October 10, 2008

Doctor as Victim

Doctor as Victim

Dr. Diggs' rant concerning media distortions and drug industry greed is well documented. (Byron, Diggs, “No Transparency in Reporting,” Letter, Cambridge Chronicle, October 9, 2008) His questions about drug company lapdogs in the legislature are too kind.
But his plea on behalf of medical professionals as victims raises questions about his perspective. Diggs suggests doctors have no influence on public policy, or how journalists write about them. The AMA is one of the most powerful lobbies in the nation.

Doctors have a privileged position in society. They earn more money than most people. They get these perks because we expect that they will treat our illnesses when we get sick. Alas, they do not always do that. Whether they do good or harm has no effect on what pay and what privileges they enjoy.

Doctors sell their prestige signing (but not always writing) articles promoting drugs that have not been fully tested on humans. They exploit poor persons and taxpayers who subsidize health care for poor persons.

Why are law-abiding doctors silent when a negligent colleague kills a patient? Weeding out bad doctors would reduce malpractice insurance rates.

Regarding letters in medical journals who reads them besides drug companies and doctors? Why does Dr. Diggs refuse to recognize that doctors unlawfully discriminate in the way they treat persons with disabilities and poor persons?

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/opinions/x1374043759/Letter-Cost-containment-No-thanks

Roy Bercaw - Editor ENOUGH ROOM

No comments: