Showing posts with label Old Boys Network. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Old Boys Network. Show all posts

January 31, 2016

New Book About Sexist Male Pigs On Wall Street



Maureen Sherry claims that the few women at Bear Stearns were sat together on what was disparagingly called ‘Estrogen Row’ by the men.

[From review]
When Maureen Sherry resigned from Bear Stearns after 10 years, she was given a going-away party, a sizable check — and a nondisclosure agreement.
“The legal department gave me this document to sign,” she says, and the money was a bribe: Don’t ever talk about the things you’ve seen here, or the way you were harassed, dehumanized, humiliated.
Sherry refused to sign and declined the check. “Me taking money,” she says, “wouldn’t help anyone coming up after me.”
Her forthcoming novel, “Opening Belle” (Simon & Schuster), a thinly fictionalized account of her 11 years on Wall Street, is the result.
[. . .]
For all of the horror stories she tells — the sexual degradation of female traders, the marginalization of women who were married or had kids — Sherry insists she didn’t have it so bad. A colleague may have guzzled her breast milk, and another may have left unwrapped condoms strewn in her pizza box, but, she says, “a lot of it was pranks. I never got groped.”
And herein lies the conflict so many women on Wall Street still struggle with: The very firms that have made them wealthy and successful have also abused them terribly — and like so many victims, many of these women feel it’s somehow their fault, their problem to fix.
Sherry points to Sallie Krawcheck, who was publicly fired from Bank of America during the mortgage crisis. Now “she runs Ellevate — it’s a membership thing for women. A lot of it’s about strategies, and how to work better with men.”
But why, she’s asked, should the onus be on women to work around men who treat them poorly?
[. . .]
A former colleague of Sherry’s, who asked not to be named, says it’s even worse than that. “Men getting b- - -jobs in front of staff — that happened all the time,” she says. “Lots of things that were extremely shocking, pretty disgusting.”
[. . .]




“Women filing complaints feel like it reflects poorly on them — that they are weak, non-team players,” Sherry says. “They don’t want to be labeled as a troublemaker. It’s a team environment, and they’ll ostracize themselves if they do so.”
Most everyone who goes to work on Wall Street is made to sign a U4 — a document stating that any grievances will be settled in-house. It’s meant to fend off sexual-harassment suits and fosters a secretive, hermetically sealed environment: Bad behavior stays behind closed doors.
[. . .]
In March 2010, three women filed a gender-bias suit against Bank of America, and in September, three women filed a sexual-discrimination suit against Goldman Sachs.
A refiling of that suit in 2015 claimed not just pay gaps and discrimination but that “Goldman condones the sexualization of women and an uncorrected culture of sexual assault and harassment.” One of the plaintiffs claims that she “was sexually assaulted by a married male colleague” after a business dinner, and that when she reported it to higher-ups, she was demoted.
In 2004 and 2007, Morgan Stanley settled two gender-discrimination suits for more than $100 million. The plaintiffs: thousands of women.
[. . .]
Then there are the male traders — less productive, less hardworking — who make double what the women do. Often, the excuse is that men can do what women cannot: comfortably entertain male clients on golf courses, at strip clubs and brothels.
[. . .]
For a moment — a super-brief, blink-and-you-miss-it-moment — there was a great discussion point after the 2008 financial collapse: Could the crisis have been averted, or at least mitigated, if there were more women in positions of power on Wall Street?
In 2014, in a column called “Eight Things I Wish for Wall Street,” author Michael Lewis wrote that women should be in charge.
“Men are more prone to financial risk-taking and overconfidence,” he wrote. “Trading is a bit like pornography: Women may like it, but they don’t like it nearly as much as men, and they certainly don’t like it in ways that create difficulties for society. Put them in charge of all financial decision-making and the decisions will be more boring, but more sociable.”
Sherry agrees. She also thinks there’s only one thing that could make Wall Street renounce its deplorable, chauvinistic attitude toward women: money. A 2014 report from the White House Council of Economic Advisers found that more women complete college and grad school than men, and make up a larger percentage of the work force.
That same year, Forbes magazine reported that women in their 20s without children out-earned their male peers. And a 2013 Pew Research Center report said women are now far more likely to be their family’s primary breadwinner.
That’s a lot of women with a lot of money to invest, and chances are high they’d rather not negotiate at a strip club.

http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/trader-exposes-the-disgusting-sexism-plaguing-wall-street/

http://nyp.st/20f9gSw

Watch Video: The horniest CEOs on the street


* * *
[From article]
A female former trader has lifted the lid on Wall St sexism and revealed how male colleagues mooed at her when she was lactating - and once drank her breast milk.
Maureen Sherry claims that the few women at Bear Stearns were sat together on what was disparagingly called ‘Estrogen Row’ by the men.
They were mocked as ‘fertile lassies’ and one man even knocked back a shot of breast milk she had stored in the office fridge.
Miss Sherry, 51, claimed that the sexism was so bad that in interviews women were asked if they were married and if they planned to marry.
Some were supposedly made to promise never to have children.
Miss Sherry made the revelations in her forthcoming novel Opening Belle, a thinly fictionalized account of her 11 years as a managing director at now defunct investment bank Bear Stearns in the 90s and 00s.
The book is due to be made into a film starring Reese Witherspoon that will come out later this year.
Miss Sherry, a mother-of-four who attended Cornell University and the Wharton School of Business, writes that on her first day on Wall St she opened up a pizza box to find condoms instead of pepperoni slices put there as a prank.
Men openly debated hiring women based on their looks and one young woman noticed that her interviewer - a man - had drawn her breasts at the top her CV.
In the trading room there was an area called ‘The Dais of the D****’ where the high earning men sat.
They would order women to come over with a microphone before subjecting them to Game of Thrones style humiliations, the book says.
Miss Sherry writes that at one point when she was walking to the company nurse’s office with a breast pump, some men made mooing noises at her.
Mooing happened on other occasions too when she was lactating.
Miss Sherry writes: ‘I ignored the time someone taped torn panties on my screen when I came back from my honeymoon.
‘I don’t want to hear slut jokes all day long. I don’t want to work in a frat house.’
Miss Sherry writes that she lost count of the times a woman shared an idea at a meeting - only for a man to take credit for it.
One male colleague told her that they should hire only ‘women who have brothers’ because they are used to the banter.
[. . .]
Miss Sherry quit, took an MFA from Columbia University in nonfiction writing and is now a writer and mother in New York.
Her husband Steven Klinsky, 59, works at a private equity firm in Manhattan.
Wall St has long been accused of sexism but has done little to address it despite a string of multi-million pound lawsuits brought by former female executive.
Miss Sherry's book seems similar to the account published last year by former Citigroup trader John LeFevre, who was born in the UK and worked in London and Hong Kong.
In ‘Straight to Hell’ he told how he and his colleagues threw thousands of dollars over a shopping mall balcony in Manila in the Philippines during a party.
The group laughing as they watched poor people scoop the cash up until the police told them to stop.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3425498/Former-New-York-trader-says-male-workers-MOOED-lactating-drank-breast-milk-d-stored-office-fridge.html

Former New York trader says male co-workers MOOED at her when she was lactating and drank the breast milk she'd stored in the office fridge
A female former trader has lifted the lid on Wall St's shocking sexism
Maureen Sherry claims that women at Bear Steams were mocked
She revealed how male colleagues mooed at her when she was lactating
Ms Sherry also said that her male colleagues once drank her breast milk
By DANIEL BATES FOR MAILONLINE IN NEW YORK
PUBLISHED: 14:10 EST, 31 January 2016 | UPDATED: 14:49 EST, 31 January 2016

October 16, 2015

Boys Need Love Too




With all of the focus on helping women develop their skills and achieve their dreams, when will someone establish a program for young men, e.g., Men's Only Leadership Development for Youth. Women are a majority in colleges and men will soon disappear from their role in baby production. What will they be good for? Will men be able to maintain any self esteem when they are no longer needed beyond objects of ridicule? Men need a MOLDY program.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20151015/NEWS/151017682

Cambridge Councilor Simmons and YWCA launch Gold Program
Posted Oct. 15, 2015 at 3:45 PM
Cambridge Chronicle

February 8, 2014

Harvard Graduates Courted After Graduation By Alumni Association


[From article]
Somehow Harvard students are marked for life. Faust hinted at it. They sense it. But there is a fundamental paradox in Harvard’s vision of success: its inconceivable opportunities are often predictable, the supposed flexibility of its expansive network confining. Successful Harvard grads follow well-tread paths that lead from campus to New York, Hollywood, and across the globe. If they go where the existing university network shapes their trajectory, it is too easy to remain within the Harvard bubble—obscuring the possibilities that exist outside of it.
[. . .]
Harvard maintains its strongest presence along the East Coast—55 percent of the 2013 graduating class reported relocating there, according to The Crimson’s Senior Survey. And New York may well be the one city where Harvard maintains a presence comparable to that of Boston: 13.5 percent of the Class of 2012 left for the Big Apple after Commencement, according to that year’s Senior Survey.
[. . .]
Jeff F. Solnet ’12, a former president of the Institute of Politics, started building his D.C network as an undergraduate coordinator for the organization’s “Summer in Washington” program,” connecting students working in D.C. for the summer with alumni in the city. 
[. . .]
affiliation with a university alone usually means almost nothing in Hollywood, where success is aided not by where you went but by who you know.
[. . .]
“Why shouldn’t you work with people that you think are talented and that you like and that you’re familiar with? Hopefully not at the cost of other types of diversity, but, you know….”
[you mean like people who went to other schools?]
[. . .]
It’s hard because Harvard’s not super conducive to helping you find any opportunities in the realm of public service,” she says.
[you mean to say that Obama is not doing public service?]
[. . .]
But this uneven perception is largely a result of unequal recruitment strategies across professions, says OCS Director Robin Mount. The most visible are those of the Fortune 500 companies who approach Harvard to recruit on campus in batches, willing to pay high price-tags that other industries cannot match.
[. . .]
“There are a lot of things Harvard students don’t learn to do that most other college students do—like pay your bills, cook a meal, and clean your bathroom.”
[. . .]
“The world really—excuse my French—does not give a whatever about what university I went to,” he says. “What are the real, substantive contributions you’re going to make? The fact that I went to Harvard might open a door, but then keeping that door open—you can’t just rely on Harvard.”
[This last comment is especially true. During my brief career in what is now called the IT field, I found the true geniuses went to small colleges and to state universities, and some had no degree at all.]  


http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2014/2/6/networking-after-harvard-scrutiny/

Club Harvard
The Postgraduate Social Network
By DELPHINE RODRIK,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
February 6, 2014

November 5, 2013

Extremist Women Identity Politicians Meet In Cambridge


[From article]
“Extremist Republicans don’t seem to understand that when women are paid what they are worth, families can put food on the table, pay for college, and save for retirement. In Congress, I’ll stand with Leader Pelosi to fight for women and make true progress for our families.”
[. . .]
Pelosi added, “We need women like Katherine Clark in Washington to help us further the fight against extremists who want to take back all the gains we have won. That’s why I’m here today to support her.”

Is this indicative of some of the problems with the politicians in Washington DC? First of all is Pelosi who famously said we have to pass the health care bill into law in order to learn what is in it. As a result 2,700 pages of statute followed by tens of thousands of regulations made the health care boondoggle a danger and damaging to the delivery of health care to the population. Pelosi has no shame. She joins Democratic US Rep. candidate Clark and MA State Rep. Marjorie Decker who has never held a real job before working as an aide to a state rep. She will probably spend her entire life with no real world experience living in the fantasy world of a legislature spending other people's money. 

More importantly these three women are (will be) elected to represent all the people of their political subdivision. Yet they openly speak for only one part, i.e. women, who are a majority of the population. That always includes the upper class women, children of upper class parents who never had to work for a living and enjoy special privileges as a women. At the same time these liberal women deny that conservative women like Sarah Palin are women at all. These liberal women may or may not be extremists. But for sure they are delusional and need to be evaluated by the nearest psychiatric clinic to be tested for their violence potential, and dangerousness to society. But more importantly they openly suggest they are not concerned with poor men who suffered injuries fighting for the nation in war or in domestic civil matters. The have no shame and continue to fight the Old Boys Network while trying to establish the Old Girls Network to replace it and do the same thing only for women. These are identity politician extremists. They work to divide the nation between men and women, assisting the Marxist agenda revealed by Chief KGB agent in the United States, Oleg Kalugin.


http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x529847602/Pelosi-Clark-and-Decker-come-together-at-Cambridge-College-women-s-forum

Pelosi, Clark and Decker come together at Cambridge College women’s forum
Cambridge Chronicle
Posted Nov 05, 2013 @ 01:25 PM

October 30, 2009

Paradigm of The Wire


What difference did it make in The Wire who was Mayor, who was Police Commissioner or who controlled the corners? The struggle for more power continued. Only the players changed. How is this different from what is happening in DC or MA? Governments are controlled by economic interest groups. At Harvard the Old Boys Network is now under control of women but the system remains intact.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=529853

HBO’s “The Wire” Earns Credits
Published On Friday, October 30, 2009 1:28 AM
By STEPHANIE B. GARLOCK
Harvard Crimson
Contributing Writer