[From article]
Waterboarding is not designed to kill anyone. None of the other enhanced interrogation techniques that liberals are screaming about are designed to cause lasting damage or death.
The reality is that the “torture” that liberals are getting upset about would be called torture only in the First World; in the rest of the world, it would be considered a mild first step.
[. . .]
Such late-term abortions are done in one of two ways:
1) Dilation and evacuation (D&E): Where the unborn child is literally hacked to pieces without anesthetic
2) Saline abortion: Where a saline solution is injected into the womb, and the unborn child is poisoned. Death can take as long as 24 hours, and the solution gives the unborn child burns over his or her entire body. No anesthetic is used.
3) Digoxin injection: Where a massive heart attack is induced in the unborn child via the misuse of the drug Digoxin.
4) Partial-birth abortion: While this is illegal, it’s not possible to be sure it’s not being used due to the lax enforcement of laws related to abortion in America. In this case, the baby is delivered, but when only the baby's head remains in the womb, a tool is used to mush up the unborn baby's brain. Then the skull is crushed.
[. . .]
If liberals really cared about torture and human suffering, they’d be all for banning abortions after 20 weeks, when science shows that the unborn suffer. After all, why would any woman have to wait that long to decide to kill her unborn daughter?
But liberals don’t just fail to support such a ban; they actively work to defeat it.
[. . .]
Basically, good people can disagree about whether or not enhanced interrogation techniques are really torture and whether or not they should be used in extreme cases, but good people really can’t contend that torturing an unborn child to death is an acceptable thing to do.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/the_real_torture_scandal_in_america.html
December 13, 2014
The Real Torture Scandal in America
By Tom Trinko
No comments:
Post a Comment