November 23, 2007

Not The Only City

Not The Only City

Councilor Toomey says removing Boy Scout collection boxes "had nothing to
do with politics; this event was politicized by the media, not by the city."
Imitating Bill Clinton Toomey suggests it depends on what the meaning of
"politics" is. (Tim Toomey, "Soldier on, Boy Scouts," Boston Herald, November
20, 2007)
He says, "I must remind those who are bashing Cambridge that we are the
first city in the state - and to my knowledge the country - that is offering
full salary and benefits to city employees who are overseas serving our country.
NYC provides full salary and benefits along with their military pay to city
employees. But they must repay (with hardship exceptions) the lower of the
military pay or the City salary when they return.
Councilor Toomey says removing Boy Scout collection boxes was "caused by an
apparent lack of communication." (His resolution (October 22, 2007; Resolution
36 "Urge all residents to participate in the Cambridge Boy Scouts Troop 45 and
Ship 45's Care Package Donation Drive to support our troops overseas.") carries
no power.
What was not communicated? It was not a City Council policy order.
Toomey states "Cambridge always has and will continue to support the men
and women from our city . . ." That allows them to ignore men and women for
other communities as far way as Somerville who fight for freedoms for the
moonbats in Cambridge.
Councilor Decker reads the names of the Killed In Action to oppose the war.
She exploits the deaths of men and women from other cities and states who fight
for her freedoms.
The City Council opposes the war because most of the Cambridge voters
oppose the war. The Councilors pander to whoever and whatever the cause, solely
to get re-elected. They have no beliefs other than getting re-elected.

Roy Bercaw, Editor ENOUGH ROOM

Soldier on, Boy Scouts
Donation drive OK in Cambridge
By Tim Toomey
Boston Herald
Tuesday, November 20, 2007 - Updated 18h ago

In light of recent events on Election Day in which Boy Scouts Troop 45 was asked
to remove donation boxes it had placed in Cambridge polling locations to collect
essential goods for local troops serving overseas, I think it is only
appropriate to clarify a few matters.

First, it is important to note that although over the past five years there has
been heated debate about the wars themselves, Cambridge always has and will
continue to support the men and women from our city who have bravely put their
lives on the line for our country.

On Oct. 22, I sponsored a City Council resolution in support of Troop 45 and its
effort to support the Cambridge military deployed overseas. The City Council
unanimously approved the resolution and went on record commending the Boy Scouts
on organizing the donation drive and urging all citizens to support the effort.

Resolutions like this one reflect the deep support Cambridge has for its
soldiers fighting abroad. The people of Cambridge understand that supporting our
troops and supporting the war those troops are fighting in are often two very
different things.

While this is an extremely unfortunate event, it was caused by an apparent lack
of communication and understanding rather than the malicious intent of any of
the parties involved.

Although the Scouts had informed the Election Commission of their intent and
received encouragement from the City Council, the individual polling locations
had not been notified in time and therefore had not granted the necessary
permissions to Troop 45. The decision had nothing to do with politics; this
event was politicized by the media, not by the city.

I must remind those who are bashing Cambridge that we are the first city in the
state - and to my knowledge the country - that is offering full salary and
benefits to city employees who are overseas serving our country. To say that we
do not care about the well-being of our troops is preposterous. The Home Rule
Petition that I sponsored on behalf of the City Council is one of the most
comprehensive benefit plans for our brave men and women.

Since the beginning of the military involvement in Afghanistan, City Councilor
Marjorie Decker has read the names of fallen soldiers from around the country
released by the Pentagon that week at each of our meetings. We do this to honor
and recognize the supreme sacrifice these heroes have made on behalf of our
country.

I encourage all those cities and towns looking down on Cambridge to examine
their own policies and see if they are on par with Cambridge.

While I am saddened by the disappointing outcome of the Boy Scouts’ donation
drive, I have also been extremely impressed by their resilience. While adults
have become entangled by the perceived politics of the situation, these Scouts
have served as impressive role models to us all by pushing forward unencumbered.
If any good has come of this, it has been the enormous outpouring of support
they have received from across the country.

I’m glad this incident has brought their admirable mission into the public eye,
and I encourage everyone to continue to show their support in this season of
giving by donating to the Boy Scouts of America.
Tim Toomey is vice mayor of Cambridge and a state representative.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Wow Roy,

That is an extremely long post not to make one good point. If NYC requires the soldiers to return their pay when they return home, it is not the same as Cambridge’s new law at all.

You ask “what was not communicated?” It seems like the lack of communication was in letting the boy scout leader know what he had to do to be granted the proper permissions. As you say yourself, the city council passed a resolution, not an order. It was not their job to button down the logistics of this arrangement. That was the job of the election commission and the troop leader.

And since when does Cambridge ignore those from Somerville? This is the most asinine statement in your whole post, paired with your unfair accusation of Decker. Just because we show tremendous support for our own servicemen from Cambridge, you want to spin this like we don’t care about our neighbors? Boy, you are really reaching here. First the city doesn’t support our own, and now that it’s clear we do, we don’t support our neighbors? This is like accusing someone of not taking care of their body, and then when they show you that they do in fact take care of their body, saying “yeah, well you don’t take care of your friends bodies also. What kind of message does that send?” Maybe it sends the message that Cambridge’s friends should be behaving more like Cambridge.

And how does this have to do with getting re-elected? They all were just re-elected and the next election is two years away. Not to mention that their incumbency will probably get them re-elected anyway (as frustrating as this is), the Cambridge voters will have new issues on their minds for the 2010 electees.

The combination of your lack of knowledge (at least pertinent knowledge) about the issue mixed with your quickness to throw unfair accusations is disheartening go me as a resident of Cambridge. Our city has caught the bad end of the right0wing spin that has taken over the story—-the last thing we need is our own residents fueling that fire. If you want to support these kids, go to your local police station and put something in one of the donation boxes for the troops.

Although I don’t always agree with you, I used to see you as a pundit of local issues to some extent. Now I think you just type to read your own words. There are times when the council makes decisions that are worth scrutiny. This is one where 98% of the city (including the council) are on the same side.. The side of the boy scouts. Are you against the boy scouts, Roy?

Diogenes said...

I am a not a pundit. I am a citizen petitioning the government for relief from criminal abuses by public officials. You demonstrate the pervasive intolerance in Cambridge for diverse views. That is the result of a one-party government which you seem to appreciate. That is what I love about Cambridge.
Citizens who disagree with the one-party thugs are not just wrong they are stupid, and evil. Thanks for more evidence of the above.