Showing posts with label Marc McGovern. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marc McGovern. Show all posts

November 24, 2015

In The Name of Good Ignoring Rights Of Persons With Disabilities




Councilor and social worker, Marc McGovern knows the lingo of local politics, paying obeisance to the list of victim groups (zip code?). He omits the one group to which he ministers, i.e., those with disabilities. He promises efforts "increasing human services programs," the business of treating those he omits from the list deserving rights as victims. 
Most importantly he knows to say one thing and do the opposite. He says, "I hope that all of us [. . .] find a way to appreciate our different opinions." Yet when it comes to defending speech that he and the PC crowd hates, he remains silent. Not a surprise.

[From article]
increasing human services programs,
[. . .]
Cambridge must ensure that every resident, regardless of race, class, age, gender, sexual orientation or zip code, has the opportunity for a safe, supportive and sustainable future.
[. . .]
I hope that all of us [. . .] find a way to appreciate our different opinions

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20151124/NEWS/151127883

LETTER: Councilor McGovern thanks Cambridge voters
Posted Nov. 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle
To the editor:
Marc McGovern, city councilor

October 28, 2015

Updated: Cambridge Chronicle and City Councilors Condemn Protected Speech


Posted October 27, 2015 5:45 PM ET; Last updated October 28, 2015 7:45 PM ET



"'based on this information, that’s not something we want to be a part of,' said Councilor Marc McGovern," a social worker in diversity saturated, conformist Cambridge, MA. He says he works with the most vulnerable population. Who is more vulnerable in Cambridge, MA than a person who holds different views than the majority, 10-20 years ago or even at present? There is no support for offensive speech, called hate speech, which is protected by the US and the Massachusetts Constitutions, in this allegedly tolerant city. There is also no compassion from this politically motivated social worker who shows lack of support for the Constitution he swore to protect. Under the Civil Rights statute of Massachusetts MGL Ch. 265, Sec 37, intimidating a person in the free exercise of a constitutionally protected right is a felony. Stormfront promotes nationalism, not supremacy. Notice the Chronicle's neutral recognition of a black separatist organization, whose forum was attended by most of the city council and school committee candidates in Cambridge last week. Use of the word supremacism, may more properly be applied to the Cambridge chapter of black separatists and nationalists who ran that candidate forum.




[From updated version]
[Councilor Mazen said] we didn’t know about the offensive views from his past and condemn those views in the strongest terms, I am confident that he has become a promoter of diversity now

Here is a public official condemning protected speech, violating his oath of office. That can be intimidating, and a chilling effect on a civilian. The Councilor mentions diversity, without defining what he means. Certainly he does not mean diversity of opinion. Few persons in Cambridge support diversity of opinions. The comments by Mr. Sanzone show he does not assert his right to express his unpopular opinions, opinions protected by the US and Massachusetts Constitutions. He appears to be intimidated by the reactions of Cambridge politicians and voters who disagree with his ten-year-old expression. His fear and intimidation is not unique. Many people fear being called racist, homophobe, Islamophobe and sexist if they express their opinion on contemporary controversial issues. It shows that the prevailing doctrine in this nation is to censor speech which may offend some person, or hurt his feelings. That is what the protection of the First Amendment and the concept of free speech is all about. Speech you like does not need protection. Shameful that so very few understand that. And fewer who do, refuse to stand up and assert their right to hear unpopular speech. Yet they seldom disagree with hateful and misguided expression that is published by mainstream publications calling for the deaths of Americans, Israel, Jews, and Christians. Is there a lack of critical thinking ability in this nation among voters, and elected officials?


* * *

[From article]
“We were welcoming him to the slate, but, based on this information, that’s not something we want to be a part of,” said Councilor Marc McGovern, a Unity Slate member.



http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20151026/NEWS/151026521/?Start=1
UPDATED: Cambridge council candidate resigns after past online hate speech revealed

By Amy Saltzman
asaltzman (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted Oct. 26, 2015 at 5:51 PM
Updated at 1:16 PM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

September 16, 2014

Reinventing The Wheel, By Denying It Exists



Marc McGovern, Cambridge City Councilor, Chairman of Spending Other People's Money Committee

Former social worker, vigorous advocate for the psychiatric industry, Cambridge City Councilor McGovern promotes income distribution for poor residents of Cambridge. He does not advocate that public officials contribute part of their taxpayer salaries to help ease poverty. Politicians seldom spend their own money, when they can spend other people's money. McGovern cites statistics as politicians love to do, without explaining what they mean. The City Councilor uses uncertain certitude when he says, "As anyone residing in Cambridge knows, it takes far more to reside in our city." More than what? Where? How much does it cost to live in a homeless shelter, or on the streets? 

He elaborates on the "effects" of poverty, saying they are well documented. But he ignores a well documented fact that politicians refuse to recognize. The fact that single parent families are more likely to live in poverty than two parent families. The rate of single parents of black American families is an outrage in the USA. This is not a new problem. Daniel Patrick Moynihan recognized it many years ago. Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams often write about it. Here's the latest from Williams.

[From Williams' article]
In 1950, female-headed households were 18 percent of the black population. Today it's close to 70 percent. One study of 19th-century slave families found that in up to three-fourths of the families, all the children lived with the biological mother and father. In 1925 New York City, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households. Herbert Gutman, author of "The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750-1925," reports, "Five in six children under the age of six lived with both parents." Also, both during slavery and as late as 1920, a teenage girl raising a child without a man present was rare among blacks.
[. . .]
The black illegitimacy rate in 1940 was about 14 percent; black illegitimacy today is over 70 percent, and in some cities, it is over 80 percent.
[. . .]
Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of the time, the murderer is another black person. Though blacks are 13 percent of the nation's population, they account for more than 50 percent of homicide victims. Nationally, the black homicide victimization rate is six times that of whites, and in some cities, it's 22 times that of whites. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, between 1976 and 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims. Coupled with being most of the nation's homicide victims, blacks are also major victims of violent personal crimes, such as assault, rape and robbery.
[. . .]
If it is assumed that problems that have a devastating impact on black well-being are a result of racial discrimination and a "legacy of slavery" when they are not, resources spent pursuing a civil rights strategy will yield disappointing results.

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/williamns082714.php3

Blacks Must Confront Reality

By Walter Williams
Published August 27, 2014

[From McGovern's article]
A recent study completed by the Cambridge Community Development Department indicated that Cambridge has a poverty rate of 14.4 percent for individuals and in certain subgroups, such as black and Latino, the poverty rate is as high as 30 percent. It is important to keep in mind that this study uses the federal standards of poverty. By federal standards, an individual earning less than $11,670 and a family of four earning less than $23,850 in combined income is living in poverty. As anyone residing in Cambridge knows, it takes far more to reside in our city.
[. . .]
The effects of poverty are well documented. Health issues, mental health issues, hunger and poor nutrition, homelessness and housing instability, substance abuse, crime, poor education, are all impacted by poverty. Children living in poverty are more likely to die in infancy, more likely to have hospital stays, more likely to repeat a grade in school, more likely to drop out of school, and more likely to engage in violence or other maladaptive behaviors. A community can be judged on how well it cares for its most vulnerable. In Cambridge, we do a very good job caring for those in need, we have many programs designed to support our neighbors, but we can do better.
[. . .]
The goals of the Income Insecurity Commission are as follows.

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20140916/NEWS/140917204

GUEST COLUMN: A tale of two cities – Income insecurity right at home
By Councilor Marc McGovern
Posted Sep. 16, 2014 @ 2:03 pm
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

May 22, 2013

Another Misguided Cambridge Voter






Talk about misinformed voters, this letter is obviously written by a misguided taxpayer. Peter Wilson seems to think that public schools exist to educate students, to teach them skills. Silly man is living in the past. Today's modern World Class Schools are focused on increasing union dues so that union leaders can improve their living standards, give more money to politicians so that they can get even more taxpayer funds next year. More union-dues-paying psychologists are needed in the schools so that they can eliminate bullying, and teach students to sit in place or get drugged until they do so. Councilor and State Rep. Decker fights for this priority with School Committee Members Marc McGovern and Richard Harding. Cambridge is number one in spending taxpayer funds and that is all that matters. First priority is that Cambridge students learn to hate America. Second and third are what diversity and multiculturalism mean to a civil society. Fourth is obedience to authority. When Councilor Decker, the conscience of the City, is upset it is not right. Wake up Wilson. You sound like a bitter white man who is clinging to his guns and religion. Get with it. Join the Unions.

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1039445833/LETTER-A-Cambridge-budget-spurned#axzz2U2WX1RqW

LETTER: A Cambridge budget spurned
Wicked Local Cambridge
Posted May 21, 2013 @ 04:03 PM
Peter Wilson, Huron Avenue

October 26, 2009

Politics Ruins Schools


Unsure that Craig Kelley's assessment of Cambridge as the standard for success "in a diverse urban environment" is merited. Having elitist universities makes it more difficult to focus public attention on public secondary schools. Children of Cambridge academics mostly attend private schools and have little interest in the public schools. New York City with a population 70 times greater attracts relatively much more attention on public schools than Cambridge does. Having a zombie-like electorate which supports political tampering with school time promoting non educational political issues over basic learning is why Cambridge fails to succeed with all of its funding. The focus is political not educational. Having a Mayor who teaches bad lessons to students is only one example of why this city fails. Not even the local newspaper recognizes the problem.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=529722

Nolan, McGovern for Cambridge
Published On Sunday, October 25, 2009 10:25 PM
Harvard Crimson
By PARAS D. BHAYANI