Showing posts with label Human Experiments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Experiments. Show all posts

June 6, 2016

Researchers Grow Human Organs In Pigs. Dr. Frankenstein Lives



Did Ancient Greeks Perform Human-Animal Experiments Too?

In a 1990 film, Death Warrant, Jean Claude Van Damme goes undercover into a prison where inmates are killed and their organs sold. This is not a new idea. 

[From article]
Scientists in the United States are trying to grow human organs inside pigs.
They have injected human stem cells into pig embryos to produce human-pig embryos known as chimeras.
The embryos are part of research aimed at overcoming the worldwide shortage of transplant organs.
The team from University of California, Davis says they should look and behave like normal pigs except that one organ will be composed of human cells.
The human-pig chimeric embryos are being allowed to develop in the sows for 28 days before the pregnancies are terminated and the tissue removed for analysis.
[. . .]
  Pablo Ross, a reproductive biologist who is leading the research told me: "Our hope is that this pig embryo will develop normally but the pancreas will be made almost exclusively out of human cells and could be compatible with a patient for transplantation."
But the work is controversial. Last year, the main US medical research agency, the National Institutes of Health, imposed a moratorium on funding such experiments.
[. . .]
His team has previously injected human stem cells into pig embryos but without first creating the genetic niche. Prof Ross said although they later found human cells in several parts of the developing foetus, they "struggled to compete" with the pig cells. By deleting a key gene involved in the creation of the pig pancreas, they hope the human cells will have more success creating a human-like pancreas.
Other teams in the United States have created human-pig chimeric embryos but none has allowed the foetuses to be born.
[. . .]
Walter Low, professor in the department of neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, said pigs were an ideal "biological incubator" for growing human organs, and could potentially be used to create not just a pancreas but hearts, livers, kidneys, lungs and corneas.
He said if the iPS cells were taken from a patient needing a transplant then these could be injected in a pig embryo which had the key genes deleted for creating the required organ, such as the liver: "The organ would be an exact genetic copy of your liver but a much younger and healthier version and you would not need to take immunosuppressive drugs which carry side-effects."
But Prof Low stressed that the research, using another form of gene editing called TALENs, was still at the preliminary stages, trying to identify the target genes which must be removed in order to prevent the pig from developing a particular organ.
His team is also trying to create dopamine-producing human neurons from chimeric embryos to treat patients with Parkinson's disease.
[. . .]
In the mid-90s there were hopes that genetically modified pigs might provide an endless supply of organs for patients, and that cross-species transplants were not far off.
But clinical trials stalled because of fears that humans might be infected with animal viruses.
Last year, a team at Harvard Medical School used CRISPR gene editing to remove more than 60 copies of a pig retrovirus.
Prof George Church, who led the research, told me: "It opens up the possibility of not just transplantation from pigs to humans but the whole idea that a pig organ is perfectible.
"Gene editing could ensure the organs are very clean, available on demand and healthy, so they could be superior to human donor organs."
[. . .]
But organisations campaigning for an end to factory farming are dismayed at the thought of organ farms.
Peter Stevenson, from Compassion in World Farming, told me: "I'm nervous about opening up a new source of animal suffering. Let's first get many more people to donate organs. If there is still a shortage after that, we can consider using pigs, but on the basis that we eat less meat so that there is no overall increase in the number of pigs being used for human purposes."
In Greek mythology, chimeras were fire-breathing monsters composed of several animals - part lion, goat and snake. The scientific teams believe human-pig chimeras should look and behave like normal pigs except that one organ will be composed of human cells.

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-36437428

Scientists grow human organs for transplant inside pigs
By Fergus Walsh
Medical correspondent
June 5, 2016


* * *


Supporters claim it could spell an end to the shortage of donor organs – which means 1,000 people in the UK die every year while waiting for a transplant.

Cambridge, MA City Council remains non committal, issuing no comment.

[From article]
Pig-human embryos have been created in a dramatic bid to solve the organ transplant shortage.
Scientists have successfully combined human stem cells and pig DNA - with the aim of growing a human organ inside a pig.
But critics say the development of such hybrids is ‘offensive to human dignity’.
The ‘chimera’ embryos have been implanted in living sows and allowed to grow for 28 days before being tested and destroyed.
Supporters claim it could spell an end to the shortage of donor organs – which means 1,000 people in the UK die every year while waiting for a transplant.
But others have described it as terrifying ‘Frankenscience’.
The technique is being trialled on pig foetuses by US scientists who are experimenting with the genes involved in creating a pancreas.
Strict rules mean that, for now, the embryos cannot be matured past 28 days and no birth of a hybrid animal is allowed.
[. . .]
The latest breakthrough has been made at the University of California, Davis, where scientists have implanted pig-human hybrids into sows. Doctors have long discussed using pigs for human transplants, as the organs are roughly the same size as a human’s.
But they have repeatedly failed to overcome two hurdles – that the human body would instantly reject the foreign tissue, and that there is a risk of passing animal viruses into people.
[. . .]
Those challenges have been surpassed by gene-editing technology called CRISPR, which allows scientists to alter DNA with remarkable precision.
They have worked out how to remove from a strand of pig DNA the exact gene responsible for making a pancreas. This creates a void, which they hope will be filled when they inject the embryo with human ‘blank’ stem cells, capable of forming any form of tissue.
The hybrid embryo is then implanted into an adult sow – and as it grows into a foetus it develops a human pancreas.
Dr Pablo Ross, leading the research, told BBC Panorama: ‘Our hope is that this pig embryo will develop normally but the pancreas will be made almost exclusively out of human cells and could be compatible with a patient for transplantation.’
But the work is intensely controversial. The main concern is that the human stem cells might migrate to the developing pig’s brain, giving it some human characteristics.
Dr Ross insists: ‘We think there is very low potential for a human brain to grow, but this is something we will be investigating.’
[. . .]
Professor Walter Low of the University of Minnesota, which is researching a similar project, said pigs were an ideal ‘biological incubator’, adding: ‘The organ would be an exact genetic copy of your liver [for example] but a much younger and healthier version and you would not need to take immunosuppressive drugs which carry side-effects.’
Professor Low admitted that human cells spreading to the brain was a concerning prospect, but he added: ‘With every organ we will look at what’s happening in the brain and if we find that it’s too human-like, then we won’t let those foetuses be born.’
But Josephine Quintavalle, of campaign group Comment on Reproductive Ethics, said: ‘These experiments are absolutely offensive to human dignity, and no utilitarian justification whatsoever can ever bypass such opposition. We are absolutely horrified at this arrogance.’
Professor Stuart Newman, of New York Medical College, said: ‘You’re getting into unsettling ground that I think is damaging to our sense of humanity.’
Peta UK’s Julia Baines condemned the research as ‘Frankenscience’, adding: ‘Creating human-animal hybrids is bad for people and worse for animals.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3626562/Scientists-let-hybrid-embryos-develop-lab-28-days-bid-solve-transplant-shortage.html

Human organs grown in pigs: Scientists let hybrid embryos develop in lab for 28 days in bid to solve transplant shortage
Scientists have successfully combined human stem cells and pig DNA
Embryos put in living pigs and made to grow for 28 days before destroyed
Critics have dubbed it ‘Frankenscience’ and ‘offensive to human dignity’
1,000 people in the UK die every year while waiting for a organ transplant
By BEN SPENCER MEDICAL CORRESPONDENT FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 17:57 EST, 5 June 2016 | UPDATED: 13:21 EST, 6 June 2016


December 14, 2015

Review of Protections of Human Subjects Used For Research




Current laughable procedure of the Office for Human Research Protection at HHS requires human subjects without consent, to provide evidence of wrongdoing, and to identify the lead researcher. How is the human subject without consent to know and do that? Within a university setting the IRB can withhold funding without informed consent. But if funding is non institutional and researchers do not obtain consent there are no protections from egregious abuse by miscreant researchers. 



Even if performed on university property which violates the Common Rule (Title 45 CFR Section 46). There are no penalties for non compliance with the Common Rule. Psychiatrists are readily available to cover-up illegal abuses designating the victim insane. Then there is the lack of oversight by state authorities when deaths occur in research. MA law requires notice to the Medical Examiner or the District Attorney. But police conveniently allow researchers to investigate deaths occurring under their procedures. Thus negligence becomes pre-existing conditions.



http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/12/14/common-rule-reform-comments/

Harvard Will Submit Comments on Changes to Research Approval Process
By IGNACIO SABATE,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
December 13, 2015

January 12, 2015

French Police Stopped Surveillance of Terror Suspects Six Months Ago




French police were watching the Paris magazine Hebedo and Kosher deli terrorists, but stopped six months ago. Meanwhile in academic run Cambridge, MA, host city of Harvard University, MIT and Lesley University, local crime family associates, Communists, local police employees, FBI informants and Harvard University campus police employees, and building superintendents, continue 44 years of 24/7 surveillance and harassment. Some say the Harvard University lesbian graduate student in psychology at Harvard University Medical School is conducting an illegal human experiment. She is using a 70-year-old white man as a human subject without consent for testing of military weapons. Were the French police harassing the suspected terrorists? Or using them as involuntary human subjects for medical research? Is that why there is relentless character assassination of the man in Cambridge to discourage any investigation? Harvard University would lose $145 million taxpayer funds annually for how many years? Performing such experiments on Harvard University property is a violation of the assurance letter written each year by Harvard University covering their three Institutional Review Boards to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Institute of Health promising they are not violating any of the U.S. laws (Title 45 CFR Section 46). But then again Harvard University enjoys protection from the Obama-Holder doctrine which allows selected persons and institutions to ignore inconvenient laws. Yawn.

[From article]
The world’s most wanted female terrorist has fled to Syria, it was revealed last night – as police admitted they stopped surveillance on her deadly Parisian cell six months ago because they were deemed ‘low-risk’.
Hayat Boumeddiene, the widow of one of the gunmen who massacred 17 civilians in the French capital – is now thought to be with her murderous Islamic State allies after fleeing the country. Official sources in Paris said that 24-hour scrutiny of members of her terror cell had been dropped to focus on other targets.
Last night, Boumeddiene, 26, was branded ‘armed and dangerous’ by France’s top policeman Jean-Marc Falcone, who said she was believed to have helped plan the attacks.
[. . .]
Boumeddiene and her co-conspirators were put under phone, internet and physical surveillance at the end of 2011, when Said Kouachi returned from Yemen, where he trained with Al Qaeda. There he met Anwar Al-Awlaki, a terrorist mastermind later killed in a US drone strike.
‘But between that date and the summer of 2014, nothing suggested any connection with a radical Islamist movement,’ said a Paris judicial source. ‘So the surveillance was stopped in order to refocus on other individuals who at that moment presented a higher risk.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2904932/Police-stopped-watching-Paris-killers-six-months-ago-terror-cell-kosher-deli-attacker-crossbow-jihadi-wife-fled-Syria-deemed-low-risk.html

Revealed: Police stopped watching Paris killers six months ago after terror cell of kosher deli attacker and his crossbow jihadi wife - who has fled to Syria - were deemed 'low-risk'
Hayat Boumeddiene, 26, is the 'wife' of gunman Amedy Coulibaly
He killed a policewoman and then four hostages in a kosher bakery
Police source said Boumeddiene flew to Turkey via Madrid on January 2
She was believed to have crossed the Turkey- Syria border on Thursday
Police are interrogating wives of Kouachi brothers in a bid to trace her
500 phone calls were made between Boumeddiene and one of the Kouachi brothers's wives
Coulibaly was killed as commandos stormed the kosher bakery
By PETER ALLEN IN PARIS FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 18:20 EST, 10 January 2015 | UPDATED: 21:35 EST, 10 January 2015

November 17, 2013

Two Harvard University Drug Tests on Prisoners


http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Concord+Prison+Experiment

Concord Prison Experiment
The Concord Prison Experiment was designed to evaluate whether the experiences produced by the psychoactive drug psilocybin, derived from psilocybin mushrooms, combined with psychotherapy, could inspire prisoners to leave their antisocial lifestyles behind once they were released. How well it worked was to be judged by comparing the recidivism rate of subjects who received psilocybin with the average for other Concord inmates.

* * *

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Marsh+Chapel+Experiment

Marsh Chapel Experiment
The round window above the altar at Boston University's Marsh Chapel
The Marsh Chapel Experiment (a.k.a. "the Good Friday Experiment") was a 1962 experiment conducted on Good Friday at Boston University's Marsh Chapel. Walter N. Pahnke, a graduate student in theology at Harvard Divinity School, designed the experiment under the supervision of Timothy Leary and the Harvard Psilocybin Project.[1] Pahnke's experiment investigated whether psilocybin (the active principle in psilocybin mushrooms) would act as a reliable entheogen in religiously predisposed subjects.[2]

June 10, 2013

Harvard Med School Research Dean Leaves For Big Business Gig



"the Medical School [. . .] announced that due to financial constraints it would close its New England Primate Research Center, which has come under fire for what some have called negligent treatment of animals.";Why is there never any concern about illegal abuses of humans used for medical research without consent at the prestigious medical school? Why are complaints about grad students abusing vulnerable humans always ignored? Why is abuse of human subjects less important than abuse of animal subjects? Why are humans who complain about non consensual human experiments designated mentally ill by prominent medical school professors?

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/6/7/hms-research-dean-departs/#

HMS Research Dean To Depart
William Chin leaves Harvard after three years
By LAYA ANASU and FATIMA MIRZA,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
June 7, 2013

October 30, 2012

NYC Coroner Saves Brains For Experiments

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2224871/Medical-examiners-office-refuses-release-9-000-brains-belonging-New-Yorkers-use-experiments-practice.html

Medical examiner's office refuses to release more than 9,000 brains
belonging to New Yorkers so they can use them for 'experiments and
practice'
By JOHN CLARKE
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 14:10 EST, 29 October 2012 | UPDATED: 14:19 EST, 29 October 2012

October 1, 2012

US Researchers Used Human Subjects for Involuntary Radiation Experiments in St. Louis

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2210415/Revealed-Army-scientists-secretly-sprayed-St-Louis-radioactive-particles-YEARS-test-chemical-warfare-technology.html

Revealed: Army scientists secretly sprayed St Louis with 'radioactive' particles for YEARS to test chemical warfare technology
By EMILY ANNE EPSTEIN
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 09:16 EST, 29 September 2012 | UPDATED: 11:21 EST, 29 September 2012

July 24, 2012

U. California Researchers Used Dying Patients For Experiments Without Consent

Still no penalties for violation of US laws using human subjects for experiments without consent. Defenders of this situation claim that banning the researchers from performing human experiments is punishment. Oh? How about if we ban murderers from committing murder when they are caught killing another person? Is that accountability as well? It shows how these morally superior, usually academics, get away with murder literally. They can kill human subjects and say they were enrolled in an experiment and not be held accountable. That actually happened in Boston. When I called Boston police to inquire if they investigated deaths in experiments at Harvard University Medical School teaching hospitals, they told me not to call again. The police spokesman told me the researchers do their own investigations. I asked if I was accused of killing would I be allowed to do the investigation? The DA and the Medical Examiner also did not investigate those deaths.
To suggest that the use of human subjects is strictly controlled is misleading if not completely false. There are no penalties under law. Unlike use of animals in experiments in violation of law, where there are fines and prison penalties. In addition what are the figures about oversight after 2000, when a Harvard psychiatrist was the director of the Office of Human Subjects Protection at the NIH, not the FDA, which regulates devices. The rules were loosened by this director.


http://bostonherald.com/news/national/west/view/20120728uc-davis_neurosurgeon_temporarily_steps_down_as_department_chair_amid_probe/srvc=news&position=recent_bullet

UC-Davis neurosurgeon ‘temporarily’ steps down as department chair amid probe
Boston Herald
By Marjie Lundstrom
McClatchy Newspapers
Saturday, July 28, 2012

* * *

[From article]
A prominent University of California, Davis neurosurgeon and his colleague have been banned from performing medical research on humans after the two were accused of experimenting on dying brain cancer patients without university permission.[...]
Research on humans is tightly controlled in the U.S., requiring a thorough approval process by the FDA, which it is alleged the neurosurgeons failed to follow.
...]
Between 1998 and 2000, federal regulators suspended human research at seven university medical centers and one veterans hospital.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2178072/A-pair-neurosurgeons-banned-human-research-illegally-introduced-bacteria-cancer-patients-open-wounds-led-deaths.html

Doctors who EXPERIMENTED on dying brain cancer patients without permission banned from research
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 00:28 EST, 24 July 2012 | UPDATED: 01:42 EST, 24 July 2012

May 26, 2012

Nazi Doctors Apologize For Human Experiments On Jewish Subjects

Seventy years after the fact of depraved experiments using Jewish human subjects Nazi doctors apologize. Huh? How many decades will it take US doctors who used vulnerable American citizens for abusive experiments? The Nazis and the US doctors all use the defense that the benefit to society outweighs the harm to individuals. That is all well and good as long as you are not one of the human subjects. See, e.g., Michael D'Antonio's book, State Boys Rebellion. It is unlikely that any US citizens or government agencies will ever address such abuses. The 2006 book, Mind Wars by Jonathan D. Moreno says, "I believe those who think they have been victimized by government mind control experiments are misguided. Yet there are thousands of such persons. Many associate their ideas with conspiracy theories. I have worked for two presidential commissions and have been a member of several government advisory committees. During periods set aside for public comments in those meetings and in private conversations, I have heard many of these people provide seemingly lucid testimony about scenarios I find fantastic. Some of them are courageous and resolute in the struggle they perceive as having been foisted upon them; others are distraught and terrified of what horrors the next day may bring." 


 If there were presidential commissions when the Nazi doctors were conducting their experiments the members of those commissions would say what Moreno says. People like Moreno are chosen because they are unwilling to recognize how depraved some researchers are. They will not allow any thoughts that US doctors could be as depraved as the Nazi doctors. For Moreno US doctors and researchers have had their genes cleansed of mendacity, greed, and sadism. But even if someone who is aware of the criminal abuses of medical researchers was mistakenly chosen to be on any of those commissions, they are only advisory commissions. They have no power to do anything not even to subpoena witnesses and to take sworn testimony. They are an element of show business to make it appear that none of the abuses occur in the US, and if they did this is how they would be exposed. But see how Moreno ignored what the people tell him. He is the extremely superior kind of bureaucrat. Sadly that is why the criminal researchers can get away with their abuses over and over again and again.

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2150056/Germanys-medical-association-apologises-sadistic-experiments-Nazi-doctors-carried-Jews.html

Germany's doctors apologise for sadistic experiments Nazi doctors carried out on Jews
Body admits many doctors under Nazi-rule during WWII were guilty of 'scores of human rights violations'
By GRAHAM SMITH
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 12:44 EST, 25 May 2012 | UPDATED: 19:09 EST, 25 May 2012

June 15, 2011

Austrian Urologist Experimented Without Consent

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/health/news/article_1645644.php/Austrian-doctor-on-trial-for-alleged-human-experiments

Austrian doctor on trial for alleged human experiments
Jun 15, 2011, 12:50 GMT
Deutsche Presse-Agentur

March 17, 2010

CIA LSD Experiments

[From article]

"the Rockefeller Commission report was released, detailing a litany of domestic abuses committed by the CIA.[. . .]

Much of this plot unfolded here, in New York, according to H.P. Albarelli Jr., author of 'A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments.'[. . .]
'The CIA itself was created and initially composed of wealthy men who came from Wall Street and New York City law firms.'[. . .]
'his reports on the incident were destroyed by the CIA in 1973,' he says."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/system_the_cia_test_lsd_subway_the_FCxMaMKrJgtH42RZ0lY6oN

Did the CIA test LSD in the New York City subway system?

New York Post

Last Updated: 5:05 AM, March 14, 2010

Posted: 1:28 AM, March 14, 2010

November 11, 2009

Human-Animal DNA Research

[This follows announcement of Human-Animal DNA Experiments.]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6913225.ece

From The London Times
November 12, 2009
FOXP2 gene shows why we can talk, but chimps can’t answer back
Mark Henderson, Science Editor

* * *

http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/science/2009/11/freaky-animal-experiments-how.html

Freaky animal experiments: How far should scientists go?
By Mike Swain
Mirror (UK)
Nov 10, 2009 12:41 PM in Science

January 1, 2009

Alex Jones Laments Use of Electrical Weapons

Alex Jones Laments Use of Electrical Weapons

Massachusetts has a Firearms statute which makes it a felony to possess or to sell electrical weapons. Mass General Laws Chapter 140 Section 131 J.
http://www.mass.gov/legis.laws/mgl/140-131j.htm
In 2001 I wrote a bill to enhance the penalties. My bill did not pass, but subsequently the legislature did enhance the penalties. Local police are not trained to enforce that law. They demand evidence of use, which is not in the statute. Police and FBI informants, and members of organized crime use these weapons for harassment and provocation. Just ignore the clueless or complicit who attribute mental illness. The laws on discrimination state that it does not matter if a person is mentally ill or not. If they are denied access to government services it is a violation of law. Saying that a crime victim is mentally ill shows that the accuser believes it is OK to ignore persons with disabilities and to abuse such persons. They are sociopaths, and that includes the psychiatrists, the politicians, the judges and the police.

"The government publicly claims that these 'directed energy
weapons,' or 'D.E.W.', are still in the experimental stage, or
that working equipment is large and bulky."

These are two of many deliberate lies promulgated by US Agencies. If these weapons are experimental then the US Government is conducting an unlawful human experiment as they've done dozens of times over 80 years. Often these experiments are conducted by university oversight with no approval from the statutory Institutional Review Boards. This violates US Law, Title 45 CFR 46, called the common rule, which applies to 17 US agencies that conduct human experiments. As such it jeopardizes US research grants. Harvard University gets $500 million each year. Over ten years that is $5 billion. But the US Office of Human Research Protection at the NIH, refuses to investigate and demands evidence, and the names of the principal researchers.

One portable unit is the size of a VCR, that uses rechargeable batteries. Others are as small as a Mini DV Camcorder, that includes through-the-wall heat sensing for targeting the individual.

Roy Bercaw, Editor ENOUGH ROOM

Domestic Torture via Radiation Weaponry: America’s Horrific Shame
Vic Livingston
NowPublic
December 30, 2008

www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2008/april08leb.pdf

FOR MORE ON DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN AMERICA:

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/american-gestapo-state-

supported-terrorism-targets-u-s-citizens

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/targeting-u-s-citizens-govt-

agencies-root-cause-wall-street-financial-crisis
--------------------------------------------------------------
Article printed from Infowars: http://www.infowars.com

URL to article: http://www.infowars.com/?p=6877