Showing posts with label Civilian Trials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civilian Trials. Show all posts

June 25, 2016

CAIR Must Stand Trial For RICO Fraud Complaint, U.S. Court of Appeals Orders




[From article]
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) will stand trial on charges of fraud and cover up for alleged crimes perpetrated against hundreds of victims, according to a new ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.



The case against CAIR National was originally dismissed by a federal judge but unanimously overturned by the appellate court. Two cases are involved in the suit, which the appellate court consolidated into one, since both cases involve racketeering, a federal RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) crime.
The lawsuits claim that CAIR National was aware that Morris Days, the “Resident Attorney” and “Manager for Civil Rights” at the now defunct CAIR-Maryland/Virginia chapter in Herndon, Virginia, was in fact not an attorney and that he failed to provide legal services for clients who came to CAIR for legal representation.



Moreover, the suits claim, CAIR knew of this fraud and purposefully conspired with Days to keep the CAIR clients from discovering that their legal matters were being mishandled or not handled at all. In addition, the complaints allege that, according to CAIR’s own internal documents, there were hundreds of victims of the fraud scheme.
While the original federal judge in the case ruled that Days and CAIR’s Virginia chapter were liable for fraud, he concluded that CAIR National was not responsible for Days’ conduct. The appeals court, however, found that, upon a review of the evidence, there was a direct relationship between CAIR National and Days.



David Yerushalmi, senior counsel for the plaintiffs in the case and co-founder of the American Freedom Law Center, remarked, “CAIR engaged in a massive criminal fraud in which literally hundreds of CAIR clients have been victimized.
[. . .]



The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has a history of Islamist extremism including links to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. The U.S. Justice Department labeled CAIR an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a Hamas-financing trial and listed CAIR as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity.
CAIR was also listed by the Justice Department as a part of the Brotherhood’s covert “Palestine Committee” to support Hamas in the United States.
In addition, CAIR was officially designated a terrorist organization on by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on November 15, 2014. 

https://www.clarionproject.org/news/cair-stand-trial-massive-fraud-0#

CAIR to Stand Trial for Massive Fraud
The Council on American Islamic Relations is now charged with fraud and cover up perpetrated against hundreds of victims.
Wed, June 22, 2016

June 12, 2015

NYC Man, 22, Held Without Trial For Three Years in NYC Kills Himself



Kalief Browder, 22, Took His Own Life After Being Held Three Years Without Trial In Rikers Island, NYC Jail

[From article]
In May 2010, 10 days before Kalief’s 17th birthday, he and a friend were arrested after a man accused them of stealing his backpack and Kalief of striking him in the face, which led to Kalief being charged with robbery, grand larceny and assault.
His friend was not held behind bars. Although Kalief insisted he’d done nothing wrong, a judge set his bail at $3,000, a sum his parents were unable to raise, because he was on probation. After his indictment, another judge ordered him held without bail because of his probationary status. He was locked up in the vast city jail on Rikers Island — for three years — awaiting a trial that never came.
He was held in solitary confinement for about two years, punishment for fighting and other infractions, his lawyer Paul Prestia told me.
A security video from inside Rikers showed him being slammed to the ground and pummeled by a correction officer as his hands were cuffed behind his back. Another showed him being beaten by about 10 teen inmates.
[. . .]
A prosecutor offered him a deal allowing him to plead guilty to felonies in exchange for a sentence of 3½ years in prison, then 2 ½.
Then a judge offered to let him plead guilty to two misdemeanors and go free immediately.
In each case, he refused. He wanted to stand trial.
Then by 2013, the guy who’d accused Kalief and his pal of robbing him had returned to Mexico and could not be located by authorities.
Charges were dropped. Kalief was sent home.
But he never really was free.

http://nypost.com/2015/06/11/the-tragedy-of-kalief-browder-must-never-happen-again/

The tragedy of Kalief Browder must never happen again
By Andrea Peyser
New York Post
June 11, 2015 | 11:19pm

September 29, 2014

Courts Failing To Function As Expected




[From article]
The adversarial process, the foundation of our criminal justice system, has become an inquisitorial process that fails to produce fair trials. Or even trials. "In 1963, nearly 15 percent of all federal defendants went to trial; in 2010, the figure was 2.7 percent." All this, exacerbated by funding disparities between prosecutors and publicly provided defense lawyers, is one reason the United States has the world's highest incarceration rate. "In most cases," Patton says, myriad factors push defendants toward "folding without a fight."

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will082314.php3

Indigent defense crisis

By George Will
Published August 23, 2014


May 6, 2014

Former Massachusetts Probation Chief's Trial Begins


[From article]
In the words of a federal prosecutor, John O’Brien is being charged with running the Probation Department “like a candy store,” doling out Probation jobs across the state to his friends in state government and the judiciary.
[. . .]
In other words, a large hunk of the state’s political establishment may well end up in federal court over the next couple of months, brought there by a guy whose alleged currency was probation jobs.

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/peter_gelzinis/2014/05/gelzinis_question_for_jurors_is_who_do_you_know

Gelzinis: Question for jurors is: Who do you know
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
By: Peter Gelzinis
Boston Herald

November 15, 2013

Bulger Trial Missed Opportunity to Expose Police and FBI Corruption








[From article]
Had Bulger testified, Wyshak said, “I would have walked him through all the charges in the indictment, all the murders and extortions. I would have asked about his relationships with John Connolly and John Morris, and other corrupt law enforcement agents. It would have been about exposing people who have been hiding in the shadows all these years. The statute of limitations may have run out on some, but we’re all about exposing wrongdoing and achieving justice.”
[. . .]
Make no mistake, it takes no business acumen to take money from folks on the other side of a gun.’’

Mr. Wyshak may be sincere in his desire to expose corrupt officials who enabled Bulger's reign of terror. But the failure of the Justice Department to investigate fully the criminal abuses and malfeasance indicated that the government attorneys did not want to expose all of the corruption. John Durham's fantasy that only Connolly was a problem made it clear they were  unwilling to investigate the police and the FBI thoroughly.
It is not only Bulger who steals money using guns. The IRS does the same thing with more firepower than  Bulger could ever assemble.


http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x919106205/MARGARET-MCLEAN-Dramatic-Bulger-trial-impacted-nearly-all-of-us

MARGARET MCLEAN: Dramatic Bulger trial impacted nearly all of us
By Margaret McLean
For The Patriot Ledger
Posted Nov 15, 2013 @ 04:11 AM

December 3, 2009

Civilian Trials for Terrorist Combatants


"If Holder and Obama are telling the truth, they have a problem.

The attorney general has no constitutional or statutory authority to unilaterally order the Defense Department to hand over military detainees so they can stand trial in civilian court.

[. . .]

The only one who does have the authority is the superior of both the AG and the defense secretary: President Obama himself.

Evidently, this hasn't yet dawned on the administration."

[. . .]

The Rasmussen Poll found that Americans disapprove of the decision 51 percent to 29 percent, with 19 percent uncertain.

Holder endured withering criticism for "his" decision in the Senate on Wednesday.

[. . .]

Whatever happened to President Harry Truman's principle that "the buck stops here?"

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/ksm_trial_it_obama_call_qCVFkytic40EUO6kf107qL

KSM trial: it's Obama's call
By KRIS W. KOBACH
New York Post
Last Updated: 7:29 AM, November 21, 2009
Posted: 1:02 AM, November 21, 2009