Showing posts with label US Treasury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Treasury. Show all posts

September 26, 2015

Harvard Crimson Shows Support For Troubled Law School Ethics Professor's Presidential Campaign



Good citation of credentials certifying that Professor of Ethics "On Leave" Lessig is a bona fide member of the beautiful elite people. That provides him with an exemption from inconvenient laws, and from rectitude. Harvard University, his employer, enjoys property and income tax exemptions, from the City of Cambridge, the state of Massachusetts and the United States government. Prof. Lessig wants to be President so he can as Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution requires, the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” He asserts his motivation is to end campaign finance corruption of elections or something. The IRS tax code and US Department of the Treasury laws strictly prohibit tax exempt corporations from conducting political activity using its not for profit corporate status. Professor of Ethics at the Safra Center, Mr. Lessig, uses his office for his campaign, an example of "political activity," as defined in the laws. State and city exemptions follow US standards, which means he may be violating those exemption criteria too. 



Not to worry, Harvard University, a tax exempt corporation (charity, Ahem!) operating as a not for profit educational institution, has an endowment of $37 billion. Whatchu gonna do about it? Huh? The IRS selectively enforces laws against conservative not for profits. Harvard University a vigorous promoter of academics who approve of violence against white people, a vigorous supporter of diversity has no need to worry. The IRS will overlook any of their violations. So too will the Cambridge City government, which is in awe of the university. Likewise for the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, which is likely run by a Harvard University alumni, like the current and previous governors. If you are one of the beautiful people, and are largely endowed you too can ignore laws if they are a bother. Cheers.



http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/9/24/lessig-2016-scrut/



Lessig 2016
Harvard Law School professor Larry Lessig is an unlikely presidential contender. But his sudden leap into the 2016 race means that he’s serious about it.
BY MEG P. BERNHARD,
Harvard Crimson STAFF WRITER
SEPTEMBER 24, 2015

May 28, 2014

Proposal To Eliminate Corporate Income Taxes



[From article]
the 35 percent U.S. corporate income tax.
Britain’s corporate income tax is 20 percent, and Pfizer stands to save over $1 billion a year by moving there.
In what are called “inversions,” dozens of U.S. companies have bought up foreign rivals, and then moved abroad to countries with lower tax rates, cutting revenue to the U.S. Treasury.
But Pfizer is far and away the biggest.
[. . .]
How could we make up for the lost revenue to government?
Simple. The corporate income tax last year produced $273 billion, less than a tenth of federal revenue. Imports, which kill U.S. jobs and subtract from GDP, totaled $2.7 trillion last year.
Put a 10 percent tariff on imports, and the abolition of the U.S. corporate income tax becomes a revenue-neutral proposal.
[. . .]
Two decades ago, Ross Perot and this writer joined Ralph and the head of the AFL-CIO to stop NAFTA, a trade deal backed by America’s corporate elite and its army of mercenaries on Capitol Hill.
Congress voted with corporate America — against the country.
Result: 20 years of the largest trade deficits in U.S. history. Transnational corporations have prospered beyond the dreams of avarice, as Middle America has seen its wages frozen for a generation.
[. . .]
For America never voted for NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, mass immigration, amnesty, or more H-1Bs to come take the jobs of our workers. These votes have been forced upon members of Congress by leaders carrying out their assignments from corporate America and its PACs, which reward the compliant with campaign checks.
Both parties now feed at the same K Street and Wall Street troughs. Both have oligarchs contributing tens of millions to parties and politicians who do their bidding.

http://buchanan.org/blog/abolish-corporate-income-tax-6399

Abolish the Corporate Income Tax!
Tuesday - May 13, 2014 at 1:17 am
Pat Buchanan

October 18, 2013

Democrats Mislead Voters On Default


[From article]
“Defaulting on our national debt is an impeachable offense, and any attempt by President Obama to unilaterally raise the debt limit without Congress is also an impeachable offense,” Palin said. “A default would also be a shameful lack of leadership, just as mindlessly increasing our debt without trying to rein in spending is a betrayal of our children and grandchildren who will be stuck with the bill.”

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/10/15/palin-defaulting-on-our-national-debt-is-an-impeachable-offense/

Palin: ‘Defaulting On Our National Debt Is An Impeachable Offense’
October 15, 2013 9:39 AM

October 14, 2012

Uncirculated $100 Bills Stolen



http://apnews.myway.com/article/20121013/DA1SCAH81.html

FBI in Philly reports theft of new $100 notes
AP
Oct 12, 9:35 PM (ET)

March 5, 2012

US To Pay $5 Trillion in Interest in Next Decade

[From article]
"Uncle Sam will shell out more than $5 trillion in interest payments over the next decade, according to the latest projections from the Congressional Budget Office.
That's more than half of the projected $11 trillion increase in debt held by the public during that period. Those figures assume that a host of expensive policies such as the Bush-era tax cuts are extended.
Over the decade, more than 14% of all revenue the government is projected to collect will be sucked up by interest payments.:"

http://money.cnn.com/2012/03/05/news/economy/national-debt-interest/index.htm

Washington's $5 trillion interest bill
By Jeanne Sahadi
@CNNMoney
March 5, 2012: 5:53 AM ET
CNN

May 7, 2010

Clueless Congress

[From article]
"Too bad Congress doesn't realize Goldman is beyond shame.
[. . .]
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/banks_cried_wolf_last_year_about_MbrZR2L5lXbB2RSVow2aMO

Banks cried wolf last year about accounting

New York Post

Last Updated: 2:39 AM, April 27, 2010

Posted: 1:50 AM, April 27, 2010

headshotJohn Crudele

March 24, 2010

Warren Buffet Safer Than US Notes

[From article]

"Though Warren Buffett's investment vehicle Berkshire Hathaway lost its AAA-rating last year, the Omaha, Neb.-based company's two-year bonds are trading as if they're safer than equivalent notes issued by the AAA-rated US Treasury."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/oracle_beats_obama_plw2fkDzSqRMQjSusyrAtK

Oracle beats Obama

Yields top Treasuries WARREN BUFFETT

New York Post

Last Updated: 1:52 PM, March 23, 2010

Posted: 1:40 AM, March 23, 2010

January 30, 2010

Tim Geithner Talks Till He Walks

"Not a single member of either political party cut [Stammering Hank Paulson and Tim "Dead Man Talking" Geithner] any slack. As we used to say in Brooklyn, Paulson and Geithner got their asses kicked.
Isn't it amazing how a little fear of losing an election can snap even the laziest politicians into action?
[. . .]
I'd be shocked if Tim Geithner, lasts much longer as Treasury Secretary.
His mouth keeps moving, but Geithner continues to say incredibly stupid things -- like, insisting again yesterday that he in herited today's financial problems when in fact he was head of the New York Fed when this mess started."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/what_congress_missed_at_aig_geithner_H1rhDxyH4vrcOMONwmkjxO

What Congress missed at AIG-Geithner hearing

New York Post
Last Updated: 7:14 AM, January 28, 2010
Posted: 1:39 AM, January 28, 2010
headshotJohn Crudele

January 16, 2010

How Long Will Geithner Last?


"Tim Geithner should not only be fired as Treasury Secretary, he should then be investigated for criminal activity -- i.e. illegal collusion with Wall Street -- once he's safely away from government.
[. . .]
We should have known that Geithner's reign would have problems when it was disclosed before his confirmation as Treasury secretary that he failed to pay some income taxes."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/why_treasury_chief_should_be_probed_Ow3AcCDG3r8cr50GbGBXgL

Why Treasury chief should be probed and fired
John Crudele
New York Post
Last Updated: 5:49 AM, January 14, 2010
Posted: 1:31 AM, January 14, 2010

January 13, 2010

Geithner Represents the Banks


"You'll see why taxpayers sense something is very wrong about this story, and rightly so. As we're now learning by the day, Goldman nearly bankrupted AIG in the fall of 2008 -- much as YRC's credit default holders almost bankrupt that company last month. The key difference is that in AIG's case, the taxpayer was left holding the bag, while Goldman and AIG live to trade another day.

