October 10, 2009
Explaining the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
"To be eligible for the 2009 prize, Obama had to be nominated by Feb. 1 -- 12 days after he took office. It is not known who nominated Obama."
[. . .]
"according to the British site freebettingonline.co.uk.
But Obama was 18 to 1, only slightly better than Michael Jackson, who was 20 to 1.
The prize committee [. . .] made clear that their unanimous decision was designed to encourage Obama, rather than thank him for past deeds."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/nobel_peace_award_stuns_even_aides_Yve8xmY1IsSd2Au9azigJJ
Nobel Peace award stuns even O aides
By ANDY SOLTIS
AP, REUTERS
New York Post
Last Updated: 10:27 AM, October 10, 2009
Posted: 2:14 AM, October 10, 2009
"To be eligible for the 2009 prize, Obama had to be nominated by Feb. 1 -- 12 days after he took office. It is not known who nominated Obama."
[. . .]
"according to the British site freebettingonline.co.uk.
But Obama was 18 to 1, only slightly better than Michael Jackson, who was 20 to 1.
The prize committee [. . .] made clear that their unanimous decision was designed to encourage Obama, rather than thank him for past deeds."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/nobel_peace_award_stuns_even_aides_Yve8xmY1IsSd2Au9azigJJ
Nobel Peace award stuns even O aides
By ANDY SOLTIS
AP, REUTERS
New York Post
Last Updated: 10:27 AM, October 10, 2009
Posted: 2:14 AM, October 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment