[From article]
CU-Boulder has essentially declared not only that the accused does not enjoy the presumption of innocence, but that defending the accused's innocence amounts to sexual harassment. How exactly the accused can receive a fair hearing in such an environment remains a mystery.
At this point it should be pointed out that false rape claims are far more prevalent than people think. Feminists like to claim that only a negligible number of rape allegations are false (2-8%), but the number of allegations recanted, along with the number of allegations not resulting in charges, indicates a much larger portion.
[. . .]
Whatever problems exist within the legal system, this case illustrates why schools have no business adjudicating sexual assault claims. Had this case been tried in a court of law, we would be able to assess the charges in light of the evidence. In the present situation, we have no idea what was alleged, what evidence was presented, or the exact nature of the statute. [. . .] The effort to adjudicate sexual assault allegations in makeshift tribunals will not end happily.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/11/colorado_sex_scandal_continues.html
November 21, 2014
Colorado 'Sex Scandal' Continues
By Ben Cohen
No comments:
Post a Comment