November 14, 2007

Mocking Fantasy


A psychiatrist and a journalist say, "The priest appears to be mentally ill - a condition that could afflict any one of us. Your reporting seems exploitive." (Eileen Reilly and Edward Downes, "An illness mocked," Letter, Boston Herald, November 14, 2007) Mental illness is so arbitrary that anyone and everyone "appears to be mentally ill," except for psychiatrists and journalists.
Ahem! The court found (with taxpayer funds) Rev. Ajemian competent to stand trial. He understands what a court is, what he is doing in court, what a lawyer is and is able to cooperate with the lawyer. Do the letter writers think that because he is not mentally ill, or because he is mentally ill he should be excused from the criminal charge? Journalists and psychiatrists need to separate crime from mental illness. Crimes are rationally defined. Mental illnesses are a made up by consensus that varies based upon personal opinions. When it comes to exploiting persons with disabilities no one surpasses what psychiatrists do to those they accuse of mental illness. What was not asked is "What is the causal connection between mental illness and crime?" There is none, except for the minds of journalists, psychiatrists and their acolytes.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/letters/view.bg?articleid=1044527

An illness mocked
By Eileen Reilly and Edward Downes
Boston Herald
Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Letters to the Editor

We are concerned about your recent articles on Rev. David Ajemian (“Father Fruitcake,” Nov. 9). We do not personally know Father Ajemian, but question your decision to give front-page coverage to his story.

The priest appears to be mentally ill - a condition that could afflict any one of us. Your reporting seems exploitive.

Eileen Reilly, Psychiatrist Mass. Mental Health Center
Edward Downes, Associate Professor BU College of Communication

No comments: