Showing posts with label Snitching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Snitching. Show all posts

May 16, 2015

Prison or FBI Informant? It's Up To You




[From article]
But the people serving the longest sentences are those who cooperated with the FBI.
On the streets, it's called a snitch. Downtown, they call it an informant.
And when the FBI decides they want you, they pounce quickly. They sneak up behind you while you're in line at Starbucks and wait until it's your turn to order. And then, when the cashier asks you how you take your coffee, they'll answer for you: "Two sugars and cream… Can you come with us?" It's a common tactic used by the authorities. Personally I know four people this has happened to — two at Starbucks, one at Dunkin Donuts and one at a Subway sandwich shop. And none of them had any idea it was coming.
[. . .]
This is what's on the table: cooperate and become an informant or go away for a very long time. The biggest fear for someone facing this decision is family.
Recently I had lunch with a friend who cooperated with the authorities. "It's not good, Turney," he said, looking across at me in the East Village restaurant. If he'd pleaded guilty initially, he would have been away and home already.
"I have no idea who my friends are," he said after the waitress took our menus. "I don't talk to anyone." He seemed to just be blurting things out unprompted. "I don't even like to walk down the street anymore."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102631930

Snitch! What's worse: Prison or being an FBI informant?
Turney Duff | @turneyduff
Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 | 12:07 PM ET
CNBC.com

September 18, 2012

Home Invasion Victims Shot Dead Day Before They Were To Testify


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204985/Alex-Zaldivar-death-Three-friends-lined-shot-head-execution-home-day-theywere-testify-suspects-May-invasion.html

Teen dies and two friends wounded after they are 'lined up and shot in the head execution style during home invasion ONE DAY before they were to testify against suspects in May break-in'
Men broke into Florida home on September 10 - a day before the friends were to appear in court to testify in case for earlier home invasion
Men 'dragged friends from their beds and lined them up in living room'
Alex Zaldivar, 19, grabbed hands of friends and told them he loved them - 'but attackers kicked their hands apart'
Fatally shot but Remington Campos, 23, and Brienna Campos, 20, survived
One suspect from May invasion was out on bond and electronic tag shows he was not at his home during second attack; no arrests have been made
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 08:34 EST, 18 September 2012 | UPDATED: 09:06 EST, 18 September 2012

August 23, 2012

Obama NBA Fund Raiser, Stop Snitchin' Advocate

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-fundraises-maker-pro-drugs-stop-snitchin-video_650507.html

Obama Fundraises with Maker of Pro-Drugs 'Stop Snitchin' Video
2:53 PM, AUG 22, 2012
BY DANIEL HALPER

November 9, 2011

Snitching for Thee But Not For Me?

The idea that snitching is wrong, is supported by police, lawyers, doctors and even Harvard academics. How often do professionals snitch on their colleagues? Why do they urge ordinary civilians, especially poor teenagers to snitch on their colleagues? Cambridge residents live under the guidance of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government's academic morality. Every time I write something negative about a city official or a Harvard celebrity the next day, sometimes the same day thugs threaten me, provoke me or keep me under surveillance using campus cops or city police employees. Intimidating a person in the free exercise of a constitutionally guaranteed rights is a felony under MA state laws. In Cambridge laws are optional. Three city employees won large settlements (one for $10 million) for retaliation by the City Manager. Retaliation is the rule not the exception in Cambridge. Why should it be any different in poor Boston neighborhoods? Why should there be one rule for the rich and another for the poor?

http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_1109stop_snitchin_moves_online_officials_say_culture_alive_and_well/

T-shirt controversy.  Designer...
Photo by Renee DeKona
T-shirt controversy. Designer Antonio Ansaldi with the Stop Snitchin’ shirt he designed and the Stop Killing shirt designed by Tina Chery.

Stop Snitchin’ moves online
Officials say culture alive and well
By Natalie Sherman and Colneth Smiley Jr.
Boston Herald
Wednesday, November 9, 2011

* * *
http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_1111help_stop_the_cycle_of_violence_/

Help stop the cycle of violence ...
By Boston Herald Staff
Friday, November 11, 2011

November 27, 2010

Snitching for Thee But Not For Me?

Nee raises a great point regarding the way that politicians stick together-the thick swamp line? They expect teenagers to snitch on their colleagues but the politicians remain silent about their colleagues' misdeeds. Politicians, doctors, academics and lawyers seldom snitch on their colleagues. Do police snitch on police?

http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1292275

Cop union president Thomas Nee blasts councilor Mike Ross over video criticism
By O’Ryan Johnson
Boston Herald
Thursday, October 28, 2010

March 30, 2010

Snitching Only for Teachers and Students?

Eagan asks how can any responsible adult stand by and allow this to happen? Huh? How many police officers stand by and allows criminal abuse by their colleagues? How many journalists stand by and allow plagiarism by a colleague? How many politicians stand by and allow criminal abuses by colleagues? How many doctors stand by etc. Have you ever thought about human nature? I do not want to get involved. No snitchin' is the rule among professionals and officials alike. Why are students and teachers expected to snitch?

http://bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1243309

Educators could have stopped the torture

By Margery Eagan
Boston Herald
Tuesday, March 30, 2010

December 6, 2009

Source of Hatred of Police


Malkin asks, "From where does the deadened and deadly callousness toward the thin blue line come?"

If she has to ask she is unaware of police abuses. No matter how small the number of abusive police officers are it discredits all of the good officers who would never abuse their power. Police protect each other. Similarly doctors never snitch on other doctors. How many politicians expose criminal conduct of their colleagues? Surely Malkin saw the video clip showing Rodney King being beat by officers. Has she never read about how police murdered Black Panthers in Chicago?

Rap performers are not the only source of hatred of police.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_war_on_cops_is_getting_worse_JIIWNWBzVt2IiJNfJysbrN

The war on cops is getting worse
Michelle Malkin
New York Post
Last Updated: 10:42 AM, December 5, 2009
Posted: 12:40 AM, December 5, 2009

October 3, 2009

Snitchin on Neighbors


"IRSnitches
The number of Americans turning in neighbors, clients and employers to the IRS to collect a reward quadrupled last year to 476, with more than onetenth of the cases alleging tax cheating in excess of $100 million, the agency said. Whistle blowers last year provided the identities of 1,246 taxpayers accused of owing at least $2 million each, the IRS said."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/business_briefs_udlouBnTzQM6MehNp58IoJ

Business Briefs
AP, Bloomberg, Reuters and Dow Jones
New York Post
Last Updated: 3:39 AM, October 2, 2009
Posted: 1:27 AM, October 2, 2009

June 10, 2009

No Snitchin' at Harvard

This letter was published in the Boston Herald on June 11, 2009 here

http://bostonherald.com/news/opinion/letters/view.bg?articleid=1178178

or

http://tinyurl.com/lskghw

No snitchin' rules at Harvard. Why do police expect young people in poor neighborhoods to snitch on drug dealers and shooters, when privileged members of the Harvard community remain silent. If doctors, lawyers, police and politicians do not snitch on their colleagues why should poor people snitch on their associates?

http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2009_06_10_2nd_arrest_made_in_Harvard_University_slaying/

or

http://tinyurl.com/mjvxk6

2nd arrest made in Harvard University slaying
By Jessica Fargen
Boston Herald
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 -

* * *

http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/06/second_arrest_i.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/kkqkwc


Second arrest in Harvard University killing
By John Ellement,
Boston Globe
June 10, 2009 07:59 AM

February 5, 2008

No Snitching for Me but Not for Thee?

No Snitching for Me but not for Thee?

Two factors never heard regarding the snitching issues is the role modeling
of public officials and professionals. (Maria Cramer, "Judge targets
no-snitching culture," Boston Globe, November 23, 2007) Why are youths expected
to snitch on their colleagues? How many police snitch on other police officers?
How many lawyers? How many doctors? How many politicians? This suggests that
young people will experience no retaliation.
It is very difficult to fool young people these days with easy access to
the internet and TV. They know how the world works at a much younger age. If you
want to change the way the courts work you need to begin with the folks who run
the courts and then the folks who write the laws.

Roy Bercaw, Editor ENOUGH ROOM

Judge targets no-snitching culture
Invites city teens to court for video and straight talk
By Maria Cramer
Boston Globe Staff
November 23, 2007

The 12 middle school students had just finished watching an instructional video
produced to help break down the "no snitching" culture in Boston when a court
volunteer asked them a series of questions.
more stories like this

How many have heard shootings at night?

Every hand went up.

How many knew someone who had been shot?

At least seven raised their hands.

Finally, how many have ever reported gunfire to police?

This time, no one raised an arm.

The children's response is why court officials have been showing the video "You
Be the Judge" to hundreds of fifth- and sixth-graders since January. The video,
filmed by the Huntington Theatre Company, tells the fictional story of a Boston
teenager named Bobby Wilson who is left holding a gun his friend used to shoot
another teenager after a drug deal gone wrong. Bobby is arrested when his
girlfriend, who had urged him to go to the police, refuses to hide the gun for
him. His fear of "snitching" leads to a first-degree murder charge and he is
left sitting morosely in a courtroom, filled with regret, as a jury decides his
fate.

On Monday, the 12 students - sixth-, seventh- and eighth-graders from the
McCormack Middle School in Dorchester - gathered in West Roxbury District Court
for a viewing.

The children were older than most of the students who have watched the video,
and some had already had brushes with the law. Court officials were worried they
would react cynically to the video.

