Diversity Proponents Have Irrational Arguments

[From article]
If racial preferences are, as proponents of them invariably insist, created for “diversity” that benefits everyone, then Michigan’s amendment banning preferences cannot constitute an invidious restructuring of the political process for the detriment of a minority. Hence opponents of Michigan’s amendment are simultaneously arguing contradictory propositions: Racial preferences serve everyone by producing diversity in academia, but banning preferences is unconstitutional because they primarily benefit a minority.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will101213.php3#.UmBCf900jDo

Jewish World Review
Is racial preference unconsitutional?
October 12, 2013
By George Will