But it gets worse. Not only did AIG pay off those contracts to Goldman and a dozen other banks to the tune of 100 cents on the dollar -- or a remarkable $62 billion -- Geithner's NY Fed insisted AIG cross out any reference to the full price of the payout. As e-mails released by Congress last week show, the idea was to keep the public in the dark. The final cost to taxpayers from the AIG rescue -- $182 billion, or about half of the entire US defense budget."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/treasury_sec_could_learn_from_teamster_5FgjrMUoX98EVMfptjoJfJ

Treasury secretary could learn from Teamster Hoffa
Hoffa shows Geithner how to run things
Terry Keenan
New York Post
Last Updated: 2:52 AM, January 12, 2010
Posted: 11:47 PM, January 9, 2010

December 3, 2009

Geithner Failing

Geithner Failing


Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is finding himself under increasing attack.

Here's the deal: Geithner is a disaster. He is terrible at explaining the Treasury's mission on the economy, and he's an apologist for a stimulus plan that isn't creating enough jobs.

Worst of all, he blames the prior administration of George W. Bush for the disaster (and in this he is correct), but never manages to mention that he held the critical position of president of the New York Federal Reserve while these mistakes were being made.

But we are stuck with Tim.

Dumping him would create more problems, especially in confidence around the world, than the guy could ever create by staying put.

Next time, however, let's do better in the job search.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/be_thrifty_not_grinchy_this_holiday_pcv43TANBmwQmP7oagiVPJ

Be thrifty, not grinchy, this holiday season
John Crudele
New York Post
Last Updated: 5:06 AM, November 27, 2009
Posted: 1:50 AM, November 27, 2009

October 9, 2009

US Money Woes Worsen


"just go down into the basement and print money."
[. . .]
"annual deficits of "just" $200 billion used to be unheard of. And that kind of spending happened mostly during major wars."
[. . .]
"our government now owes $4.41 trillion to Social Security, which -- despite all the accurately dire predictions -- is still taking in more money each year than it is paying out."
[. . .]
"the US Treasury, where money is being printed and then lent to ourselves.


That's called "quantitative easing" and this brilliant idea is the product of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's years in academia thinking about such theoretical nightmares."
[. . .]
"If you want to look at the official numbers your self, go to the Treasury's Web site: http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np The figures are right there in all their ugliness."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/one_trillion_reasons_to_skip_new_ILwWVHbXUeorQXi1JjEHbO

One trillion reasons to skip a new stimulus plan
By John Crudele john.crudele (at) nypost.com
New York Post
Last Updated: 3:33 AM, October 8, 2009
Posted: 2:36 AM, October 8, 2009

September 27, 2009

What Was Hank Paulson Doing?


"IT'S clear that former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson considered himself a vital intermediary between Wall Street and Washington -- a job description that not only doesn't exist but which is also fraught with potential conflicts."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/paulson_rate_cut_telethon_doesn_A8YuH3qzccMBydla6SNyFO

Paulson's rate-cut telethon doesn't ring true
John Crudele john.crudele (at) nypost.com
New York Post
Last Updated: 10:49 AM, September 24, 2009
Posted: 1:19 AM, September 24, 2009


Paulson, the former head of Goldman Sachs, who lobbied strongly for interest rate cuts as well as controversial bailouts of financial institutions, admitted that he saw himself as a conduit.


"I think it's my job to talk regularly to market participants, but also talk regularly to key regulators and make sure we are seeing the same issues, the same problems and working toward the same solutions," Paulson said during an Aug. 21, 2007 television interview.


In my last column I laid out what occurred on Aug. 16, 2007, the day Paulson lunched with


Ben Bernankeand likely tried to convince the nation's leading central banker that interest rates needed to come down. That was a week after the Fed had already decided that they didn't.


It was also the day when the Dow Jones industrial average did a sudden 328-point reversal, turning what was going to be a horrendous loss into one that was barely noticeable. Soon after the Bernanke/Paulson lunch a rumor started spreading on the Street that the Fed was going to act.


I also explained that after Bernanke and Paulson lunched, Paulson made a couple of ordinary phone calls, which took place 30 minutes before the actions that have been deleted from his official schedule.


Later that night Paulson called


Robert Rubin, another former Treasury Secretary, who was then leading Citigroup -- which owned a brokerage firm. The two men probably shouldn't have been talking, especially if Paulson had learned anything substantive about Bernanke's thinking at the lunch.


The next day -- Aug. 17 -- the Fed made Wall Street very happy with a surprise interest-rate cut that was an extremely unusual about-face on policy.


Today I'm going to look at who Paulson spoke with the day before his lunch with Bernanke -- Aug. 15, 2007 -- and also on Aug. 17, the day rates were cut. It's interesting to see the "market participants" and "regulators" that were using Paulson as a go-between.


Wednesday, Aug. 15: First thing in the morning -- at 7:05 a.m. -- Paulson called


Jean-Claude Trichet, head of the European Central Bank, and left a message. Then, at 7:15 a.m., he reached Bernanke by phone. After that he called


Tim Geithner, who was then head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank and is now Paulson's successor as Treasury Secretary. Clearly, Paulson wanted to get the lowdown on what to expect when the already jittery financial markets opened.


Then, in rapid succession -- and remember, this is after speaking with Bernanke for five minutes and Geithner for 20 minutes and presumably getting important information -- Paulson placed calls to the heads of numerous Wall Street firms --


Jamie Dimonof JPMorgan,


Dick Fuldof Lehman Brothers,


Ken Lewisof Bank of America,


John Mackof Morgan Stanley, and


Stan O'Nealof Merrill Lynch.


Paulson called Mack again, who he hadn't reached the first time, and then phoned Lewis for a second time within an hour. After that he tried Trichet again, this time apparently successfully. That call lasted 10 minutes, according to Paulson's official schedule.


By 8:40 a.m. -- or 50 minutes before the stock market was to open in New York -- Paulson had reached the bulk of Wall Street's elite.


Wall Street's elite could have gleaned important information just by knowing that the head of the Treasury had spoken with Bernanke that morning and was subsequently making calls around Wall Street.


Lloyd Blankfein, who took over as head of Goldman when Paulson left, didn't get one of those earliest calls, at least not from Paulson's office phone. But Blankfein did get three calls from Paulson that day, starting with one that lasted 10 minutes between 9:40 a.m. and 9:50 a.m.


At that point, concerns about the credit market and the situation in housing had caused stock prices to decline 8 percent in a matter of weeks.


Some would call that a normal correction and nothing that should have caused Washington to panic.


According to his official phone log, Paulson is the one who initiated all these calls. So it seems reasonable to assume that he was just doing the job he had taken on -- coordinating what "regulators" like Bernanke and Trichet were thinking with the reaction he wanted by Wall Street.


When the Fed announced a "surprise" rate cut early on Friday, Aug. 17, Paulson again went into overdrive.


But this time he waited until the stock market was trading and prices were up. Just as soon as a conference call with Bernanke, Geithner and a couple of other Fed governors ended, Paulson called Dimon;


Charles Princeof Citigroup, where he left a message; Lewis; Blankfein,


Jimmy Cayne, head of Bear Stearns; Mack; O'Neal;


Ned Johnsonof Fidelity InVestments;


Larry Finkof BlackRock; Fuld; and


Bill Grossof Pimco, the influential bond-trading firm.


Paulson received a phone call at 3:40 p.m. from Bernanke that lasted 15 minutes. Within five minutes Paulson was fielding a call from Blankfein, the third time that day.


So, my questions are: Was Paulson really the Secretary of the (U)nited (S)tates Treasury or the (W)all (S)treet Treasury. Was he looking out for our inter ests or those of his friends? Was there such a grave threat to the US economy that all the normal boundaries between Washington and Wall St. ceased to exist?


On Tuesday I'll have more leads investigators should follow.