As it played, the children did snicker occasionally, mocking the sometimes stiff
acting and melodramatic courtroom scenes. But they paid attention and stayed
quiet for most of the film.

"It was good," said Shawn Rowe, a serious, hazel-eyed 15-year-old, afterward.
"It seemed like something that could happen."

For others, the video lacked credibility.

"That video wasn't real. It was made by adults," said one 14-year-old
eighth-grader who declined to give his name. "If it had been done by kids, it
would have been way different."

Asked what he meant, he said that for one thing, most girls he knows would have
hidden their boyfriend's gun.

"My girl would take that hammy," he said, referring to the slang word for gun.

"I wouldn't," retorted Myiesha, a 14-year-old girl who asked that her last name
be withheld.

The video unleashed a torrent of discussion inside the judges lobby, where
Kathleen Coffey, the first justice of the West Roxbury court, had invited them
to view the film with probation and police officers.

The children debated whether Wilson should be found guilty and if his girlfriend
did the right thing - most of them believed she did. They then peppered Coffey
and the officers with questions about mandatory gun sentences, why juveniles are
sometimes charged as adults, and why police shoot to kill. In turn, the
officials asked the children why they do not turn to authority figures when they
witness an assault or are the victims of one.

"If you go to the principal, that's going to make things worse," Rowe said.
"Because they're going to come after you even more."

The video, which features police officers, court officials, and teenagers from
across the city, is part of Reinventing Justice, a volunteer program of police
officers, lawyers, and others run by Coffey and designed to make the courts more
accessible to the community.

Coffey said they decided to show the film to middle school students because they
are more likely influenced by its message than high school students, who have
formed firmer opinions about cooperating with police.

Middle school students are at "the turning point," she said. "You still have
their attention."

As the students prepared to leave her conference room for a tour of the
courthouse, Coffey told them she hoped they would reflect on what they discussed
that morning. They would be heading into her courtroom to watch defendants plead
their cases. Many of them, Coffey told them, are good people who made "bad
decisions."

"What we're talking about is serious," she said. "I pray every night and I'm
sure your parents pray every night that you will make good decisions."

Maria Cramer can be reached at mcramer@globe.com.
© Copyright 2007 Globe Newspaper Company.

November 23, 2007

In The Name of Good

In The Name of Good

Having police do child rearing will lead to worse abuses. ("Search for a
fix to Hub crime woes," Boston Herald, editorial, November 20, 2007) The longer
the absence of fathers in the home is ignored the longer this out-of-control
youth violence will continue.
Until lawyers, doctors, police and politicians begin snitching on their
colleagues the amount of violence will only increase. Young people are no longer
fooled about equal protection of the laws. They believe their own eyes over the
propaganda of the government and PR firms.
This is an instance of what George Bernard Shaw recognized as "The road to
Hell is paved with good intentions." Pre-Homeric Philosopher Cleobulous said,
"The Chief source of evil among men is excessive good." This is a clear example
of that.
If police see a 2-year-old with bruises will they ignore that? Who will own
the confiscated but not prosecuted drugs found by police searching for illegal
guns?

Roy Bercaw, Editor ENOUGH ROOM

Search for a fix to Hub crime woes
By Boston Herald editorial staff
Tuesday, November 20, 2007 - Updated 22h ago

We treasure our civil liberties in this country, but a proposal by police and
prosecutors to search for guns in the bedrooms of Boston teens - with explicit
permission from their parents - is not the privacy infringement that some
critics are suggesting.

It is instead a return to old-fashioned crime prevention - when worried parents
could trust a cop to step in and help, without fear the kid will be tossed in
jail.

“We have conversations with single mothers who express frustration in dealing
with teenagers who are uncontrollable,” said Boston Police Commissioner Ed
Davis. “In a community policing context, knocking on a door and asking . . . if
they would allow us to check their kids’ rooms for firearms may give them an
out.”

Davis and Suffolk District Attorney Dan Conley announced the new “Safe Homes”
program, in which police, accompanied by clergy, will seek consent from parents
(in writing) to search the home if their children are suspected of gang or gun
activity.

Police will act on tips from the community, which Davis points out, they already
have the option to do. The difference here is that if a gun is found, the DA
agrees not to prosecute unless it’s later determined the weapon was used in a
crime. Police will, of course, continue to seek warrants when they do suspect a
youth of involvement in a shooting.

There are those who say searching a home without a warrant (even with consent)
is wrong. Yes, it must be awfully nice to sit in an ivory tower and wax academic
about the “right thing” for parents in crime-torn neighborhoods who are
terrified for their kids. Saying no is an option, and Davis wants parents to
know it.

The Safe Homes initiative is an out-of-the-box approach to tackling Boston’s
youth violence problem. Let’s let it work.