reason is two-fold. First Harvard University officials are not held accountable for their violations of law. In addition they use character assassination (see above minor hate expression in the comments of The Crimson) to discredit me which allows the public officials to ignore me because they believe character assassination. That includes but is not limited to 43 years of "He's crazy." "He's a retired drug dealer." etc., etc., etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment