May 8, 2009
Protected Speech
[Posted May 8, 2009 as a comment on Phoenix online. But it was deleted.]
[An edited version of this letter was published in the May 22, 2009 edition of the Boston Phoenix (see link below.]
Phoenix editors object to Jay Severin calling illegal aliens "the world's lowest of primitives." WTKK's Michelle McPhee and a great many police officers refer to criminals who are citizens as "dirt bags," and "scum bags." These are not human characteristics. Why no objection? Why is the Phoenix silent on allowing Bill Ayers an admitted bomber to speak at Brandeis? Why is his speech protected more than Severin's?
Phoenix editors say Severin's speech should be "unacceptable," while citing no standard. Calling illegal aliens "primitives" does not "deny the basic humanity of Mexicans." Severin insults illegal aliens as a special form of humans, unlike being a "dirt bag." Eric Holder insulted white Americans. Why is the Phoenix silent?
The editors affirmed "Severin's constitutional right to say what he said" suggesting that just because he can, does not mean he should say it.
The editors say, "his on-air presence does nothing to enrich or elevate public debate" with no supporting evidence. Why not compare Severin to Ayers or Rev. Jeremiah Wright?
Just because the Phoenix editors can write editorials, does not mean that they should.
* * *
[Edited version published at this link. Third letter from the top.]
http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/83883-Fascism-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/
or
http://tinyurl.com/oz8kg2
* * *
[Comment posted May 9, 2009 on Phoenix online.]
Phoenix editors lament dehumanizing hate speech toward illegal aliens. Severin's comments are derogatory not dehumanizing. If dehumanizing speech is an evil to be denounced, why are the editors silent about dehumanizing speech toward persons with disabilities? Police, journalists, medical professionals, and court employees regularly dehumanize persons with disabilities calling them diseases. Why is saying a person is a "paraplegic" or a "schizophrenic" OK with the Phoenix editors? If a major concern of the Phoenix is hate speech and equal rights, why do the editors ignore widespread abuses of persons with disabilities? Is there bigotry at the Phoenix?
* * *
Roy Bercaw, CEO and Founder
North American Pirate Defense League
http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/82542-Bostons-Severin-problem/
Boston's Severin problem
Is WTKK up to measuring degrees of intolerance?
EDITORIAL
May 6, 2009
[Posted May 8, 2009 as a comment on Phoenix online. But it was deleted.]
[An edited version of this letter was published in the May 22, 2009 edition of the Boston Phoenix (see link below.]
Phoenix editors object to Jay Severin calling illegal aliens "the world's lowest of primitives." WTKK's Michelle McPhee and a great many police officers refer to criminals who are citizens as "dirt bags," and "scum bags." These are not human characteristics. Why no objection? Why is the Phoenix silent on allowing Bill Ayers an admitted bomber to speak at Brandeis? Why is his speech protected more than Severin's?
Phoenix editors say Severin's speech should be "unacceptable," while citing no standard. Calling illegal aliens "primitives" does not "deny the basic humanity of Mexicans." Severin insults illegal aliens as a special form of humans, unlike being a "dirt bag." Eric Holder insulted white Americans. Why is the Phoenix silent?
The editors affirmed "Severin's constitutional right to say what he said" suggesting that just because he can, does not mean he should say it.
The editors say, "his on-air presence does nothing to enrich or elevate public debate" with no supporting evidence. Why not compare Severin to Ayers or Rev. Jeremiah Wright?
Just because the Phoenix editors can write editorials, does not mean that they should.
* * *
[Edited version published at this link. Third letter from the top.]
http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/83883-Fascism-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/
or
http://tinyurl.com/oz8kg2
* * *
[Comment posted May 9, 2009 on Phoenix online.]
Phoenix editors lament dehumanizing hate speech toward illegal aliens. Severin's comments are derogatory not dehumanizing. If dehumanizing speech is an evil to be denounced, why are the editors silent about dehumanizing speech toward persons with disabilities? Police, journalists, medical professionals, and court employees regularly dehumanize persons with disabilities calling them diseases. Why is saying a person is a "paraplegic" or a "schizophrenic" OK with the Phoenix editors? If a major concern of the Phoenix is hate speech and equal rights, why do the editors ignore widespread abuses of persons with disabilities? Is there bigotry at the Phoenix?
* * *
Roy Bercaw, CEO and Founder
North American Pirate Defense League
http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/82542-Bostons-Severin-problem/
Boston's Severin problem
Is WTKK up to measuring degrees of intolerance?
EDITORIAL
May 6, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment