January 8, 2009
Smile for the Cameras
Smile for the Cameras
[Five comments under this article all support street security cameras.] The Conformist Party speaks, 'We want security not freedom!' Washington Post reports that US Army deployed a brigade on Oct. 1, 2008 to assist local authorities. [One comment suggested that the cost of the cameras is not from the City tax base.] This is funded by the money tree too. Cameras help solve crime. [One comment suggested that cameras deter crime.] They do not deter or prevent crime. Do criminals think, 'Wait. Am I on TV? Maybe I shouldn't do this?' Cameras in jails, police stations and on patrol cars catch officers beating suspects. [One comment stated that the ACLU is run by criminals.] If the ACLU is run by criminals why not put cameras in their homes and offices? 'Through the wall' technology makes it easy to watch and to listen to civilians in their homes. US Supreme Court says (US v Kyllo) it is an illegal entry. Has that ever stopped criminal officials or crime families?
http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x2094351180/Guest-commentary-Big-Brother-s-watching-and-you-should-be-concerned
Guest commentary: Big Brother’s watching… and you should be concerned
By Nancy Murray
Cambridge Chronicle
Wed Jan 07, 2009, 07:47 AM EST
[Five comments under this article all support street security cameras.] The Conformist Party speaks, 'We want security not freedom!' Washington Post reports that US Army deployed a brigade on Oct. 1, 2008 to assist local authorities. [One comment suggested that the cost of the cameras is not from the City tax base.] This is funded by the money tree too. Cameras help solve crime. [One comment suggested that cameras deter crime.] They do not deter or prevent crime. Do criminals think, 'Wait. Am I on TV? Maybe I shouldn't do this?' Cameras in jails, police stations and on patrol cars catch officers beating suspects. [One comment stated that the ACLU is run by criminals.] If the ACLU is run by criminals why not put cameras in their homes and offices? 'Through the wall' technology makes it easy to watch and to listen to civilians in their homes. US Supreme Court says (US v Kyllo) it is an illegal entry. Has that ever stopped criminal officials or crime families?
http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x2094351180/Guest-commentary-Big-Brother-s-watching-and-you-should-be-concerned
Guest commentary: Big Brother’s watching… and you should be concerned
By Nancy Murray
Cambridge Chronicle
Wed Jan 07, 2009, 07:47 AM EST
Labels:
ACLU,
Crime,
Security Cameras,
Through the Wall Technology,
US v Kyllo
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment