Showing posts with label Not Dead Yet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Not Dead Yet. Show all posts

July 14, 2015

Disability Rights Advocates Oppose Assisted Suicide Laws



Disability Rights Advocate, Diane Coleman, Founder, Not Dead Yet

[From article]
Doctors told her she would have six months to a year before it grew back, requiring more risky followups.
But 13 years later, Phillips is 38 years old and thriving, despite two very severe medical conditions. She also suffers from lupus. The state of her health has made her somewhat philosophical about her own mortality.
“There’s a certain freedom that comes with dying,” said Phillips, who lives near New Orleans. “You really don’t have to deal with your annoying cousin. You really don’t have to go on that family trip. You can eat ice cream for breakfast.”
Her prognosis was not unlike Brittany Maynard’s. But Maynard chose physician-assisted suicide after doctors diagnosed her with terminal brain cancer on Jan. 1, 2014. Before she died less than a year later – on Nov. 1, 2014 – at age 29, Maynard had become a prominent advocate for the “death with dignity” movement, which has triggered legislation in 25 states.
[. . .]
But as citizens from California to Kentucky push for dying rights, advocacy groups for people with disabilities question whether physician-assisted suicide should be legal.
“The risk of mistake and coercion and abuse are really too great,” said Diane Coleman, founder and CEO of Not Dead Yet, an advocacy group that informs and lobbies on behalf of the disabled.
[. . .]
Phillips said the laws discourage people from finding comfort in their condition. Thoughstudies of some patients show that physicians generally offer more optimistic predictions about how long a terminal patient will live, she’s still alive long past expectations.
“I’m able to surround myself with people like me,” said Phillips, who worries that many terminal patients do not know about support groups and advanced palliative care. “These aren’t things that people are told exist. Doctors often don’t know. They value my life as it is.”
[. . .]



Coleman established Not Dead Yet in 1996 to counter the efforts of Dr. Jack Kevorkian, dubbed “Dr. Death” for his active support of a terminally ill patient’s right to die.
Not Dead Yet partners with groups like the Disability Rights, Education and Defense Fundand the Massachusetts activist group Second Thoughts to create a nationwide network that opposes the death with dignity movement and the laws it champions as discriminatory and dangerous.
The laws generally stipulate that only a capable adult with a terminal illness, meaning one that will lead to death within six months of diagnosis, may receive a life-ending prescription. The patient must make both a written and oral request in the presence of two witnesses. Another oral request must follow at least 15 days later.
But where the safeguards stop, the danger begins, according to the disability groups. None of the laws or rulings include provisions about when, where or how patients should ingest the life-ending medicine once prescribed.
[. . .]
Most advocacy groups cite unendurable pain as the main motivation for pursuing legislation.
To Not Dead Yet and the Disability Rights, Education and Defense Fund, this amounts to fear of disability rather than fear of painful death or lessened quality of life.
The laws have a provision that bars physicians from prescribing a life-ending prescription to a person with disabilities simply because they are disabled. But opponents stipulate that the danger does not come from those with disabilities who might feel pressure to end their lives, but those without disabilities who fear becoming disabled or having a poorer quality of life.
Marilyn Golden, a senior policy analyst at the Disability Rights, Education and Defense Fund, who uses a wheelchair as a result of injury, spoke from personal experience about the doubts about her quality of life that she initially encountered.
“At the beginning, I felt that the injury was unbearable,” she said. “A year later, it hit me: There was no change in my quality of life.”

ad more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article26972707.html#storylink=cpy
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article26972707.html

JULY 13, 2015
As assisted suicide laws spread, cancer survivors, disabled object
BY DANIELLE OHL
McClatchy Washington Bureau

May 2, 2012

Dr. Phil's Audience Supports Killing Disabled Child

Here is an effort by ethicists like Peter Singer who is a professor at Princeton University to make acceptable the murder of persons with disabilities. Pediatricians encourage women to abort their children if they see an indication of a severe disability before they are born. But Singer and his acolytes believe parents should be allowed to kill their disabled babies up to the first six months of life. His argument is that will increase the amount of happiness in the world. He says parents would likely have another child who may not be disabled. 


Here too is a pervasive pattern of the human services industry. They or a relative speak for their disabled clients. Judges allow lawyers to speak for their disabled clients not asking for testimony from the disabled person him or herself. The laws usually applied to denying rights to persons with disabilities are not functioning in the court system or in the human services industry. 


Not mentioned in this article is the potential to begin killing children who are accused of having a mental illness. Mental illnesses are fiction. They are created by consensus not science. The psychiatric industry and the drug industry spend millions on campaign contributions and public relations campaigns in the media to maintain their images. Only psychiatrists can see mental illnesses. They have no pathology. Mental illnesses are speech and behavior that the psychiatrist finds objectionable or that they do not understand. Much of it is protected speech. But again psychiatrists do not care about laws. They know better and have superior intellect and morality.
What will ,stop the murder of persons accused of mental illness?


Glenn Beck discussed this issue on his show. He said the killing of disabled persons began in Nazi Germany. But that is incorrect. It began in Massachusetts with the Eugenics Movement. Hitler congratulated the progressives who ran that effort.

http://notdeadyetnewscommentary.blogspot.com/2012/04/dr-phil-promoting-killing-people-with.html

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 2012
Dr. Phil: Promoting Killing People with Cognitive Disabilities - And a Close Encounter in 2002

* * *

[Link to video on this issue embedded]
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/16/dr-phil-show-mercy-kill-people-with-disabilities/

Dr. Phil Show: “Mercy Kill” People with Disabilities
by Cassy Fiano
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
4/16/12 12:17 PM

February 27, 2012

Journalist Is Unaware of Medical Abuses

Just because Andrea Peyser is unaware of how vigorously the medical profession screens pregnant women for fetuses with disabilities does not mean that it does not happen. It is a regular procedure and some women object. Many are intimidated by their doctor's urgings. No less than the prominent "ethicist" (Ahem!) at Princeton University Peter Singer advocates allowing parents of severely disabled babies to kill them within the first six months of life. His argument is that they would be free to have another child which would increase happiness in the world. Inquire of the group of disability advocates in Chicago, Not Dead Yet. They've opposed this institutionalized insult by medical professionals for many years. Peyser is aware and intelligent. But this shows she is far from omniscient.

[From article]
"This unusual, to say the least, episode led Santorum to the conclusion that prenatal testing, such as potentially lifesaving amniocentesis, was a ploy by the medical community to identify and abort babies with Down syndrome and other afflictions.
“Ninety percent of these kids or more are aborted, because the medical community thinks that these folks just have lives that aren’t worth living,” he said in Tucson, offering no evidence.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/weird_reality_of_rick_world_LyW6ekJ4vOisTCKBwVFJzJ

Weird reality of Rick’s World
Andrea Peyser
New York Post
Last Updated: 5:10 AM, February 27, 2012
Posted: 1:36 AM, February 27, 2012