Showing posts with label Security Cameras. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Security Cameras. Show all posts

January 19, 2015

Hidden Cameras in NYC Subways



Besides the hidden cameras, typical domed cameras are littered through the subway system.
Photo: J.C.Rice


Some of the pipes above your head in NYC’s subway stations are actually hidden cameras.
Photo: J.C.Rice

[From article]
The cameras date to as far back as the 1990s, MTA spokesman Kevin Ortiz said, but the agency revealed it prefers using other, equally covert “enhanced equipment” — even better cameras “that serve in a number of various capacities.”
Besides the hidden cameras, typical domed cameras are littered through the subway system.
The MTA described the cams as “antiquated” — yet some of the cameras found by The Post appeared to be housed in brand-new metal casings.
“They are covert cameras for high-priority areas or high crime,” one source noted. “They record, but can be monitored real-time if it’s deemed necessary.”
[. . .]
In all, there are more than 4,500 cameras throughout the subway system, according to the MTA.
Experts marveled at the cameras, which are housed in what look like electrical conduits.
“These are fascinating,” said Robert McCrie, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice’s Department of Security, Fire and Emergency Management. “What we are seeing is something very well adapted to the circumstance — not only in the sense that they look like a part of the industrial environment of the MTA, but also in the sense that they are positioned in ways to get people’s heads and shoulders.
“These add something different because the perp isn’t looking for it — because he doesn’t know what to look for,” the professor added.

http://nypost.com/2015/01/18/4500-cameras-in-nycs-subways-including-these-hidden-ones/

The hidden cameras in NYC’s subways
By Gary Buiso
New York Post
January 18, 2015 | 8:21am

June 30, 2014

Manchester NH Police Will Wear Cameras on Uniforms



[From article]
Two cases settled this month include a $57,500 lawsuit brought by Carla Gericke, president of the Free State Project, who was arrested in March 2010 for videotaping officers during a traffic stop, and a $300,000 settlement for the August 2013 killing of Alex Cora deJesus of Manchester during an undercover drug deal gone bad.
[. . .]
The small waterproof and rugged cameras are made by the Taser Company exclusively for law enforcement and are the Axon model. They come equipped with audio and can’t be manipulated. The video cannot be downloaded by the individual officers.

http://www.unionleader.com/article/20140627/NEWS07/140629163

June 26. 2014 9:50PM
Weare police officers to wear body cameras on patrol
By KATHLEEN BAGLIO HUMPHREYS
Union Leader Correspondent

August 13, 2012

Cameras Everywhere, 500 in NYC Subway



[From article]
People pointing cameras in New York are regarded as suspicious and the facial recognition images of them from the civilian CCTV are fed into a data centre run by U.S. firm Abraxas.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187602/U-S-Government-secretly-spying-using-civilian-security-cameras-say-Wikileaks.html

U.S. government is secretly spying on EVERYONE using civilian security cameras, say Wikileaks
Cameras use facial recognition to log people's activity
Details released by Wikileaks which has now been hacked in cyber attack
Disturbing echoes of CIA officials in hit film The Bourne Identity
By RICK DEWSBURY
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 04:13 EST, 13 August 2012 | UPDATED: 08:22 EST, 13 August 2012

May 8, 2012

Shocked to Find Images Captured by Digital Video. Huh?

Prominent media darling Jeffrey Denner, defense attorney extraordinaire, but electronics challenged, expressed outrage about crime captured on digital video. Welcome to the 20th (yes, twentieth) Century Mr. Denner. Retail outlets, banks and Harvard University use cameras for many years to help catch criminals. How is this different? The device name may differ but the process remains the same. Video images can be captured by a camera lens attached to a receiver. One more example of how remotely ignorant the law and lawyers are regarding technology now in use by law abiding citizens and criminals alike. 

[From article]
“Welcome to the worst aspect of the 21st century: cyber horror and its progeny. This is just one more step in a horrible direction,” said defense attorney Jeffrey Denner." 

http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1061130041&position=0

Experts foresee Web of horror Say killing allegedly caught on video chat is future of law
Boston Herald
By Matt Stout and Laurel J. Sweet
Tuesday, May 8, 2012

August 26, 2011

Facial Recognition Cameras Will Become Common

[From article]
"Once the stuff of science fiction and high-tech crime fighting, facial recognition technology has become one of the newest tools in marketing, even though privacy concerns abound.
The Venetian resort, hotel and casino in Las Vegas has started using it on digital displays to tailor suggestions for restaurants, clubs and entertainment to passersby."

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-facial-recognition-20110821,0,7327487.story

Advertisers start using facial recognition to tailor pitches
By Shan Li and David Sarno, Los Angeles Times
August 21, 2011
Los Angeles Times

August 10, 2011

SF Bus Cams Can See Under Your Clothes

[From article]
"The new technology allows the government to “track your eye movements, capture and record your facial dimensions for face-recognition processing, bathe you in X-rays to look under your clothes, and even image your naked body using whole-body infrared images that were banned from consumer video cameras because they allowed the camera owners to take ‘nude’ videos of people at the beach,” Mike Adams writes for Natural News."

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-funds-real-time-spy-cams-on-sf-buses/

DHS Funds Real-time Spy Cams on SF Buses
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 9, 2011

November 25, 2010

Big Sis Bringing Cameras to Houston

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7310659.html

Smile, if you're in downtown Houston
Homeland Security picking up tab for 250-300 surveillance cameras
By BRADLEY OLSON and ZAIN SHAUK
Copyright 2010 Houston Chronicle
Nov. 24, 2010, 10:15PM

March 28, 2009

No Spy Cameras But Computer Spying OK!


While the Cambridge City Council and the ACLU focus our attention on security cameras watching the public places, nefarious interests are scanning computers without any concern of these alleged privacy concerned humans. While there is no right to privacy in public there is a right to be secure in your home and papers, which computers are by extension. Why is this not a problem for the city Councilors who promoted wireless internet access which is even less secure than hard wired internet connections? Who got campaign contributions from wireless routing companies and equipment manufacturers? Why is the ACLU silent about this privacy abuse?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/technology/29spy.html

Vast Spy System Loots Computers in 103 Countries
By JOHN MARKOFF
New York Times
Published: March 28, 2009

Wide Cyber Attack Linked to China
TECHNOLOGY
MARCH 30, 2009
By Ben Worthen
Wall Street Journal

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123834671171466791.html

March 10, 2009

Clueless Cambridge Journalist


Is this why the Editors 'forgot' to publish Griffin's column? Other references to security cameras disappeared from their blog. Obama's local newspaper keeps the voters informed. Ahem! Why do Homeland Security cameras offend when others do not? Harvard and many private individuals have security cameras operating watching public spaces. They abuse their video tapes power worse than the government. Nothing like clueless voters to support or oppose something for irrational reasons. Amazing how many Cambridge elitists believe that cameras prevent crime. More amazing is that this long term citizen-columnist of the Conformist Party City does not know how the city works. It is a question for him whether the City Manager did this by himself? The unelected one man ruler boasts that he has the statutory power to make contracts in the name of the City. He tells the City Council they should be grateful that he informs them after the fact. Griffin, have you ever seen a City Council meeting? Do you know what form of government the city has? There is no civil or constitutional liberty to be free of cameras in a public space. It is well established law. There's no right to privacy in a public place. Do you really reject the fact that Bush prevented any further attacks on this country? The current mayor of the city of conformists wants a policeman on every corner but opposes the USA PATRIOT Act. How is that rational? For many years the Ashburton state office building required screening before entering. Did Bush control security at the State House? Mexican drug cartels are invading the country and you call them 'alleged terrorists?' Regarding the FBI, were you outraged when they allowed Bulger to murder 19 civilians? Were you comfortable while Joe Salvati, Peter Limone and two who died in prison were framed for murder and jailed for 30 years? Have you noticed that the FBI has not changed? Do you think the City police and the state police have any cameras in the City?

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1676795291/Griffin-Smile-your-picture-might-not-be-taken


Griffin: Smile, your picture might not be taken
By Richard Griffin/Growing Older
Cambridge Chronicle
Mon Mar 09, 2009, 11:48 AM EDT

February 12, 2009

Privacy?

Privacy?

The Cambridge City Council voted to prevent the Department of Homeland Security to operate surveillance cameras in the city. They allege that their privacy is of great concern. What legal acts do people do in public that they fear being exposed? But the City Council remains silent on the Obama proposal to put all medical records online. The history of computer security is atrocious. Yet there is no concern for having one’s medical records available to each and every government bureaucrat to share with the media or their friends? Hello? What are the priorities of these shameless, clueless and conscienceless officials?

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30674

Goodbye, America! It Was Fun While It Lasted
by Ann Coulter
Human Events
02/11/2009

January 8, 2009

Smile for the Cameras

Smile for the Cameras

[Five comments under this article all support street security cameras.] The Conformist Party speaks, 'We want security not freedom!' Washington Post reports that US Army deployed a brigade on Oct. 1, 2008 to assist local authorities. [One comment suggested that the cost of the cameras is not from the City tax base.] This is funded by the money tree too. Cameras help solve crime. [One comment suggested that cameras deter crime.] They do not deter or prevent crime. Do criminals think, 'Wait. Am I on TV? Maybe I shouldn't do this?' Cameras in jails, police stations and on patrol cars catch officers beating suspects. [One comment stated that the ACLU is run by criminals.] If the ACLU is run by criminals why not put cameras in their homes and offices? 'Through the wall' technology makes it easy to watch and to listen to civilians in their homes. US Supreme Court says (US v Kyllo) it is an illegal entry. Has that ever stopped criminal officials or crime families?

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x2094351180/Guest-commentary-Big-Brother-s-watching-and-you-should-be-concerned

Guest commentary: Big Brother’s watching… and you should be concerned
By Nancy Murray
Cambridge Chronicle
Wed Jan 07, 2009, 07:47 AM EST