July 23, 2010
Psychiatry Mocks the Constitution
Does the definition of erotomania apply to politicians too? Each form of bizarre behavior whether or not illegal has its own mental illness. These "illnesses" (made up by consensus) are always treatable with drugs that may cause violence or deformed babies. Psychologists and psychiastrists are always able to make diagnoses without ever having met their "clients." What allows all of these irrational protocols to make use of the courts to take an individual's freedom and to force drug usage? If the behavior is a crime arrest the violator. If not get this unconstitutional mumbo jumbo boondoggle out of the court system.
[From article]
"The two men, Peyton and Weldon, who were allegedly in pursuit, appear to be textbook cases of celebrity stalkers, both with extensive histories of mental illness.
[. . .]
Webster’s dictionary defines erotomania as a “psychological disorder marked by the delusional belief that one is the object of another person’s love or sexual desire.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-23/jennifer-aniston-and-sandra-bullocks-celebrity-stalkers-/?cid=sexybeast:mainpromo3
What Was Jennifer's Stalker Thinking?
[From article]
"The two men, Peyton and Weldon, who were allegedly in pursuit, appear to be textbook cases of celebrity stalkers, both with extensive histories of mental illness.
[. . .]
Webster’s dictionary defines erotomania as a “psychological disorder marked by the delusional belief that one is the object of another person’s love or sexual desire.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-23/jennifer-aniston-and-sandra-bullocks-celebrity-stalkers-/?cid=sexybeast:mainpromo3
What Was Jennifer's Stalker Thinking?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment