October 8, 2009
US Intelligence is a Bureaucracy
"Battered by politicized criticism and with CIA agents threatened with prosecution for keeping our country safe, the agencies have gone into what the Army calls "full hull defilade": They're just ducking the bullets, rather than fighting."
[. . .]
"If a top-of-the-game analyst had walked into his boss's office on Sept. 10, 2001, and warned that a few low-budget Arab terrorists soon would stage a complex aerial ballet that would slaughter thousands of Americans, ravage landmarks and set our country on the path to multiple wars, he would've been told to go home and get some rest."
[. . .]
"So cutting-edge analysis and the rare analysts who can perform it get shunted aside by a system wary of disturbing the peace."
[. . .]
"But you can't footnote the future. Superb analysis is the product of talent, seasoning and moral courage. By demanding documentation of developments that haven't yet occurred, we cripple analysis and neglect the country's security."
[. . .]
"If the satellites don't show it, we don't know it. Our allies are worried about Iranian nukes. Washington's worried about careers. The inevitable result? You'll hear the words "intelligence failure" again. Ralph Peters' new novel is "The War After Armageddon."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/spy_vs_spy_on_iran_nuke_drive_X13Z6uzK9C60WeibsxI1bO
Spy vs. spy on Iran's nuke drive
By Ralph Peters
New York Post
Updated: 4:10 AM, October 7, 2009
Posted: 1:11 AM, October 7, 2009
"Battered by politicized criticism and with CIA agents threatened with prosecution for keeping our country safe, the agencies have gone into what the Army calls "full hull defilade": They're just ducking the bullets, rather than fighting."
[. . .]
"If a top-of-the-game analyst had walked into his boss's office on Sept. 10, 2001, and warned that a few low-budget Arab terrorists soon would stage a complex aerial ballet that would slaughter thousands of Americans, ravage landmarks and set our country on the path to multiple wars, he would've been told to go home and get some rest."
[. . .]
"So cutting-edge analysis and the rare analysts who can perform it get shunted aside by a system wary of disturbing the peace."
[. . .]
"But you can't footnote the future. Superb analysis is the product of talent, seasoning and moral courage. By demanding documentation of developments that haven't yet occurred, we cripple analysis and neglect the country's security."
[. . .]
"If the satellites don't show it, we don't know it. Our allies are worried about Iranian nukes. Washington's worried about careers. The inevitable result? You'll hear the words "intelligence failure" again. Ralph Peters' new novel is "The War After Armageddon."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/spy_vs_spy_on_iran_nuke_drive_X13Z6uzK9C60WeibsxI1bO
Spy vs. spy on Iran's nuke drive
By Ralph Peters
New York Post
Updated: 4:10 AM, October 7, 2009
Posted: 1:11 AM, October 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment